1

Flat Earth General / Re: Perspective of the Sun Makes No Sense

« on: January 06, 2025, 10:51:00 PM »

Building on top of past knowledge is not lazy. It's just how society works.

It is lazy, however, to take information as "knowledge." In library science there used to be a section in the early 0s called methodology (the study of research methods). That is, "how is it that I know what I know?" In religion, this is called epistemology, although that has more to do with philosophical means. I would lay down cash that a majority of students in graduate school do not in fact have even basic knowledge of the core of how their knowledge works.

Trivia is not knowledge. Facts given by a book are not knowledge. Information given by teachers is not knowledge. Truly knowing is a rare and precious thing.

Going back to PEDMAS, "If an equation is written such that different interpretations of PEDMAS gives different results, then the equation was poorly written and should be rewritten to eliminate the ambiguity." Actually, it's quite easy. Even in equations where you had parentheses. So, learning PEDMAS is not knowledge. Knowledge here would be knowing how easy it is to screw up, how to write it so there isn't ambiguity, and understanding when not to use it. Blindly following it, is definitely not knowledge.

People who have past knowledge but do not understand it might as well be replaced by AIs.  They wind up pressing buttons. They don't look at what they are scanning on the computer and understand it. When I was working at the library, I began to understand the demographics of our area. I figured out that our town had a great deal of people at the poverty line, a few people who are second homers, homeschool kids, and so on.  The other librarians? Scan the books in, scan the books out. Knowledge is being able to use what you have learned. If you just take it for granted, knowledge is worthless.

In order for society to work, it must be built on truth. If, for instance, the government were to lie about the shape of the Earth or the moon landing or elections, what do we have? The beginning of corruption. If they can lie about something like the nature of the Earth, they can lie about practically anything.

(This should go to "why does the government lie to us" but we keep getting these topics sorta mixed)

So just skim past the entire thing where I point out the hypocrisy of not wanting to believe evidence that can be and is replicated on a day to day basis with video evidence and go right to the government lies BS. Neverminding the fact that at the time that all the research regarding round earth was done, that the people doing the research are in the exact position you're in now. Back then, the government was the oppressive religious majority. It was actually pretty commonly punished by death if you said anything that even slightly contradicts what the religious authorities said.

That's even how the US came to be. A religion backed monarch who decided he was gonna create his own version of the religion with his own rules so he can do what he wants and people were sick of it. Dogmatic religious governments are why the Middle East have been ravaged by non stop war over the past millennia, even tho they all started in the same place at the same time with the same guy. Now there's like 6 or 7 different religions with different beliefs, each with dozens of sects and denominations. How do you even know the one that you follow is right? How do you know you haven't been the one that's been lied to this whole time? Is this the truthful society that you're talking about?

Oh right, blind faith forced on you under threat of eternal misery is why you stick to your religion so fervently. I bet you guys wouldn't be so keen to believe in it if there wasn't a promise of eternal afterlife.
Where's the federal law that commits you to eternal damnation for believing in flat earth or God? Or the rule that says that only if you're devout follower of round earth and science that you'll be promised a life of fortune and happiness?
It's kinda like every major religion is based off blindly following their deity(ies) with no proof whatsoever in exchange for an eternal reward and that's really the only reason to believe in one, because who would willingly choose to follow a deity who would send you to hell for for something as small as being in love with someone who's the same gender as you.

Realistically tho, it doesn't matter. Everyone should be able to believe in what they want and do what they want as long as they aren't affecting anyone else. My point in droning on like this is to point out the hypocrisy of you saying repeatedly that we are the ones Indoctrinated because we choose to listen verify able information, while in turn believe in all knowing being that requires complete devotion so you don't suffer forever which has no actual evidence (spiritual evidence is complete bs), other than the rules and books that were created by a man. Literally every argument that you use to discredit science can be turned around and used against your religion.  The difference between the two of them is that from a young age you are taught to not trust science or the government because it's ran by men and men are inherently wicked and Satan this and that blah blah.
But in my experience a lot of the people I know who think the same way as I do, and I'm sure many of the people in this forum who follow the scientific method would agree, came to the conclusion that religion is bs made up by men to explain the (at the time) unexplainable and eventually grew into a form over government that men change and use to their own wims to exert power over others, usually poor people who have had no education who need some kind of comfort that someone is watching over them and if they work hard enough they'll be rewarded, or if they can pay their way out of it. Ever heard of indulgences or tithes?

