Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mike247

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
1
when i told my teacher that the earth is flat and gave her facts, she called me stupid and dumb. how can i explain to my math teacher that the earth is not round and to open her eyes!

the world isn't flat

2
Vacuum has power. But has the power of zero. Ahahah. Power / zero = infinitive. It has power, it has infinitive power but negative. Destroys everything.

I suggest you finish high school physics before hurting your brain anymore

3
Flat Earth General / Re: Antarctica's 24/h sunlight days
« on: April 04, 2018, 02:41:44 PM »
How would you like me to prove it?

You can't do that. Because you don't know how you can prove something. So why do you here?

Up to what standard of evidence would you accept as proof? I can provide photos of me on the ice, photos of my gps location, photos of me in antarctic bases however I think you might just say all this is fake and dismiss it

So what evidence would you require to accept the fact that I have been to Antarctica

if you can't reasonably come up with a system by which I can prove I was there then you refuse to accept the possibility that it was true and this entire discussion is moot as you don't believe in the possibility that you could ever be wrong

4
Flat Earth General / Re: Antarctica's 24/h sunlight days
« on: April 03, 2018, 02:49:37 PM »

Prove it. Where is proof? No proof. No, any proof. You're nothing but just a cute liar.

How would you like me to prove it?

5
Flat Earth General / Re: Antarctica's 24/h sunlight days
« on: April 02, 2018, 04:33:25 PM »
Have been to Antarctica, experienced 24 hour sunlight, have also been to Iceland and experienced nearly 24 hour sunlight there too

6
The effect of nothing being inside the tanker is obvious to most, except you.



This is the affect of lots of stuff outside the tanker while nothing is in the tanker, if nothing was in the tanker and nothing was outside the tanker, it wouldn't implode, therefore it isn't the vacuum making it implode but the lots of stuff (air) outside the tanker

7
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gyroscope on a plane
« on: March 20, 2018, 05:48:35 PM »
The technology does not exist to create to create a gyroscope with that much precision that you could take onto a plane

8
Flat Earth General / Re: Prove That Antarctica Is A Continent.
« on: March 11, 2018, 07:00:40 PM »
I have been to Antarctica, its true, I was abducted by storm troopers and experimented on by Darth Vadar /s

I have actually been to Antarctica, lots of snow, ice and penguins

9
Flat Earth General / Re: ISS altitude measured
« on: March 06, 2018, 02:16:20 PM »
I'm not going to watch that video without more information first. Could you summarize it?

Guy measures altitude of the ISS

10
Flat Earth Debate / Re: 100% PROOF GRAVITY ISN'T REALITY
« on: March 05, 2018, 01:37:09 PM »
The moon

11
Flat Earth General / Re: Eclipse 21.08.17 will debunk the Globe
« on: March 01, 2018, 05:30:06 PM »
Not that its probably still relevant but


12
Flat Earth General / Re: Can someone explain this?
« on: March 01, 2018, 04:31:57 PM »
Looks like smoke.  Maybe condensation?

lol

13
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA and the flat earth airplane...
« on: March 01, 2018, 01:44:52 PM »
Even if this was case, friction free environments exist if you believe in outer space...

Analogy fail!

Jesus your dumb

14
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA and the flat earth airplane...
« on: March 01, 2018, 01:43:11 PM »
I think it is NASA acknowledging the reality of the Earth.

That it is flat and non-rotating.

No.

15
Flat Earth General / Re: The Earth is Flat, Space is Curved
« on: February 27, 2018, 04:50:26 PM »
My premise is this. Earth is flat and space is curved. The flat dimensions of the Earth are curved by space back onto themselves in an endless loop. This 'curviness' of space is determined by the earths mass. There need be no contradiction.

Please take part in my poll.


 :P

This is a cool theory, you should go out and try to disprove it then come back and present your results

16
I'm not riled up, I made one post about the curvature in it being minimal and hardly a reliable bit of evidence when there's as much potential error as there is when that many clouds etc are involved, and a one-pixel line can make it impossible to notice. Just, as ever, it gets blown out of all proportion by a select few round earthers who think even the bad arguments are sacrosanct.

Except its not. Modern cameras even cheap ones are extremely precise, barrel distortion from the lens is is measurable extremely accurately, there is no reason for any sane rational person to say photos are hardly a reliable source of evidence unless they feel they have proof of Photo manipulation, and unless every single person who has ever sent a camera up in a ballon is all a part of the same giant mass conspiracy then they can't all be doing it

17
Flat Earth General / Re: dome Moon landing
« on: February 25, 2018, 04:47:28 PM »
Why couldn't we just fire a laser or a large canon and see the reflection and or bounce off the dome if it was really there

18
Flat Earth General / Re: Something wrong with Blue marble (AS17-148-22727)
« on: February 15, 2018, 12:52:11 PM »
He's saying the surface area doesn't add up.

If the surface areas did add up then there would be a problem with the photo

When taking a photo of a sphere you can never see half of it, not at the distance this photo was taken

see https://www.handprint.com/HP/WCL/IMG/LPR/sphere.gif

19


Would the physical appearance of "A" be same for both "B" and "C" or different?

