Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Computer generated images are hardly any proof that man went to the moon to be fair, are they?
It's basically going back to the accepting what they tell you to believe based on their calculations.
I can say with 100% certainty, at least for my own personal satisfaction, that no man, or man made object has ever been anywhere near the moon, never mind on it.
I was of the belief that the Earth is round, a ball.
When I was at school and many years after I left school, I was of the belief that the Earth spun on it's axis too and later in life, I was swayed , more to the Earth being round but stationary.
I basically went on the explanations as to why this was the case.
For instance:
I was told, plus watching documentaries and books that the Earth spun on it's axis and whizzed around the massive centralised sun and the explanation made a lot of sense for years, so I went along with it and never really tried to question it.
Later on, as I was reading books, I came across various theories by people, labelled as crackpots, today, yet who were very well educated people , excelling in their relative fields and ,I don't mean astro physicists, I mean people who have invented many things that we take for granted today.
I decided to look into their claims that the Earth was a sort of sphere and that it was stationary, with everything going round us.
I absorbed it all and using basic logic, I concluded that, this could actually be a far more relevant explanation, as it takes away the fact that we do not sense any 1000mph rotating Earth and our bodies are extremely susceptible to motion and balance and yet our bodies do not pick up the fact that we are supposed to be rotating at that speed, or any speed and yet , looking up at the sky, it became logical to accept that it was objects moving in the sky instead.
Naturally, there's explanations that cater for a rotating Earth, as in inertia but when you really think logical about it, it makes no sense and definitely threw me into the stationary Earth thoughts.
Now, I'll be the first to admit, that I, simply try to work out what appears to fit better, using simple logic, yet rely on what is being told by whoever seems to explain it best.
Until I found this forum, I was stuck fast to the stationary Earth and I scoffed at the flat Earth theory for no more reason than, I used simple logic to say that if it was flat, we would fall off the end and what was underneath a flat Earth.
I still don't accept the Earth being flat as such, yet I do think there is a better explanation that could actually incorporate something like a flat type of Earth into the equation as we see it.
I'm really confused about it all, yet the one thing I'm absolutely 100% in my own mind sure about, is, this Earth does not spin on it's so called axis.
The round stationary Earth also presents it's problems with me the same as the rotating Earth as in, us , sticking to the planet, which in both cases renders them extremely unlikely with what we are told is gravity, yet it cannot be explained in any real sense.
A sort of flat or disc type Earth would make much more sense and this ice wall sort of makes some sense as well.
I'm going to have to spend some time really scrutinising this as not everything is fully explained for a flat Earth yet neither is it for both round versions, without plenty of shoehorned equations put into the mix to cater for discrepancies that have arisen over time, like Einsteins relativity and the calculations of the extremely slow 10mph moon rotation as well as it rotation to fit into everything we are told to believe.
I have a problem with why Australia is called down under on this round rotating so called Earth, I mean, why are they down under and not those on top..
What is up and what is under?
What do you guys find so unsatisfactory about the RET. What makes you feel NASA is taking part in a conspiracy?
I'm going there for Christmas! What should I do?
What's the apps name? Is it free?
Good find Mizvki. I was trying to explain exactly that to someone only yesterday but didn't have such a good source.
A very interesting read.
Thork
If a key or two went bad though, I'd have no problem buying a cheap USB keyboard to plug into it.
If a key or two went bad, why would you not just change the keyboard on the laptop? With many laptops, it is not difficult to change the keyboard.
My brother offered to do just that. But it is just one of those things that i probably won"t get around to doing.
Mizuki x
Does this mean you are going to decline my offer?
If a key or two went bad though, I'd have no problem buying a cheap USB keyboard to plug into it.
If a key or two went bad, why would you not just change the keyboard on the laptop? With many laptops, it is not difficult to change the keyboard.
im willing to pledge a fair portion of the costs for a new keyboard or the whole postage (whatever is greater) to buy Mizuki a new keyboard.
they do not cost much and its for the good of the FES. anyone else in? i can buy off ebay and send direct too.
just need;
Mizuki's permission to give me their address for postage
other sponsors.
this is a legit request and i will provide proof of purchase as well. lets do something nice for somebody
or if its something like this;
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/New-Slim-USB-Wired-Multimedia-Spillproof-Keyboard-Office-Home-Black-/230891323665?pt=UK_Computing_ComputerComponents_KeyboardsMice&hash=item35c2320111
just give me your postage Mizuki and ill buy you it for christmas. itswomanspillage friendly too so it wont break so easily! but if people want to chip in then a better quality one can be bought.
if you want to do this then message me a pm for my paypal to add funds. im not sure if this is against forum rules or not but it is most definitely not a scam! and full proof will be shown.
).
Its likely been reported because they aren't part of the club. They launched that satellite against all advice. The 'space nations' clubbed together. They didn't want this rogue state to be able to confirm what we at this site know about earth's shape. That satellite has likely been designed to orbit a round earth. And surprise, its not doing it. North Korea are forcing a seat at the conspiracy table so they can get some of the riches that come with it.
There will be all kinds of threats and bargaining going on behind the scenes.
Good find Mizvki.
Assuming the world were flat, in what way would knowing that have made navigation more straightforward for the Vikings?
Would they not still need a way to know what direction they were traveling and approximately where they were? What would make this easier on a flat earth? If you have details or suggestions of a flat earth navigation method which would be easier and/or more accurate than the forms which assume a round earth I'm sure people would love to hear it. If the methods differed fundamentally and worked well it would blow your whole theory wide open and lend it much credence.
Say I bought a yacht today and wanted to sail it to Hawaii from northern California. How would I navigate there if I assumed the world was flat?
On-screen keyboard.
Yes. But it"s too fiddly to use all the time. I just didn"t want the title to look odd.Is there something wrong with your keyboard?
