1

Flat Earth Debate / Re: I know who started the conspiracy

« on: May 09, 2007, 02:01:58 PM »

i knew it.

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: I have a question about the Ice wall

« on: May 09, 2007, 02:00:45 PM »

global warming being caused by us is a gull of bull....it's a cycle the earth has been going through for tons of years.

3

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: I have a question about the Ice wall

« on: May 09, 2007, 11:57:00 AM »

yea...but some FE'ers say that earth is cold, and that helps to keep the ice wall frozen, so it won't ever completely melt.

4

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Proof of the FE

« on: May 05, 2007, 09:08:16 PM »

tom...based on your logic...if this were true, the government would have simply shut down the publishing of these best seller flat earth books. the government could stop this movement much earlier than u claim...so, why not stop the publishing, rather than burning down a library? also, i don't see how shutting down this site would cause such a riot...i only heard of it a few weeks ago by way of my brother, angelflesh, who posts here, who also debunked your defenition of a conspiracy....

5

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Proof... Round Earth - Real Proof

« on: May 05, 2007, 02:35:24 PM »

besides that....using "an inconvenient truth" as evidence for anything would make u an inconvenient idiot.

6

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Coriolis effect

« on: May 05, 2007, 02:31:38 PM »

so....are any flat eatherers gonna discuss this coreolis deal or what?

7

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Commerical Space Flight

« on: April 26, 2007, 03:48:37 PM »

pfft...that is not all we'd learn. then, we could travel to other planets for real and check em out...maybe move there one day if our earth takes a shit on us. maybe we could for real walk on the moon. lots of stuff could be learned from going to space.

8

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Commerical Space Flight

« on: April 26, 2007, 03:43:07 PM »

i believe the government would waste money on that....we could learn so much. as technology gets better, they may find a way to have sustained space flights....and being able to spend 5 minutes up there is starting point to real space travel. 

9

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Commerical Space Flight

« on: April 26, 2007, 03:38:53 PM »

that is no excuse....u can still take photos is the point. and u can take dozens of photos in five minutes....what dumb statement.

10

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Commerical Space Flight

« on: April 26, 2007, 03:35:19 PM »

that doesn't matter....it means it is possible for us to go into space and take pictures of the earth....so, where are the pics of flat earth from space?

11

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Commerical Space Flight

« on: April 26, 2007, 03:28:28 PM »

u do know u just admitted that space flight is possible then....

if we could stay up there for 5 minutes....then how come we haven't tried? i mean, i would the government would spend billions of dollars on doing that, rather than a conspiracy about the round earth....it just doesn't make any sense.

how come a rocket could only stay 5 minutes in space....but an airplace can fly for hours on end?

12

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Commerical Space Flight

« on: April 26, 2007, 03:12:45 PM »

ok....so we can't go into space cuz we need an infinite amount of fuel. how much would we need if we wanted to stay in space for 5 minutes and then come back down? planes can stay in the air for several hours. i don't see why a rocket couldn't stay up there for even 5 minutes and have enough to do so.

13

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Commerical Space Flight

« on: April 26, 2007, 12:44:48 PM »

y would the rocket need an infinite amount of fuel?

14

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Commerical Space Flight

« on: April 26, 2007, 11:38:31 AM »

why would a pencil falling downwards accelerate? there is nothing pushing it to accelerate anyways. but, with a rocket, there is something pushing it to give it acceleration. planes can fly in the sky, what is stopping a rocket from going even further and into sapce?

15

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Commerical Space Flight

« on: April 26, 2007, 11:16:34 AM »

so....do the FE'ers believe this guy, or not? also, how come space flight is impossible in the FE theory?

16

Flat Earth Debate / Re: This date in 1970

« on: April 25, 2007, 11:09:30 AM »

wait....do they not believe australia exists?

17

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Questions concering the 'íce wall'

« on: April 25, 2007, 09:37:12 AM »

I do beleive in the flat earth, but photos really can't be trusted as evidence. I can say, though, that the government doesn't make it too easy to go to 'Antarctica.' I remember seeing a sled race that was supposed to replicate one from the past on that 'continent,' but they could only gain access to Greenland. Kinda fishy.

cruise ships go along antarctica....yet none of the passengers tell stories of peeople gaurding it.

i am still waiting for proof that everyone who has gone to antarctica had gone missing.

18

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Questions concering the 'íce wall'

« on: April 24, 2007, 05:35:26 PM »

First of all, anyone who's ever been to Antarctica that claimed not to have seen the ice wall is part of the Conspiracy (either that or they just didn't go far enough inland, although I'm not sure how far inland the ice wall actually is).

