Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Guessed

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 67
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Community
« on: June 08, 2011, 06:45:04 AM »
"See? It's a fat-girl's name. Might as well be Gravy Jones"- Pierce

Also, the trampoline episode.

Two of my favourite moments in the series.

The Lounge / Re: Greetings and etc.
« on: June 05, 2011, 02:48:54 PM »
Missed it  :(

The Lounge / Re: Greetings and etc.
« on: June 03, 2011, 03:07:40 PM »
Yay Guessed! I missed you!!!

Missed you too Gayer, how's things?

Things are crazy. Hows things with you my luverly Guessed?

Also crazy, but in the best way possible.

The Lounge / Re: Greetings and etc.
« on: June 03, 2011, 01:47:10 PM »
Yay Guessed! I missed you!!!

Missed you too Gayer, how's things?

The Lounge / Re: Greetings and etc.
« on: June 03, 2011, 01:19:02 PM »

Chris! How goes?


  Yeah,I am also looking for a similar thing that such a big forum have no welcome or Introduction thread.I am AlbertBatista from Asia.I really like this forum.Forums are always a great source of sharing the Information and having the same on the topic of your Interest.

Get out of my thread and lurk the fuck moar.

The Lounge / Re: Greetings and etc.
« on: June 03, 2011, 12:35:35 PM »
I may have seen your pants draped over the gazebo on the city square this morning.  Khaki were they?

Welcome home.

Much obliged, and, although my pants were not khaki, those seem like a suitable replacement.

Also, HI DANN!

The Lounge / Re: Greetings and etc.
« on: June 03, 2011, 10:59:59 AM »
Well, all things come to a close, such is the way of life, the internet, and everything. Good to hear the crate guarding is going well and that you're keeping America's crated goods out of the hands of the godless terrorists. The great white north is not so bad, it's actually been pretty hot this past week, which is terrible for all the igloos.

Arts & Entertainment / Re: Underrated Movies
« on: June 03, 2011, 10:52:42 AM »
Brick was a great movie that (as far as I know) very few people talked about.

The Lounge / Re: Greetings and etc.
« on: June 03, 2011, 10:45:03 AM »
There was a whole team of us for a while. So, who needs smiting? I'd lurk moar and find out, but I can't be arsed at the moment. How's crate guarding treating you Wardogg? (you may in fact be guarding other materials at this point, but it's been a while)

The Lounge / Re: Greetings and etc.
« on: June 03, 2011, 10:10:08 AM »

The Lounge / Re: Greetings and etc.
« on: June 03, 2011, 10:08:20 AM »
I was just thinking about you yesterday.  Welcome back!

Aww, shucks. It's good to be back.

The Lounge / Greetings and etc.
« on: June 03, 2011, 10:05:46 AM »
As so many other older members have been doing as of late, I'm back. I've also found a new and permanent place with new and permanent internet. So, what have I missed? Who's still here? Who should I prepare to battle? And where the hell are my pants?

Side-bar: anybody else think Fergie looks a bit like a tranny? Like, a good one, post-op possibly, but a tranny none the less.

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Who is Victorious?
« on: January 31, 2011, 04:36:39 PM »
If both sides of an arguement claim victory, then how do you conclusively know who really won?

As there is no such thing as a definitive proof, neither side can ever conclusively win.

Arts & Entertainment / Re: True Grit
« on: January 14, 2011, 06:57:51 AM »
O Brother was one of the best movies of its kind ever. True Grit was alright, but I wasn't blown away. I downloaded a good quality screener, and was certainly impressed with that one gruesome scene in the cabin. And I suppose in light of most of hollywood's garbage, it was good. But nothing to write home about. Jeff Bridges is always solid, but Matt Damon was a transparent poopsicle.

At first I would've said the same of Damon's performance, but I think that's how his character was supposed to be portrayed. Someone who is desperately trying to portray confidence and "grit" without actually posessing either. In short, he seems like a transparent poopsicle, but that's who his character is. The rest of the movie could've used a little more effort though, little too slow for my liking. Also, Jess Bridges should be at least mildly intoxicated in every role he plays from now until he dies. FACT

The Lounge / Re: Kids will be Kids, right?
« on: January 06, 2011, 11:56:11 AM »
lol, $250 fine.

Although, I don't think she should have been taken down to the police station. The officer should have called her parents to come pick her up or something.

This. Although, I'm pretty sure the trip to the police station was to serve more as a deterrent to her peers than to her, though I do doubt she'll be as tempted to do it again in the future. You could also argue that by taking the responsibility out of the hands of parents and putting it into the hands of the police, you're instilling unnecessary fear of authority into the child which will lead her to resent police in the future. However, my understanding of child psychology is not nearly great enough to fully analyze this, so there's a good chance I'm talking directly out of my ass.

