1
Flat Earth General / Re: World is flat
« on: November 27, 2011, 04:07:09 PM »
What does the "Conspiracy" have to gain?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
2
Flat Earth General / Re: Neutral and Objective Evidence Supporting Flat Earth
« on: November 26, 2011, 11:56:55 AM »
there's also humans in star wars, does that mean humans are fake too
4
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Okay, so, I'm probably just getting trolled. Right?
« on: November 26, 2011, 06:47:51 AM »Newton's Law of Gravity, Relativity, The Standard ModelHolding unorthodox beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, and throwing out centuries of repeatable experimental and observational evidence in order to do so, very much equates to stupidity.So global warming believers and religious people are stupid? Well, that makes it a bit easier, since now we can dismiss the majority of the world as possible authorities on anything.
If there is overwhelming evidence against global warming, then to believe it is stupid.
If there is overwhelming evidence against a religion's teachings, then to believe it is stupid.
If there is overwhelming evidence against anything, then to believe it is stupid.
If you disagree, give an example of something there is overwhelming evidence for that is provably false. It can't be done, because the existence of overwhelming evidence is only possible if something is not false.
Oh, I get it! You're making a joke by saying things that are true!
5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spooky stuff
« on: November 25, 2011, 07:39:42 PM »
I don't really know or care what you just said
6
Flat Earth General / Re: Neutral and Objective Evidence Supporting Flat Earth
« on: November 25, 2011, 04:54:08 PM »No, they won't. They'll write off all of those. "Oh, you got it from that website? That's cute, a typical RE'er would think that's a reliable source." "Well of course that organization would want you to believe in a Round Earth. Of course they'd post a doctored image like that."
They're so adamant to cling to their non-conformity and feel smarter than the mass of sheep around them that when they see evidence like that they'll just write it off as being a part of this massive Conspiracy. Never mind the lack of proof or reasoning as to why and how every single one of those organizations would and could be a part of the Conspiracy; they threaten the non-conformist beliefs of the FE'ers, so clearly they're just lying. The sad thing is that they probably aren't even just using "Lol those are from the Conspiracy you sheep" as a cop-out. They legitimately are so desperate to stick with their belief that they've convinced themselves that all contradictory evidence must be part of a Conspiracy against them. Doing this allows them to write off literally any proof you ever present them with because if it gets to be too tangible of evidence against them, they just assume "Well, part of the Conspiracy. Nyah nyah nyah, now your evidence is refuted. We win." It's actually pretty sad.
Sometimes the reason why everybody believes in an accepted theory is because it's just right. Everybody likes to feel like they know or have access to some great undiscovered truth, like they know more about one given topic than the common man, like they're smarter and therefore more superior. That's why conspiracy theories exist. Because people like to think that they're smarter than the masses, even though sometimes the masses are just plain right.
We don't think we're better than RE'ers. We just think the evidence points towards a flat earth. Also, no personal attacks in the upper fora.*
*not a mod
That doesn't negate the validity of what I'm saying. Your entire argument is based on the fact that any evidence contrary to what you believe is part of a mass conspiracy. Deciding that anything that goes against your viewpoint is false because of a conspiracy, the only proof of which is "We say so because it makes us right", is the opposite of logic.
7
Flat Earth General / Re: Conspiracy?
« on: November 25, 2011, 04:52:30 PM »
Except for the part where there's not.
Just because there's proof that you're wrong, that doesn't mean it's fake crap being made up by a conspiracy.
Sometimes it just means you're wrong.
Just because there's proof that you're wrong, that doesn't mean it's fake crap being made up by a conspiracy.
Sometimes it just means you're wrong.
8
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Okay, so, I'm probably just getting trolled. Right?
« on: November 25, 2011, 04:51:26 PM »
Touche.
9
Flat Earth General / Re: Neutral and Objective Evidence Supporting Flat Earth
« on: November 25, 2011, 01:36:00 PM »
No, they won't. They'll write off all of those. "Oh, you got it from that website? That's cute, a typical RE'er would think that's a reliable source." "Well of course that organization would want you to believe in a Round Earth. Of course they'd post a doctored image like that."
