Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bondurant

Pages: [1] 2
1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Quick question No.2
« on: August 21, 2007, 12:49:22 PM »
Stars do not appear within ten degrees of the horizon, where the bulk of the atmosphere lays.

Image 1: http://www.astronet.ru/db/msg/1210491/eng/




That picture looks faked to me.

2
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: August 07, 2007, 04:53:08 AM »
I'm too scared to go to Australia. Not because of the poisonous animals or the rock hard rugby players, but because there's a risk that the plane might miss the right supersonic jet stream and end up going backwards or something.

3
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: History of Conspiracy
« on: August 07, 2007, 03:28:04 AM »
The space Conspiracy was premeditated as early as the late 1800s (as Rowbotham's popularity threatened to thwart the RE myth). Evidence suggests that Scott of the Antarctica was murdered by the Conspiracy in the 1900s before he could tell the truth about the Ice Wall.

What evidence is that?

4
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Power of sun
« on: July 31, 2007, 11:57:31 AM »
Let's not forget that Tom has yet to explain how the Sun is a spotlight.  So far, I've only seen the argument that it's a spotlight because that's the only way it would work.

From Chapter 8 of Earth Not a Globe:

    The question, "how is it that the earth is not at all times illuminated all over its surface, seeing that the sun is always several hundred miles above it?" may be answered as follows:--

    First, if no atmosphere existed, no doubt the light of the sun would diffuse over the whole earth at once, and alternations of light and darkness could not exist.

    Secondly, as the earth is covered with an atmosphere of many miles in depth, the density of which gradually increases downwards to the surface, all the rays of light except those which are vertical, as they enter the upper stratum of air are arrested in their course of diffusion, and by refraction bent downwards towards the earth; as this takes place in all directions round the sun--equally where density and other conditions are equal, and vice versā--the effect is a comparatively distinct disc of sun-light.

I think a diagram or two would help to explain this, because all I read there was a pile of bullshit.

5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Power of sun
« on: July 26, 2007, 04:29:11 AM »

In the Cook's Strait Almanac, it is said:

"At Wellington, New Zealand, December 21st, sun rises 4 h. 31 m., and sets at 7 h. 29 m., the day being 14 hours 58 minutes. "


So, by your own admission, the longest days in the southern hemisphere are longer than 12 hours. On 21st December, the days in New Zealand, Australia, South Africa and South America will all be longer than 12 hours.

So, Gumshoe, how is this possible with your spotlight that should be sweeping across the southern hemisphere in 24 hours?

6
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 23, 2007, 01:48:17 AM »
Clearly The Engineer and Gulliver are both part of the Conspiracy, as agents instructed to hijack any "sensible" discussion and to take threads off topic.

How much are they being paid?

Are they really this serious in real life?

Are they, in fact, the same person?


I also believe that Tom Bishop must be in on it, as an agent provocateur to destroy the credibility of the flat earth movement.

7
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 20, 2007, 12:12:08 AM »
I don't see how ascending into the air and observing an apparently rounded horizon would prove a Round Earth. Remember, the horizon of a Flat Earth would also appear rounded; elliptical. When we move outside of the atmosphere of the Flat Earth, to the foot of space, we are looking down at a circle.
Quote

well, i guess there really is no way to convince FEer's of a round earth. a flat earth that appears round in space? beats me. if this was true than why wouldnt they just go ahead with space programs?
The space programs present too much evidence for FEer to ignore. The images show that Australia is not elongated as their model predicts. The curvature of the Earth seen in the photographs doesn't align with their model. The position of the Moon and the Sun, the Sun's illumination, and the orbits of the spacecrafts and satellites all demonstrate that the Earth is round.

Really, "the Earth is round in the photographs because the Earth is cylinder" fails miserably with just a casual inspection. Continents, over the curvature of the Earth, the horizon, aren't visible, for example. The terminator often doesn't match FE predictions. It's just all lots of little explanations, picture by picture, failing to explain the next bit of evidence until it's in hand. 

