Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Stash

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 121
1
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA EPIC LIES
« on: July 04, 2020, 02:01:58 PM »
Worse.  The key words have been taken out mid sentence:

Yes, you keep getting worse and worse.  Literally cutting out words in the middle of a sentence is called lying.  YOu're no longer quoting, but making things up.

Your best evidence is lying.  That's terrible.

LOL, now i see what you are whining and complaining about...When quoting Unconvinced...

ARMSTRONG:   
We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the Moon by eye without looking through the optics.
I don't recall during the period of time that we were photographing the solar corona what stars we could see.


my intention was to delete these two signs : b and /b between which the words "the solar corona" are placed, and while doing this -by mistake- i deleted the words "the solar corona" as well... O.K., sorry for that, however, it doesn't make any difference...so keep whining and complaining about small things if you think it can help you...lol...what a pathetic morons you are...absolutely amazing...

Strange too how in your claim that you were removing bold mark-up that you:
- Just so happened to remove the most important clarifying words in the sentence
- Even more curious, you somehow added in a comma to make the sentence read correctly without the key words you deleted

Why was the text bolded in the first place? Must have meant they were important, right?
How did that comma get in there?

You straight up altered a quote to make it something that it is not. It doesn't get shadier than that. You lied. And you're still lying trying to cover up your lie. This is beyond unacceptable behavior. You have absolutely less than zero credibility. If your last resort tactic is to lie, you lose.

2
Flat Earth General / Re: Geocentric Earth model and Aether
« on: July 04, 2020, 01:19:08 AM »
Take #6 for example:

Zeta zero #6

37.586178159

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2083623#msg2083623

37.5859324

From your link:

Already we have obtained a five digit/three decimal place approximation:

37.5859324


What causes your calculation to end up as: 37.5859324

When it should be: 37.586178159

I understand we're splitting hairs here. Just curious as to why they are not more 'exact'.


3
One in four testing positive in Houston? 

Surely that can't be right?   If true that's game over for Houston.

https://www.newsweek.com/1-4-houston-residents-testing-positive-covid-19-amid-texas-outbreak-1515349

I'm not sure exactly how to read this, but one thing popped out, Adult vents in use versus available, 842 to 1022. Doesn't seem like a gap one would want to see. Less than 200 avail???



Here's the interactive dashboard:
https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2020/06/16/this-dashboard-tracks-the-daily-hospital-capacity-for-general-icu-beds-in-the-houston-area/


4
I am famous for having shown how M/S Estonia sank 1994. That's when my fame started. I wrote about it in the biggest Swedish daily newspaper Dagens Nyheter. I operated similar ships and it was easy to show full scale that visors do not fall off ships. I have attended many public meetings about it in Scotland, Estonia, Finland, Sweden, France, etc, and all agree with me except the governments 'experts' suggesting that the visor fell off with nobody hearing it. The Swedish Navy blew off the visor from the wreck after sinking at the bottom of the sea. I happen to have done my military service in that shit Navy 1965/70. Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter will not mention my name since. That newspaper just publish Fake News today. I feel sorry for the editor & Co.

A cursory search around the subject that brought you "fame" reveals that you're just another conspiracy theorist nobody.

"One of Bjorkman’s comrades in arms is the Swedish-German author and lawyer Henning Witte who, in 1999, released a book titled “MS Estonia Was Sunk: New Facts and Theories on Estoniagate.” Witte repeated Bjorkman’s argument and asserted that the ferry might have been hit by a Russian torpedo fired from a submarine in order to thwart the export of sensitive military technology. Today, Witte runs White TV, one of the most prolific channels for the dissemination of conspiracy theories in Sweden, ranging from 9/11 to 5G and the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, mind control of Swedish politics."
https://www.fairobserver.com/region/europe/ms-estonia-disaster-conspiracy-sweden-radical-right-news-14531/

Your "fame" is more like infamy in that all you have done is run your mouth full of conspiracy theories and nothing more. No one in the Estonia case even remotely takes you seriously.

I know Henning Witte of course. I wrote the foreword of his book.

Of course you do and of course you did.

Wittes theory of MUST
According to Henning Wittes theory, TT and Sweden Radio are controlled by the Board of Psychological Defense, which in turn is part of the military security service MUST . [ 10 ] [ 11 ]

Other areas of (Henning Witte's) interest
Other areas he is interested in from a critical and conspiratorial perspective are thought control and brainwashing


My speciality is safety at sea and not conspiracy theories.

