Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - abaaaabbbb63

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 19
1
Flat Earth General / The Globe was an Inside Job
« on: October 21, 2015, 02:41:36 AM »

2
Flat Earth General / Re: Proof the Earth is flat
« on: June 06, 2015, 10:11:14 PM »

3
This theory has still flaws but it's still far more viable than JRowe's fairy tale. Keep up the good work.

Thank you!

Nothing is perfect, and everything is improvable!

4
I'd like to postulate an amendment to the dual earth model V4  to correct for the observed magnetic inclination that we see on compass needles,   what I propose is that the elevation of the south and north poles be increased to an altitude that gives the correct magnetic inclination.   I calculate that an altitude at the poles of  6371 km would fix it.

Good work so far, nice to see Jrowe agrees with the improvements.

I am currently conducting research in this field. I will go to the most remote and people-free place on Earth to minimise magnetic interference in order to conduct my study: A BlockBuster Rental Shop.

5
Flat Earth Debate / Re: evidence clouds do not exist
« on: June 04, 2015, 12:03:04 AM »
Jrowe, I went to Kaprun, Austria last winter, and took the following photo:



I was at 3000m altitude, skiing. The Kaprun village is actually under the clouds, and it normally looks like this:






From my hotel in Kaprun, it seemed that it was a cloudy day, as the sky was covered in clouds. I had a pleasant surprise when I took the ski lift up. There wasn't any mist on the ground, just clouds at about 200m above ground.

How do you explain this?

6
JRowe, why don't you just shut the fuck up and let the actual dual-earth experts do their job.

You're a quack, whereas abaaaabbbb63 is the leading academic in this field.
come back when his model requires fewer assumptions, explains the ability to see across the equator, and has any kind of logical definition for aether.

some of us put work into our theories and don't appreciate seeing them being mocked by ignoramuses.

We only have one assumption in this Theory: The Aether is very weird.

And I too had to work a lot on my theory. MS Paint can be a real bi*ch sometimes.

7
I believe you need to add the bulge back in for the Northern and Southern pole areas, that JRowe had in DET version alpha 0.1.  This way the aether does not have such an extreme effect on light. 
We could increase the bulge to a point to where the aether isn't needed to "bend" the light to match observations and you will not need to have the aetheric transmission at the equator.  But that's just silly, it would need to be a spheroid shape to match observations and we would need to accept either aether pushing us down or gravity.
Also, question:  What role does aether play in the magnetic field as shown in your model?
You also have my vote as the new and total authority on all things dual Earth.

1. Any contribution to the Theory is welcomed! You will receive a "Contributor" title! Thank you for your observations and scientific facts that you presented. Bulges are now part of the Dual Earth Theory V4.

2. The aether was not proven to have a role in the magnetic field of the Earth.

8
Thank you President of DESA, Dual -Earth theory makes a lot more sense like this.
Question, What happens if someone jumps over those purple "concentrated aether spots" do you go into space?
It would make sense as it is well know that going into space is easier from the equators especially if flying east.

The transition is possible because of LOW, not high concentration of aether. Think!

Aether is a "thing" that is unknown to us until now. All we know is it refracts light towards the Earth, likes weird shapes (like in the sketches), and produces short-ranged wormholes when present in high concentrations.

9
Apologies, if aetheric transmission is not part of your improved theory.

It isn't part of the Dual Earth Theory. Sun lies 149,600,000 km away from the Earth.

10
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: JRow's aether
« on: May 31, 2015, 01:03:53 AM »
How did you come to the conclusion it crates large amounts of wormholes?

Wait, let me put my circular argument suit on.

Because we can get from one side of the equator to another without even noticing! Everything goes through wormholes, even light, and it creates the illusion that nothing happened!

11
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: JRow's aether
« on: May 30, 2015, 11:20:54 PM »
Months later, I still dont get what aether is. JRow, I dont want you to explain what aether is, but, rather, I would like a simple enumeration of all the characteristics you know or have been taken into account on the design of your hypothesis.

In Jrowe's outdated theory, the Aether is simply the fabric of space. But we intellectually evolved from that. According to the Dual Earth Theory V3 ( http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=63774.0#.VWqnk8-qpx4 ), the Aether is an entity that we know very little about. We don't know its nature, but we know that it likes weird shapes, refracts light towards the Earth, and creates wormholes in huge concentrations.

In conclusion, the Aether is weird. Jrowe's primitive thinking will not offer you the answer. That's were we, DESA (Dual Earth Scientific Association) step in.

12
I can see important significant advances on Jroweskeptic's fatally flawed model.   Nice work,  Dual-Earth could finally go somewhere.

Good idea to host it on reddit  http://www.reddit.com/r/DESA/   

Thank you!

Welcome to the truth!

13
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: round earther trolls
« on: May 30, 2015, 01:41:55 PM »
not only can't you spell, you still don't seem to have the slightest understanding of aether. (eg: it is low concentrations at the equator, otherwise you'll need to define what on earth your aether is). stop wasting time. some of us are trying to have some discussion, while you're parrotting bs about something you clearly don't understand.