2

Flat Earth General / Re: Perspective of the Sun Makes No Sense

« on: January 03, 2025, 06:21:29 PM »

It’s a pity you unlearned it to the extent you no longer make sense, you are beyond wrong in almost everything you say, like a child that has broken his toys and put them back together arbitrarily, declaring “There, that’s better.”

You're funny.

Whereas a humble person recognises there is no way to do that.

You're confusing humility for complacency.

Complacent people think they are being humble when they aggressively defend the ideas of others or their own insane ideas.

Humble people understand that they may be wrong, and others by extension are human. Within my life expectancy, I will learn everything (that I can, in the time allotted me). Will I know every chemical equation in the Merck Index? Heavens no. Will I learn that this list is very definitely not all inclusive? Yes. A complacent person might think that Merck discovered (or invented) every chemical. But I know there are always more, and since my ambition is not to be a chemist, I'll stick to things without the "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing" rule.  It is far too easy for me to poison myself or blow myself up. Knowing what it is important not to know is a key part of wisdom. I don't pick mushrooms either.

Will I really know everything before I die? Ummm, well, my life expectancy is maybe 80 years if I'm of average health, and my life span (the total amount, likely or not) is 120. There isn't enough time realistically. That is no excuse, however, to be lazy and let others do the thinking for me. That is complacency.

You were taught in school about Order of Operations in math, no?


It's wrong.

When you are complacent, if an authority figure tells you something, whether a teacher, the Pope, a scientist, or someone dressed like an angel, you accept it without question.

Galatians 1:8 tells us even if someone claiming to be an angel of God tells something that isn't in accord with the Gospel, don't you believe it. Personally, I don't even trust the Gospel to not be tampered with, so I do as 1 John says.

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of antichrist(s), which you heard was coming and now is in the world already.

Scientific literature has something similar, known as the scientific method. Before consensus about climate change or evolution or anything else, they stressed the need to repeat experiments. Why do this? Well, to test for mistakes. And to test for fraud. Science (having been corrupted) no longer employs this as common practice.

Building on top of past knowledge is not lazy. It's just how society works.

With your logic you should be going back and and studying the very basic fundamentals of math and science and perform every single experiment for yourself and go back and review every mathematical proof for every equation that's we've used to form the basis of human knowledge.

Car manufacturers arent called lazy for building upon the internal combustions used in cars and making it more efficient and powerful over the years. You wouldn't say that developers of advanced micro processors to be used to extremely precise GPS guides missiles are lazy even tho computer technology came about in the 50s.

Not everyone has an extreme amount of time to dedicate to learning every single thing. No single person can, like you said even in 120 years. This is why you need to rely on other people who have actually dedicated a significant amount of time and effort to whatever field they are researching. This is how a cohesive society works and progresses.


What I'll never seem to understand is that you are a devout Christian from what I've seen from your posts which is funny because most people are indocotrinated by birth thru circumcision, not even a year later you are baptized, youre forced to go to church by your parents and pray before dinner, you're taught that if you disobey you'll be punished by God and that you must be willing to suffer for the all knowing all powerful Creator who supposedly loves you. What about the beautiful brown haired, white skinned Jesus on every mosaic in every Church? Completely disregarding the fact that Jesus was born in the Middle East and was definitely brown/Carmel colored.