Obviously, because your conspiracy theories lack any intelligence or evidence whatsoever. You need to keep your day job.

Of course plenty people make up all sorts of stories to fool people. They are paid for it. I know them. I just show that their stories are not true. They get upset.

Actually, you don't show anything, Therein lies the problem. All you do is show, over and over again that if you don't understand something then it must be fake. It doesn't get any more Dunning-Kruger than that.

So I got famous for it, when I showed 1996 that official explanation of the M/V Estonia accident by the Swedish government 1994 was false.  The Swedish government's official, public response via media was that I was an idiot.

They were not wrong.

It was the only answer they could produce.

The only reasonable conclusion based upon your credibility or lack thereof.

The matter has since been discussed in the Swedish parliament several times and nobody dares to suggest that I am an idiot. And the case is not closed. It goes on.

The case was closed out years ago and you haven't had a job since.

5
All info there is correct. I have checked all myself on the spot.

Self checking your ignorance is hardly an argument for anything credible. It's a closed loop of stupidity.

How about a new Heiwa Challenge? I'll give you $1 million dollars if you can show that anyone has hired you based upon your website and all that your conspiratorial lunacy entails.
No, the present five Heiwa Challenges - http://heiwaco.tripod.com/chall.htm - are OK. No winners.
And I don't need your $1 million. I have enough already.

So you don't accept the challenge? If so, I think it's safe to say zero people have employed your services since you went over the edge with half-baked conspiracies. I mean who in their right mind would hire you to ensure the safety of a bathtub let alone a merchant ship seeing that you can't even wrap your head around what is mass and what is weight?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4280640#post4280640

6
Flat Earth General / Re: Geocentric Earth model and Aether
« on: July 03, 2020, 11:50:23 PM »
This is the list of the zeta zeros:

http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/zeta_tables/zeros1

Zeta zero #5:

32.935061588

My algorithm (see my previous message) has provided this figure:

32.93506148

An eight digit/six decimal place accuracy.

That's all you need to know IT WORKS!

What about Zeta zero #4 & Zeta zero #6? What did your algorithm come up with?

How about Zeta zero #22 & Zeta zero #64? What did your algorithm come up with?

7
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA EPIC LIES
« on: July 03, 2020, 11:44:07 PM »
cikljamas, you deliberately omitted the second sentence in Armstrong's response and skipped straight to Collins' response. Why did you do that?

Worse.  The key words have been taken out mid sentence:

ARMSTRONG:   
We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the Moon by eye without looking through the optics.
I don't recall during the period of time that we were photographing the solar corona what stars we could see.

CONSPIRACY THEORIST EPIC LIES VERSION: 
We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the Moon by eye without looking through the optics.
I don't recall during the period of time that we were photographing what stars we could see.

Absolutely shameless.

Yep, even worse and more shameless than I had even initially thought.

Why lie cikljamas, why?

8
Thanks for studying the funny milesmathis link I provided. Miles is professional painter and can spot a fake piece of art on Earth easily. I am a professional safety at sea (and space) expert and can easily spot drunken sailors and astronomers lying through their noses about it on Earth.
Let me correct that.

Miles is a professional con artist who understands nothing of physics and you seem to understand nothing about space missions and astronomy.
Whatever, I just linked to Miles about space. My expertise is safety, i.e. probability of no accident. Humans have no chance and nothing to do in space, so the NASA human space program is fraud since the beginning in the 1950's. But thanks to Fake News media NASA has got away with its Hollywood show. It is similar to this fake image of a Black Hole >50 million light years away.

If you link to Miles as your source for space information I question your expertise in safety. Because you obviously have no rational filter when it comes to sources for your 'knowledge'.
Well, I linked to Miles space page because he/it is funny. Personally I work to drink, dance and have fun and meet people, while producing things of value, so I note down my findings at my website. Because I am always a serious professional, I never have problems finding serious work. And during all that long time I meet a lot of clowns. It is my life.

You actually have clients and they've seen your site? That's more unbelievable than all the ignorance and misinformation on your site.

Yes. I also have a family and they all agree with my findings.

All you're really saying here is that your family is just as ignorant and misinformed as you are.

Some time ago our town was visited by some fake asstronuts and we went and talked to them. Of course they could not explain anything about returning back from space. They were simple liars/actors.

