Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wise

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 354
1
werenasa format may be. but cfc can not do it, will not do it, does not do it. cfc names absense as a narrator already shows the unnecessary of any agreement. it's like mocking. how serious can you be while someone mocks you? I'm tired of your ignoring my suggestions. the thing made this game in this stage that a bunch of people decide everything behind the closed doors.  you're still doing the same thing. Where did the name cfc come from? Who decided that? you are still playing games. I don't mean anybody but this group. I'm not in this one.

2
So you have broke the peace, right? I have answered the Op'er. I don't want to discuss with you because you need nothing to learn here. You are here just for fighting and making genocide.
Stop with the lies and insults.
I am for the truth, but this is a debate forum. If you think debating constitutes fighting and don't want to debate then you don't belong here.

I found a way that I'll answer Opers via PM after now. Then you can not annoy me anymore and can not manipulate the issues. What will happen now? I just want to ask you one thing. Are you thinking the following post is a racist post or not? How can I discuss a bunch of racist people?

PS Why does Queensland have to supply so much electrical energy to you useless Mexicans?

Just, yes or no. Now everybody will see your sincerety.

3
Flat Earth Believers / My Rules
« on: Today at 01:23:08 AM »
I will answer some Op'ers only via PM after now.

Because otherwise rabblack/Jackinoz (racistinoz) is manipulating the issue. Hence, he shall not bother me at all, because he shan't see anything I post.

Look how he is a racist:

PS Why does Queensland have to supply so much electrical energy to you useless Mexicans?

he proved a lot of times that it was not worthy of our peacefull society. Where is fair justice system in USA?

He is now hiding behind Jackblack and thinks everything will be normalized. You Americans may be hypocritical, but I am not so.

I'll stay far from this racist as soon as possible, although you management team constantly try to sidle us. I am aware that you are doing a lot of things in order to disrupt the motivation of the believers and to influence the soul structures. Look at yourself, it hurts you more. If you play with fire, your hand will burn.

God damned rabinoz, what does his difference of Hitler?

4
Flat Earth Believers / ...
« on: Today at 01:21:00 AM »
...

5
Flat Earth Believers / ...
« on: Today at 01:19:04 AM »
...

6
Flat Earth Believers / ...
« on: Today at 12:32:34 AM »
...

7
It effectively has been asked, as it is the same as other questions regarding gravity. What makes things fall?
Whatever causes things to fall would do the same to the components of the accelerometer.
Alternatively, with UA it is actually measuring an acceleration.

Accelerometers in phones work like how other navigation devices. your mobile phone is part of a network and its location is shared tens times per second. You can learn your speed, acceleration, position, altitude and other information instantly thanks to the continuously updated position information.
No you can't.
For starters you need some interval to determine acceleration or the like from 2 positions. Also how would you be able to determine position if that is what is being sent?

But more importantly in order to determine the acceleration shown by a phone it would require multiple position determining devices in the phone which can extremely accurately locate and track these position sensors. This is because they need to know the orientation of the phone not just the location.

But what is even more damning are devices like drones (where the software can be ported to phones if it isn't there already) which can have a GPS based positioning and an inertial based positioning. The GPS position uses GPS (or whatever conspiracy you want to use to replace it) to determine its position. The inertial based positioning starts with a GPS based location and then uses inertial data (i.e. acceleration and rotation) to determine where it is. If it was just using location, they would be identical, but they can drift by quite a bit with poor GPS and cause errors for the drone.

So you have broke the peace, right? I have answered the Op'er. I don't want to discuss with you because you need nothing to learn here. You are here just for fighting and making genocide.

8
I have not seen the question asked before, but how do flat earthers explain how a cell phone/tablet can tell 'up' and 'down' and rotate the screen accordingly.
They have an accelerometer built into them, which measures gravity and allows the phone to tell which way is down.
https://www.scienceabc.com/innovation/smartphones-change-orientation-horizontal-landscape-gravity-sensor-accelerometer.html is a link that explains the basics of how such a device works in a cell phone.   
If gravity does not exist, then how do flat earthers explain such a function in a cell phone. 
However flat earthers explain such a phenomenon, I challenge you to ask Apple/Samsung/etc how their phones are designed, are they designed around <insert your theory here> or are they designed around gravity.   See what their response is.

This is a really fun forum. According to the question asked, it should actually be answered by someone who believes in the flat world or who does not believe in gravitation. but the answer is just to ridicule the flat earthers.