The difference is that that information that scientific organizations spread can be observed and/or recreated today with video evidence. Your religion was passed down by word of mouth over thousands of years and is based off an older religion also passed down by word of mouth for thousands of years as well, and is also based off an even older polytheistic Mesopotamian religion. It's also been split into hundreds of denominations since it's formation, it has been edited and revised countless times and nothing from it other than some of the life lessons apply to modern life. Not only that, but dozens of religions are older, have more documented history, and also have prophecies "fulfilled". Then the kicker is that you hold right wing politicians on a pedestal like Trump as if he's some beacon of Christian morality while he has 7 different kids with different women out of wedlock and pays off prostitutes, lies, and commits cardinal sins on the norm daily.

What I'm trying to get at is you can't really say it's lazy to trust people who know what they are doing via experience and studying information than can be replicated, then turn around and believe some fairy tail about you being carefree and God providing for you and not having to work or dealing with any hardships  or working (huh, kinda sounds like something a left wing socialist Democrats would promise, huh?) just because some old wrinkly guy said "trust me bro" while he's funneling all your tithes into his pocket.

3

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why care if the earth is flat?

« on: December 18, 2024, 04:19:03 PM »

A thought experiment to show the moon doesn't have to be in the atmosphere is very simple:

Boil a pot of water, and place a person across from you 15 feet away. As the vapor rises, your friend will be obscured, despite being well away from the steam. Same principle applies. Please turbo, for the love of god, no one is forcing you to say stupid shit.

He's just inadvertently prove himself wrong like all the other "definitive" experiments they do that proves the earth round.


He's like a compulsive liar except he compulsively spreads misinformation.

4

Flat Earth General / Re: Do FE-ers believe everybody who has a precise accelerometer is a conspirator?

« on: December 09, 2024, 06:49:48 PM »

Someone is gonna have to save that quote  from Tom admitting that scientific institutions in fact can be trusted and there's no reason to do your own experiment s, contrary to what his own Wiki says 😂😂

5

Flat Earth General / Re: Do FE-ers believe everybody who has a precise accelerometer is a conspirator?

« on: December 07, 2024, 08:22:38 PM »

Tom, isnt the entire flat earth movement based around performing these experiments for yourself because scientific institutions cannot be trusted? Don't you think it's kind of antithetical to flerf belief system to ask why you should have to come up with your own experiment designed by you because some science organizations have done the work already?

You realize that is exactly what the rest of us do and flat earthers rail against that saying that if you can't perform the test yourself then they're lying to you? You cant cherry pick and choose which scientific organizations to draw information from while they perform experiments and observations that you would say are bs if they were used for a source in a separate argument. It's called having your cake and eating it too, and there's a saying about it. You can't.

Also pretty disingenuous to constantly promote your own wiki that you made as sources for your argument. You know what happens when a student turns in a research paper and the sources are just paragraphs from one of their other research papers or Wikipedia? They don't pass because you can't cite yourself or a loose collection of text as proof unless you have published a peer reviewed paper, reviewed and approved by people who have been studying field in which the paper was written, which is also peer reviewed the same way. I can make a website talking about pedophile space vampires sucking the life from fetuses to retain their youth and then list my buddies who share the same dogmatic beliefs as I do under their online handles as "peer reviewers", but that doesn't mean it holds weight in any actual debate setting. If you're going to cite evidence that is in your wiki, just do everyone a favor and link to the ORIGINAL source of the information. That is how debates work

6

Flat Earth General / Re: The Final Experiment - Antarctic 24 hour sun

« on: December 04, 2024, 09:08:56 PM »

Bulma, Eric Dubay is a self proclaimed anti-semite who believed that Hitler and the Nazis did nothing wrong.

 I don't think he's the kind of person you should be defending him from supercilious insults.