Who were these astronauts that you just so happened to bump into and strike up a conversation with?


Re A-bombs I don't know anybody that disagree with me.

So? We humans tend to run inside our own bubbles of beliefs. It means nothing that you run with like minded people of ignorance. Evidence of nothing.


A-bombs are just propaganda since 1945. But in Japan and USA it is illegal to say so.

I don't know about Japan, but it's not illegal to disbelieve in A-Bombs and say so. Right there you have fabricated a lie.

I happened to know people in East Germany helping Stalin building fake A-bombs!

Stalin faking military might is no proof that A-Bombs don't exist. Probably more proof to the contrary. Why would Stalin try to bother to match western might/bluster if he thought the might didn't exist?

I also know people from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I have worked in and visited Japan many times.

So? And again, meeting some random people who say something about whatever is not evidence of anything.
You really have no idea what evidence is, do you?

I am famous for having shown how M/S Estonia sank 1994. That's when my fame started. I wrote about it in the biggest Swedish daily newspaper Dagens Nyheter. I operated similar ships and it was easy to show full scale that visors do not fall off ships. I have attended many public meetings about it in Scotland, Estonia, Finland, Sweden, France, etc, and all agree with me except the governments 'experts' suggesting that the visor fell off with nobody hearing it. The Swedish Navy blew off the visor from the wreck after sinking at the bottom of the sea. I happen to have done my military service in that shit Navy 1965/70. Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter will not mention my name since. That newspaper just publish Fake News today. I feel sorry for the editor & Co.

A cursory search around the subject that brought you "fame" reveals that you're just another conspiracy theorist nobody.

"One of Bjorkman’s comrades in arms is the Swedish-German author and lawyer Henning Witte who, in 1999, released a book titled “MS Estonia Was Sunk: New Facts and Theories on Estoniagate.” Witte repeated Bjorkman’s argument and asserted that the ferry might have been hit by a Russian torpedo fired from a submarine in order to thwart the export of sensitive military technology. Today, Witte runs White TV, one of the most prolific channels for the dissemination of conspiracy theories in Sweden, ranging from 9/11 to 5G and the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, mind control of Swedish politics."
https://www.fairobserver.com/region/europe/ms-estonia-disaster-conspiracy-sweden-radical-right-news-14531/

Your "fame" is more like infamy in that all you have done is run your mouth full of conspiracy theories and nothing more. No one in the Estonia case even remotely takes you seriously.

Re 911 - same thing. I have made public speeches about it in the USA - skyscrapers do not collapse into dust from top down by gravity after Arabs have attacked - and invited FBI to learn something but then I was stopped. Just study my website. I report it all there.

Here again. Didn't you get kicked to the curb by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (https://www.ae911truth.org/) for being even too much of a crackpot for them?

I am quite proud of my website.

Why? It looks like some 6th grader was tasked after their introductory class in 1996 to create the most disorganized awful on the eyes psuedo-science heap of garbage of a site they could possibly muster. You call yourself an engineer and you can't even put together a single cogent, straight-forward argument for just about anything. Your best argument: Apollo = Where do they urinate = I can't figure it out = Must be fake. That's about the depth of any of your arguments/observations. Your ignorance is overwhelming across the board.


All info there is correct. I have checked all myself on the spot.

Self checking your ignorance is hardly an argument for anything credible. It's a closed loop of stupidity.

How about a new Heiwa Challenge? I'll give you $1 million dollars if you can show that anyone has hired you based upon your website and all that your conspiratorial lunacy entails.

9
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Murder of George Floyd
« on: July 03, 2020, 03:03:58 PM »
The CHOP still hasn't been cleared out. https://www.capitolhillseattle.com/2020/07/more-arrests-overnight-on-capitol-hill-as-new-battle-lines-form-between-protesters-and-police/

The CHOP reminds me of when some members of a Native American tribe took over Alcatraz in San Francisco Bay I think back in the 70's. They occupied it for like a year or something amazing like that.

It was abandoned and unused for years before they occupied it.  It would be like occupying a spot somewhere on a government reserve that nobody went to.  It' wasn't a tourist attraction back then, or even open to the public.  If they had occupied an active government facility that would likely have ended differently.  They weren't armed white guys after all.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/01/03/us/oregon-wildlife-refuge-protest/index.html

Good point. I had forgotten that at the time Alcatraz hadn't yet been turned into the tourist trap it is today.

