1
Flat Earth Q&A / GUESS WHAT?
« on: January 29, 2007, 03:21:36 PM »
Fickt euch ins Knie! :lol: :lol: :lol:
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: "silvermoon":?:
Engineer, youīre a blame for the entire branch you carry their name :lol:
Quote from: "TheEarthIsRound89"1) Seen from space, the earth is a spherical object.
2) You can go on a plane from one location, keep moving forward and end up at the same location. This is because the earth is round.
3) When you're on the plane, you can see that the earth is round.
4) We don't fall off the Earth because gravity pulls us to the centre of the Earth. Objects are attracted to other objects with a mass that is much greater than theirs. This is why dog hair sticks to EVERYTHING!
5) Prove that the Earth is flat. Go on.
1. Is it? Have you been there?
2. No you won't. You will end up in space.
3. Nope, you can't.
4. I say it's due to acceleration.
5. Read Earth: Not a Globe.
Quote from: "Rick_James"You really believe this is limited to the US? I think your anti-US prejudices are overpowering the point you're trying to make.
Nono, it's true. I was in America recently. They're all three hundred pounds. They walk around all day staring up into the sky, waiting for UFOs to come and tell them that the Earth is flat and 6000 years old -- if the aliens say anything else, the Americans will shoot them with those guns they're always carrying around.
They're all like that. No exceptions. Just like all Australians are criminals!
Ugh. I'd just gotten finished talking about you people.
Here we go. Time for you to read. If you want proof, have it:
http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm
It's not the best site, but it's a start. It's got good arguements, and a basis for the major problems of the Round-Earth theory.
Now please.
Just.. don't.
- Derek
Conspiracies and Coverups
<This page is currently under construction. Please come back when we have our act together.>
REers, post here links to threads that FEers have been unable to answer coherently. I DO NOT MEAN THAT ARE STILL IN DEBATE, i mean threads that prove fatal flaws in the FE theory, I.E.,
Quote from: "silvermoon"...Dont tell me about highschools in US, I have relatives there, and I saw what they are learning in highschool...Only highschools where you have to pay are teaching like in Europe..
So where do these relatives live? Because it matters where they are going to school.
Is English your first language?
Quote from: "silvermoon"Oh, I think you should dont talk about Einstein. He was sure the earth is round, no doubts. You need new physics to explain the FE-model..
Gravity cant still be explained, but one day it will be, for sure!
You can accelerate infinitely without reaching the light velocity ever?!? :shock: How is this possible?? Can you explain this acceleration? I suppose no, your explanations are like "It must be so, otherwise our FE-model doesnt work"..
Simple: we're all in the same reference frame, so, to us, there is no diference in acceleration, but someone in a different frame of reference would see something very different.
Quote from: "silvermoon"
You can accelerate infinitely without reaching the light velocity ever?!? :shock: How is this possible??
1. Circular motion.
2. Relativity prevents it.
Quote from: "silvermoon"Oh, I think you should dont talk about Einstein. He was sure the earth is round, no doubts. You need new physics to explain the FE-model..
Gravity cant still be explained, but one day it will be, for sure!
You can accelerate infinitely without reaching the light velocity ever?!? :shock: How is this possible?? Can you explain this acceleration? I suppose no, your explanations are like "It must be so, otherwise our FE-model doesnt work"..
it is possible to keep approachin a point without ever reaching it.
for example: take one meter, then split it in half, and again, and again and again..... you can keep going forever. there's allways something left to split in half
Quote from: "silvermoon"Oh, I think you should dont talk about Einstein.
I think you should don't talk about English.QuoteHe was sure the earth is round, no doubts.
Really, was he a friend of yours?QuoteYou need new physics to explain the FE-model..
Because Einstein believed the Earth was round, we can't use his theories? We don't need new theories, especially if the old ones can be applied to a Flat Earth.QuoteGravity cant still be explained, but one day it will be, for sure!
Unless of course it doesn't exist. Which it doesn't.
Quote from: "silvermoon"
In our physics
Dont mix it! You need new physics to get credibility with your FE-model!!
No we don't.QuoteHuh, I repeat and repeat! I think I will make my own FAQ on this site.. :lol:
Try not to have too much fun.