Also, believing in scientific institutions is inherently anti-woke. The term "woke" was coined by those people who think there is some universal vibration and we are all in tune with and a few years back there was a divergence of some sort where the people with the correct universal vibrations would ascend to Nirvana or something like that (it's been awhile) and they would say they are "woke" and we are "asleep" because they are enlightened and we are not, so to speak. These people constantly rail against science and also believe in stupid shit like astrology or energy crystals and will call you close minded if you try to reason with them

You Trumpets picked up on it and use it as a general insult for literally any person who isn't religious, straight, or believes in social welfare. Let me be clear, that insult means nothing to anyone and is tantamount to calling us dumb dumb poopy heads. That's what we hear when you go on about "woke liberal queer retards". Its literally every argument about anything and you can count on at least on person calling me "woke" or " liberal" when neither of them apply to not only my personal beliefs, but also the argument at hand.

Also if Trump is such a for-the-people guy and is only concern with the truth, why hasn't he come out about 9/11, flat earth, the Holocaust, etc? He had a full term in office not even a Decade ago with access to this information. But y'all say "it's dangerous, they'll kill him"

I would argue that one 78 year old diabetic's life is a reasonable price to pay for the liberation of 8 billion humans from the stranglehold scientific institutions have in us apparently (but you think religious institutions that have been around for far longer can't?), especially considering how high of a pedestal that you guys put him in. Won't God and Jesus themselves come down from heaven to protect him again like they supposedly did at the Pennsylvania rally?

7

Flat Earth General / Re: Healthy Skeptical View of Science and Conspiracy theory

« on: October 09, 2024, 07:40:56 PM »

I don't see any evidence that these people are not pilots.

I don't see any evidence other than a claim that they are.

This isn't a case of anyone disagreeing with me being a liar.
It is a known FE liar, someone who is known to repeatedly lie.

But again, this is deflecting from the issue.
What motivation is there to pretend Earth is round such that so many systems operate based upon that?

There is more than one person in those videos. I don't see any evidence that they are lying. You have provided none. Once you can provide evidence for your claims we can consider your opinion.

Tom, I'm a pilot for Delta Airlines and I say it's round. My name is Adam. Prove that I'm not.

Wait you can't because there is so evidence to prove I am or I'm not. That is what we are trying to say.

Also linking wiki articles of the wiki that YOU created is disingenuous. Scientists don't cite themselves as evidence for their thesis they quote other people. Link the original article or don't link anything all. No one wants to swim thru the loose collection on conflicting ideas presented in your wiki.

8

Flat Earth General / Re: Accounts of FE’rs getting the info they wanted, then hand waved it off.

« on: October 09, 2024, 06:44:07 PM »

Gonna have to agree with Smoke there. Data,

Thanks for bumping the thread.

To just post off topic like a Flatie.

So, who’s posting for attention.  Vs posting to counter the ignorance that is Flat Earth. 

🤣

This thread never had a topic in the first place. It was just to gaslight flat earthers into a argument with you so that you can insult them cause you clearly have a superiority complex. IDC if if the post is bumped or not I've nothing to gain or lose from you getting a view extra views on your post. I'm sure you'll spring up 10 more of them this week. You've been in this forum a little over 2 years and you've posted nearly 5,000 times since then. That's about 6 posts a day and I bet if you went back and looked at most of them it's you not only insulting flerfers but also other RE believers cause they've corrected something you got wrong or got on your case for attacking people and hurling insults

I'm just trying to explain to you why maybe coming off as an egotistical ass maybe isn't the best way to convince someone to think the same way you do. Sorry your ego had to come up with some kind of way to make statement about your character flaws into a W for you

9

Flat Earth General / Re: Accounts of FE’rs getting the info they wanted, then hand waved it off.

« on: October 09, 2024, 04:17:29 PM »

Gonna have to agree with Smoke there. Data, you slip farther and farther into the mind space if a  stereotypical flerfer. You and Jack just ceaselessly insult and rile up the flerfers instead of picking their mind in their posts to consolidate your beliefs or have rational debate.

Insults and down talking people do nothing to further anyone's understanding of the point you are making, and in fact entrenches them in their own beliefs because now they have to prove they are not an idiot. Sure a lot of the flerfers on here do the same thing. Turbo, John, wise, Sando Khan (haven't seen him in awhile tho) but the amount of them doing it vs RE believers is not even comparable.