10
Flat Earth General / Re: Geocentric Earth model and Aether
« on: July 03, 2020, 02:58:25 PM »
But they do? What if Eric Dubay (you probably know him), for example, discovers something new to science? That will help his Flat Earth message.

Sandokhan did that with zeta zeros

Sandy did what with zeta zeros? And what do zeta zeros have to do with anything?

11
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA EPIC LIES
« on: July 03, 2020, 02:48:18 PM »

And you missed the point. Read Stash's post and maybe you'll learn something (though I doubt it). They were specifically asked if they could see stars in the solar corona in spite of the glare, referring to a experiment performed on the trip. He does NOT say he couldn't see stars any other time.

cikljamas, you deliberately omitted the second sentence in Armstrong's response and skipped straight to Collins' response. Why did you do that?

12
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA EPIC LIES
« on: July 03, 2020, 12:41:40 PM »
LUNAR ROVER HOAX :

Who is this guy? Vsevolod Yakubovich, Russian special effects 'operator' for a handful of crappy iron curtain 70's films. And why is it that all the Apollo conspiracists feel the need to speed up the original footage? Disingenuous at best.

Speaking at a press conference just weeks after returning to Earth, Armstrong said: “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface, or on the daylight side of Moon without looking through the optics.

“I don’t recall, during the period of time that we were photographing, what stars we could see.”

Before Collins added: “I don’t remember seeing any.”

You left out the second part of Armstrong's response deliberately (see bold). Why?

REPORTER: I have two brief questions that I would like to ask, if I may. When you were carrying out that incredible Moon walk, did you find that the surface was equally firm everywhere or were there harder and softer spots that you could detect. And, secondly, when you looked up at the sky, could you actually see the stars in the solar corona in spite of the glare?

ALDRIN:   The first part of your question, the surface did vary in its thickness of penetration somewhere in flat regions. The footprint would penetrate a half an inch or sometimes only a quarter of an inch and gave a very firm response. In other regions near the edges of these craters we could find that the foot would sink down maybe 2, 3, possibly 4 inches and in the slope, of course, the varlous edges of the footprint might go up to 6 or 7 inches. In compacting this material it would tend to produce a slight sideways motion as it was compacted on the material underneath it. So we feel that you cannot always tell by looking at the surface what the exact resistance will be as your foot sinks into a point of firm contact. So one must be quite cautious in moving around in this rough surface.

ARMSTRONG:   We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the Moon by eye without looking through the optics. I don't recall during the period of time that we were photographing the solar corona what stars we could see.

ALDRIN:   I don't remember seeing any. (This was actually said by Mike Collins. See http://archive.org/details/VJSC_1425Q_Apollo11_F.A.C.T.S._PartQ.wmv at counter 44:42)


However, Michael Collins wrote on page 221 of "Carrying the Fire" :

"My God, stars are everywhere: above me on all sides, even below me somewhat, down there next to that obscure horizon. The stars are bright and they are steady. Of course I know that a star's twinkle is created by the atmosphere, and I have seen twinkle-less stars before in a planetarium, but this is different, this is no simulation, this is the best view of the universe that a human ever had."

He was referring to his EVA from Gemini, not Apollo. As in from a capsule, not from the Lunar surface:

"Approaching orbital dusk on the afternoon of 19 July, Collins opened the hatch above his head and poked himself into space for EVA-1. Known as a “Stand-Up EVA,” he set up a general-purpose camera to examine ultraviolet radiation emissions from distant stars, specifically from the southern part of the Milky Way galaxy. In total, he acquired 32 images. “The stars are everywhere,” Collins later wrote, “above me on all sides, even below me somewhat, down there next to the obscure horizon. The stars are bright and they are steady.” Passing into orbital nighttime, he could see little of Earth, save for the blue-gray tint of water, cloud, and land."

I think somewhere Collins mentions seeing stars during Apollo. Again, he was in the capsule, not down on the hyper bright Lunar surface.

Get you facts straight.

13
You know Pangea was not what the scientists claim it is. It was not our current earth continents joined together as one. Pangea in the original universe was a massive landmass roughly 200.000 miles from North to South and this huge continent was actually one of the smallest compared to its neighbors. Ocean of Eden is infinite so I can only imagine the size of some continents that exist there.

If the universe was 200000 mile land mass, where did all the stars, planets, sun, and moon come from.