Even so I want to put forward the perspective of majority of flat earthers. There may be people think something else. I want to share my thoughts.

Accelerometers in phones work like how other navigation devices. your mobile phone is part of a network and its location is shared tens times per second. You can learn your speed, acceleration, position, altitude and other information instantly thanks to the continuously updated position information.

9
The Lounge / Re: I believe it is time ..... werepenguin sign up
« on: May 23, 2019, 10:41:51 PM »
So you say you have to at least annoy the wise in all ways, right? He is absolutely the worst and unlikable narrator here. I believe this is a proof of an unhealthy mood. I think someone with a more reasonable mind should have done it. Common sense finds the truth.

10
I am insisting barometer experiment. It can be easily used in also beach.

Chose three points in a beach on a line. Control them being in zero altitude. Then draw a line passing these 3 points. Check the second points staying whether on line or under it. If it stay on the line the earth is flat. If it stays upside of line then the earth is a globe. That's all.

11
The Earth has a radius of approximately 3965 miles. Using the Pythagorean theorem, that calculates to an average curvature of 7.98 inches per mile or approximately 8 inches per mile (squared) Ė source Internet

As shown in the diagram

OB=OD=R=Radius of earth

ABDC is a continuous structure Ė we havenít reached at that level so just ignore it

The world's longest and highest continuous bridges over land or water might help in finding AC and BD

Let AB and CD are the two high-rise vertical structures.
Height of AB = CD and length AC and BD must conspicuous (say at least one limes) for curvature
Two stable helicopters or hot air balloons at height A and C can also be used instead of high-rise vertical structures.

An object x falls and strikes at B if drops from height A, similarly
An object x falls and strikes at D if drops from height C

B and D can be found via a continuous laser beam from A to B and C to D respectively

Measure AB, BD, DC, and AC with modern equipment of engineering survey

If BD = AC then the earth is flat Ė case closed

If BD < AC then we can measure not only the correct curvature of earth but also its radius via geometry as shown in the figure

We need extra reinforcement (steel) in the lower portion of very high-rise building if the earth is round.




Fair enough. It has been suggested earlier with a similar mentality but different way.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=69075.0

12
The Lounge / Re: Narrator suggestions and discussings here
« on: May 22, 2019, 11:25:28 AM »
Okay. I can handle with shifter or somebody else's narrating too. It seems Jane is going to do it. Because when it silence happens, then Jane does.
You're overestimating how much time I have.

Plus honestly if anything, if I end up with the time to narrate and no one's taken up the mantle by then, I'm more likely to go for something completely different in the hope it'd attract more players. As it is the elaborate rulesets are probably dissuading people.

Agreed. I wonder what will you done without make it more complex but make it more attractive. It may be surprise, no problem.

13
The Lounge / Re: Narrator suggestions and discussings here
« on: May 22, 2019, 05:57:27 AM »
Okay. I can handle with shifter or somebody else's narrating too. It seems Jane is going to do it. Because when it silence happens, then Jane does.

14
The Lounge / Re: Where is everyone?
« on: May 21, 2019, 01:22:53 PM »
it will be counted as a failure to make the game as hard as it would be while it was ideal formation, and then to return to its simplest form. it may be better to return to the latest running settings. junker's settings seem fair. Two teams have both two members without wildcard.

15
The Lounge / Re: Where is everyone?
« on: May 21, 2019, 12:54:44 PM »
Batterystaple really seems gone.

I think we need a werepenguin to activate here again. I prefer shifter but can handle with anybody's narrating if he does not want to narrating anymore.

16
It is clear that boydster who continue to post here forcing me to open his post and reply him; by same logic with Notsoskeptical is a clear turd in mind of I open the ignore posts. It is clear that boydster is doing it with this only. He is weak. I am strong enough to don't open/care his posts. He is an agressor and I deny to open his agressive posts. if I was a person who loved messaging, my mailbox would be full of messages. whereas for the past months I've never been messaging with anyone. I did not send a PM to anybody and anybody did not sent me a PM in past 30 days. it means I don't like so much to correspond with people. especially with someone who is on my legally ignore list. I think some of moderators here are using their powers in bad faith and not deserving to have it.

In short, boydster has turned a Notsoskeptical in my side.

boyster who is swooping the wailing wall of believers like a  Hitler, a Vlad the Impelar in my side. he is a tyrant who tends to forcibly people to accepted that he is right because he has a power here. I don't care about that. it is his ugliness.

