1
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Teens capture images of space with ?56 camera and balloon
« on: September 17, 2009, 11:52:48 AM »Lots of pictures?
Pictures prove nothing.
Exhibit A:
I see a spaceship in front of a round earth? so?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Lots of pictures?
Pictures prove nothing.
Exhibit A:
I would direct you REers out there to that main principle of this site - the Earth is flat, and if you feel differently then it's up to you to prove it. We know the Earth is flat and have seen enough evidence to back up that claim - what do you have that can possibly prove that the Earth is not flat?
I've got a picture:
Does that make me automatically right too?
no because you depict an existing earth therefore you must have existing proof that it actually exists. My depiction of a 'No Earth' is obviously correct because it's lack of existing proof proves that it does not exist proving that I am right.
Define antiphysics and how it applies to what I said. I think you only say that because you didn't learn about such things in physics 200.I go to Metro. I do not believe you went to Mines.
I no longer go to Mines, it's true.
The UA in itself goes against physics. A universal accelerator that is able to be stopped by an inch of a substance or the bottom of the Earth yet it is universal? Where does the infinite energy come from to accelerate things? Energy inst created or destroyed.
Yep. The location of the poll on this website guarantees biased numbers.
As does the number of people who actually give a shit about voting on stupid topics such as this one.
By the way, the government isn't in on the conspiracy, the conspiracy is in on the governments.
|
[code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code][code]... how come it isnt??
[/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code][/code]
This thread gives me the urgent desire to run out and shoot something.
O GOODY!! DO it towards your own head.
I said "run out and shoot something."
This thread gives me the urgent desire to run out and shoot something.
It sure looks like a series of divisions. It is not obviously a fraction. Math is precise.
Come on Tom, either prove the shadow object or explain my original post.
because you have term1/term2/c^2a fraction over a fraction so we can view it as term1/1 * c^2/term2. for an example of this 1/2/1/4=2
Quoteyes, seems that the old theories are getting a makeover
The Ice Wall has always been made of rock with ice on top.
are you suggesting that the ice, keyword "ice", wall can stop a tectonic plate, seriously Engineer
SHELL UP