Your question shows that you didn't read my OP. Please read my post. I never said universe was 200.000 miles. Original Universe which is Ocean of Eden is infinite. Pangea (one of many continents) was 200.000 miles from North to South. The sun and stars didn't exist in the original universe. Sun and stars exist in our Heleocentric universe only. If you read Genesis it doesn't say that he created the sun and stars. It says that God separated night from day, light from darkness. So I assume the original universe was illuminated by divine heavenly light which is not our current sun. The sun we see now is native to our earth globe only. I will repeat again and stress it very strongly, the earth we are on now is not the earth or universe described in Genesis. After Adam and Eve were driven out from the Garden of Eden they came to this earth globe, before that they were in Paradise (Pangea) another dimension.

What happened to all of your Vedic disk stuff? Here:

For a very long time I believed that earth was an infinite ocean, featuring billions of continents spread far and wide across this infinite sea. I began to study Vedas and found a different cosmological view where Earth is presented as a disk inside a giant sphere. The disk is 4 billion miles in diameter featuring 7 concentric oceans and lands. I believe there is element of truth in Vedic teachings however I refuse to believe that there is a dome or that we are inside a big sphere. However I do think that we are on a giant disk (Bhumandala) and this disk stretches for millions of miles, the disk itself is floating on infinite ocean or as I call it "Universal Ocean"  Vedas refer to this ocean as Causal ocean. But the Vedic concept is somewhat different from mine. So after studying Vedas and relying on my own spiritual intuition, my new model is as follows; Earth is infinite in all directions. The section of earth on which we live is called "Bhumandala" or Earth disk, it is millions of miles wide featuring concentric oceans and lands same as Vedas describe. The entire earth disk is surrounded by Loka Loka mountains which are extremely high, these mountains serve as the border of our sun. Beyond this mountains there is no sun. Outside earth disk is universal ocean, no more sun, rather the area of infinite ocean is illuminated by pleasant light of God himself and so it is better than our sun. The universal ocean is filled with endless continents in all directions.

14
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Murder of George Floyd
« on: July 03, 2020, 11:17:18 AM »
The CHOP still hasn't been cleared out. https://www.capitolhillseattle.com/2020/07/more-arrests-overnight-on-capitol-hill-as-new-battle-lines-form-between-protesters-and-police/

The CHOP reminds me of when some members of a Native American tribe took over Alcatraz in San Francisco Bay I think back in the 70's. They occupied it for like a year or something amazing like that.

15
Thanks for studying the funny milesmathis link I provided. Miles is professional painter and can spot a fake piece of art on Earth easily. I am a professional safety at sea (and space) expert and can easily spot drunken sailors and astronomers lying through their noses about it on Earth.
Let me correct that.

Miles is a professional con artist who understands nothing of physics and you seem to understand nothing about space missions and astronomy.
Whatever, I just linked to Miles about space. My expertise is safety, i.e. probability of no accident. Humans have no chance and nothing to do in space, so the NASA human space program is fraud since the beginning in the 1950's. But thanks to Fake News media NASA has got away with its Hollywood show. It is similar to this fake image of a Black Hole >50 million light years away.

If you link to Miles as your source for space information I question your expertise in safety. Because you obviously have no rational filter when it comes to sources for your 'knowledge'.
Well, I linked to Miles space page because he/it is funny. Personally I work to drink, dance and have fun and meet people, while producing things of value, so I note down my findings at my website. Because I am always a serious professional, I never have problems finding serious work. And during all that long time I meet a lot of clowns. It is my life.

You actually have clients and they've seen your site? That's more unbelievable than all the ignorance and misinformation on your site.

16
Thanks for studying the funny milesmathis link I provided. Miles is professional painter and can spot a fake piece of art on Earth easily. I am a professional safety at sea (and space) expert and can easily spot drunken sailors and astronomers lying through their noses about it on Earth.
Let me correct that.

Miles is a professional con artist who understands nothing of physics and you seem to understand nothing about space missions and astronomy.
Whatever, I just linked to Miles about space. My expertise is safety, i.e. probability of no accident. Humans have no chance and nothing to do in space, so the NASA human space program is fraud since the beginning in the 1950's. But thanks to Fake News media NASA has got away with its Hollywood show. It is similar to this fake image of a Black Hole >50 million light years away.

If you link to Miles as your source for space information I question your expertise in safety. Because you obviously have no rational filter when it comes to sources for your 'knowledge'.