17
1- boydster is an agressor in my ignore list.

2- This is the wailing wall of the believers, but not the court room. This situation will not mean anything for people who are rude or inhuman.

3- We can read short of my complains as "management has not any respect to us". And boydster is proving this complains by not showing any respect to general tendency of this page.

18
I have been got banned by our "Flat Earth Society management" again during past three days. Because some globularists have formed a group opposed to me to get banned. Interestingly rabinoz is saying me being a friend of globularist theory because I show FE theory as ridiculous. If I show the FE theory as ridiculous so could not he be my biggest supporter here because of defend same theories he defend? Because he has got banned because of harrasing me earlier. As a revenge they had a counter agressivity like this.

for this occasion I want to talk a bit about discussings in society. As we all know, the two notorious globularists and their supporters have closed down the discussion forum. they wellcome newcomers at the door and claim that our theories are ridiculous and inaccurate. Although we are free to enter the discussion forum, we are lynched by this group and its fans every time we try it. if you are pay attention, there are only globalists in the discussion forum. and when any one of us enters this forum, fierce globalists and supporters are attacking directly. this is not for the general purpose of the discussion forum.

the newcomer come here is probably not coming to hear the global theories again and again. there is already enough number of globalist forum for this. they come here to discuss with people who believe in the flat earth on any subject. Although we know this situation, we are still not keen to discuss with these people. because we know that some of the most prominent globalists are eagerly awaiting us for fly at us. they use the following expressions to provoke us to be involved in the discussion: "You see, flat-earthers don't have an answer to these questions" or "you see, they are also aware that the earth is not flat". we are becoming the target of the same group in these discussions where we are involved in pressure, provocation. and the subject is developing in the direction of the subject of the fierce resident globularists here, not in the direction of the subject. The fierce globalists, who are openly residenting in the forum, prevent the discussion of newcomers and flat-earthers about flat earth theories. this causes the forum to move away from its actual function.

The theory of flat earth is not ridiculous or nonsense. but because more than one notorious globalist attacked at the same time, we cannot find enough time to defend ourselves and our theories. it is clear that there is no point in entering the discussion forum without taking the one-to-one discussion platform suggested by some flat earthers here earlier.

now the reality of the forum management and fierce globularists should get the truth. people do not come here again to listen to globalist claims. people are coming to the wiki section and the believers section to learn about flat earth, and the discussion forum to discuss with the flat earthers. everyone must act in accordance with this fact.

If life is a game, then everyone must play according to the game rule.

19
The Lounge / Re: Where is everyone?
« on: May 19, 2019, 02:42:29 PM »
What dyou mean? Either jackblack or rabinoz is always here. Isn't here the globe earth society?

20
The Lounge / Re: Narrator suggestions and discussings here
« on: May 18, 2019, 11:31:37 AM »
I'll wait Batterystaple's narrating, who the best narrator ever in mankind history.

21
The Lounge / Re: Narrator suggestions and discussings here
« on: May 18, 2019, 08:23:42 AM »
Maybe wise will play if Shitler narrates. lol

Sure I play but I'll ignore you because you've banned me.

22





An iftar dinner table, Gaziosmanpasa, Istanbul.

24
It is a matter of substance and image.
What is real is a metaphysical matter.

But what I'm saying is not real, but the sun that looks like it.
It's the sun that we sense.
We see the sun, just like we see hologram patterns.
And it is a hologram for the individual.
So I mean it 'Holographic multiverse'.


It is clear that it is so.

A Korean e-book about my cosmology was released last April.
https://www.aladin.co.kr/shop/wproduct.aspx?ItemId=188146361
It consists of five chapters.
Chapter 2 is a counterargument to the heliocentric theory and Chapter 3 is a counterargument to the round earth theory.
The other three chapters are about my cosmology, Homocentric Universe.
I am preparing an English version of Homocentric Universe.
It will be sold as an ebook on Amazon within May.

Homocentric Universe is perfectly capable of explaining all the phenomena of the earth.
In other words, it explains not only the visible distance, but also the star's diurnal motion, the altitude of the North Star, Antarctica, the flight distance of southern hemisphere, and so on.

Of course, <Homocentric Universe> is a flat earth theory.
My YouTube account will help a little.


After the English version is released, I will keep updating it.

Since NASA backed FET÷ has forbid us to use youtube in our offices so I can't open youtube links. But I'll open it at home then will say you my thoughts about it.