Conspiracy

8
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 19, 2007, 07:18:10 AM »
Tom ruined our discussion. I'm very disappointed.

Me too. Much as I am pleased about the great TB finally contributing to my thread, it has been dragged off topic. Who's in on the conspiracy, Tom?

Quote from: Tom Bishop
Look at any High School physics book to see that heat and pressure have a correlation to each other.

Look at any High School physics book, gumshoe, and it'll tell you that areas of high pressure will try to move to areas of low pressure, in the absence of gravitational effects. What you've described would cause an instantaneous explosive decompression of the Earth's atmosphere!

Therefore, authors of High School physics books are in on the conspiracy!

9
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 18, 2007, 03:31:42 AM »
Everything NASA has done constitutes as proof that support those initial observations and experiments of Eratosthenes, Posidonius, and Ptolemy.

True. But does that mean that prior to 1958, there was no "proof" that the world was round, and the the evidence only constituted a "suggestion" that the Earth was round?

Wait a minute. NASA are part of the conspiracy!!! You almost had me there.

10
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 18, 2007, 02:35:35 AM »
We have numerous observations that suggest the shape of the Earth that long precede this.


Divito, you are so tiresome. At what point does the weight of evidence in any given theory constitute "proof" rather than a "suggestion".

11
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Southern hemisphere summer
« on: July 17, 2007, 02:24:57 AM »
So the sun "spotlight" becomes banana shaped during the southern summer. Very impressive. Now I just need to know how and why it does this. Then I'll be a believer.

12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Southern hemisphere summer
« on: July 17, 2007, 01:57:21 AM »
Obviously it does not move itself, God must do it.

Just to clarify:

The question I originally asked wasn't "How does the sun move between the north and south during the seasons".

The question was "How does the sun shine all the way from Perth to Sao Paulo at the same time during the southern summer, but doesn't illuminate most of the rest of the disc?"

Draw a circle on the map above, centered on the tropic of Capricorn in Africa, and big enough to reach Australia and South America. How much of the rest of the world is within the circle? Nothing within the Arctic Circle should be in daylight.

13
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Southern hemisphere summer
« on: July 16, 2007, 02:06:33 PM »

It doesn't 'jump'  even according to the base FET.  It follows a spiraling course which takes it north and south over the course of a year.  The picture is misleading.

I don't care whether it jumps or not. If the sun is over the tropic of Capricorn over Africa (i.e. on December 21st) then it should be daylight in both western Australia and South America at the same time. At the same time, it should be dark over the Artic Circle near to Iceland. I want to know how this can be possible.

Then I'll believe in a flat Earth. Honest.

14
Flat Earth Q&A / Southern hemisphere summer
« on: July 16, 2007, 05:51:58 AM »
This is probably a question that has been asked a million times before, and if so, I apologise.

Basically, if it's summer in the southern hemisphere (or whatever the flat earthers call what lies south of the equator), then how is it possible to have days longer than 12 hours, given that the sun is a spotlight? I simply cannot understand how this could be possible.



For example, if it's 12.00 in Cape Town, South Africa, then it must be about 07.00 in Sao Paulo, Brazil and about 19.00 in Perth, Australia. All should be in daylight in the southern summer. If the earth were a simple spotlight, then nearly the whole world should be in daylight for this to be possible!

Hope somebody can help me. I want to believe!!!

[Thanks to Chrissetti for the pic]

15
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 16, 2007, 04:40:24 AM »
Another group for the conspiracy: The media.

You would think that a few people would break their silence over the conspiracy and leak it to the press, but nobody ever has. If they have tried to tell their story, it's never made it's way into the public domain. And quality investigative journals such as the National Enquirer would be all over it like a rash if there was even a hint of a conspiracy.

As for "Why"? Well, there must be something in it for them other than the scoop of the millennium. Major kick-backs from the governments of the world.

I'll never trust the BBC again, the lying bastards.

16
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 13, 2007, 09:28:40 AM »
This thread is hilarious.