Like IDK why you guys act surprised to see people who believe in FE when this a forum dedicated to FE Theory. Itd be like going to a church in Sunday mass and talk blasphemy and get surprised when the people there get up in arms.

It is the problem with debates in general, especially as of recently. Everyone is their own person seeking their own truths in this world. It's doesn't always have to be us vs them. And if they don't want to accept RE then that is there prerogative, man. Who are we to force that on them regardless of how outlandish their claims may be.

Explaining your side of an argument shouldn't be to belittle the opposite and make them feel smaller than you cause they don't understand the world the way we do. It should be about coming to a mutual understanding and if it can't, then you agree to disagree and leave it at that.

You're not going to convince them and they aren't going to convince you at this point, so all we can really do, FE and RE both, is collect information from the opposing argument and compare against our to either confirm or deny our own understanding.

You can't insult someone then act surprised when they don't hold anything you say to any merit. Would you walk into a job interview and when they say they aren't sure and ask why you think you should have the job, do you reply by hurling insults about the flaws in their company so they have no room to ask you that question?

10

Flat Earth General / Re: what are flat earthers telling about Hurricane Milton that is happening now?

« on: October 09, 2024, 02:11:03 PM »

Bulma, you say that according to the NOAA explanations that we should have hurricanes in the summer, as if we don't already.

Hurricane season is June 1st - November 30th. This covers the entirety of Summer.

11

Flat Earth Debate / Re: They've lied to the world about the stars

« on: October 08, 2024, 04:30:44 PM »

So Turbo, you believe meteorites are part of the firmament falling on us? Could you also see my post about earthquakes and Tsunamis and give your explanation on that as well? I've seen your very entertaining explanations on why you think nuclear bombs aren't real (we don't have any pictures of ground zero at the second of detonation so that's clearly an indicator they aren't) so I'd like to get your take on both of those questions as well

12

Flat Earth Debate / Re: They've lied to the world about the stars

« on: September 30, 2024, 08:20:31 PM »

Do you think that meteorites are fake too? Or you one of the people who believe it's part of the "firmament" falling down on us? At which point would allow all the atmospheric pressure to rush out like a popped balloon. It'd be like a reverse OceanGate all over again, except the entire planet.

13

Flat Earth Debate / Re: FE Theory on Earthquakes and Tsunamis

« on: August 31, 2024, 09:09:31 PM »

Really? No one else?

I felt time this would've sparked a more lively debate considering virtually every other topic regarding FET has been touched on many times and people are still arguing over them.

This is a topic I have seen very little discussion over and I would like better reasoning other than that there's water below the earth with no followup explanation other than the only explanations I've seen are lies and a conspiracy. That means there much be a second side to this coin right? There has to be a debunk of it

14

Flat Earth Debate / Re: FE Theory on Earthquakes and Tsunamis

« on: August 29, 2024, 06:59:17 PM »

Personally, I think wars are one of the most important factors causing earthquakes. The Earth is not as deep as thought and therefore heavy bombardments can cause the ground to move and earthquakes.

This is ridiculous, earthquake are observed throughout the history of human, before the invention of nukes and gunpowder, you tell me what sort of "heavy bombardment" in ancient Greece can cause a 7.2 magnitude earthquake and what sort of explosion can cause a 8.4 magnitude earthquake in Japan?

In case you think I am making everything up, here is the link to wikipedia page about historical earthquake: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_historical_earthquakes

The fact that earthquakes create waves in distant places is the same as the globalist pseudoscience explanation. If you hit an object hard to the ground, it will cause vibrate around it in waves with a diminishing effect. Earthquake  is a kind of bigger one. If you do this on water, you will get a similar result. The shape of the earth does not create much of a distinctive effect here.