I hope you success about ebook.

25
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Globe Proof #2
« on: May 15, 2019, 12:40:20 AM »
Quote
It is true that we object to the theory of gravity in a prejudiced way because it supports the theory of the round world. but when we take into account the general deceptiveness of science, it is more likely that it would be false. So much so that, the masses do not attract each other in nature, but push each other. laboratory experiments confirming gravity have never taken place. this theory is one of the infinite options that can come to our minds. If we consider false science based on false information, not believing in this theory is more logical than believing it.

Actually, laboratory experiments have been done and do show that masses attract each other. And the experiment is simple enough that an intelligent and reasonably capable high-school student can repeat it. Okay, well, an extremely smart high-school student.



Gravity is real. And since gravity is real, the Earth does not need a dome to keep the air in. And since the Earth does not need a dome, there's no reason at all to reject the existence of space. And if space exists, there's no reason to doubt that Neil Armstrong and others walked on the moon.

Gravity does not prove the Earth is round. Maybe one of the biggest mistakes we have made as flat-Earthers was to reject gravity just because the globists insisted that it did.

The Earth is flat. Gravity is real. And in the English language, "space" is the word used to refer to the region more than 100 miles above the surface of the Earth, in which there is very little stuff; so little that it's almost a vacuum. Object to the word if you like, but that's the word in this language.

And Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. (Trivia: He flubbed his line: Armstrong upon stepping onto the surface of the moon, said "One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." What he was supposed to say was "One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind." He left out the word "a" which changed the whole meaning of the phrase.)

Do you really believe this so called experiment? you have got to be kidding. And you are using it as an argument, right? If I prove its not being true so will you agree the gravity isn't exist and the earth is flat? No. We know you'll not admit anything it and find another lie.

27
Flat Earth General / Re: Rowbotham A contemporary account
« on: May 15, 2019, 12:25:57 AM »
How many workings of me or sandokhan inside; other FE scientists outside did you see we have mentioned to Rowbotham? 5%?, 1%? 0,1%? Or nope?

You can use here to search our mentiones to Rowbotham:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.0
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66236.0

Ah but you are a mere flat earth midget of little consequence. Sandokhan, on the other hand, is obsessed with Sagnag....or rewriting history.  Flat earth giants on the other hand like John Davis, the most eminent flat earth scientist alive, worships Robotham. Possibly that's where you have been going wrong.

Come on, who the hell of John Davis? He is just one of the five flat earth scientists here, and the weakest one. His theory of UA model has never mentioned by Rowbotham. And John Davis and his theories are old and demode. Sandokhan's sagnac obsession is his own problem, can not change his being a great scientist.

Again, John Davis is a mere of flat earth scientists here, he is only a giant for angry globularists like you. You are only using his name to mock flat earth believers. He definitely does not represent us at all. He represent himself, fake flat earthers, controlled opposition group and globularists like you whose want to mock FE.

Did you forget to go back and make it seem like you donít know English?

Edit:  your last post is like that too. Itís a miracle.

I am glad somebody else noticed this too.  Had to laugh my ass off when I read the above post.  What benefit does it serve  him to fake his low English-writing abilities?

Possibly because he is a prize fool. There are other instances of his 'lapse of understanding English' on other threads. That's why I seldom reply to him, he's an utter fake who goes out his way to troll total nonsense for effect. I think it's pretty pointless given his voluminous output. I think the Heavenly Breeze character may be one of his alts or offspring as they operate in much the same way.

This is one of the most absurd post ever I read. Both me hasing so called good English and using Heavenly Breeze as an alter account; both of them ridiculus and BS.

Do you know how many times I correct a post, resend it, correct it and resend; and delete and repost it if required. because I do it to respect to the readers.

This is because mods sometimes ask me Why I do it. But this time I did not do it to you see how it happens in my side. Look at the upper post. What has change?

nothing. it's not just as weak as you think. I've said it many times before. intermediate2 level means english, which means I can speak English. but not good. I'm who my mother language isn't English arguing here with people whose mother language is English,. and for this I spend twice the amount of labor you spend. and you're still interested in teasing me with BS claims. Read the first , second and third post times. About 15 minutes. This is the time I spend of this post for only "correction the mistakes".

28
Flat Earth General / Re: Rowbotham A contemporary account
« on: May 15, 2019, 12:15:20 AM »
How many workings of me or sandokhan inside; other FE scientists outside did you see we have mentioned to Rowbotham? 5%?, 1%? 0,1%? Or nope?

