Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tom Dipshit

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15
1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: A sincere question
« on: March 25, 2008, 04:42:44 PM »
Well, if the ice wall theory is correct, then the flat earth theory should be easy to demonstrate. One only needs to fly over the ice wall and capture video of the great expense of space past the edge of the earth. Or am I over simplifying things?  ???

People have been to the 150 foot Ice Wall at the coast of Antarctica. We have pictures.

A "great expanse of space" does not exist beyond the Ice Wall; but a perpetual tundra of ice and snow stretching Southward farther than eye or telescope can penetrate, and becoming lost in gloom and darkness.
However, I still see a curve in that picture. ;)

2
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Logic has no place here
« on: January 29, 2008, 06:31:43 PM »
That belongs to the (Long since dead) Darth Bishop.

3
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Logic has no place here
« on: January 29, 2008, 06:22:19 PM »
If you want to get banned, check out the enclosed instructions book. :D

4
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Logic has no place here
« on: January 29, 2008, 06:16:20 PM »
what honestly is the point of discussing this rediculous topic? I mean really...I'm a little mad at myself for being able to post about it to start with. If I don't get any replys in a few minutes i will most likely leave this site and never return. boredom brought me here, boredom will be the reason i leave.

5
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Logic has no place here
« on: January 29, 2008, 05:45:00 PM »
In before the lock

6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 22, 2008, 07:36:28 PM »
I'm open minded enough to accept FE if it were true.

Yeah right. We can all say that, but when push comes to shove, I have a hard time believing you'd convert - what evidence would you require before you realised it was flat?

After all, your entire online persona exists purely as a hateful mockery of someone who holds these beliefs. Are you honestly trying to claim that you'd readily accept those beliefs?
This is Tom were talk about. A complete insult to FE. I know that you may say 'then why did you make this thread?' The answer to that is, I was curios.

However, back to the real question. If you can prove to me a conspiracy then you've pretty much convinced me. Right now I believe a conspiracy of that size is uber unlikely, but not impossible.

7
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 22, 2008, 12:48:38 PM »
Fikealox is right. The real question is what if you saw for yourself that FE theory is incorrect? Suppose you were offered a rocket ship ride around the earth. This, I suppose, would be the only way (if any) to discourage your belief in a FE world.

FE theory relies heavily on the world governments obstructing truth. So, I suppose the question within a question here, would be what do you value more: FE theory, or truth?

Well what if it turned out that we were right? The question is just as stupid the other way round.
I'm open minded enough to accept FE if it were true.

8
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 20, 2008, 03:24:33 PM »

Tom, what if FE was wrong and everything for RE is right? What if Rowbotham or anyone you use as evidence was wrong? Would you still believe FE, or would you finally accept RE?
Just answer the question Tom!

9
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 20, 2008, 01:03:47 PM »
Tom Bishop would never accept RE. It is his nemesis.
I'm giving him no choice. He must consider this scenario no matter what has done to prove FE.

10
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 20, 2008, 12:46:09 PM »
Tom, what if FE was wrong and everything for RE is right? What if Rowbotham or anyone you use as evidence was wrong? Would you still believe FE, or would you finally accept RE?
Just answer the question Tom!

11
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 19, 2008, 06:14:03 PM »
Tom, what if FE was wrong and everything for RE is right? What if Rowbotham or anyone you use as evidence was wrong? Would you still believe FE, or would you finally accept RE?
Just answer the question Tom!

12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 18, 2008, 05:42:44 AM »
Tom, what if FE was wrong and everything for RE is right? What if Rowbotham or anyone you use as evidence was wrong? Would you still believe FE, or would you finally accept RE?
Just answer the question Tom!

13
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 17, 2008, 03:08:23 PM »
Quote
Tom, what if FE was wrong and everything for RE is right? What if Rowbotham or anyone you use as evidence was wrong? Would you still believe FE, or would you finally accept RE?

Why would Rowbotham be wrong when I've verified the results of his experiments myself?
YES! You've just, indirectly, proven my, er, everyones point. You can't answer any question even if it's just a what if question!

14
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 17, 2008, 03:05:50 PM »
Tom's answer: He would accept RE

The Truth: Give me FE or give me death. I'm inclined to satisfy his wish.
XD

15
Flat Earth Q&A / Quick 'what if' question for Tom
« on: January 17, 2008, 03:01:15 PM »
Tom, what if FE was wrong and everything for RE is right? What if Rowbotham or anyone you use as evidence was wrong? Would you still believe FE, or would you finally accept RE?

16
Quote
This is the baseless skepticism I'm talking about. Its fine to say that its possible general relativity may only apply to the cosmos but not the earth however you give no basis for it.

Yes, actually we do.

If the earth is infinite or near-infinite in size it may operate on an entirely different set of laws, similar to how General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics apply to bodies of different sizes.
Does someone, besides me, see something wrong here?

Everyone with reason does.
I couldn't help but laugh at what he said. Even someone like Bishop should know something like 'near infinite' is impossible. Then again, were talking about Bishop here.