That was the intention. Sadly not quite in the way I thought.

Instead of the positive and humorous additions to the list of people in the conspiracy all we've had is a waaaayyyy too serious discussion about the finer points of military logistics. And there was me thinking this was a joke website.

You. All. Fail.

L2Humour.

17
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 12, 2007, 01:11:59 PM »
I say that the conspiracy theory requires an enormous amount of effort and resources, and lies beyond credibility.

I say that you're part of the conspiracy, perpetuating the cover-up. How much are they paying you?

18
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 12, 2007, 10:15:29 AM »
The Ice Wall Guards

The ice wall guards don't need to be in on the conspiracy.  They could just be positioned soldiers told what to do that act approprietly.

Imagine the briefing:

"Right then, chaps. We have to defend this here wall of ice for queen and country. We can't tell you why, as it's a secret. When you write home, make sure you tell your family you're in Iraq, and not on a wall of ice, with only seals for food. Oh, and if you should happen across any civilians around here, tell them they're in the wrong place and that you've heard the north pole is really quite nice at this time of the year.

"See you in 6 months, fellas!"

19
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 12, 2007, 08:02:48 AM »
Land and Hydrographic Surveyors

Architects of tall buildings

Telecoms companies

The engineers who build the radiotowers instead of satelites

Round the world Yacht Racers

I always thought Ellen MacArthur looked a bit shifty.

Google must be in on it. "Do no evil" my arse, what about Google Earth?

20
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 12, 2007, 07:10:18 AM »
Divito, your response almost made me laugh out loud at my desk in a busy office.

Brilliant. Simply, brilliant.

 ???

21
Flat Earth Debate / Who's in on the conspiracy? Info for the FAQ
« on: July 12, 2007, 05:40:24 AM »
With all of the work Gulliver has done on his RE Primer, I thought it was about time we helped out on the FE FAQ. In this instance, I wanted to help expand on who's in on the conspiracy (or has been in the past) and what their motive is, as the information currently in the FAQ is rather lacking. Feel free to add to this!

Eratosthenes, Posidonius, and Ptolemy
The men that kicked it all off, by carrying out independent experiments in Ancient Greece that supposedly showed that the Earth was round and not flat.

Why?
We don't know, but it was probably money.

Who else is involved?
Everyone that replicates the experiment and talks about it to perpetuate the myth. Anyone who buys the basic equipment will have their costs refunded by the government and a free holiday to the ice wall for a long weekend.

The Ice Wall Guards
These guys are busy protecting the 78,000 mile long ice wall and whatever lies beyond it. Nobody has ever heard a squeek from them.

Why?
We don't know, but it probably involves money. To keep them all quiet, the governments of the world must be rewarding them well. To keep them happy, they probably have their own World of Warcraft servers for recreation, bars, casinos and brothels. If they weren't happy, they could cause havok in the rest of the world if they revolted. Computer simulations have shown that if they all jumped up and down at the same time, they would cause a tidle wave that would engulf all of the world's continents.

Who else is involved?
The governments who supply the soldiers, Blizzard entertainment, and all the bar staff, croupiers and prostitutes.

The Governments
This goes without saying, of course. Starting from ancient Greece, all governments were gradually coerced into supporting the conspiracy. All of the apparent disagreements over policy or ideology were faked or set aside in the greater evil of the round earth conspiracy. Saddam Hussein was heard to say on the way to the gallows, "Remember, infidels, that the world is round!"

Why?
Well, that's like asking why America invaded Iraq! It's money, of course! Maybe there are oil or gold reserves beyond the ice wall. Maybe the secret to eternal life is beyond the ice wall. Maybe there is lots of ice beyond the ice wall.

Who else is involved?
Everyone who works for the governments. If the governments are protecting oil reserves, then the oil companies must also be involved (potentially faking their oil extractions elsewhere or maintaining artificially high prices). The space agencies are obviously involved too.

NASA, ESA, RSA, etc.
All of the space agencies, both government controlled and commercial are involved, faking the sending of satellites and inter-planetary probes into "orbit". In reality, they are firing them into the sea near the ice wall.

