Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - squevil

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 83
1
The Lounge / Re: Post an image of yourself!
« on: November 30, 2013, 07:21:38 PM »
rooster look alike at the end with snoop dog lol

#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">HOLY CRAP

2
The Lounge / Re: Why is it so hard to buy presents for girls?
« on: November 30, 2013, 09:21:31 AM »
White goods are always a win. I have bought my girlfriend quite a few kitchen appliances, she grumbles at first, but I know she is gonna use it a lot and get the most out of it.
She is not your fiance yet?

Nah I don't believe in marriage. A child and mortgage is a binding contract :)

I try and get good gifts. I have actually bought Eva kitching appliances before but I would get her shoes or something too. I bought her a washing machine and a juicer in the past. Last year I got her a coffee machine too.
Perfume is a safe option though but depends on the ladies tastes. If its somebody you are close too massage credits go a long way along with a foot rub. Or a spa day if your budget is good.

3
The Lounge / Re: Why is it so hard to buy presents for girls?
« on: November 30, 2013, 04:38:53 AM »
White goods are always a win. I have bought my girlfriend quite a few kitchen appliances, she grumbles at first, but I know she is gonna use it a lot and get the most out of it.

4
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 29, 2013, 10:19:41 AM »
This thread got funny. Maths is a conspiracy. It reflects reality but is a lie because 'they' made it up.
Maths is a form of language to describe our surroundings and interprets the environment around us. Yes it was made up or invented. But you are taking that way out of context.
I wonder if scepti is a hippy?

The point is, it might be made up by man but the concept still works. Use maths to work out the diameter of a circle, then measure the circle with string. They will both equal the same number. The same idea is applied to the earth.

You are binned now btw, cba with hippy retards anymore.

5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 29, 2013, 06:18:33 AM »
I know you have problems understanding scientific equations. But is simple maths hard to grasp for you too. If that's the case I can just leave you to your fantasy because ignorance is bliss.

6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 29, 2013, 06:11:25 AM »
Instant death from what? There are flights over the North Pole, the volcanos should be visible for well over a hundred kilometers. Why has there been no detected major tectonic activity there there no detect clouds of ash or earthquakes or anything like that.
There are no flights over the north pole. There may be flights skirting the edge, but not over it.
Flight do go over the artic and you haven't answered the rest of my post.
Flight do not go over the centre of the earth. There is a sun there, so how can they. But anyway, that's a pointless argument as you don't and never will accept that, unless direct physical evidence of it, was there. Which I doubt would ever happen.

About earth quake activity. Look around the world at earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.These are the ones you can detect and see and they are spin off's from what's happening at the centre, which is way out of our range and senses.
There are a large number of research stations in Antartica, yet they've never detested any major tectonic activity there. Scientists are able to determine when the epic enters of volcanic eruptions are. Yet they never detect any major earth quakes at the poles
Why would they detect any activity in Antarctica?

It's at the inner RIM of the dome, so it'll be far, far away from seismic activity.

There is no inner rim  ::) We established that already. You need to make a new viable story.

7
Flat Earth General / Re: Clouds illuminated from below..
« on: November 27, 2013, 09:41:17 PM »
Paint class 101 in here! Its not proven until you have a drawing of it in paint  >o<

8
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 09:39:32 PM »
So explain how his measurements were wrong?
Why would I feel the need to explain wrong measurements.The measurements are simply fabricated and copied by people like you. They hold nothing to me.

Nothing was copied or fabricated! lmao. Theres no shoe horning here, nothing to do with space as well. You sir were defeated, then you bit into your own cyanide laced apple and finished yourself off.
Just because a circle gets bigger doesnt mean the rules change, given any portion of a circle and the size can be worked out.
It holds nothing to you because it supports the fact you are a buffoon, just making up silly stories and when you are proven wrong you dismiss it.
Even primary school maths can explain it.

9
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 02:06:48 PM »
Just to set the record here that maths also supports FET. It doesnt matter what shape the earth is. I just wanted to have a bit of banter with scepti.

