Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pringles

Pages: [1]
1
Flat Earth Q&A / Clouds are muuuch higher than 150 ft
« on: June 22, 2006, 09:39:22 AM »
fair enough.. i would love to stay on an chat all nite but im off to take up my other occupation: partying, getting drunk an gettin nailed :P
soz i cant stay mate, we'll have another debate another time im sure lol
catch u later

2
Flat Earth Q&A / Clouds are muuuch higher than 150 ft
« on: June 22, 2006, 09:22:27 AM »
dude :P im not pointing out poison doesnt exist, merely that his argument is flawed

3
Flat Earth Q&A / Clouds are muuuch higher than 150 ft
« on: June 22, 2006, 09:14:47 AM »
on what case do you accept reasonable evidence though?
is it because you have been told to accept and taught the boundaries of reason throughout your education, correct me if im wrong, but i believe so, in which case why is it so implausable for you to have been taught what to think?
Explain this, and you, my friend, have a valid argument
I am not argueing the theory of the FE merely discussing it, and until it is proven 100% (or disproven) then i do not feel the need to choose between, much the same problem arises with the existance of god.
What do you believe about the existance of an all powerful being?

4
Flat Earth Q&A / Clouds are muuuch higher than 150 ft
« on: June 22, 2006, 09:03:59 AM »
in this way your statement is true, but this brings up more queries, would you care proving there is indeed poisonous plantlife on this earth..
by the way if your gonna talk about it like that with govornment conspiricies, surely all facts about poisonous plants could be made up, therefore to prove they exist you would indeed need to poison yourself with a plant, (or another person) and in fact watch them die...
Care to "prove" they exist?

5
Flat Earth Q&A / Clouds are muuuch higher than 150 ft
« on: June 22, 2006, 08:56:34 AM »
im not saying that, as obviously people have been killed by poisonous things before, but the number of people who have been into space and actually seen the earth is comparitively little to those killed in the manner of which you are suggesting.

6
Flat Earth Q&A / Clouds are muuuch higher than 150 ft
« on: June 22, 2006, 08:34:51 AM »
you mean much the same as you have no evidence the earth is round.. im not a FE'er before you go off on one, purely stating that without personal experience, we are placing all theories on belief, we are in fact questioning the govornments, and the theory of the RE as the is no proof apart from what we are given and told to recognise as the truth,
(for more details find my post about the example of showing a child a photoshopped image) all in all, that post basically says, if i were to photoshop an image of something, as an example, lets say.. a chimp, to give it wings, and then told a child who had never seen a real chimp that this is what they look like, they would believe you as they are given no alternative, these FE'ers are simply offering an alternative

7
Flat Earth Q&A / What are you people trying to prove?
« on: June 21, 2006, 02:30:57 PM »
cheers man, have fun debating, ill be back around sunday nite, party time calls.. later

8
Flat Earth Q&A / the Sun.
« on: June 21, 2006, 02:29:53 PM »
stonicus, i just point out, either theory has its flaws and so could be conspiricy, i would love to debate but im off, laterz

9
im not so sure on the technicalities on what is over the other side of the ice wall, as is anyone else as of course it is kept top secret, but i fail to see what the problem is with earth plates? as long as the wall was not neccessarily built continuously on the surface and is patrolled, i cannot see the problem, perhaps the govornment is in fact using all of these sorts of theories such as the plates being where they are to, as you said "debunk" the FE theory, however if all of the plates are freeflowing, with a "ring/wall" of ice around the outside, as long as the plates are kept within these boundaries, what is the problem? unfortunately, i need to go, and i regret to say i wont be online again over the next few days, my exams are over and partying begins, i will however, get back to any questions asked if sent to my inbox or alternatively, ill check back in more than likely on sunday nite...
its been a pleasure guys

10
Flat Earth Q&A / EXPLAIN THIS
« on: June 21, 2006, 02:17:49 PM »
binxsy... what is your question you would like to ask? post it quick and i will try to answer it as best i can, obviously i cant speak for the FE community as i am merely a philosopher.. but continue, ask your question, i just answered every one another guy fired at me.. so carry on :?:

11
Flat Earth Q&A / What are you people trying to prove?
« on: June 21, 2006, 02:09:02 PM »
"How do I know the world is round? Because I've seen so many pictures of it? Because all the OTHER planets are clearly round? Because the moon is clearly round? Because I've SEEN the earth cast a round shadow on the round moon? Because I would have to be INSANE to believe that the sun is only 32 miles in diameter and 3000 miles up... yet can only cast light for about 7000 miles?