This is also wrong, since you said people should do more research, I did some research and find the flat Earth map that YOU made (yes wise, you made the map)

You said that earthquakes are caused by vibrations, if a earthquake is so powerful in Tokyo, shouldn't northern Canada be engulfed by waters when that happens? Because we observed minor tsunami in east coast of USA, the shock wave will travel in a straight line, shouldn't northern Canada be hit first and there will be news about Whitehorse is now underwater? It simply doesn't make sense.

Not to mention you can literally see the fault line with un aided eyes. You can also head up to Greenland and see the North Atlantic plate separating from the Artic Plate. There is a long wedge shaped chasm that runs for miles tracing out the fault line.

Furthermore, if you go diving in the trenches I mentioned earlier, you can see the hot gases escaping thru vents in the ocean floor. Then when seismic activity happens between these plates along the subduction zones, magma escapes from the cracks that form. How is this explained?

Speaking of volcanic activity, how is that explained by the FE model? Where is the magma in relation to the waters below? If the ground is on average 10km deep before the Waters Below start, which is not deep at all really,  is the magma just chilling there in between the waters and the surface? I feel deaths from lava in that case would be much higher than they are.
And what causes the magma to be there? The RE theory explains that extreme pressure from insanely hot molten rock and metal from the second layer of the earths core causes the liquid magma to be forced to the top and explode violently from the pressure by the thin layer of crust acting as a cap to store the building energy until it gives, like a bit of boiling water with a sealed lid.

We know that magma is liquid rock and metal by sampling it once cool, so there much be some force or mechanism within physics causing it to melt and be ejected into the atmosphere the way it does

15

Flat Earth Debate / Re: FE Theory on Earthquakes and Tsunamis

« on: August 29, 2024, 08:45:54 AM »

Firstly, welcome to the flat earth society forum, mister Adam. Thank you for trusting us with your safety. Of course, this is a more reliable source for information about the flat Earth model than Google. According to the flat Earth model, there are waters beneath the lands. Occasionally, normal fluctuations can cause earthquakes. You can think of this as similar to a ship's creaking hull.

Could you explain it in more detail? How far are the waters below the surface of the earth and how do these fluctuations cause the earthquakes?

Also what is the explanation how an earthquake with an epicenter off the cost of Japan causes waves to be sent to the cost of the US and vice versa?

There are multiple flat earth models with water underneath the flat earth's land. You can find these models by searching the forum and the web in the believers subforum or on the site wiki.

You can think of the thickness of the Earth's land as 12 kilometers on average, at least 10 kilometers and at most 100 kilometers. As I said, if you want a source, use the search option. Personally, I think wars are one of the most important factors causing earthquakes. The Earth is not as deep as thought and therefore heavy bombardments can cause the ground to move and earthquakes.

The fact that earthquakes create waves in distant places is the same as the globalist pseudoscience explanation. If you hit an object hard to the ground, it will cause vibrate around it in waves with a diminishing effect. Earthquake  is a kind of bigger one. If you do this on water, you will get a similar result. The shape of the earth does not create much of a distinctive effect here.

I did a lot of reading on Tom's FE wiki before I came to this forum. The models and explanations for it there did not satisfy me. If anything, at its best the FE Wiki is just a general guidelines for flat earthers to get started and almost everyone I've talked to has a different idea and I was hoping to get more responses to see what the Average consensus on here is and I do not feel like sitting thru the thousands of dead threads for my answer especially cause everyone has different ideas on how FE works (some say the earth is square, some say its unmoving some says a circle and spinning, some say its a circle but it's not spinning some say its flying upwards at a specific speed, etc) and everyone is always arguing it would take forever, plus this forum is like 15 years old and I'm sure there has been progress made in FET over those 15 years with the technology available.

According to FET, where is the earth the thickest and why? And where the average thickness measurement come from, and by who? There was the Soviet Super Bore hole where they dug 14 km into the earth and the oldy reason they had to stop was because the drill kept overheating and melting due to friction and the increased temperature of the rock that far beneath.

Touching on waves, yes bombs and wind and water displacement from ship movement causes waves but they are much smaller than most Tsunamis which regularly get up to 15 feet at the coast and in the ocean from crest to trough, the wave height is in the hundreds of feet and travels thousands of miles. Some of the largest bombs we've dropped out in the ocean or detonated under did not create anything in that scale.