Arts & Entertainment / Re: What are you reading?
« on: January 06, 2011, 11:48:04 AM »
What the Dog Saw by Malcolm Gladwell

At this point, I'd say he's one of the most important voices of our times. His examinations of the seemingly banal ("The Pill", homelessness, and the enron scandal) and seemingly insignificant (Ketchup, The Dog Whisperer), range from thought provoking to, quite frankly, earth shattering.

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: FET believers denying a conspiracy
« on: January 06, 2011, 11:35:37 AM »
ITT: trolls trolling trolls about the possibility of trolling trolls.  /digression

Carry on...

The Lounge / Re: Seasons Greetings
« on: December 19, 2010, 10:05:45 AM »
Stop having real life and spend moar time here  >:(

I'll try my best, don't blame me, blame my genetic flaws!

The Lounge / Seasons Greetings
« on: December 19, 2010, 02:27:12 AM »
As some of you have perhaps noticed, real life has seriously conflicted with my posting/lurking frequency here. For this, I am sorry, promise. Not too worry though, I'm not dead yet. Hope you've all been well and that I haven't missed too many lulz 'round here.

- Guessed

The Lounge / Re: In Case of Zombies
« on: October 05, 2010, 04:58:55 AM »
This thread really should have been locked a while ago.

The Lounge / Re: Status Update (incase anyone cares...which is unlikely)
« on: October 02, 2010, 02:21:33 PM »
Welcome back, glad things are going well finally, stay a while? 

Arts & Entertainment / Re: Jonathan Hobin
« on: October 01, 2010, 04:24:38 PM »
That's what I asked myself as well. Apparently a lot of people are outraged, though, hence the topic.

Which people?

I found them - meh - eh?

Prefer Anne Geddes.


Read the accompanying article, what do I look like, wikipedia?

Arts & Entertainment / Re: Jonathan Hobin
« on: October 01, 2010, 04:09:05 PM »
That's what I asked myself as well. Apparently a lot of people are outraged, though, hence the topic.

Arts & Entertainment / Jonathan Hobin
« on: October 01, 2010, 04:04:39 PM »
Some of you may have already heard of him already (perhaps even made a previous thread, I can't be bothered to look) but for those of you who haven't, let me inform you. He's a photographer who's latest piece is a series of pictures called "In the Playroom" where he gets children to pose in ways that recreate headlines from the news (Terry , the 2004 tsunami, and even 9/11) the children were not abused in the making of the pictures, and in fact most had fun creating them. His intent was apparently to show that children are deeply affected by the news, whether we realize it as a society or not.  Here's a link to a gallery of the photos in question


And so I put it to you, the incredibly biased, often intoxicated, and most likely insane, inhabitants of this forum to decide: are these photos offensive? If so, why? How far is too far in the name of art? Is this a statement or just a cheap gimmick?  

The Lounge / Re: Going away
« on: September 30, 2010, 05:32:57 AM »
Well, at least you were thinkin' of me.

The Lounge / Re: Going away
« on: September 30, 2010, 05:30:00 AM »
The day I come back is the day you announce you're going away. That's what's really cold here, gayer.

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: A QUESTION TO ROUND EARTH BELIEVERS
« on: September 21, 2010, 05:43:42 PM »
ITT: People clog the serious boards with blatant lies.

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: All drugs should be legal.
« on: September 04, 2010, 06:09:24 AM »
At the beginning of this thread, a few people compared outlawing drugs to certain other things that are potentially dangerous, like bacon and wood chippers.  It doesn't look like anyone addressed this, so I'll do it now.  The problem with that argument is that drugs are the only products that are dangerous when used as intended.  Wood chippers are not designed for people to stick their hands into.  Bacon is not designed to be eaten by the pound.  Cars are not intended for use in colliding with people, aerosols are not meant to be huffed, etc.  However, with most drugs, the correct use of them is inherently dangerous.  A single hit of heroin, for example, has been enough to instantly kill many people.

If used correctly, drugs will not kill you. A single hit of heroin will kill you if you a)shoot up improperly (not as intended, b)overdosing (note:OVERdosing, hence not used as intended, or c)if you are given heroin laced with something terrible (not as intended). The problem is that there is no regulatory committee. As for your bacon argument, who are you to say that it was not designed to be consumed in one sitting? The packages are not entirely air-tight resealable for the most part. Obesity is a far more dangerous threat than illicit drugs ever have been or will be.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 67