Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - LogicalKiller

Pages: [1]
Let's start to be FE'ers (and so I talk that to like 90% of users of this forum, 10% are FE'ers, I even count these troll FE'ers). Then, we all know conspiracy exist. But what's the point of it? Why do governments keep the conspiracy for hundreds of years? Why do they do it? How can that little and simple people discover something and know that much about it, if it's hidden so well by greatest governments specialized in their work, because of hundreds of years they were doing it? Explain me that.

Flat Earth Debate / how evolution disproves fixing broken limbs
« on: May 02, 2015, 10:53:52 AM »

{jrowe grammar set: on
sig. no = unlim. [+0]
       sane mind set: off
mind - false
stupdes - true
homosx - true
hetr - false
re - false
trollng - true
exmpl; start--

evolution makes each type of animal better, therefore if some predator is better, then prey should e.g. better escape. but if predators damage its prey badly, but it'll suddenly escape, then the prey must regenerate itself. fixing broken bones and limbs by using plaster would be extremely effective for prey animals. but we don't see any animals that fix their broken bones by plaster and fixing it perfectly, therefore fixing bones and limbs by plaster is not possible and doesn't exist.

--exmp; finish

Flat Earth Debate / How evolution proves deep-mining is impossible
« on: April 24, 2015, 07:53:11 AM »
If space travel is impossible, because any other animal couldn't send itself into it, then deep-mining is also not possible, because if it was, then there would be some animals that would mine few kilometers below the ground to hide from the predators, but as we see, no animal excluding us is capable of doing so.

Flat Earth Debate / How exactly is space travel impossible?
« on: April 24, 2015, 07:47:59 AM »
How exactly is it impossible? List here your scientific points based on mathematics and physics.

    Evolution is a slow process, really, really, really slow process in which totally random mutations happen and decide of later future of whole specie. Mutations decide of the future because they are brought up to natural selection. It's not simply like "always positive mutations win and negative loose" but it's a bit more complex. We've got 3 types of mutations - positive,neutral and negative.

    Negative mutations in a period of thousands, even tens of thousands of years make the number of animals representing particular specie with this negative mutation to decrease. Neutral mutation in current (the time of when mutation happened to occur) time does nothing and just stays, but there might be a change of environment, when neutral mutation turns to positive, and positive mutation makes number of animals representing particular specie with this mutation to increase. 1 of 3 particular mutations can be positive or negative or neutral in 2 ways. It can be positive, negative or neutral in 2 ways just by being positive, negative, etc., etc. in 1 way of 2, or by being positive, etc. etc. in 2 of 2 ways. These 2 ways are these two points:
a) reproduction factor,
b) survival factor.

     Reproduction, just as survival factor, can be positive or negative or neutral (nothing changed). If in specie mutation happened, we count these two parts of the same species the subspecies. The subspecie of a specie A, let's say A1-2, has a positive mutation that makes its reproduction factor bigger (wider loins for example), the subspecie A1-2 will - in a period of time of thousands of years - eventually displace subspecie A2-2 without this mutation.

     And let's get back to the "It's not simply like >>always positive mutations win and negative loose<<" point. Yes, negative mutation can actually displace specie without this mutation, so we can say it can displace a specie that is healthier. How? Species were living on several places on Earth, and also cataclysms were taking place on several places on the Earth, so if subspecie A-H (subspecie of specie A without negative mutation, therefore "healthier" - H) meets cataclysm and subspecie A-S (subspecie being "sick" - negative mutation) don't, then subspecie A-H will eventually die and subspecie A-S survive, therefore the "displacement" won't happen, therefore A-S will later be no A-S because it doesn't have any other subspecie to compare with, that it can measure if mutation is negative or not and actually it has even a future for maybe positive mutations that will "cancel" the effects of last negative mutation. I think I explained it that much that some idiot on this forum or other "feed-me-with-your-idiotic-statements" guys won't say stupidest thing about evolution.


Flat Earth Debate / Earth is round, final evidence
« on: April 04, 2015, 01:10:05 PM »
In this topic - - user Dog linked a video which proves that Moon landings were real.
If they were real, then yeah...
The photos with Moon were real.
The photos with... Earth were also real.
And what these photos have shown?
A round Earth.