Why?
We don't really know, but it must be money. The government is putting billions of dollars into these agencies, which is probably spent by the agency administrators on rewarding the people who carry out the Eratosthenes experiments, as well as their own trips to the the bars and brothels beyond the ice wall.

Who else is involved?
The scientists who create the interplanetary probes, which obviously never go anywhere. Satellite navigation companies. Satellite broadcasting companies. Richard Branson and his Virgin Galactic firm.

Airline Pilots
Most pilots would probably never claim to see the curvature of the earth, but they would certainly claim to navigate along great circle routes in both hemispheres of a round earth.

Why?
We don't really know, but it's probably money. After all, they can't paid that huge salary just because of the stress, long hours and the fact that they are responsible for hundreds of lives. They're paid to keep their mouths shut about the fact they travel at supersonic speeds in the southern hemisphere and that a route from Australia to Chile does, in fact, take them up the Western seaboard of north and south America and near to the north pole.

Who else is involved?
The airline companies, of course. The air traffic controllers. The passengers. People at ground level who have witnessed Boeing 747s passing overhead at supersonic speeds, leaving behind 747-sized sonic booms.

Australians
They would maintain to the world that the shape of their continent is approximately two times the distance east to west as it is north to south, as this fits in nicely with the round earth model. In fact, Australia is at least 4 times the distance east to west as it is north to south.

Why?
We don't know, but it must be money. They are probably too drunk and too busy having "barbies" to notice what shape their continent really is in any case.

Who else is involved?
Anyone else who maintains that the shape of their world is inconsistent with a flat earth. So, that means anyone in South America and Africa in particular. Most Africans, of course, do a great job in hiding the wealth that they earn from the conspiracy.

Scientists
Astronomers keep making "findings" about the universe that simply aren't possible in a flat earth. Solar observers keep showing computer generated images of the ball of fire they call the sun.

Why?
Money, of course. All scientists are secretly stinking rich, but outwardly only show the living circumstances of a research income.

Who else is involved?
Publishers of research journals. Teachers. The programmers who have written the sophisticated computer imagery software since the 1950s.

22
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flight times experiment
« on: July 04, 2007, 11:29:38 AM »
*Yawn*

Still waiting for a response.    :o

23
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Psuedoscience
« on: June 30, 2007, 06:05:16 AM »
Great thread. The concept of Pseudoscience vs. science is perfectly typified by the FE vs. RE "debate".

On the science (RE) side, there is no issue, for example, with flying from Sydney to Santiago, as the distance on a spherical Earth is well within the range of a commercial airliner.

On the pseudoscience (FE) side, you have to invent jet streams that propel the airliner to supersonic speeds, and travel in both directions simultaneously. Not only that, the pilots, passengers, air traffic controllers, and probably Boeing and Airbus all have to be in on some big conspiracy so that the rest of the world knows nothing about it.

The FE'ers need to prove to us that supersonic jet streams exist, or else the FE fails. Period. And by proof, we don't mean something along the lines of, "well, airliners do the trip every day, so they must exist".

24
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flight times experiment
« on: June 24, 2007, 02:58:25 PM »
Maybe American Airlines is in on the conspiracy.

And Qantas Airways. And all of the hundreds of people who take the flight every day. Sod it, so  must everyone who lives in, or has ever been to the southern hemisphere.

25
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flight times experiment
« on: June 24, 2007, 03:09:05 AM »

Personal observation will be necessary for flight times between the extremities of the earth.

Book yourself a flight from Santiago to Sydney, then Tom. Come back after and tell us how it was.

http://www.bestflights.com.au/

26
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flight times experiment
« on: June 23, 2007, 04:31:19 AM »
Bump. Come on someone has got to answer soon. You know you want to...