The physical appearance of A will absolutely in all scenarios you can think of be the same for both B and C

20
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: AI chatbots...
« on: February 13, 2018, 12:37:16 PM »
Note how the bot first emphasises that there ARE real people here, then goes on to imply this forum is too insignificant to have bots, before finishing by claiming that there are no bots here, implying I am mentally ill for saying so.

And of course it ignores the parts of my post about corruption, criminal conspiracy etc, because it is programmed to avoid those subjects.

Classic bot shitpost.

I know how to spot you, so give it up.

beep beep crackle beep, error, error, beep beep, call parent AI, error, beep beep

21
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: AI chatbots...
« on: February 13, 2018, 12:17:57 PM »
The reputation I have on here that I do not have IRL, even when I speak about the same subjects?

Yeah, that's just more evidence that bots run this place.

Because IRL people completely understand the concepts of criminal conspiracy,  boondoggles and government corruption:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(criminal)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boondoggle

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_corruption

Even Wikipedia acknowledges them ffs...

Yet in this madhouse none of those things exist.

Why?

Bots.

Not shills...

Bots.

This place is an automated lying machine, nothing more.

Why do people not believe you? Because this is the back water of back waters in regards to internet, this is the most rural hillbilly country area of the internet, no one is targeting you with chatbots, unless they are to practice diagnosing mental health issues  ;D

22
Replicating an infinite hard vacuum in a skinny plexiglass tube?

Sounds legit!

And no free body diagram of an object surrounded by nothing, as usual...

Another sockbot goes on ignore.

My god you are dumb

23
IMPOV - In My Point Of View

Would the physical appearance of "A" be same for both "B" and "C" or different?

It would be the same

24
Since A has only one physical appearance, therefore, physical appearance of A  will be same for both B and C IMPOV - so what is your opinion?. 

I don't understand what you are saying here

What is IMPOV?

Why would the physical appearance of B and C be linked in any way to A?







25
Quote
Person A, B and C are three distinct people, they don't have the same physical appearance nor will they age the same

Person A would age 60 years and look 60 years older, person B would age ~50ish years and look 50ish years older, person C would age ~25 years and look 25 years older

Would "A" aged 60 years and look 60 years older relative to himself and "B" and "C" as well?


I'm sorry but I dont understand your question


From person A's perspective, he is the oldest, B is a little younger and C is youngest

From person B's perspective, A is the oldest, c is a lot younger

From person C's persepctive, both A and B have aged a lot more than he has

26
Rockets work in a vacuum

see

if you want to understand the basic phyiscs of why they work in a vacuum, there a lots of good high school and primary school resources for you to up educate yourself on

27
Quote
A would look oldest, b would look a little younger and c would look a lot younger

Does it address to what I said 

Since A has only one physical appearance, therefore, physical appearance of A  will be same for both B and C IMPOV - so what is your opinion?.  Similarly,

Wasn't the airplane (in which an atomic clock was sent for time dilation purpose) in acceleration mode when flying parallel to the curvature of the earth?

Person A, B and C are three distinct people, they don't have the same physical appearance nor will they age the same

Person A would age 60 years and look 60 years older, person B would age ~50ish years and look 50ish years older, person C would age ~25 years and look 25 years older

28
Quote
Standing on a sidewalk @ 1g is different than accelerating @ 1g?

Both B and C can use a separate rail car for their journey on a very big asteroid. A stays at home while B and C set out with high speed (say 0.5c and 0.9c) in their respective rail cars at the same time in the same direction relative to A. They attain their respective speed right after their departure. Assume each 10 years old at the time of departure. After 3o years relative to A, both B and C turn around and gain their respective speed in the same manner after taking a very short stop/ break (say 1 hr).  Afterwards, B and C return home at the same time and reunited with A.

Since A has only one physical appearance, therefore, physical appearance of A  will be same for both B and C IMPOV

Wasn't the airplane (in which an atomic clock was sent for time dilation purpose) in acceleration mode when flying parallel to the curvature of the earth?

A would look oldest, b would look a little younger and c would look a lot younger

29
Qantas with lie of: Sydney to Santiago flights. Johannesburg to Perth flights. (flight time)

I have taken this flight, the flight time was accurate, the flight is real

As to why there is variance in flight times for different airlines, not all airlines fly the same routes, some fly into jet streams to speed up the plane, others fly to minimise fuel use to save money, and depending on weather that can also drastically affect the flight time.

A planes maximum cruise speed is not its maximum ground speed, 899km/h in the air with a 100km/h tail wind is about 999 km/h ground speed

I don't believe you. Prove you taken this flight.

I don't believe that you don't believe me. Prove this to me.

30
But since it is and, as far as we know now, can be nothing but a "thought experiment" who knows?


Fun fact - Gps satellites have to account for time dilation and the difference in the curvature of space time due to their high orbits which means their clocks actually tick faster by about 38 microseconds per day

http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/1061/why-does-gps-depend-on-relativity

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7