*tfes crushed*

Flat Earth Debate / Is JRowe omniscient?
« on: April 01, 2015, 08:00:15 AM »
Look - every question we ask him is answered (no matter if he comes up with another unproved assertion). Old truth says that some idea can be true if a person who's stating this idea don't knows everything about it - as we see, JRowe seems to know everything about FE or DFE, so it must mean these both are untrue.

How Earth formed according to JRowe and a history of his thinking?

On the beginning there was nothing more but a bunch of rocks.
Because of gravity, this bunch of rocks was squished into a disc, when somehow all other planets survived the squshing and to this day stay nearly perfect spheres.
Because this disc needed to represent perfectly azimuthal equidistant projection, it formed to represent perfectly azimuthal equidistant projection.
To make people not going out of Earth, to make water not flowing out of Earth and to explain the position of Antarctica on azimuthal equidistant projection, ice wall formed.
Because earlier sunsets and circumpolar stars were literally glitched, all-powerful aether flew from another edge of universe straight to Earth to explain it, also there for the first time bendy light occured.
Because nature was so intelligent that it predicted that there will be so not so intelligent who will know the thing about obvious fact - that Antarctica does exist and there is no ice wall (morons) and that north hemisphere is obviously smaller than south one, nature splited two hemispheres, made the north one bigger, the south one a circle and sticked each other together and so formed a "dual Earth".
But because even with that nature predicted that FE'ers will realize that they would fall off the edge, nature made the aether to be thin at the edges, to make people instantly teleport on the other side.
But even with that, nature couldn't explain how will the teleportation survive if it's negative to ETR.
And then, FE'ers born.

You see? In e.g. dual flat Earth, SOMEHOW aether made itself to be thin.

Flat Earth Debate / Problem with fakeness of photos
« on: March 31, 2015, 08:22:48 AM »
Why FE'ers think NASA photos (which are 100% more real) are fake and the really and utter fake "photos" of fairies don't? Do they have brains? How they can recognize if there photoshop was used and not recognize a drawing sticked to a picture?

Here's why. You said that by dating C14 supplies "scientists" told that Earth is 3000-4000 years old (directly or indirectly, whatever). You're wrong from the first point - C14 dating is used only for things younger than 50 000 year old, after that results can be crazy, because amount of C14 isotope is really, really low.

Gravity is a force, which I found to be able to get in touch if we talk about communication. I'm still communicating with Earth's gravitational soul, but I'm also trying to contact with Sun's gravitational soul which is helluva stronger, but further. From the beginning to now I learnt from gravity that:
a) gravity exists (JRowe's one of the biggest nonsenses). Of course it was known, but at the beginning I felt it and knew it must be gravity.
b) air does exist,
c) Earth is round.

If you want I will explain how I learnt these things and how can I communicate with Sun's gravitational soul.
Here's a diagram of how in a pretty vaguely way my communication with gravity works.

Flat Earth Debate / ask me about round earth fact
« on: March 29, 2015, 11:26:20 AM »
in an effort to keep all discussion and refinement of the fact in one place, rather than the multiple threads covering the forums, please direct any questions you have about round earth fact to this post.

if you are unfamiliar with the basic model, it's been stated since the civilization of ancient Greeks, you flat-brain sheeps.

if something has already been answered either in this thread, or the original, i will ignore you as i am tired of having to repeat myself if you add nothing new. further, if i have you blocked, i will read your posts for the purposes of this thread, but i will hold you to this rule far more strictly.

ask away.

Flat Earth General / Will you start to save money for Virgin Galactic?
« on: March 29, 2015, 07:06:49 AM »
It will be a final evidence - is the Earth flat or round. I know the Earth is round, but some irrational sceptics will be surprised with the result.
So - will and when you will start to save money for a Virgin Galactic flight? It'll cost like 100k or 200k dollars.

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Fairies
« on: March 28, 2015, 04:30:57 PM »
How can you even believe in them and use photos clearly faked as an evidence for 'em and still think the ultra-realistic NASA photos are faked, when they look 100% more real?

