1
The Lounge / Turkey hit by another 6.4 magnitude earthquake
« on: February 20, 2023, 05:36:41 PM »
Another earthquake has hit southern Turkey.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Water level.
For a globe to work there must always be a water hump. Yes, a water HUMP from your vision at one point to an object over the calm water.
You do not need a laser if you have a frozen lake to use.
You can place 5 equal sized markers along a 201 metre line.
Attach the line exactly on top of the start and end markers.
Rest the line atop the central marker between the start and end markers.
If the Earth (water) is flat and level the string line should also be touching the tops of the other two markers left and right of centre.
If the string line does not touch the left and right of centre markers and those markers are below the line, then the argument for a globe is valid.
All it takes is for 3 honest people who want to find a truth to do this experiment.
One each end to ensure the string line is taut and a person to video that string line resting on centre and to verify whether left and right of centre have a string line touching or not touching.
Something like this.
The fact that the Moon is often crisp and clear while mountains only 10 miles away are foggy and discolored is a piece of evidence that the visible Moon is a projection upon the atmolayer.
So, being fairly new to FET, I'm wondering what's below? In another thread I made a joke that if you dig down far enough you'll hit turtles. But I'm wondering, what does FET say would happen if you could dig far enough down? People have dug and drilled pretty far down, so we know that the Earth is at least a mile or so thick because nobody has ever come out the bottom. But assuming it were possible to dig to an arbitrary depth, or if it were possible to get past the ice wall and over the edge, what would we find?
Is there an under-side to the Earth? And if so, what's it like? Or is there a dimensional distortion so that there is no bottom, but you'd dig forever, or curve around and come out at another point of the surface, as predicted by RET?
What's underneath the Earth?
I hope this thread will not become a debate on the truth or not of FET. I would like to find out what FET says about what's down there.
A material like water. Like the dome side.
The earth has been created stratified layers. the top of one layer is the bottom of the other layer. So that;
Whenever you look at the sky, meanwhile you see the bottom of this earth.
That's not a question about FET, you can read one of the hundreds of topics that already exist on that subject.
Actually it is, sorry. I should have made it more clear why I was asking. I have regular debates with this coworker of mine, and as a new member, I just wanted that one piece of evidence from a die-hard believer that would really deliver the "whammy" I'm looking for. Sorry to bother you, but anyone else can feel free to respond.
One easy one to observe is that when the moon and sun are in the sky together, the light of the moon does not point at the sun. It's called the Moon Terminator "Illusion".
RE'ers spam out perspective effects as an explanation, and link to close range examples where angles change at close range as bodies change distance radically, but they are unable actually show how such perspective changes are possible with Round Earth Geometry, where the earth and sun are far from the observer and equal distances away from the observer at all times.
It is possible to hold a pencil out horizontally and look at it from different angles close up to get the pencil to point upwards and downwards with close range perspective effects; but doing is harder to do so when the horizontal pencil is at a distance far from the observer. Those same motions would not cause the pencil to change. When the pencil is far from the observer it would require an equivalent change of ratio, which the Round Earth System cannot provide. In RET the sun and moon are far from the observer and equal distance from the observer at all times.
We are spammed with hallway examples where, when standing in the middle of a hallway, the angles of the ends of ceiling corners of the hallways are tilted upwards or downwards, but the concept of the sun and moon are "going down a hallway" and changing distance radically from the observer is actually the Flat Earth example, not a Round Earth example. Under RET the sun and moon are far away and maintain the same distance from the observer at all times. They do not change position in relation to the observer radically.
We are spammed with demands to hold a small ball up against the sky with the moon in the background and position yourself in a manner where the ball shows a similar scene to the moon. "Proof!" Yet, this is another dumb close range perspective effect, and is no different than the pencil explanation. It is possible to get a ball that is close to you into many orientations with slight movements, and, like the pencil, not so possible when the object is far away.
At some point astronomers did provided a mathematical equation to predict the changes, but unfortunately the distance to the Sun or Moon do not matter in the equations for the result; and so the predictive model is entirely frivolous as a Round Earth model.
It is a clear win for the Flat Earth model, and one that is easily observable to anyone. Look past the lies and excuses. The evidence is right there in the sky!
On many days, I can see the moon and the sun out at the same time, how does this work on the flat earth?
It only works in flat earth model.
In round model, there is no explanation about in a place in daylight and the other place is 180 degrees in the other side, night side of the earth has moon in the air. This is impossible in the round model.
In the flat earth model, ie, there is many models, but in some models, the earth and sun has different speeds so that sometimes you see the moon in only night and sometimes you see the sun and moon both together. It is possible if they are visible together. I could not explain very well. anyway. perhaps someone else may do it better.
I guess nowadays my energy is going down .
It only works in flat earth model.That's beyond laughable.
In round model, there is no explanation about in a place in daylight and the other place is 180 degrees in the other side, night side of the earth has moon in the air. This is impossible in the round model.
In the flat earth model, ie, there is many models, but in some models, the earth and sun has different speeds so that sometimes you see the moon in only night and sometimes you see the sun and moon both together. It is possible if they are visible together. I could not explain very well. anyway. perhaps someone else may do it better.
I guess nowadays my energy is going down .
It is completely possible and does happen in the RE model. I'm sure it's been explained to you before, and you just ignored it. In the RE model the moon orbits around the earth while the earth orbits the sun. Here is a diagram.
Can you provide a diagram of how the moon works with the sun on the flat earth.