10
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 12:15:28 PM »
You do realize that twice as big would be 100% larger right?  Meaning that the numbers are even less in your favor.
Remember, we are not talking about a sphere.
Twice as big is 100% larger no matter if it is a sphere, cube, circle, or what ever.
I'm well aware of that.

Im just gonna have to throw a 'lol' in here and risk getting a warning. So by your own submission you have equally proven your theory to be false. Thanks.

ANOTHER WIN FOR FET

11
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 09:58:19 AM »
But those figures match up with what the so called liars tell us it is. Don't you even see the relevance? Or you just too arrogant to admit that your wild theories may not be correct?
When given such good evidence how can you even argue that the northern hemiplane is 40% bigger?  ???
I never, ever said the northern hemiplane is 40% bigger.

Somebody quoted you on that. I just followed suit. But you have stated it was bigger when its clearly not.

Just to back up Squevil with some additional information.  London is at 51 degrees north and New York is at 40 degrees north.  If you split the difference to assume a straight path following the parallels, you get roughly 45 degrees north for the average latitude.  The circumference of the Earth at this latitude, as calculated by RE means, is 28, 385 km or 17, 638 miles, roughly.  Thisfigure is actually larger than Squevil's number indicating that the basic maths lead to a smaller earth, not larger.

My figures will not be 100% accurate but will give a rough estimate.

12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 09:47:05 AM »
But those figures match up with what the so called liars tell us it is. Don't you even see the relevance? Or you just too arrogant to admit that your wild theories may not be correct?
When given such good evidence how can you even argue that the northern hemiplane is 40% bigger?  ???

13
Flat Earth General / Re: Clouds illuminated from below..
« on: November 27, 2013, 09:38:44 AM »
Thats fine. You have been shown how it works, if you refuse to believe it, even as a thought experiment then thats fine.
You can lead a horse to water...

14
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 09:33:07 AM »
Also your statement is not correct, I just calculated part of the circumference in the nothern hemiplane to some degree of accuracy using the speed the sun moves.

15
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 09:31:10 AM »
Now im not amazing at moths maths but here goes (I already did this earlier before replying):

3,460 mi
Distance from City of London to New York, NY

 3:57 PM
Sunset in London, UK

 4:30 PM
Sunset in New York, NY, USA

5 hours time diffence = 9:30

3:57 - 9:30 = 5:33

Speed:
37405.4055 mph
60198.1647 kmh
16721.7124 meters/sec
3291675.6137 feet/minute

distance = 14962.160000000002 miles


Astroliar circumference at equator:

40,075 km
Earth, Circumference

40075km = 24901mi 792.77yd
You don't have a clue what the earth's circumference is. It cannot be measured. So all your calculations are a waste of time.

I have not claimed to know them. However the distance to new york is known. And thats where the values came from. I added the earths distance at the equator for reference purposes only.
Can you actually refute my claims or not? If you like I can use a shorter 100% known distance in the uk and still get the same figure. Would you rather me do that or do you also dispute distances between British cities?

16
Flat Earth General / Re: Clouds illuminated from below..
« on: November 27, 2013, 09:27:56 AM »
These are visual representations for both models, neither of which bend light to go under the cloud because quite frankly its impossible.
On the round earth model the light can clearly hit the underside of a cloud if enough room is made. You also have to remember that you dont get red sun sets every day, simply because the conditions need to be right. i.e clear sky between the suns rays and the clouds its hitting.


The round earth model works differently. The sun can not directly hit the underside of the cloud. The suns light is refracted at extreme angles and as it hits the top of the cloud the light is scattered through it creating the pinks and oranges we see at sunrise and sun set.


These images are exaggerated for demonstration purposes only.

17
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 09:03:54 AM »
How can he possibly hold that number still when I demonstrated that its not today using primary school maths.

