I just skipped over here from page six. I don't really feel like reading page seven and page eight, I'm just curious why you guys are still arguing with this guy. He's already stated that the Easter Bunny's existence is a coin toss, as well as the existence of a supernatural deity. He has not really provided evidence to support such a position, except to make the claim that he's being more rational than we are. Let's look at it this way:
1) A conscious, intelligent, complex, supernatural being exists foundationally, always has existed and always will exist. This being created the universe.
2) Energy has always existed.
We have outside, objective evidence that energy exists, but not evidence that this supernatural being exists. Thus, it's automatically more probable to believe number two. Yet this guy keeps saying (unless he changed his position in the last couple of pages) that there is a 50-50 chance of either one being the correct model. Why? Because he apparently doesn't think about it enough. Okay guys, let him think about it, quit giving him the pleasure of typing posts that simply call you all "assholes" and the like (as he has been doing). Finally, check out this awesome video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5464505634137914176&q=God&hl=enBTW in regards to this video, I don't know what this lady is so upset about because there's a 50-50 percent chance that her religion is right and there is a 50-50 percent chance that astrology, tarot, psychics, etc. are true sources of wisdom