Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Violent

Pages: [1]
1
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« on: September 24, 2009, 01:40:56 AM »
New supporting evidence that nuclear bombs might not exist:

loki700: The "theory backing it up," as you put it, is Einstein's flawed "Theory of Relativity" which is officially debunked: http://www.you.com.au/news/1121.htm

2
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« on: January 24, 2009, 01:12:06 AM »
"Nukes exist. The damage and radiation levels (and sicknesses within survivors) prove so."

I have not seen: damage, radiation levels, sickness, with my own eyes. Have you?

Most of us have seen these things on television, or in photos.

3
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« on: January 23, 2009, 08:15:21 AM »
Check out this revealing article about fake Russian nuclear bombs: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19981118/ai_n14192997

It proves that fake nuclear bombs do exist.

4
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« on: January 14, 2009, 02:35:05 AM »
Tom thanks for the excellent link to the Hiroshima still photograph. It's obvious from the picture that they burnt down a large section of the city in both Hiroshima and Tokyo, using whatever method. All brick buildings are left standing intact save for apparently missing windows.

5
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« on: January 14, 2009, 02:30:09 AM »
Jack that's interesting you should mention E=mc? - check this out: According to Einstein mass and energy are "different manifestations of the same thing," and "very small amounts of mass may be converted in to a very large amount of energy." Now this all sounds very scientific, but it's very important to note its title: The Theory of *Relativity* -which is dissolutionist- and next and perhaps even more revealing is the spoken equation itself, which is apparently Masonic / Kabalist: E is equal to mc-squared, in which energy is put equal to mass, multiplied by the square of the velocity of light." We've got the Square mentioned repeatedly. Light is given a velocity and is squared.

6
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« on: January 13, 2009, 08:29:26 AM »
Would anyone who is not a troll like to express their opinion or contribute useful commentary?

7
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« on: January 13, 2009, 08:28:12 AM »
Thank you for your fair response.

The damage to Hiroshima is not proof of nuclear bombs.

8
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« on: January 13, 2009, 04:12:30 AM »
I've put together a seven minute piece which asks the question "Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?":

Although this possibility is rarely postulated, and although when it is put forth it always receives scathing incredulity, even from the most skeptical conspiracy theorists, I am certain that the canon of nuclear/atomic explosion footage shown to the public starting in the 1940s was falsified from the beginning.

Nuclear bombs are the cornerstone of the world's military-industrial control structure. It is therefore necessary that, if the current order is to be maintained, everyone must believe in them.

9
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« on: January 13, 2009, 04:08:48 AM »
I made a video entitled NUKE LIES which contains evidently falsified nuclear / atomic bomb test footage:

Pages: [1]