### Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

### Messages - Linyx18088

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
##### Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Catholic VS Christian
« on: March 09, 2009, 05:59:32 PM »
I like my own mythology....i can do everything...pwn everything....and nothing can defeat me. >.<

2
##### Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Catholic VS Christian
« on: March 09, 2009, 05:19:24 PM »
Greek Mythology.
agreed

Greek Mythology is interesting....but I don't know....Egyptian is cool in the ceremonies and the rituals that went on, but I love the many different gods with Greek.

3
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Whos in the middle
« on: March 04, 2009, 02:19:56 PM »
Mass and energy are not phase changes (as far as we know). So what differences are between the two?

Mass is how much space an object takes up. Energy is based on how much force an object [with mass] can give. Force is that which can cause an object with mass to change it's velocity. Therefore, they are proportional and they aren't. Energy is based off force, so it's mainly proportional to force which is proportional to mass. So energy is changed through one thing to be proportional to mass. It's not proportional by that same thing, however, because energy is directly affected by the work that a force can do. So it's a win-lose situation when you look at it in different aspects.
- You can say "Energy is proportinal to mass in a 2nd degree because force is proportional to mass."
- You can also say "Energy is NOT proportional to mass because energy is only changed by the work (or how much it does) of a force."

You decide.

4
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: If Earth is constantly moving up....
« on: August 07, 2008, 07:36:18 PM »
The FE hypothesis has so many flaws its ridiculous. The first that comes to mind is the concept of no gravity. Without gravity we'd have serious problems staying on the earth flat or not. Even if the FE were moving 'up' at the speed of light, everything would be moving relative to this. If you were to jump and provide an added bit of acceleration, you should continue to float away.

Exactly.

5
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Narc's FE Guide: Index
« on: August 06, 2008, 07:48:52 PM »

EDIT: United states soldiers have killed more innocent Iraqis than were killed in September 11th, but of course with all your flag waving why would you care about a few dead "a-rabs".  And also, before you get on my case, I am not against the troops, I AM against murder...under ANY circumstance.

Ah, where did you get that bull?

6
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: If Neeman went to space on Bransons Rocket and took a photo.....
« on: August 06, 2008, 06:46:04 PM »
The only way is, that they go into a decompresser. But those are only allowed for training astronauts.

7
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Narc's FE Guide: Index
« on: August 06, 2008, 06:30:12 PM »
We didn't take over all of Europe and Asia, we destroyed them? Yes, but we help them rebuild. Nagasaki and Hiroshima are examples of how we destroyed them then rebuilt them.

8
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: earths age
« on: August 06, 2008, 06:27:14 PM »
The rotational speed of the Earth at the equator is about 1,038 miles per hour.

9
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Images of The Flat Earth
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:36:33 PM »
Ah

10
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Images of The Flat Earth
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:34:23 PM »
GR?

11
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Narc's FE Guide: Index
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:32:51 PM »
All wars are bad, but that doesn't mean that a way is meaningless. The war is here because the insurgents took over Iraq/Afghanistan and Osama Bin Laden killed innocent lives. If we wouldn't have gone there then there would be more innocent lives killed. Also, they had killed 2-4,000 US citizens. That's not good, would you look at that and be like... "Ah, it's ok, they're not suffering or anything."

12
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Why does the FE Sun travel in a curve?
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:25:21 PM »
Google Earth (earth simulator) is only 22.5 MB. Currently, there is almost nothing that takes up terabytes, other than programs that super computers use.

13
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Images of The Flat Earth
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:21:58 PM »
I would say pictures, but everyone who brings them, people say it's photoshopped.

14
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Images of The Flat Earth
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:14:32 PM »
A theory is only an idea with no ideal proof, other than equations. RE and FE are theories, just to clear that up.

15
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Narc's FE Guide: Index
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:08:21 PM »
Are you serious or are you making fun of the Iraq thing?

16
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Narc's FE Guide: Index
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:05:47 PM »
The fact that there are less car bombings and US soldiers being killed. But if you think 40,000 people is a lot, then look at the millions that died in WWII (all countries...about 500,000 to 1,000,000 Americans died)

17
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: big question
« on: August 06, 2008, 10:27:12 AM »
How is different, I would find them to use it, and not just be like "we're the greatest with the most money."

18
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: big question
« on: August 06, 2008, 10:18:31 AM »
Ok, so they share the money with higher parts of government, then why are we in debt exactly? That's apart of the conspiracy too. Eh?

19
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: big question
« on: August 06, 2008, 10:10:17 AM »
Rockets are very sophisticated though. Why would they spend so much money on something that's useless?

20
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: big question
« on: August 06, 2008, 10:08:39 AM »
Exactly, if it costs millions of dollars, they would have to get billions of dollars for ad reasonable profit.

21
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: big question
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:54:10 AM »
Why do they spend millions of dollars on rockets and satellites then?

22
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: what does the earth look like from the other side
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:51:20 AM »
That would be funny...

23
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: If Neeman went to space on Bransons Rocket and took a photo.....
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:50:40 AM »
That will be the answer, if they say no, and you say why, and they say no again, then you assume a flat earth but if they let you out, then you know it's a round earth.

24
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: If Neeman went to space on Bransons Rocket and took a photo.....
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:43:47 AM »
Well, when you're in space, why don't you ask them....."Can I float around outside?"

25
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: other planets
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:41:28 AM »
We can also see that the sun is spinning, but no one ever says anything about that...

26
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: what does the earth look like from the other side
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:36:29 AM »
What if everyone on the parallel does everything we do, like me typing....someone else on the other side is doing that.....

27
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: If Neeman went to space on Bransons Rocket and took a photo.....
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:33:41 AM »
Why not send an FE and RE?

28
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Proof
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:16:35 AM »
Well, I simply no the answer "it's due to a gas that omits from different things, which causes an elliptical illusion."

29
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Proof
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:09:32 AM »
If that equation shows the Earth is flat then why is it that we can't see for a long way away on the ground but we can when we're on a hill and even farther on a plane.

30
##### Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Proof
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:03:10 AM »
Which equations?

Pages: [1] 2 3