Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - drevko

Pages: [1]
I think this one hasn't been scanned & uploaded.

Mine is 5șed, 1866.

Are this images good enough? Or should I scan in color (brown) for more contrast?

I don't have much experience scanning books, color increases the weight of the image a lot.

Just verify for me that I'm not wasting my time and the book isn't already somewhere else on pdf.

In color, it would look like this;

Flat Earth General / Reichenbach
« on: April 29, 2012, 01:06:58 PM »
Has anybody read his works on magnetism, life force and his wide-range experiments, including moon-light?

He doesn't investigate the shape of the Earth but it seems to me he was almost a zetetic and his researches are interesting, and forgotten.

Flat Earth Information Repository / Forum debate (Spanish)
« on: April 28, 2012, 02:35:32 PM »
Not sure it belongs here, a 140 pages long flat earth defense, in a famous Spanish forum.

The link

Sergei Sinyakin "Monk at the edge of the earth"
Сергея Синякина «Монах на краю Земли» (1999)

I'm reading this interesting book, to see what useful facts I can find hidden there.

Based on the 1934 Soviet balloon "Osoaviakhim-1", said to have reached a record height of 22,000 m, then having an accident with all crew dead...
The book plots the balloon proved the flatness of the Earth and the crew and the discovery was repressed and censored.

I will post in the following weeks.

Flat Earth General / Planes are wasted
« on: February 24, 2012, 09:18:47 AM »
Planes are wasted.
Their capabilities are not used.
Even the post office take advantage of planes and sneak* their letters inside.

It would be cheap to hide a camera in the plane and use it to survey the country, take good maps, for agriculture, meteorology, against fire, for military, espionage, lots of reasons...

You have thousands of planes in the air, at 10 km altitude! Moving! You cover all your country or most of it!

Why the need for expensive satellites then? No need for them!

You already have a network! If you don't want to send the data online, then while landing in the airport, it will go to military to the weather stations as "coming from satellites"... to Google Street Maps...

Even GPS! There is no need for satellites! We always have planes on the air, they could act as communications satellites!

I'm not 100% saying there are no satellites, only that they don't need to be that high to take the pictures or connection they give to us.

It's stupid to waste the surveillance, mapping and satellite-like advantages planes offer, for free!

There was a debate on this, I add commercial planes are a big part of it, of sat imagery and sat comms.

*Sneak in good technical, carefully planned way, the phone spy against you without your knowledge way, in leage with the government, officialy such parts would be mislabeled or explained as something else...

Flat Earth Information Repository / Curious geocentric Russian Site
« on: January 22, 2012, 01:54:46 PM »
A site that could be interesting. (in Russian) (With Google Translate)

Geocentric, but with small close moon and sun, with independent light in the moon, and moderately active in the taking of pictures for the many inconsistencies in the official model.

Flat Earth General / Translating and publishing books
« on: November 21, 2011, 03:53:17 PM »
I'm tired and angry. I want to do something.

I imagine translating and uploading as text old flat earth books not available could be a good start.

I may start with William Carpenter Theoretical Astronomy Exposed, scan, re-typing, and translation(Spanish first), maybe later uploaded to or similar easy printing sites.

What do you think?

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Official astronomy in 1818
« on: September 21, 2011, 04:58:27 AM » page 15

The great official astronomy of 1818, centuries after the great Copernicus, after Galileo and the rest of the wise men...

It said the list of Planets was as follows;


But today, Ceres is considered "With a diameter of about 950 km (590 mi), Ceres is by far the largest and most-massive body in the asteroid belt,"

And that is the bigger one! After it we have Vesta "with a diameter of about 530 kilometers"  and then "Juno who has only 3% the mass of Ceres".

So, our wise round-earthers couldn't differentiate between a little asteroid and a massive planet? Why should we trust their calculations or imaginations? Why should we trust the massive dimensions they calculate?

Flat Earth Information Repository / 32GB of Papers
« on: August 01, 2011, 05:47:32 AM »

Not flat earth per se, but goes a few centuries back and may include interesting things.

I found it recently, very interesting, talks about Piri Reis but much much deeper, a true gem, by Spanish Duchess Medina Sidonia, who had access to ancient documents on her and other's archives.

For those who read Spanish

If not, link with Google translate|en

Of course, I too support new chronology, so, take what you can from it, don't focus on the dates, but on the rest.

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Look at that map I found
« on: April 10, 2011, 03:42:22 AM »

From Russia. Their maps seem much interesting than the standard euro-american.

(Found in a blog, )

Are you aware of any work or data that would support that?

Flat Earth General / What about a rotating flat earth?
« on: March 14, 2011, 05:40:15 PM »
I don't think it has been proposed.

Just food for thought : - )

Translated from Russian to English

Being Spaniard I vouch for it (it explains a lot of the weird history I was fed).

Still a lot has to be researched but I think it's an important fact to remember.

Pages: [1]