At 10pm tonight, it will be dark where I live. For the FE model to be true, that means the sun, which should be clearly visible to me... is invisible because it's too far away. And that seems reasonable to you?

The FE model holds that satellites don't exist, and it's a huge conspiracy. Really? First I've heard of it! I had Satellite TV, and let me tell you, that dish is highly directional, and there was no transmission tower.

I'm told a lot of things I don't believe, sometimes I wait for peer reviewed results to come in that independantly verify the info, sometimes I reject it out of hand as silly. This is a case of the latter."




first of all, i seem to wander as to why you are getting angry as to what other people seem to think, i am not a FE nor a RE  (or a figure-8 E  :P)
all i am doing is debating with other like minded, and not so, on a forum.
You have seen pictures, may i say woop-de-bloody do, so if i could photoshop a new crater on the moon and teach kids that is in fact named the pringles crater, they would believe it, and why? that is because i am telling them to, they do not need to question as they are being told to recognise this as the truth.
    You state the moon is clearly round, how do you know this may i ask?
Pictures? i believe i have delt with these already.. a telescope? well if you read my other post in 3-4 forums about S-9 atoms that'll clear that up for u. What next, ahh the sun, this as explained by many FE's is a spotlight, well i cant see any way to disagree with the plausability of that (not the probibility, just the mechanics of how it works)
     The suns invisibility to you seems perfectly plausable to me, as explained, the holo-genetic "o-zone" layer and atoms in the air can easily stop you from seeing this.
     Next up we have satellites, i am not claiming there to be no satellites, so that clears that up, as stated i am not a FE'er.
   And last but not least, you wait for evidence to arrive about the FE?
If the govornment managed to create the ice wall, and stop anyone from ever witnessing it.. then how difficult is it going to be for them to stop evidence of a FE and make it sound entirely implausable, not very may i say. And just out of interest, what is the evidence you have of a round earth? Oh.. yeah right, i forgot... u were told

12
Flat Earth Q&A / Question regarding FAQ
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:56:02 PM »
oo engineer, how very crude :P

ok, luke i can explain the last one, about sunrises, sunsets etc. with my post.. if only people would read all of them :P

the atom is neither sphericle, flat, or triangular.. it is in fact made up of mostly... empty space..
now.. what if, the govornment could manipulate these atoms into certain bonds, such as the "o-zone" layer, if all of these atoms, instead of carrying empty space, were in fact filled with the govornment-made holo-genetic, synthetic material, whats to say all that we see at night, is in fact a hologram?

this is in-fact and easy way for the govornment to control what we see

13
Flat Earth Q&A / seasons??
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:50:25 PM »
if you would care to read my other post, these can be easily explained with the theory of the S-9 atom:

the atom is neither sphericle, flat, or triangular.. it is in fact made up of mostly... empty space..
now.. what if, the govornment could manipulate these atoms into certain bonds, such as the "o-zone" layer, if all of these atoms, instead of carrying empty space, were in fact filled with the govornment-made holo-genetic, synthetic material, whats to say all that we see at night, is in fact a hologram?

explaining, different constellations would be explained, as for the seasons: climate control inside a dome (as explained somewhere else) is in fact relatively easy, like having an indoor snow room

14
Flat Earth Q&A / Continents
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:46:15 PM »
luke, may i just point out, you have proved nothing, merely stated it and assumed everyone will accept it, to prove it, you must  100% undoubtable evidence, which, im sorry to say, you do not have, as dogplatter says, what if the continents have forever been in that position?

15
Flat Earth Q&A / What are you people trying to prove?
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:42:30 PM »
you say we believe some "truly outrageous crap" but, may i ask, coming from a civilisation where everything which is told to you, you accept and take into everyday life, how do you know the world is round? much the same as my comment on the S-9 atoms (see one of my other posts)

16
Flat Earth Q&A / EXPLAIN THIS
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:38:14 PM »
stonicus, im liking the way you think, so you are aware, im neither a FE or a RE i am purely trying to uncover the truth, if you can give me reason to believe in this "figure 8" i will more than gladly fight your cause to, but atm, im FE all the way

17
Flat Earth Q&A / THE BET TO SETTLE THIS ARGUMENT
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:35:22 PM »
im siding with Erasmus here, not only does a person have choice in what they believe in, but honestly, who are you to say he has issues, may i ask how you found out so securely that the earth is in fact round, apart from being told?

18
Flat Earth Q&A / earthshine
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:30:31 PM »
authaeros

just want to compliment you on your understanding of the entirity of the human race, people believe what they want to, and sometimes what they are told to, making either the FE or RE theories invalid, none can be shown with evidence for sure, i just seem to think the arguments for a flat earth seem more coherent and explain things which RE theories cannot.