Sorry mate, but the fact that you tried to understand what the aether is and got it wrong is not my problem. I choose to say "We don't know yet what the aether is, but it creates wormholes when it's in high concentrations, it likes weird shapes, and it refracts light towards the Earth".

14
Flat Earth Information Repository / Re: My Flat Earth Model
« on: May 30, 2015, 01:32:27 PM »
just shut up.

I'm sorry, but I really want to spread the true and updated Dual Earth Theory. It's our mission at DESA.

15
Flat Earth Information Repository / Re: My Flat Earth Model
« on: May 30, 2015, 01:14:28 PM »
weird processes at the equator? if you are struggling with the simple concept of moving through space i have no idea why you're acting remotely capable of providing any kind of informed parody. not only that, you still completely fail to have any understanding of aether whatsoever, you constantly increase your assumptions. what maintains the shape of aether? how does the earth being tilted prevent the underside being in perpetual shade?
just stop. you don't understand what you're talking about. if you could be serious, we could discuss the actual, working dual earth theory.

what is the definition of your aether? it clearly has no resemblance to mine.

1. At the equator wormholes form, due to the aether, therefore one is transported without feeling anything to the other side.
2. Shape of aether is maintained by the weird properties of the aether.
3. The aether is an unknown entity. All we know is that it forms wormholes at the equator, loves weird shapes, and that it refracts light towards earth.
4. If you look at the drawing closely, you'll see that the underside has light. It's just as predicted. During the winter, the tilt would be opposite, so the south hemiplane would have more daytime, as observed.

Only assumption? Aether = weird stuff.

16
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: round earther trolls
« on: May 30, 2015, 12:32:58 PM »
You guys just hate JRoweSkeptic because he spreads the truth and you mentally ill round earthers can't stand it. I bet you guys are also homosexual supporters.

Actually, my organisation (DESA- Dual Earth Scientific Association) spreads the truth. Jrowe's version is outdated. Check it out:

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=63774.msg1693110#msg1693110

17
Flat Earth Information Repository / Re: My Flat Earth Model
« on: May 30, 2015, 10:45:55 AM »
Actually, the new and improved version of this theory, Dual Earth Theory V2 does this better.
your fantasy has the sun able to shine on both poles at once, which does not happen in reality. it does not work. you have no explanation for the earth's magnetism, for geothermal energy, and you clearly have no understanding of aether at the equator otherwise it would change from day to night when you cross it in your model, because there is no way for the currents of aether to just oush you down: you go through the earth to the far side. you have not even the slightest comprehension of the work you have stolen. just stop. it's irritating, it's not remotely funny, and it just makes you look like an attention-seeking moron, which clearly isn't too far from the truth.

Good points , Jrowe!

We, at the Dual Earth Scientific Association have taken your points into consideration, and fixed our theory. Now it goes something like this:

1. Aether around Earth now has a different shape.
2. The Earth's axis is tilted, therefore it explains the 6 month day night cycle at the poles.
3. The Earth has an iron core, that spins and produces the magnetic field (as evidence suggests). Above and below the iron disk core, there is magma, heated by the weird processes that take place at the equators.

Thank you Jrowe for contributing to the new DUAL EARTH THEORY V3. Here is a graphical representation:
http://i.imgur.com/pdccjGl.png

You will be mentioned as our No. 5 contributor to this theory.


18
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: On Eden
« on: May 30, 2015, 05:48:12 AM »
the tree was in the garden because precious things are always kept together. the garden was the seat of God's greatest works.

When did this happen? How much time ago?

19
Flat Earth Information Repository / Re: My Flat Earth Model
« on: May 30, 2015, 05:47:18 AM »
dual earth theory manages all of that, the end.

Actually, the new and improved version of this theory, Dual Earth Theory V2 does this better.

20
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Theory=fact?
« on: May 30, 2015, 02:34:40 AM »
I would say that a theory becomes a fact when you only need to do small corrections to it, not huge ones anymore. It's so close to the truth that it doesn't need much of an improvement.

21
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: round earther trolls
« on: May 29, 2015, 01:12:11 PM »
I did not personally attack you. It was the other way around.

I just improved your theory  ;D

22
Flat Earth Debate / Dual-Earth Theory V4 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« on: May 29, 2015, 01:02:27 PM »
VERSION 2
I did a lot of research, and managed to improve Jrowe's Dual-Earth theory.

http://i.imgur.com/mUyeSkd.png

Basically the dual-hemiplane Earth has Aether around it, like in the image above, that refracts sunlight towards the surface. At the equator, as commonly accepted among the Dual-Earth Scientific Association (of which I am the president), there is a high concentration of Aether that makes the transition from a hemiplane to another as smooth as possible, therefore almost unobservable. The Earth rotates around its axis (As in the drawing above, the poles are its axis, therefore producing day and night), and at the same time rotates around the Sun.