18
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 06:49:30 AM »
Now im not amazing at moths maths but here goes (I already did this earlier before replying):

3,460 mi
Distance from City of London to New York, NY

 3:57 PM
Sunset in London, UK

 4:30 PM
Sunset in New York, NY, USA

5 hours time diffence = 9:30

3:57 - 9:30 = 5:33

Speed:
37405.4055 mph
60198.1647 kmh
16721.7124 meters/sec
3291675.6137 feet/minute

distance = 14962.160000000002 miles


Astroliar circumference at equator:

40,075 km
Earth, Circumference

40075km = 24901mi 792.77yd

19
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 06:42:11 AM »
Thats irrelevant isnt it. The distance is known because people have been navigating it for a very long time. Why you have an issue with that figure now? Not everything is a conspiracy. The distance has been traveled by air and sea. If there was a mistake then the 1000s of people who have navigated it would of noticed.

You ready for game set and match yet? Or you gonna squirm some more?

20
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 06:37:06 AM »
The distance from London to New York is a fact. Actually the distance is longer than the circumference at that longitude.
So no its not the true distance, it will actually make the calculation slightly bigger than what it should be.

21
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 06:25:51 AM »
Fair enough, thats why I said its a rough guess. But you are saying its much bigger so the data should still show this. However while blowing out my ass on the loo I had a better idea. Why not use the speed of the sun then.

The distance from London to New York is a know fact. See what time sun set is in both places. You can then work out the speed of the sun. Using that data you can then work out the size by calculating the speed of the sun as it makes a 24 hour cycle.

22
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 06:16:41 AM »
Are you saying the northern hemiplane is larger than what people are lead to believe too?
Yes!

Ok cool well this can be easily verified online in the next hour. I imagine there are flights round the northern continents that vaguely follow the same longitude. If you connected the flights together and then worked out the distance using time x speed you can roughly see how big it is. Use some flight plans online dude and show us. Just use the average air speed. It wont be right but if you are correct the data should show that the earth is much bigger than we think it to be.
You seek the truth or you just make up stories? I will give you an hour or 2 to come back with evidence.
Flight times prove nothing and will prove nothing about what you think the north pole is in terms of its size.

Why not?

23
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 05:59:56 AM »
Are you saying the northern hemiplane is larger than what people are lead to believe too?
Yes!

Ok cool well this can be easily verified online in the next hour. I imagine there are flights round the northern continents that vaguely follow the same longitude. If you connected the flights together and then worked out the distance using time x speed you can roughly see how big it is. Use some flight plans online dude and show us. Just use the average air speed. It wont be right but if you are correct the data should show that the earth is much bigger than we think it to be.
You seek the truth or you just make up stories? I will give you an hour or 2 to come back with evidence.

24
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Explain Time Zones
« on: November 27, 2013, 05:56:19 AM »
During the southern hemiplanes summer AW reflects the light back round the ice wall creating the 24 hour daylight.

25
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: questions for scepti
« on: November 27, 2013, 05:53:29 AM »
Are you saying the northern hemiplane is larger than what people are lead to believe too?

26
Flat Earth General / Re: Clouds illuminated from below..
« on: November 27, 2013, 05:50:03 AM »
He is saying that because the clouds are curved also the light shouldnt shine under them too. This might be the case at times. You dont get nice sunsets every day do you? But there are breaks in clouds that would let the light shine under.

27
Flat Earth General / Re: Clouds illuminated from below..
« on: November 27, 2013, 05:45:22 AM »
No it doesnt, intellectual dishonesty never wins debate. Its just a small window when the clouds are lit up, thats why when the sun sets those orange clouds only stay that colour for about 5 mins before it changes to shadow.

28
Flat Earth General / Re: Clouds illuminated from below..
« on: November 27, 2013, 03:48:45 AM »
Before i elaborate, whats your excuse for the sun 'going down'?
Distance along the dome. Ok let's forget the dome for a sec.

Distance from your convex eye point of view.

Not quite sure what you mean here. The light goes into the eye not out of it. I don't see how the lense will effect it. Can you explain a bit more?

29
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Please unlock "Site Upgrade Suggestions."
« on: November 27, 2013, 01:52:30 AM »
Just quote the relevant points in a new thread and as said here it will be strictly modded for you. :)
Would of been better to clean the old one up rather than lock it. One of my hates here is the lack of post deletion.

30
Flat Earth General / Re: Clouds illuminated from below..
« on: November 27, 2013, 01:49:59 AM »
Before i elaborate, whats your excuse for the sun 'going down'?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 83