17

Do you even know what a quasar is?  Why do you think you should see one?  Do you just make things up as you type them?


Thanks for asking. I describe quasars at my website based on info provided by astronomers. They should be seen adjacent to Black Holes. See also - http://milesmathis.com/black4.pdf
"the most dishonest scientists love to hide out in data holes, where they can say whatever they wish and get famous for nothing".

A perfect example of where you get your dunning-kruger syndrome from: Miles Mathis. Miles has quite a number of thoughts on various topics. Here's just a few to give you a sense of his (and your) credibility, or lack thereof:

PAPER UPDATE, added 6/6/20, The George Floyd Killing was Faked. I have added brief comments from another reader at the bottom.
PAPER UPDATE, added 5/20/20, Obama's Genealogy. See p. 3, where I show you a few new things.
NEW PAPER, added 3/14/20, The Coronavirus Hoax. A guest writer gets us started on this one.
NEW PAPER, added 2/19/20, The 22 July Massacre in Norway was Fake, part 5. A guest writer from Norway continues my 4-parter on Anders Breivik, discovering some tasty additions.
NEW PAPER, added 12/13/19, Yes, Diana Faked Her Death. You always knew it. This is probably the closest thing to proof you are going to get.
NEW PAPER, added 11/15/19, The Assassination of Malcolm X was Staged. Also analysis of Willie McGee, William Faulkner, Madame Chiang Kai-Shek, Bella Abzug, and others.   
PAPER UPDATE, added 5/29/19, Abe Lincoln. See p. 25, where we find more evidence Lincoln's death was faked.

It goes on like this for page after page after page.

It's good to know where you get your astronomy and physics knowledge from.

Thanks for studying the funny milesmathis link I provided. Miles is professional painter and can spot a fake piece of art on Earth easily. I am a professional safety at sea (and space) expert and can easily spot drunken sailors and astronomers lying through their noses about it on Earth.

Your affection for Miles speaks volumes about your personal credibility. Based upon that partial list I provided of his "work" I can't imagine he can spot much of anything. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. He's got a hundred more papers of his "findings" that are just as asinine and insane as "Abe Lincoln faked his death..."

Here's a full list of his insanity:
http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html

Oh, and my new personal favorite:
NEW PAPER, added 4/17/15, Stephen Hawking died and has been replaced. I show lots of photographic evidence that Hawking died in 1985 and has been played by an impostor since then.

You are the company you keep.


18

Do you even know what a quasar is?  Why do you think you should see one?  Do you just make things up as you type them?


Thanks for asking. I describe quasars at my website based on info provided by astronomers. They should be seen adjacent to Black Holes. See also - http://milesmathis.com/black4.pdf
"the most dishonest scientists love to hide out in data holes, where they can say whatever they wish and get famous for nothing".

A perfect example of where you get your dunning-kruger syndrome from: Miles Mathis. Miles has quite a number of thoughts on various topics. Here's just a few to give you a sense of his (and your) credibility, or lack thereof:

PAPER UPDATE, added 6/6/20, The George Floyd Killing was Faked. I have added brief comments from another reader at the bottom.
PAPER UPDATE, added 5/20/20, Obama's Genealogy. See p. 3, where I show you a few new things.
NEW PAPER, added 3/14/20, The Coronavirus Hoax. A guest writer gets us started on this one.
NEW PAPER, added 2/19/20, The 22 July Massacre in Norway was Fake, part 5. A guest writer from Norway continues my 4-parter on Anders Breivik, discovering some tasty additions.
NEW PAPER, added 12/13/19, Yes, Diana Faked Her Death. You always knew it. This is probably the closest thing to proof you are going to get.
NEW PAPER, added 11/15/19, The Assassination of Malcolm X was Staged. Also analysis of Willie McGee, William Faulkner, Madame Chiang Kai-Shek, Bella Abzug, and others.   
PAPER UPDATE, added 5/29/19, Abe Lincoln. See p. 25, where we find more evidence Lincoln's death was faked.

It goes on like this for page after page after page.

It's good to know where you get your astronomy and physics knowledge from.