17
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Evidence of Conspiracy
« on: January 17, 2008, 05:04:32 AM »
Quote
For the point of the moon rocks being tested by nasa employed geologits I know of many occurences where the rocks were granted to independant university research departments for study. IF they were faked there would be intellectual outrage and an exposure of the fake rocks.

NASA controlled exactly who the moon rocks went to for "analysis."

Therefore there is no evidence in your statement showing that NASA has sent the moon rocks out for an honest peer review.
Controlled? Then why is it that my dad has a moon rock outside his office where anyone can see it?

18
Quote
This is the baseless skepticism I'm talking about. Its fine to say that its possible general relativity may only apply to the cosmos but not the earth however you give no basis for it.

Yes, actually we do.

If the earth is infinite or near-infinite in size it may operate on an entirely different set of laws, similar to how General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics apply to bodies of different sizes.
Does someone, besides me, see something wrong here?

19
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Hi i am the son of a piolot convince me !!
« on: January 15, 2008, 10:44:20 AM »
Quote
Feel free to prove your claims.

Flat Earth Theory predicts that from a very high altitude you are looking down at the circular spotlight of the sun.

High altitude observations seem to agree with this assertion, and so high altitude observations act as evidence for the Flat Earth Theory.
Feel free to prove your claims.

20
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Religious Bias?
« on: January 15, 2008, 09:58:02 AM »
You know that less than 6 percent of us believe in FE, right?

But Trekky0623 claims that is is only 5 percent. Plus he believes in a flat mars, which is of course true! So i will go with him
Trekky isn't serious about a flat mars.

21
Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Earth is not flat
« on: January 12, 2008, 05:37:01 PM »
Quote
hmm. It seems you didn't read right. "Using satellite-based research" Wouldn't that mean they saw actual pictures of earth to make this?

If a 3D model fooled you, what does that say about your ability to determine the "real" from the "fake"?
I believe in Santa because he's in literature.

22
Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Earth is not flat
« on: January 12, 2008, 05:35:06 PM »
Quote
I know people who have been there and they have seen no ice wall

Antarctica is the Ice Wall.

Wow your nickname should be Tom Dipshit.

Go to hell liberal
Are you talking to me or Tom Bishop?

He was talking to Bishop, calling him tom dipshit.
I know that...

23
Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Earth is not flat
« on: January 12, 2008, 05:31:42 PM »
Quote
I know people who have been there and they have seen no ice wall

Antarctica is the Ice Wall.

Wow your nickname should be Tom Dipshit.

Go to hell liberal
Are you talking to me or Tom Bishop?

24
A question for the FAQ:

Why is Tom Bishop even here?

Honestly, I mean, most people seem to dislike him. Yet he still visits here? >_>
You don't know why? You edited your first post to say all hail Tom Bishop. That's why.

@GG: As if I care how I do it; I just do it.

25
On second thought, you're a troll so piss off.

Simply having fun  ;)

Who's over-reacting now? ;D

I'm simply having fun as well

Well then. *Ehem*

Carry on.

Word of advice, get rid of the Tom avatar. We hate people with 'Tom' avatars. It's not big, it's not clever and it sure as hell isn't original.

What if I draw him as a PIRATE! :o
PIRATE TOM IS ORI- Oh fuck it. I have a better one.
THIS IS TOM BIIIIISHOOOOOP!

@ GG: I'm not trying to debate, I'm just having fun f***ing up the place.

26
On second thought, you're a troll so piss off.

Simply having fun  ;)

Who's over-reacting now? ;D

I'm simply having fun as well

Well then. *Ehem*

Carry on.

Word of advice, get rid of the Tom avatar. We hate people with 'Tom' avatars. It's not big, it's not clever and it sure as hell isn't original.
Ok come on! What can be better than Darth Bishop?

27
Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Dealy Sun
« on: January 10, 2008, 05:19:14 PM »
Some REers claim that the FE sun is too close and would burn up all life on earth.

Other REers claim that the FE sun is too small and would not provide enough heat to sustain life.

But did they ever stop and think for a moment that the sun is small enough and close enough to the earth that it creates the proper amount of warmth?
Well, when powered by coal, no.

28
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: On the South Pole/Wall
« on: January 09, 2008, 05:20:50 PM »
Quote
...then why does Antarctica's summers have days where the sun is up all 24 hours a day, just like the North Pole?

It doesn't.
It does

29
Flat Earth Debate / Re: FE: Why a circle? And: Damn that gov't!!
« on: January 08, 2008, 12:42:19 PM »
Why should I need to do that when you can't give us the testimony of a single pilot who claims to have seen curvature to the earth in flight?

Stop posting.
I'm not a pilot but I have been in a cockpit and saw a curved horizon.

30
Flat Earth Debate / Re: what would this look like through a telescope
« on: December 28, 2007, 04:01:22 PM »
@ cpt_bthimes: Zeroply is right about one thing. In the time span between each picture the wave changes. However, the wave is very small of significant change.

@ Zeroply: Dude, stop with the ranting and immature insults. It is not helping. You are only fueling CPT. You're saying there are 'holes' yet you haven't even backed it up.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15