Gulliver correctly answers the question by quoting me:

    For the rare flight that does occur between the extremities of the earth; along the courses of international flights between points in the Southern Hemisphere exist enormous jet streams located at around 35,000 ft above the surface of the Earth. In the Southern Hemisphere there are both eastward and westward jet streams. By necessity, in relation to the polar front and subtropical jets, easterly jet streams in the Southern Hemisphere propagate at rates even faster than the westward ones. The winds in a jet stream regularly reaches speeds of over 400 km/h. Airliners use these jet streams to faster reach a destination.

    This variable contributes significantly to the travel time between Argentina and New Zealand, for example. While an airplane may have a rated cruise speed it can provide under its own power, the extreme winds of the jet stream adds enormously to the actual velocity of the plane over the surface of the Earth.

    For every moment the plane stays in the jet stream it is being accelerated until it matches the surrounding velocity and momentum of the air around it. From there the plane can use the limits of its power to travel faster than the jet stream. Thus, seven hours of travel time between Argentina and New Zealand becomes extremely possible.

    In general, it has been found that winds are strongest just under the tropopause. If two air masses of different temperatures meet, the resulting pressure difference (which causes winds in FET) is highest along the interface.

    These facts are a consequence of the thermal wind relation. The balance of forces on an atmospheric parcel in the vertical direction is primarily between the pressure gradient and the force of gravitation by acceleration is a balance referred to as hydrostatic. In the horizontal, the dominant balance outside of the tropics is between the Coriolis effect and the pressure gradient is a balance referred to as geostrophic.

    Given both hydrostatic and geostrophic balance, the Flat Earth Society derives the thermal wind relation: the vertical derivative of the horizontal wind is proportional to the horizontal temperature gradient. The sense of the relation is such that temperatures decreasing polewards implies that winds develop a larger eastward component as one moves upwards. Therefore, the strong eastward moving jet streams are in part a simple consequence of the fact that the equator is warmer than the poles.


400kph isn't fast enough, Tom. The jet stream would have to be at least 600-700mph.

27
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: FE Map
« on: June 11, 2007, 07:49:21 AM »
Who needs a search feature when you've got angry people more than willing to point out stuff for you?

Seriously though, your maps are excellent and serve to highlight the questions I asked in my previous thread (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=14382.0)about how you can fly at least 20,000 miles in a Jumbo jet from Sydney to Santiago in 16 hours 10 minutes, without anyone on the flight thinking it strange how the sun sets on the left and rises on the left and without anyone on the ground noticing all those jumbo jets passing over-head at twice the speed of sound.

How does the fact that Santiago is 7,000 miles from Sydney tie up with these maps?

Just how big is the round earth conspiracy???

28
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: FE Map
« on: June 11, 2007, 03:56:07 AM »
This is the problem, isn't it? If you can't even draw a map of a flat earth, then why on earth (pardon the pun) would anyone ever believe in it?

Cartographers have struggled for centuries to draw maps of the Real Earth (i.e. the globe). It's always a compromise that gets surface areas correct or directions correct, but never at the same time. This comes from the topological impossibility of representing a sphere on a flat piece of paper.

Of course, for a discworld, this topological problem is removed. So it should be dead easy to represent a flat earth on a flat map (easier than drawing a map of the globe), and yet we never see a definitive map of the flat earth!

29
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flight times experiment
« on: June 11, 2007, 12:29:06 AM »
Clarification for point 4 included in the OP.

Still looking for explanations...

30
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flight times experiment
« on: June 10, 2007, 11:50:48 AM »

People will notice passing an invisible line? Must be that sixth sense I've been hearing so much about.

Maybe I should clarify point 4. When you take off on your flight at 11.10 from Sydney, the sun will be in a certain position, which will quickly disappear behind you and to the left of the plane. As you approach Santiago at 13.20, the sun will quickly appear from the right and front of the plane, since you are in the southern hemisphere for the whole trip (in December).

In the flat earth model, the sun would set to the left side of the plane and rise on the left side of the plane.

No hypothetical conjecture, just simple fact.

As for the rest of what you've said in this thread, I can honestly say I have no idea what you are on about.

Pages: [1] 2