19
Flat Earth Q&A / EXPLAIN THIS
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:19:22 PM »
what is there to justify? i am simply stating the govornment has complete control over what we learn, and through this, we cannot know the "truth"

20
Flat Earth Q&A / Question for the Flat-Earthers..
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:10:32 PM »
no, by disregarded i mean, disregarded to exist, people do not believe they exist purely because they are told it is an absurd idea, and you know what?
Who are they told by? the Govornment i'd imagine, how can we tell an atom only has 8 electrons except from the knowledge which has been filtered through govornment systems first? answer that, and ill be a happy man

21
Flat Earth Q&A / EXPLAIN THIS
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:08:21 PM »
may i just answer the original question, with.. another question, just out of interest, where did you learn that this happens? im guessing from school right? or from a book, or an internet site, all controlled by the govornment.
Case Closed

22
Flat Earth Q&A / Okay. I want pictures of this ice wall.
« on: June 21, 2006, 01:05:30 PM »
neither do we, thats the point, we wander as to why they keep it secret from us, by we, i mean you, i am slightly enlightened into some of the govornment plans (read my other post)

23
Flat Earth Q&A / Question for the Flat-Earthers..
« on: June 21, 2006, 12:59:04 PM »
all i am trying to explain is that, your curriculum is developed by the govornment, you learn what they want you to learn, you are in fact (no matter how independant you think you are) controlled, and restricted by the rules and regulations of the govornment. For you ever heard of the s-9 set of elements? i doubt very much as this is a scholar talking to a bunch of over-philosophical school-kids/adults, as this was never in your curriculum i will explain:
the S-9 element is a theory in which an unstable atom of unproportional size and weight exists.
This atom is more powerful than any nuclear substance in its strength of reactivity, it has been highly disregarded as a theory, and guess who by?
govornment scientists.

24
Flat Earth Q&A / Okay. I want pictures of this ice wall.
« on: June 21, 2006, 12:52:33 PM »
could i just point out that if the govornment were to let us get our hands on a picture, or indeed get near the wall then they would in fact have failed in keeping us from the truth, so possibility of evidence is next to none.

25
Flat Earth Q&A / Question for the Flat-Earthers..
« on: June 21, 2006, 12:44:44 PM »
and just so you are aware, nothing is impossible, merely implausable

26
Flat Earth Q&A / Question for the Flat-Earthers..
« on: June 21, 2006, 12:43:52 PM »
and who told you it was there for a reason.. im guessing it was in your curriculum... created by the govornment?
how can you be sure it is empty space?
unless u are in fact a person who has managed to look inside of an atom (which i highly doubt).
i suggest you carefully consider your next move, what now.. claim im "smoking crack" again?

27
Flat Earth Q&A / Question for the Flat-Earthers..
« on: June 21, 2006, 11:49:10 AM »
"pringles wrote:

now.. what if, the govornment could manipulate these atoms into certain bonds, such as the "o-zone" layer, if all of these atoms, instead of carrying empty space, were in fact filled with the govornment-made holo-genetic, synthetic material, whats to say all that we see at night, is in fact a hologram?"

"Wow. I think you need to stop smoking crack."

i believe that you need to stop placing emphasis that anyone with a theory you cant explain "smokes crack"

28
Flat Earth Q&A / Question for the Flat-Earthers..
« on: June 21, 2006, 11:38:59 AM »
first off, " including the largest mountain in the Universe, Mount Olympus(sp?)." whats that about? how do we know thats the biggest in the universe? by that you mean the known of the universe i imagine?

and secondly, why the atom is neither sphericle, flat, or triangular.. it is in fact made up of mostly... empty space..
now.. what if, the govornment could manipulate these atoms into certain bonds, such as the "o-zone" layer, if all of these atoms, instead of carrying empty space, were in fact filled with the govornment-made holo-genetic, synthetic material, whats to say all that we see at night, is in fact a hologram?

29
Flat Earth Q&A / antartica
« on: June 21, 2006, 11:24:14 AM »
im a student interested in medical science and marine biology, i was wandering, whats the probability that pangea ever existed? yes, there is fossils spread.. explained by dogplatter what more proof do we need? Whats to say anyone here isnt a govornment official.. it could be a person disagreeing with these theorys to put forward and argument that "surely must be true" or whats to say someone coming up with absurd theories isnt and agent putting forward these to strengthen our belief in the RE? personally i believe a FE is entirely possible, the ice wall seems plausable and the penguins used to sustain wall workers, that seems entirely likely and economic.

Pages: [1]