Second of all, one of our own has been there:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=5829.0

that's all good, but we conveniently cannot verify that he went there, for all we know he and his friend could be climbing mount everest or something similar. also, i thought pics don't prove anything cuz they can be edited....so i don't understand why he calls them proof. i didn't know antarctica had so much vegetation.

19

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Questions concering the 'íce wall'

« on: April 24, 2007, 05:20:35 PM »

1) As explained, the ice wall is not just ice.  It is also composed of rock and dirt.  We assume that due to its structure it actually forms a bond with the bottom of the earth below.  It actually holds in the oceans like a giant bowl of soup.  The continents are like matzoh balls, if you will.

2) How, exactly, do you know?  Have you ever been to that region of the world personally?  Anybody who's ever been there was shot to death by the guards, then declared "missing".  Have you ever noticed how many people who go to Antarctica turn up missing?  Do you think there might be a correlation there?   

3) It is a very strong and thick wall.  There's a better chance of Los Angeles falling off the face of the earth due to an earthquake than the ice wall.  Remember, it is composed of rock and dirt besides just ice.  We figure it's pretty much indestructable.  Except, of course, for the potentially deadly effects of global warming, because we do estimate it to be about 75% ice.

woah...everyone who has traveled to antarctica has gone missing? where's your proof? thousands of people have gone to antarctive and came back. they never mentioned anything about seeing gaurds or being shot at either. how come none of you FE'ers try going there?

so if the wall is 75% ice, and if that all melted leaving behind the rocks and dirt, then the wall may not be able to hold in the oceans anymore, right?

20

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Unanswered Round Earth Questions

« on: April 22, 2007, 06:12:03 PM »

tom...there is a thread in the clarifications section about asterioids that u haven't bothered to really discuss....so don't get on us for discussing your questions about RE....just as u don't know what stops the atmosphere from falling over the edge, or what is under the earth, and u have ZERO proof of gaurds along the alleged ice wall....we also do not know what causes the acceleration of the expanding universe. so...both sides have things that cannot be unexplained. i'll do some research and try to find answers to the other Q's.

21

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: More astronomy clarification, comets and meteors

« on: April 22, 2007, 06:03:41 PM »

woah.....i can't believe no FE'er has come with a response yet.

22

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: so what happens whenn.....

« on: April 17, 2007, 12:59:45 PM »

how did this theory of people with guns gaurding the ice wall anyways?

23

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: so what happens whenn.....

« on: April 16, 2007, 04:57:16 PM »

i'd like an FE'er like tom bishop to answer my question

24

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: so what happens whenn.....

« on: April 16, 2007, 04:19:58 PM »

yea, they shun pics that weaken their case, but just go on to claim that all pics are worthless no matter which side it backs up.

so i'm asking that if there really was photographic evidence to prove the earth is flat, or that the ice wall exists and is gaurded, would they use it to strengthen their case or still just throw it out?

25

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: so what happens whenn.....

« on: April 16, 2007, 04:09:55 PM »

wait.....but if u FE'ers could get photographic evidence, would u say it backs up your case more? also, what if u could get a pic of the ice wall, would u? have any of u tried? do u know of anyone who has tried?

i never did get names of people who went up the ice wall and never came back. there are lots of people who have been to antartica and have returned though, how come they never return with tales of the ice wall and such?

26

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Earth From Space

« on: April 12, 2007, 09:04:38 AM »

i think this is a good topic, and the big Fe'ers on the board to get in here and debate it. where is tom, narc, and the engineer??

27

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Okay...

« on: April 12, 2007, 08:39:09 AM »

engineer: u never answered the Q about how thick the earth is.

28

Flat Earth Debate / Re: REAL questitons about the flat earth

« on: April 04, 2007, 01:09:18 PM »

i am still waiting for names of FE's who died going to the ice wall.

it's pretty obvious u would use mathematical equations to get the sun to be 32 miles wide. i wanted to know the equations and how u worked to them to come to that conclusion. if it only works for you when u assume the earth is flat....then that proves that it actually doesn't work in your favor. how does it work out if u don't assume that?

29

Flat Earth Debate / Re: REAL questitons about the flat earth

« on: April 04, 2007, 12:57:58 PM »

ok, so the greenhouse effect traps in the heat....but where does the heat come from, if not the sun? the heat has to come from somewhere for it to be trapped at all.

30

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Confused...

« on: April 04, 2007, 11:45:38 AM »

i'd like to see a list of names of people that traveled to the edge and didn't come back. if there is an ice wall, doea that mean they climbed it and fell off of it onto the other side: space? even if they got to the ice wall, i thought it was gaurded 24/7....so how could they have even gotten close enough to fall off?

i hate mashed potatoes....but everyone around me loves them and thinks i'm crazy for not....their must be a conspiracy to this.