They're so adamant to cling to their non-conformity and feel smarter than the mass of sheep around them that when they see evidence like that they'll just write it off as being a part of this massive Conspiracy. Never mind the lack of proof or reasoning as to why and how every single one of those organizations would and could be a part of the Conspiracy; they threaten the non-conformist beliefs of the FE'ers, so clearly they're just lying. The sad thing is that they probably aren't even just using "Lol those are from the Conspiracy you sheep" as a cop-out. They legitimately are so desperate to stick with their belief that they've convinced themselves that all contradictory evidence must be part of a Conspiracy against them. Doing this allows them to write off literally any proof you ever present them with because if it gets to be too tangible of evidence against them, they just assume "Well, part of the Conspiracy. Nyah nyah nyah, now your evidence is refuted. We win." It's actually pretty sad.
Sometimes the reason why everybody believes in an accepted theory is because it's just right. Everybody likes to feel like they know or have access to some great undiscovered truth, like they know more about one given topic than the common man, like they're smarter and therefore more superior. That's why conspiracy theories exist. Because people like to think that they're smarter than the masses, even though sometimes the masses are just plain right.
They're so adamant to cling to their non-conformity and feel smarter than the mass of sheep around them that when they see evidence like that they'll just write it off as being a part of this massive Conspiracy. Never mind the lack of proof or reasoning as to why and how every single one of those organizations would and could be a part of the Conspiracy; they threaten the non-conformist beliefs of the FE'ers, so clearly they're just lying. The sad thing is that they probably aren't even just using "Lol those are from the Conspiracy you sheep" as a cop-out. They legitimately are so desperate to stick with their belief that they've convinced themselves that all contradictory evidence must be part of a Conspiracy against them. Doing this allows them to write off literally any proof you ever present them with because if it gets to be too tangible of evidence against them, they just assume "Well, part of the Conspiracy. Nyah nyah nyah, now your evidence is refuted. We win." It's actually pretty sad.
Sometimes the reason why everybody believes in an accepted theory is because it's just right. Everybody likes to feel like they know or have access to some great undiscovered truth, like they know more about one given topic than the common man, like they're smarter and therefore more superior. That's why conspiracy theories exist. Because people like to think that they're smarter than the masses, even though sometimes the masses are just plain right.
10
Flat Earth General / Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« on: November 25, 2011, 01:28:59 PM »They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.
You have a very unique username. There are none like it. You are special.
This might surprise you seeing as how you're the kind of person who goes with a stupid, outdated theory about the shape of the earth because you think it makes you cooler than the "sheep" who aren't stupid enough to go against accepted fact for the sake of non-conformity, but some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!Shocking, isn't it?
My point is that, although you doubtless consider your username to be a clever jab at us, it is literally the most generic one could possibly have chosen, with the possible exception of tombishopsucks. I even consider it to be more generic then llortamai
That's a silly assumption on your part.
Is tombishopsucks taken? Because that's a good one.
Probably. And it most likely has an avatar that is like Tom's old one, but they messed with it in MS Paint. And 51 posts.
Hmm. Nope. Looks like there's Tom Bishop's Daddy, Tom Bishop Is Gay, Tom Bishop Is A Failure, tom bishop is stupid, Torn Bishop, and - my personal favorite - Tim Bishop, but no Tom Bishop Sucks. I'm sure someone will get around to it, though.
Or "Tom Rook". Because of the chess piece. That'd be a clever one.
11
Flat Earth General / Re: Conspiracy?
« on: November 25, 2011, 01:09:35 PM »
If your post contains the word "retard", then your argument is invalid.
12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Could FE Math Prove an RE World?
« on: November 25, 2011, 01:08:15 PM »It may sound acceptable if you do not look too carefully, but as soon as you dig even a millimeter deep you start to need some curvature to make things work.
Unless you're towards the outer edge of the world, because then millimeters become distorted if I recall correctly. Perhaps then one would need to dig a decimeter deep?
13
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spooky stuff
« on: November 25, 2011, 01:05:38 PM »
I don't know or care what side snipez is on because I didn't bother to read it, because if your post contains the word "retard", then your argument is invalid.
14
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Celestial gravity
« on: November 25, 2011, 01:03:42 PM »
This is assuming, of course, that celestial bodies exist.
15
Flat Earth General / Re: Neutral and Objective Evidence Supporting Flat Earth
« on: November 25, 2011, 12:59:24 PM »
They take things that prove Earth is a sphere like NASA images and satellites and just counter it with "Nah that's all fake. It's a conspiracy." You could argue literally anything if you decide to dismiss any evidence that goes against your belief as fake and part of a conspiracy.
16
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Okay, so, I'm probably just getting trolled. Right?
« on: November 25, 2011, 12:55:15 PM »
How is it a claim as opposed to evidence?
17
Flat Earth General / Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« on: November 25, 2011, 12:54:40 PM »They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.
