Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Jingle Jangle

Pages: [1]
1
Here is a flat earth documentary... It pretty much covers areas which comprehensibly validate the earth's flatness..

Jingle and Jangle give it two flat thumbs up...

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">

2
Flat Earth General / The Round Earth Molten Core (We Are Not Melting)
« on: November 24, 2014, 05:42:17 PM »
The temperature of the mantle of the earth comes to about 1200 degrees Celsius...  With this in mind, observe how the sun temperature figures to about 5700 degrees Celsius...  The sun's distance from the earth, approximated to amount to over a 92 million miles, reminds me of how far the sun's radiant heat travels in RE belief...  Even though a vacuum exists in space (according to RE'ers), the heat reaches earth from a vast distance away...

I have seen the composition of the earth's crust, about how it consists of feldspar and quartz as its primary compounds and a few other metals in high concentration...  A lot more heat should actually be reaching the surface... Considering the fact of how Quartz and all metals have sufficient thermal conductivity, the large amount of radiant energy in the planet's core should still be felt...

Just take note of the thin crust of the oceans at 3 to 5 miles and 25 miles for landmasses...  The inner diameter of the earth comes to about 7,918 miles in comparison...  quartz and feldspar do not insulate heat... They conduct...  So, where does the heat exist???

With this in mind, I need to present a quartz crystal window with a giant bonfire in front of it... Please note, you will actually feel the heat...  See the crust in the same way... Know that the temperature of lava exceeds greatly that of a bonfire...  Also, note that the multiple elements that compose the crust possess superior or inferior thermal conductivity properties...

Earth's temperature only exists with an ancient flat earth model...  FE holds feasibility...  RE gets burned severely...

I want to even address planetary formation RE theory...

Take into consideration that objects sink as they solidify in their molten substances of origin...  The opposite reveals itself in water, where ice floats on the top...  This tendency comes from hydrogen bonds forming more apparently and molecules being more widely distributed from molecular polar orientation... 

If the planet coalesced from a molten state and all the crust gradually solidified to form plates, one needed to deny the existence of density changes as compounds go through phases...  The condensed form of molten rock always sinks to the bottom, never floats...  The core, in other words, needed a composition of just solid matter... No volcanoes should be possible...  The crust should be scores thicker...

3
Hey fellow FE'ers... I imagine an experiment involving infrared lasers being an effective form of determining the exact planar nature of the earth... 

1.  I take a pillar lined up with the ground at exactly 90 degrees using a plumb line protractor 5 feet in length...

      - On that very pillar, a infrared or red laser tube is lined up precisely with ideally only .003 degrees of deviation...  (might need a microscope)

2.  After that, I assemble some transparent epoxy mixed with a very small amount of very fine aluminum powder and form it into a 5 in. x 5 in. 5 in. cube using a latex candle mold... 

3.  Traveling a mile or so, I place that cube opposite the laser on a pillar similarly aligned to the earth...  (The beach presents a wonderful idea)....


Why the red laser?  Red light at 650 nm being at such a long wavelength ignores refraction... Observe the red light from the sun which hits your eyes at sunset...  The Cube perfectly shows the laser as a holographic red line... This line gets compared to another thin line on the cube's surface (parallel to the top and bottom edges of the front face (microscope aligned ;) )  With that, one determines the direction of curvation...  The results should be consistent with plumb line experiments at the Tamarack mines...

An even better idea, is to use a type of radio frequency beam...  This cheap alternative involves the use of a substrate which fluoresces in the cube from radio wave excitation.  (no possibility of atmospheric refraction there especially at 3kV and a very low hertz)  ( i need to remember what exact substrate, I saw it somewhere before)..

Glass would give even additional transparency...  What do you think... Be free to perform this experiment yourselves...  Post results... Might take me a while though...  :(


4
In the Tamarack Mines an experiments was performed...  Basically, A plumbline was suspended from two holes hundreds of feet deep and a mile apart...  Fortunately, betwixt both of the bottoms of these holes existed a connecting tunnel which permitted measurement...

  Instead of converging together more at the bottom than the top (what an individual would expect on a round earth), a divergence of about 8 inches was observed...

Gravitational attraction of the side walls was ruled out...

Magnetic field influence proved to not provide the answer as well... (They used brass wire and a 50lb. weight suspended in oil)

Winds as well inside of the tunnels provided no explanation as to the cause (they sealed the entrances)

https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/hollow/tamarack.htm

The guy in this website discusses the aspects of centripetal force as a possible explanation...  However, I possess keen observations on how centrifugal divergences give very small effects on hanging objects: how much more so centripetal force a tiny attraction and pivot to the center...  It would not create such a great change in RET...

