1

Flat Earth General / Ski, I am curious as to your model of the earth

« on: June 04, 2018, 03:25:35 PM »

You mentioned in a thread that something loaned itself to your model.  I am curious as to what that model is.
I promise to try to not argue with you about in this thread, but I will ask questions if I need any clarification.
I have had some decent discussions with a few others about their particular models and would like to hear yours, if you are so inclined.

2

Flat Earth General / Shifter, I am curious about some things.

« on: March 06, 2018, 03:05:08 PM »

I didn't want to derail the other thread so I thought I would start a new one.

There is this thing called 'The Great Attractor' in the Laniakea Supercluster that is using 'gravity', (known as incredibly weak force) but is pulling many galaxies from as much as 2,365,182,618,145,200,000,000km away if not more. Keep in mind our galaxy weighs in at about 700ish billion solar masses with one solar mass weighing ~2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg. So times that by 700 billion and that's just our galaxy which is not that big comparatively speaking

And they tell us gravity is weak. HA!

There is something else at play here and gravity is not what anyone suspects.

What do you think is at play here, and why do you think that?

There is a fabric that connects everything to everything literally spanning the whole universe. It operates on an inter dimensional level. The 'virtual particles' you see appearing and disappearing out of 'existence' is evidence of another dimension. In reality they haven't spontaneously been created and then spontaneously annihilated. In the same way a '2D flat lander' would see 3D objects appearing and disappearing in his world, the same is true in our world for things more than 3D.

What you call dark matter and dark energy is connected to all this.

Gravity in the way you describe it could be considered weak but your missing most of substance that belongs to it.

There is no other force in the universe that could rip a hole in space, distort time, create black holes or even the universe itself.

Yes a star quake releases a gamma ray burst, but its the quake itself

You can detect gravitational waves from the furthest reaches of the universe

Your mass still has an attraction to objects on the furthest reaches of the universe. Even if negligible, the number is not zero.

You should give gravity more credit. The universe operates as a whole. The way you guys have decided what gravity is, is like taking a skin flake of a human and determining what it could be. There is more to the story

You are not a god, and you are not super intelligence, so you are neither of those.
You are a fool with delusions of grandeur, nothing more.
You have been unable to substantiate many of your claims and seem to just want to spout crap to look smart, even when you are repeatedly wrong.
Grow up.
Deal with the OP or get lost.

The ASI which is orders of magnitude in the millions more evolved than you disagrees with you. I think I'll take the word of it over you. Thanks for your insight though, it is 'amusing'

I'm no physicist, like, at all, but your description of gravity seems consistent with what I understand some of its qualities to be so I'm not sure how you think it is different.
The idea that there is some other thing connecting the universe or there are other dimensions doesn't seem connected or related to it.
And lastly, what is the ASI you mentioned?
I'm seriously curious.

3

The Lounge / Does narcberry really think he's a mod?

« on: December 26, 2017, 02:54:24 PM »

If he does than he is a figure to be pitied as he is a poor delusional sod.
He he doesn't than he is just another idiot troll.
Just curious as to what the thinking is here. 

4

The Lounge / Any bets on how long it takes Legba to get banned?

« on: October 10, 2017, 05:32:50 PM »

What are the going odds here?

5

The Lounge / SCG, how are you fairing?

« on: September 11, 2017, 07:51:40 PM »

Hey mama, just wanted to check in on you and see how you are doing?  What's your situation?  Do you need anything?  The board booted me when I tried to post this so if it ends up coming up twice, ignore one of them.

6

Flat Earth Debate / Flat Earth and the Eclipse

« on: August 08, 2017, 11:13:51 AM »

There are several threads going about the solar eclipse.  Several flat earthers are saying this proves globe is wrong.  They throw out a lot of reasons which then get debunked.
But after asking repeatedly I have yet to see any give an explaination for it on a flat earth.  Perhaps I have missed it but people like Dutchy, Resistance and IFE keep saying a globe doesn't explain it yet refuse to give an alternative.
So guys, how do YOU explain this eclipse on a flat earth?

7

Flat Earth General / Are rainbow possible on a flat earth

« on: July 26, 2017, 12:43:54 PM »

Would sunlight ever be at the proper angle to give us rainbows on a flat earth?

8

Flat Earth Debate / NASA lies

« on: February 11, 2017, 10:57:35 AM »

I was on another thread and several people said that NASA is known for its lies.  That in fact there are several provable lies.
What provable lies do you know of?  Actually provable though.

9

Flat Earth Debate / A challenge to Heiwa. Post your evidence here that we never went to the moon!

« on: January 19, 2017, 07:40:55 PM »

Now, I am an honest man so I won't offer money that I don't have, unlike some people.  But I do challenge you to post evidence on this forum that we, meaning humanity as a whole, never made it to the moon.  Now, the rules of this challenge include you NOT making reference to your website. 
No you have to post the evidence that manned space flight is impossible right here.  Show us your evidence.  Oh, and by the way, you saying it is impossible is not evidence.
As a secondary challenge, post your actual evidence that nuclear weapons are impossible here as well.
Now we all know you have your own website, and your own fake challenge, but, frankly, nobody cares. 
This challenge is FUN and you should easily be able to copy and paste the appropriate parts from your website here to prove your case.
Or, as is most likely the case you can show yourself to be a fraud and a liar.  You can do this by making any reference at all to your website and fake challenge,
This is easy stuff.  You have all the evidence, just post it here.
Now some people may wonder why I make such a big deal of this.  Well the answer is two fold, one, I have some free time on my hands and I like poking idiots with a stick.  The other is, God forbid, some naive person may read your nonsense and think that it is true.  And, well that would just be bad for everyone.
So, Heiwa, the self proclaimed expert on all these things, just show us your evidence.  Or admit you are a fraud.  The choice is yours.  Your honor is at stack Sir.  Put up or shut up!

10

Flat Earth General / Can someone explain Scepti's concept of stacking to me?

« on: January 15, 2017, 03:29:41 PM »

I have asked several times but have yet to see an explaination.  He has thrown around a couple of examples, but as far as I can tell they require a force, such as gravity, to make them work.
I'm not saying you need agree with it, but if you grasp what he is talking about with stacking aspect of denpressure please clue me in.
I have seen other theories on here about flat earth, etc, that I don't agree with but at least I get what they are trying to say.  I have no idea what he is talking about though and whenever I ask he either asks me to explain gravity or puts me on ignore.
Thank you in advance.

11

Flat Earth Q&A / Ok since no one can explain the nature of the sun how about sun rises and sets?

« on: June 30, 2016, 07:00:29 AM »

I live near a mountain.  At sunset every day you can see the shadow crawl UP the face of the mountain.  At sunrise the light starts at the top, on the other side, and moves down.  If the sun were like a spotlight the light, coming or going, would strike the bottom first.

This is something you can test with your own eyes and it only works if the sun is, in fact, dropping below the horizon of a round earth.  So how do you explain this?

12

Flat Earth Q&A / Can someone explain the physical nature of the sun under this theory?

« on: June 26, 2016, 04:59:26 PM »

I keep reading it shines like a spotlight, which is why, as it move in a circle over the earth, some areas are dark and some are light.

So what is the physical make up of such a sun?  Is it a sphere?  If so, how does it act light a spotlight and why can't we see it all the time?  Is it a disk?  If so, then why doesn't it look like an oval shape since we are often seeing it from an angle?  How does it continue to look perfectly round even as it sets?  How does it set below the horizon?