5
« on: September 09, 2016, 12:45:28 PM »
Our universe is so big that one has to wonder about all that has been claimed about the universe.
For starters we go back to the globe we all knew in our childhood.
This globe was, let's say.....30 cm in diameter.
A rocket in this scale is invisable small and so is the Hubble telescope.
When we use this globe as a starting point the sun is a big ball with a 35m diameter. A height of a 10 storey building.
The distance between those two models is 3,74 km.
Pluto is only 6cm in diameter and a whopping 110-185 km away depending where it is in it's orbit around the sun.
The sun's gravity is however keeping it in place.
Alpha Centauri is the nearest star at 1.000.000 km !!! away from our 30cm globe model.
The diameter of the scale Milkyway is 25.000.000.000 km (still considering our 30cm earth as reference)
Andromeda is 600.000.000.000 km away (still considering our 30cm earth as reference)
And the furthest known galaxy is 3.000.000.000.000 km away (still considering our 30cm earth as reference)
Since rockets aren't even visible in this scale model it is safe to assume that mass will not get us anywhere at all.
Even the speed of light is extremely slow to go anywhere and i urge people to write down the billions of lightyears in miles/km, because it are absurd distances.
What can we really tell about our universe when we are trapped because we are to little by an extremely big margin ?.
Even on a scaled down universe the distances remain absurd as i have pointed out above.
What is so brilliant about all those conclusions scietists get so excited about ?
When light doesn't travel in absolute straight lines for trillion-quadrillions of km's, but to some unknown reason bends a tiny bit of a degree each lightyear, we can tell nothing about the direction of the things we observe. Wat is perceived in a certain direction could be in any place at all (not talking about time delay, but the path of light rays).
Yet when we look at the stars, nothing seems so outlandish far away.....and those mockin such infantile reasoning, forget that they themselves can never proof anything behind our solar system. which is so extremely small compared to the other distances (again see above in the scale model), that claiming certain absolutes is nothing more than wild guesses, because we will probably never find out.
From the time that the flatearth debate is growing the counter arguements include more light bending , refraction and all sort of great manouvres than ever to make the globe curvature math fit the equation.
But light from far away gallaxies, trillions and trillions times the distances travels in straight lines so we can make conclusions about the origans of our universe ?