You have a very unique username. There are none like it. You are special.
This might surprise you seeing as how you're the kind of person who goes with a stupid, outdated theory about the shape of the earth because you think it makes you cooler than the "sheep" who aren't stupid enough to go against accepted fact for the sake of non-conformity, but some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!
My point is that, although you doubtless consider your username to be a clever jab at us, it is literally the most generic one could possibly have chosen, with the possible exception of tombishopsucks. I even consider it to be more generic then llortamai
That's a silly assumption on your part.
Is tombishopsucks taken? Because that's a good one.
18
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Okay, so, I'm probably just getting trolled. Right?
« on: November 24, 2011, 05:03:15 PM »A flat surface can neither heat nor cool. Therefore, global lukewarming is occuring.
Explain
Prove me wrong.
You haven't provided any evidence to disprove.
"A flat surface can neither heat nor cool."
That is my evidence.
My claim is that global lukewarming is occuring.
19
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Okay, so, I'm probably just getting trolled. Right?
« on: November 24, 2011, 07:50:48 AM »A flat surface can neither heat nor cool. Therefore, global lukewarming is occuring.
Explain
Prove me wrong.
20
Flat Earth General / Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« on: November 24, 2011, 07:47:35 AM »They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.
You have a very unique username. There are none like it. You are special.
This might surprise you seeing as how you're the kind of person who goes with a stupid, outdated theory about the shape of the earth because you think it makes you cooler than the "sheep" who aren't stupid enough to go against accepted fact for the sake of non-conformity, but some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!
Shocking, isn't it?
21
Flat Earth General / Re: Direct viewing of Earth's curvature: an easily repeated observation
« on: November 23, 2011, 03:58:46 PM »
The ocean is part of the Conspiracy and has trapdoors in it into which the ship was slowly sinking.
22
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Okay, so, I'm probably just getting trolled. Right?
« on: November 23, 2011, 03:47:14 PM »
A flat surface can neither heat nor cool. Therefore, global lukewarming is occuring.
23
Flat Earth General / Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« on: November 23, 2011, 03:44:25 PM »
They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.
24
Flat Earth General / Re: There are no real believers.
« on: November 23, 2011, 03:37:13 PM »
We all know the Earth is obviously flat, but what about Pizza Planet? That's where the real debate lies. I believe it's anchovy-shaped but I've seen theories that it's pepperoni-shaped, which intrigues me.
25
Flat Earth General / Re: Gosh the Conspiracy has a lot to do!
« on: October 23, 2011, 03:07:01 PM »
Do you just love it platonically, or is it a C/W/B (citizens with benefits) deal going on? Florida looks like it hasn't had a handy in ages.
26
Flat Earth General / Re: How do you stay under the radar?
« on: October 23, 2011, 02:45:59 PM »I can use it more than that, but its the internet so who cares? Its where we get terms like "U" for You, or R for "are" and Y for "why"............like I said as long as you know what the person is saying who cares how you type it out...4th time today nicePlease read this. You do it again and again in every thread.No they can't because this site is built on belief and you can't bomb belief.Your right they cant take your belief.. But you can take down a website, especially if your NASA and its a national threat.
http://www.youryoure.com/
like I said who gives a damn. its the internet. im not here to write a paper.
You only use correct spelling and grammar when writing papers?
Yeah but it makes you look like a dumbass
27
Flat Earth General / Re: Gosh the Conspiracy has a lot to do!
« on: October 23, 2011, 02:42:31 PM »
i like the giant waving american flag in your avatar
28
Flat Earth General / Re: Gosh the Conspiracy has a lot to do!
« on: October 23, 2011, 12:52:02 PM »
There's also the fact that it's, you know, a map proposing the idea that the Earth is flat.
Does it just not occur to you at any point that you are believing that the world is flat and that there is a worldwide conspiracy to hide this fact? Does it just not hit you that that is the point you are legitimately trying to defend?
Does it just not occur to you at any point that you are believing that the world is flat and that there is a worldwide conspiracy to hide this fact? Does it just not hit you that that is the point you are legitimately trying to defend?
29
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: If you sent a science letter back in time to 100 A.D.
« on: October 23, 2011, 12:50:18 PM »
In that case, I'd go with Q.
30
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: So, where's Antarctica Again?
« on: October 23, 2011, 12:48:39 PM »
I dunno man. The Conspiracy has some sick CGI effects. It's not that hard to fake a vast, snowy wasteland.
Pages: [1] 2