How to understand this improved theory:

1. Read Jrowe's research.

2. Come here and read the improvements.

3. Praise the Dual-Earth Scientific Association (DESA) and its president (myself) for bringing you the truth.


Edit: DESA NOW HAS A SUBREDDIT ON REDDIT:
http://www.reddit.com/r/DESA/


VERSION 3

1. Aether around Earth now has a different shape.
2. The Earth's axis is tilted, therefore it explains the 6 month day night cycle at the poles.
3. The Earth has an iron core, that spins and produces the magnetic field (as evidence suggests). Above and below the iron disk core, there is magma, heated by the weird processes that take place at the equators.

Here is a graphical representation:
http://i.imgur.com/pdccjGl.png


VERSION 4

A major contribution has been brought by Mikey T Lovzballs in his post, presented below:

I believe you need to add the bulge back in for the Northern and Southern pole areas, that JRowe had in DET version alpha 0.1.  This way the aether does not have such an extreme effect on light. 
We could increase the bulge to a point to where the aether isn't needed to "bend" the light to match observations and you will not need to have the aetheric transmission at the equator.  But that's just silly, it would need to be a spheroid shape to match observations and we would need to accept either aether pushing us down or gravity.
Also, question:  What role does aether play in the magnetic field as shown in your model?
You also have my vote as the new and total authority on all things dual Earth.

Please take the drawings above as mere sketches of reality.

23
Flat Earth Debate / Re: evidence clouds do not exist
« on: May 29, 2015, 12:51:46 PM »
you are a moron. fuck off, i am sick of you. stop ignoring the work i have put in to creating a working model of the world. you are a waste of time and space. just leave and stop wasting everybody's time. some of us are actually trying to have a scientific duscussion, do you mind not derailing everything with your utter bs?
if you really want to talk about your model, start your own thread, stop ruining mine.

You're just angry I improved your outdated model. It's okay, some people have a hard time moving forward. Just wait it out. I did not cancel your work. I just improved it.

24
Flat Earth Information Repository / Re: My Flat Earth Model
« on: May 29, 2015, 12:49:32 PM »
BETTER, NEW AND IMPROVED DUAL-EARTH THEORY

http://i.imgur.com/mUyeSkd.png

25
Flat Earth Debate / Re: dual earth prediction verified
« on: May 29, 2015, 12:45:54 PM »
BETTER, NEW UPDATED DUAL-EARTH THEORY

http://i.imgur.com/mUyeSkd.png

26
Flat Earth Debate / Re: evidence clouds do not exist
« on: May 29, 2015, 12:45:17 PM »
go fuck yourself you patronizing little asswipe. i have put a lot of work into my theory, pay attention to what i have actually stated and put forth or just fuck off. you are wasting time at this point. you have nothing to say. stop posting. stop wasting time.

Dude, you're a scientist. Scientists know when they're outdated, and accept it. No need to swear and get angry.

27
Flat Earth Debate / Re: evidence clouds do not exist
« on: May 29, 2015, 12:41:28 PM »
shut up and go away. have your own theory if you want, do not put words in my mouth, i am tired of how pathetic all of you are. you aren't even capable of defending your own theories without falling back on blatant straw men. thank you for making it clear to everyone where your intelligence and open-mindedness stops. just fuck off.

Sorry, dude, you're outdated. No need to be angry about it. You made the foundation of the theory, after all. It was just improved. You should be proud, not angry.

28
Flat Earth Debate / Re: evidence clouds do not exist
« on: May 29, 2015, 12:37:55 PM »
read the current model thread you illiterate moron. i know my own theory. if you are not going to be serious do not interrupt a scientific conversation.

Oh, didn't you know? Your theory was upgraded. Here's an updated version of how the dual-hemiplane Earth works:

http://i.imgur.com/mUyeSkd.png

29
Flat Earth Debate / Re: evidence clouds do not exist
« on: May 29, 2015, 12:26:26 PM »
I know about dual-earth theory.
you clearly do not. there is no computing power needed. there is nothing special going on, just light moving through space: it is the space that is 'projected: that is, it flows to a position above the earth. why would it not be visible from all directions?  if you knew the dual earth model of the sun, you would know that. the sun does not achieve it, aether does.

Actually the dual-earth theory states that the dual-hemiplane Earth rotates around the Sun, and around its own axis. You clearly are not informed about the latest version of this theory.

30
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Rust Disproves A Lack of Air
« on: May 27, 2015, 01:32:09 PM »
push your hands together as hard as you can. they won't move, does it really feel like you're not using energy?
energy may cancel other energy out. plus, atoms do constantly move so long as they're not at absolute zero.

There's a difference between me pushing my hands together and a pencil being at rest on a table. The first one has a tension force. The second is at perfect equilibrium. No work is done, no energy is consumed by the pencil while it's just sitting there on the table.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 19