If everybody now believes in dual-flat Earth idea,then why not change the title of this creepy society?

Flat Earth Debate / How could even Earth formed as a disc?
« on: March 21, 2015, 05:12:02 AM »
How could even Earth formed as a disc, when other objects as a part of nature are being formed into nearly-spherical shape? How's that even possible?

The best evidence of round shape of our planet are the photos. The FE'ers are thinking that these photos are faked, because it hurts their stupid idea. Now, if these images are faked, how will you prove they really are? Because most of your so-called evidences are just "it looks so fake". Come on, you can do it better.

Especially if I saw it few minutes ago...

Flat Earth Debate / A collection of scientific evidence for aether
« on: March 18, 2015, 02:07:21 PM »
You're free to post! Share your evidences!

[note: I hope this topic won't be empty as I predict]

Flat Earth Debate / Problems with dual FE belief
« on: March 17, 2015, 02:18:37 PM »
1. If we emitted neutrinos from somewhere in America, it would hit somewhere on Indian Ocean. On double FE it would "fly" towards the South America.
2. Someone is few kilometers from the equator and he clearly sees places on south hemisphere. How could be that even possible, if south hemisphere is on the lower side?

Flat Earth Debate / Absurds of one, big conspiracy
« on: March 09, 2015, 01:26:28 PM »
1. Hundreds of millions of people that are involved in conspiracy - this number is just ludicrous. On 250 000 000 people there would be like 10000 who would have revealed the truth.

2. How the freak conspiration can be hold for normal people during the war? For example - Russia in the Cold War would have told the truth to ridicule the NASA and whole USA.

3. How the freak airlines could be involved into this conspiracy? For example, some comment I've read - "Airlines that say that are taking flights over the Antarctica are actually taking flights over the Grenland. " - so now tell me what. If a plane is starting from an airport that is located on very south of Argentina, still would it fly over the Grenland, even if it's almost 18 000 km ahead?

Flat Earth Debate / Australia is too tight on FE map
« on: March 09, 2015, 09:09:45 AM »
Normal distance between the town of Karumba and the middle of Spencer's Gulf is around 1900 km. Distance on FE map (around 1 : 203 333 333 scale) is around 1490 km. It's wrong.

[how I calculated the scale]
Shortest distance between Africa and South America is +- 3050 km. On this map it's almost 1,5 cm. 3050 km is 305 000 000 cm. 305 000 000 divided by 1,5 is equal to around 203 333 333, so the scale is 1 : 203 333 333.

Like from a south pole to the same point through north pole.

Why do some farmers use a fictional aether as a sh*tty filler for everything they can't explain? Aether is energy, that isn't a matter (matter=energy - E=mc^2, so aether is wrong), aether is also an air thingie, aether is also making sunsets and changing light directions just like fricking BLACK HOLES do, if light is in proper distance... So, what's wrong with you, guys?

Flat Earth Debate / Last thing crushing your stupid theory
« on: March 07, 2015, 04:01:42 PM »
- Get a stratospheric balloon.
- Get a box.
- Get a nice camera.
- Get a really nice string.
- Get a really nice duct tape.
- Get a GPS.
- Make a special camera-on-balloon thingie.
- Heat the balloon up.
- Start recording.
- Let it go.
- After few hours, find the balloon with camera by your GPS.
- Watch the video.

It'll be like this - #ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Toy Robot in Space! - HD balloon flight to 95,000ft

Flat Earth Debate / Questions that might destroy your funny theory
« on: March 07, 2015, 01:31:47 PM »
1. How can Earth be flat if other astronomical objects with a diameter bigger than few hundreds of kilometers are round? And please, don't tell me that Earth is "another kind" of object, because it's not. Earth is based on the same things as for example Mars, Jupiter, WASP-12b and so on.

2. If Earth is flat, how then can you go to north pole starting from north pole through the south pole?

3. How can the seasons and changes in sunbeams trajectory exist if the Earth is flat? Please, Sun isn't 2000 km from Earth, everybody knows that using simplest mathematics.

Like from a south pole to the same point through north pole.

Pages: [1]