He had to note how centrifugal forces, being of a much greater potential, only give tiny readings on even the Foucult pendulum (and that was a very small pendulum... not at all 50 lbs.)  In addition, the centripetal change, if it really existed, would have to produce a uniform result across both plumblines.  A result which still allows one to determine the shape of the earth by taking the average measurement...

This organization even utilized a rectilineator which measured the concave parabolic shape of the planet... I suggest a slight bowl shape to the earth, their measurements support also the hubcap model with its intense curves...

They really got hyped up about this issue and created a cult (which I do not believe in by the way)...

5
Flat Earth Debate / The Earth is Flat the Sun is not that far away...
« on: October 11, 2014, 08:12:59 AM »
The standard figures of the sun I discussed before in the adventures of Mr. Blob...  Here is a recap...

Diameter of the sun = 1,391,684 km
Distance of the sun = 149,600,000 km

What I did is performed some trigonometry... Instead of using regular angular diameters taking the highest and lowest points of the sun, I used horizontal angular diameter...  This technique allows Pythagorean trig... U get the same results with alot less sweat...

 All in all, if u draw a line from where u stand to the middle of the sun and then to utmost left side on paper, u get an angle... A terrifyingly small .27 degrees or .266 degrees should be apparent... A .54 degree full viewing angle from left to right should hold the entire body of the sun... (these figures are derived from the above figures, except to get the radius of the sun divide the diameter by 2)

However this is the picture of the sun's angular diameter calculation shown on Wikipedia...



All in all, the angle presented is much larger in nature than explained by science...  It had to be the size of a grain of popcorn in the sky...  Take a protractor yourself and attest to this truth

These major variations alter all gravitational theory because it offsets orbital calculations involving calculus and mass compositions... It destroys the idea of gravity itself.  When u possess these great inaccuracies in science, everything is debunked... post haste...

You can perform the same operation with the moon...  Both moon and sun possess the same angular diameter calculations from earth...  (only 98% deviance should be expected)...

Moon's diameter= 3474.8 km
Distance to the moon = 384,400 km

The degree measure observed in the picture above is about 10 degrees WHOA...  BOOM Shakalaka...

6


Mr. Blob possesses great curiosity... One day, he wished to observe the sun... Magical caliper in hand, he determined that the sun was forming a 3 degree angle from one end of the sun's diameter to another.

The Green Wonder knew from this information he can double check the sun's size...

Forming two right angle triangles with the triangle mid line allowed him to use trigonometry formulas...

Using trig, one has the power with degree measurements and collective height distance to determine the length of the base.  The base being the radius... 

His initial results received, he double checked the establishment's widely accepted values... They say the diameter of the sun is 864,327 miles, the radius 432,114 miles...



Unfortunately, with the distance of the sun being at 92,960,000 miles away and the radius being 432,114 (diameter 864,327 miles), the collective angle aperture for viewing would only be .54 degrees (.27 degrees for one half angle section)...  Look at the difference between 432,114 miles for science and the observed 2,434,243 miles for the radius from earth...  Too big of an error...

Mr. Blob sits in tears... The sun in the sky should be much smaller than told... Much, much closer...  He reaches his fist into the air, lollipop in hand...  A homemade Ti-2000 gives him strength to analyze...  It would only be a tiny little speck in the sky...

7
I asked this question in flat earth Q and A... However it needed to be repeated just for clarity...  I could not input any other comments..

If I live in the northern hemisphere and the earth did not possess any tilt whatsoever, the appearance of the arc of the sun would form a straight arc in the sky with no northern or southern deviation...  I drew a few pics of a man looking out at 49 degrees to the sun's center (taking the tangent into consideration as well)... the sun only traveling east to west with no northern or southern movement would have to form a straight arc that looks like it rises up perpendicular but smaller and further out than at the equator...


8
If the earth possessed no tilt in respect to its rotation, would the sun's arc trace a path perpendicular to the ground?  There should be no southern or northern deviation in its chord, so I had thought... 

Let us work with the northern hemisphere above the tropic of cancer...

Muchisimas Gracias....

9
Sandokhan, a little while ago, presented the Tunguska explosion.  This explosion received absolutely no visual blockage across hundreds of miles (there should have been over 7000 km of visual interference).  Refraction of such a high magnitude never occurs enough to explain this phenomena. 

The earth is flat. 

The topic titled Day And Night In Flat Earth forced me to construct this new topic.  I will take the argument that refraction does not occur on orders of great magnitude and reveal the splendid light of FE proposals.

