Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Monu

Pages: [1]

Also, aren't electron "orbits" probabilities of finding an electron there and not the actual, distinct location of an electron?

This is entirely true.

Also, Wilmore, you are an utterly pathetic hipocrite you just that an established doctrine is "wrong" and when someone tells you to prove it you go "No YOU prove YOUR doctrine is correct." Four year olds give better arguments than you.

Flat Earth General / Re: More evidence for Flat Earth Theory
« on: June 03, 2010, 04:53:33 AM »
I love how you pathetic hipocrites always avoid the "It's as photoshopped/untrue as a NASA image" comment.

Flat Earth General / Re: FE=Pseudoscience(topic from RES)
« on: April 09, 2010, 04:36:25 AM »
I love how Tom has no iot of scientific knowledge or reasoing to back up his aburd claims and would question everything against his stand by just denying the legitimacy of the argument and not, again, NEVER baing his thought on rational or credible grounds.

I, sometimes, think he is the greatest troll.

Flat Earth General / Re: FET theory is pretentious.
« on: April 09, 2010, 04:31:08 AM »
I love how Tom questions are scientific development by demanding empirical proof from EVERY person that bleives in them and trie to make a point about not believing in ANYTING without emperical evidence as all of the scientistific communtiy is stupid or corrupt and then is a blatant and idiotic show of massive hypocrisy just blindly bases all his claims on ENAG, so the guy who wrote it isn't corrupt but Newton and Hawking was/is.

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: my thoughts on FET
« on: April 03, 2010, 03:29:05 AM »
Exactly....even a suggestion that Vietnam was part of a 'cover up' is ludicrous. Did NASA meet with the Russia and say tell ya what...we'll send thousands of young men (barely out of boyhood) to run around the jungle so that your North Vietnamese pals can cut them down and send them back in boxes. And tell ya what, we'll send a small platoon to Mai Lai to go mad over four days and rape and massacre that village. That's should ensure everyone still believes the world is round so that we all get our space funding!

No, I didn't assert that Russia and the US were cooperating to further the 'RE conspiracy' in these matters alone.
The fact that both sides had an 'enemy' that stood against everything each side stood for is enough to keep both sides in power.
Sure, maybe the Vietnam and Korean wars were to stop the spread of communism, maybe they weren't.  I don't know why we sent thousands of Americans overseas to die in jungles and forests.
Additionally, it's kind of like a double standard to interfere with matters in Russia's hemisphere, and not let them in ours.
The idea that Russia is our (America's) sworn mortal enemy, I believe, was fabricated by the west to keep our governments in power.
If there's no one to keep us protected from, then there's no justification for us tyraiding all over the world and inserting our influence.

There are many small governments in the world that don't have huge militaries and don't fear insurrection.  Without fear, there is no need for force.  This is why the tension between the US and the former USSR was obviously beneficial to both sides.

For the first point, EVERYONE KNOWS. Only YOU DON'T WANT to know, so that you can justify your inhumane, disrespectful and baseless revisions of history and of the obvious truth.

Yes, it was wrong, everybody knows that too, BUT all super-powers to do it. USA had to do it to prevent Russia from becoming capable of seconding USA. I am not American, and I don't support any of USA's far-realist foregin policies of the past or present. But their conflict with USSR was real, you just don't kill millions of people to prove the Earth's shape, maybe it makes sense to FE-ers, but it wouldn't to any sane and rational human being.

USSR WAS USA's sworn enemy, had Stalin had the capability he would have destroyed USA's economy and army to make USSR the sole super-power of the world. He would also destroy USA because Soviets hated USA. If you think the entire philosphy of Soviet Communism and thwe Bolshevik Revolution were part of a conspiracy to stage two super-power enemies to generate force tomake people think the Earth is round then you should get you brain checked, seriously.

Your part about small governments is right, but USA and USSR level super-powers don't need excuse to have an army, when you are at the top of the mountain and have no guard, there will always be entities that would want to take you down.

Sure, the Cold War atmosphere gave them a chace to become super-nuclear war freaks but that armament drive was reversed with the fall of USSR, if USA really wanted to keep all that, it would have done it without giving anyexplantion to the world

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: my thoughts on FET
« on: April 01, 2010, 05:41:35 AM »
Not to mention that such a conpiracy would have resulted in amssive losses to those involed in it. But of course, understanding that requires basic intelligence which these FE-ers do not have? Did I sound disrespectful? I don't give a damn if I am disrespectful to idiots who don't respect the massive loss of lives because of the cold war and people who died duringh space missions.

A planet cannot be flat, it's called physics. Some may bob up here say, "Ooh! How do you know how all the physicts today ween't lying? Also is you can't validate something personally you can't refer to it." But these idiots have no problem in beliving that some other idiots like Parallax cannot be wrong or corrupt when Carl Sagan and Newton can be.

And for those who say that we can't use experiments and accepted theories just because we cannot validate them personally, they may as well stop using all technology from Light Bulbs to Computers that are made on the basis of those theories. 

Flat Earth General / Re: Conspiracy?
« on: March 30, 2010, 08:13:39 AM »
I find it amazing how these FE-ers never try to explain/justify rationally the existence of the "Conspiracy", something they readily refer to defy everyone from Newton to Hawking, NASA and all the Governments in the world.

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Is mars flat, too?
« on: March 30, 2010, 08:03:51 AM »
Mars is a planet. The Earth is not a planet.

You can't be serious. You can't be serious. Youcan'tbeserious.Youcan'tbeserious.Youcan'tbeserious.

Flat Earth Debate / Re: The appearance of Gravity
« on: March 30, 2010, 04:59:54 AM »
When you stand on the earth's surface your guts are being pinned to the surface as the earth accelerates your body upwards.

LOLWUT?! My guts were never pinned to the earths surface.

An accelerometer measures zero because all parts of the accelerometer are being accelerated at the same rate.


Actually it masures zero because there is zero acceleration.

Okay Tom, by your logic, if we put an an accelerometer on the ground, make and observer stand near it and then throw a person of the roof of a very High building besides the accelerometer than will the accelerometer give any reading?

Also, Malleo is correct. Earth does have some accelration intheory but practiclly it is negligible in comarison to that of the man that falls.

What these FETs people are saying here that all scientists and Engineers from Galileo and Newton to Stephen Hawking how believe(d) on the basis of Scientifc thought and rational logic and empirical activites that the Earth is round  and all Scientific organisations that believe the same and all scinetific researches that PROVED that the Earth is round are either:

a.) Wrong.
b.) Consipring and corrupted.
C.) Both.

Pages: [1]