Going back to Earthquakes, bombs from wars definitely cause vibrations in the Earth but are highly localized. If bombs causing earthquakes were the case, during WW1 Europe would have been experiencing hundreds of thousands of earthquakes over the period of war. There would have been mass destruction to cities not touched by bombs and to my knowledge no such damage or earthquakes were recorded. Meanwhile, places along fault lines such as San Diego experience many sever earthquakes every year. There is no war in or around California every year, year round.
If we are talking about the waters below, why are do earthquakes almost always happen in the same areas along fault lines? I live in Southern Ohio and I've never experienced an earthquake in my almost 24 years of life. If there is water below is and the ground is only 6-7 miles on average between us and the water, I feel like they should be a lot more common all over the world.
Furthermore of the models I've seen with Waters Below, the water from above the earth flows into the oceans which feeding into the Abyssal Waters that are underneath the Earth. In order for earthquakes to happen on the scale they do, wouldn't the Water Below have to be a closed system? There would be no pressure built up beneath the earth to transfer the power from the water moving because the pressure will travel thru the water and just displace it on the coast in the form of waves so there wouldn't really be any earthquakes, at least not in the scale that we have them today without it being a closed water system beneath us, as which earthquakes would be common all over the earth at much high magnitudes.

Another thing is epicenters. Earthquakes are caused by tectonic plates slipping and grinding against one another causing massive vibrations cause of the sheer scale of each plate. This causes a "centralized" point from where the earthquake originates called an epicenter that radiates from that point outwards in a circular shape on a map that can be corroborated by people living within those areas. Tsunamis are caused by this happening in the water, displacement tons of water.
Another thing to add to this is that earthquakes that happened from one slip strike zone that is surrounded by other slip strike zones will also cause all of them to trigger multiple earthquakes, each with its own measurable epicenter. How is this explained with FET?

If the Earth is an thin as you say and the Abyssal Waters are as expansive as others make them out to be, Earthquakes would not behave the way that they do. There would be one large wave that travels over a massive distance from the point of whatever is strong enough to cause it.

Again not trying to argue or say I'm right or you're wrong, but just trying to gain more knowledge on this.
Thanks,

16

Flat Earth Debate / Re: FE Theory on Earthquakes and Tsunamis

« on: August 27, 2024, 11:12:14 PM »

Firstly, welcome to the flat earth society forum, mister Adam. Thank you for trusting us with your safety. Of course, this is a more reliable source for information about the flat Earth model than Google. According to the flat Earth model, there are waters beneath the lands. Occasionally, normal fluctuations can cause earthquakes. You can think of this as similar to a ship's creaking hull.

Could you explain it in more detail? How far are the waters below the surface of the earth and how do these fluctuations cause the earthquakes?

Also what is the explanation how an earthquake with an epicenter off the cost of Japan causes waves to be sent to the cost of the US and vice versa?

17

Flat Earth Debate / FE Theory on Earthquakes and Tsunamis

« on: August 27, 2024, 09:08:22 PM »

I cannot find much in Google and do not feel like digging thru the endless arguments on this forum to figure it out

I would like to know how earthquakes or tectonic plates in general are viewed by FET. I would also like to figure out thoughts on Tsunamis. They are caused by massive displacement of water so there has to be something down there causing it.

Also how are earthquakes that occur in Japan that cause  minor Tsunamis on the East Coast of the US explained. If we are looking at the FE map, the Pacific coast of the US is almost parallel to Japan. If the Earthquake were to happen where they usually do, which is along the subduction zones around the massive trenches around that area, the waves should be running parallel to the Coast after colliding with North Western Alaska and Possibly North Western Washington as well, as they just out past the "line of fire" of the waves. But instead hit Southern California and Hawaii.

Please keep it civil I'm not here to argue one point or the other I'm just wondering