10
Flat Earth Debate / North Star Proves the Earth Is Flat and Geocentricity
« on: September 26, 2013, 03:00:24 PM »


If one takes a small tube and points it at Polaris in the northern hemisphere, fixing it to that point, the star remains visible throughout the entire year.  This visibility within a small CPVC tube shows that the earth does not travel in a wide circuit around the sun.  If this was the case, the star would not always be visible to the naked eye through the tube.  If all those stars in time lapse video change position with the supposed rotation of earth, then there should be an even larger deviation in position over the course of one solar orbit.  This fact; however, never receives recognition.

Do not say that the polestar stands in a far away position which is why one can see it always.    Even though the stars stand all far away, the supposed rotation of the earth still creates moving stars in the sky.  If one should see all the stars move during 24 hours, the entire year with a larger orbital circle should do the same thing with the polestar.  It does not occur, so the earth possesses geocentricity and planar characteristics...

Wikipedia even declares that the polestar presents itself at points below the equator.  Refraction is a bogus excuse.  Refraction cannot occur over distances of 1000 miles.


11
This is an old news report: http://beforeitsnews.com/space/2013/01/supergiant-star-to-explode-in-earths-neighborhood-betelgeuse-to-go-supernova-when-it-collides-with-giant-dust-wall-say-astronomers-2453570.html.  However, it does prove the point that we live on a flat earth with stars that are much closer than supposed by NASA.  Since this star is 642.5 light years from earth, it should take 642 years and 6 months to be able to see any activity that is strange at any moment.  And yet, telescopic imaging was a recent development starting about 150 years ago.  There is no way that light can take that long to travel back and forth to give an approximation of the exact moment where something will happen.  One would always be 642 years off...

12
    When a theory is presented to me that deals with RE, I quickly deny its cogency.  The reason why is that there is no science in the scientific method.  The earth was really flat all along, but people want to introduce theories that support round earth globalism.  The Suez Canal, The Nile River, and the Bedford Canal experiment should have had curvature if you want people to believe.  They did not have curvature.  Heretofore, do not believe the epic lies of scientific establishment that add up falsely.  One after another there has been white lie after white lie with nothing to show for it except massive migraine headaches from all the RE data.  FE'ers are truly the only ones there for each other in times of crisis such as these.  Can you not see in our spirits that these experiments that we do are genuine and not petty squabbles...
     RE'ers make up blind discussions and present evidence which they have large volumes of, but they fail to defend against simple canals and rivers.  Why jump off into space into your minds without mastering the ponds and lakes?

13
Flat Earth Q&A / New Experiment Reposted in Correct Bin
« on: May 09, 2013, 06:43:54 AM »
 Hey guys, I am new to this forum, so I would like to start off by saying, "hello."  .  When I first saw that an airplane took the same amount of time moving both east and west between two points, I knew that the earth does not actually rotate 700 mph... Otherwise there would be a slight speed advantage when moving from east to west in comparison to west to east.  I also know that the existence of polonium-218 halos found in granite, which can be googled, prove that the earth had been instantaneously created.  Even dinosaurs according to the understanding of certain ancient apocrypha are explained as creatures of leviathan.
     Well anyway, has anyone ever taken a boat out to sea and gone out at least 80 miles to see the coast with a high power telescope?  With this experiment, we can finally prove that the earth is flat once and for all.   The idea that light actually bends is a horrible lie.  Because, if this were the case, at night time planes in the air would be clearly illuminated by the sun.  This is because the tangent lights rays would have to bend with the gravitational influence.
     Please tell me what you think, attempt to do this experiment, and meet back here. I dont have a boat or anything like that neither can I afford a high power telescope at the moment.  Someone out there must have some form of telescope.

14
     Hey guys, I am new to this forum, so I would like to start off by saying, "hello."  ;D.  When I first saw that an airplane took the same amount of time moving both east and west between two points, I knew that the earth does not actually rotate 700 mph... Otherwise there would be a slight speed advantage when moving from east to west in comparison to west to east.  I also know that the existence of polonium-218 halos found in granite, which can be googled, prove that the earth had been instantaneously created.  Even dinosaurs according to the understanding of certain ancient apocrypha are explained as creatures of leviathan.
     Well anyway, has anyone ever taken a boat out to sea and gone out at least 80 miles to see the coast with a high power telescope?  With this experiment, we can finally prove that the earth is flat once and for all.   The idea that light actually bends is a horrible lie.  Because, if this were the case, at night time planes in the air would be clearly illuminated by the sun.  This is because the tangent lights rays would have to bend with the gravitational influence.
     Please tell me what you think, attempt to do this experiment, and meet back here. I dont have a boat or anything like that neither can I afford a high power telescope at the moment.  Someone out there must have some form of telescope.

Pages: [1]