You can use here to search our mentiones to Rowbotham:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.0
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66236.0

Ah but you are a mere flat earth midget of little consequence. Sandokhan, on the other hand, is obsessed with Sagnag....or rewriting history.  Flat earth giants on the other hand like John Davis, the most eminent flat earth scientist alive, worships Robotham. Possibly that's where you have been going wrong.

Come on, who the hell of John Davis? He is just one of the five flat earth scientists here, and the weakest one. His theory of UA model has never mentioned by Rowbotham. And John Davis and his theories are old and demode. Sandokhan's sagnac obsession is his own problem, can not change his being a great scientist.

Again, John Davis is a mere of flat earth scientists here, he is only a giant for angry globularists like you. You are only using his name to mock flat earth believers. He definitely does not represent us at all. He represent himself, fake flat earthers, controlled opposition group and globularists like you whose want to mock FE.

Did you forget to go back and make it seem like you donít know English?

Edit:  your last post is like that too. Itís a miracle.

I am glad somebody else noticed this too.  Had to laugh my ass off when I read the above post.  What benefit does it serve  him to fake his low English-writing abilities?

Possibly because he is a prize fool. There are other instances of his 'lapse of understanding English' on other threads. That's why I seldom reply to him, he's an utter fake who goes out his way to troll total nonsense for effect. I think it's pretty pointless given his voluminous output. I think the Heavenly Breeze character may be one of his alts or offspring as they operate in much the same way.

This is one of the most absurd post ever I read. Both me hasing so called good English and using Heavenly Breeze as an alter account; both of them ridiculus and BS.

Do you know how many times I correct a post, resend it, correct it and resend; and delete and repost it if required. because I do it to respect to the readers.

This is because mods sometimes ask me Why I do it. But this time I did not do it to you see how it happens in my side. Look at the upper post. What has change?

29
Flat Earth General / Re: Rowbotham A contemporary account
« on: May 15, 2019, 12:12:36 AM »
How many workings of me or sandokhan inside; other FE scientists outside did you see we have mentioned to Rowbotham? 5%?, 1%? 0,1%? Or nope?

You can use here to search our mentiones to Rowbotham:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.0
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66236.0

Ah but you are a mere flat earth midget of little consequence. Sandokhan, on the other hand, is obsessed with Sagnag....or rewriting history.  Flat earth giants on the other hand like John Davis, the most eminent flat earth scientist alive, worships Robotham. Possibly that's where you have been going wrong.

Come on, who the hell of John Davis? He is just one of the five flat earth scientists here, and the weakest one. His theory of UA model has never mentioned by Rowbotham. And John Davis and his theories are old and demode. Sandokhan's sagnac obsession is his own problem, can not change his being a great scientist.

Again, John Davis is a mere of flat earth scientists here, he is only a giant for angry globularists like you. You are only using his name to mock flat earth believers. He definitely does not represent us at all. He represent himself, fake flat earthers, controlled opposition group and globularists like you whose want to mock FE.

Did you forget to go back and make it seem like you donít know English?

Edit:  your last post is like that too. Itís a miracle.

I am glad somebody else noticed this too.  Had to laugh my ass off when I read the above post.  What benefit does it serve  him to fake his low English-writing abilities?

Possibly because he is a prize fool. There are other instances of his 'lapse of understanding English' on other threads. That's why I seldom reply to him, he's an utter fake who goes out his way to troll total nonsense for effect. I think it's pretty pointless given his voluminous output. I think the Heavenly Breeze character may be one of his alts or offspring as they operate in much the same way.

This is one of the most absurd post ever I read. Both me hasing so called good English and using Heavenly Breeze as an alter account; both of them ridiculus and BS.

30
Nope, I am. You are not deciding anything here. You are not a right of critize my methods because you are not a scientist.
If you were a scientist you would accept criticism of your work and either defend your method or admit your method doesn't work and stop using it.

The fact that you continue to use your invalid method even when the problems with it have been pointed out repeatedly and you simply ignore these problems show that you are not a scientist.

Now like I said, either defend your method or stop using it. Until you do so, I will continue to expose it.

There is nothing around debunk my workings. You and your other alt membership rabinoz are constantly repeating same baseless BS are not critism. You're just parasite of this forum. You are a contradiction of this life that God has created you unnecessiraly. Because you are not working for anything positive or negative in this world, just air pollution.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 354