19
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Murder of George Floyd
« on: July 01, 2020, 04:45:22 PM »
Wow.  You are unhinged.  When the Cronoa vaccine comes out, you are going to be one of the jerks who refuses to take it because you think it's got nano-tracking alien dna implanting mind control parasites in it
Prove that it doesn't, retard.
But what if the mind control part of the vaccine is to cure systemic racism and reduces the number of unarmed minorities killed by police?
So you think it's ok to inject people with microchips? That's pretty dumb, even for your standards.
First off, I didn't offer an opinion, I asked a question.   Not knowing the difference is pretty dumb, even by your standards.

Secondly, since when do vaccines come in the form of a microchip? ???
First off, I didn't offer an opinion, I asked a question.   Not knowing the difference is pretty dumb, even by your standards.

Secondly, I didnt say they do I just asked for proof that they don't!

What would proof that vaccines don't come with microchips look like?

20
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA EPIC LIES
« on: July 01, 2020, 03:30:34 PM »
UPDATED: Just to keep a running recap tally and fill in some gaps so future humans don't have to go back and wade through all of cikljamas' conspiratorial flotsam:

- Challenger astronauts did not perish and are alive and well today - DEBUNKED, over and over, and over again
- Mice in space - DEBUNKED
- Lemmings on Mars - DEBUNKED
- Missing lunar rover tire tracks - DEBUNKED
- Claiming ’NASA’ is Hebrew for “to be deceived"…. - DEBUNKED
- Secret NASA Mars landscape in Canada - DEBUNKED
- Ring Laser Gyroscope doesn’t show earth rotation - DEBUNKED
- Claiming the State of Liberty is actually Apollo aka Lucifer aka Demonic Masonic Lying Lightbearer - DEBUNKED
- Not properly citing sources - CONSTANT
- Copious amounts of plagiarism - CONSTANT
- Cherry picking citations - CONSTANT
- Misrepresenting/misinterpreting sources - CONSTANT
- Not understanding the basics of a frame of reference - CONSTANT
- Grotesque and childish use of font size and color - CONSTANT
- Presenting images and claiming they are genuine and/or from NASA, when they are not - CONSTANT
- Presenting videos and claiming they are genuine and/or from NASA, when they are not - CONSTANT
- Antivaxxer - CONSTANT
- Conspiracy Theorist through and through - CONSTANT
- Repeating the same copy & paste walls of text over and over again even though they are debunked - CONSTANT
- Contacting and threatening a Professor - EGREGIOUS, SELFISH, and UNWARRANTED
- "I don't understand how space suits work therefore they don't work - DEBUNKED
- Truth seeker - NEVER
[/quote]

21
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA EPIC LIES
« on: June 30, 2020, 03:50:48 PM »
Just to keep a running recap tally and fill in some gaps so future humans don't have to go back and wade through all of cikljamas' conspiratorial flotsam:

- Challenger astronauts did not perish and are alive and well today - Debunked, over and over, and over again
- Mice in space - Debunked
- Lemmings on Mars - Debunked
- Missing lunar rover tire tracks - Debunked
- Claiming ’NASA’ is Hebrew for “to be deceived"…. - Debunked
- Secret NASA Mars landscape in Canada - Debunked
- Ring Laser Gyroscope doesn’t show earth rotation - Debunked
- Claiming the State of Liberty is actually Apollo aka Lucifer aka Demonic Masonic Lying Lightbearer - Debunked
- Not properly citing sources - Constant
- Cherry picking citations - Constant
- Misrepresenting/misinterpreting sources - Constant
- Not understanding the basics of a frame of reference - Constant
- Grotesque and childish use of font size and color - Constant
- Presenting images and claiming they are genuine and/or from NASA, when they are not - Constant
- Presenting videos and claiming they are genuine and/or from NASA, when they are not - Constant
- Antivaxxer - Constant
- Conspiracy Theorist through and through - Constant
- Repeating the same copy & paste walls of text over and over again even though they are debunked - Constant
- Contacting and threatening a Professor - Egregious, selfish, and unwarranted
- Truth seeker - Never

22
Flat Earth General / Re: Is there a Missing Orbital Sagnac Effect?
« on: June 30, 2020, 03:02:15 PM »
I guess he isn't talking about Normal saganac

No, my bad English strikes again

I guess I am not talkibg about effects of ordinary saganac, but abiut something new to science

The question is, what are you talking about then?

Your english is great. But I still don't know what you're going on about.

23
oh Man, you don't know what my issue is.

Correct, I have no idea. You're just now realizing that google has owned YT for 14 years and for some reason you don't know how to search on google. Yeah, I'm mystified as to what your problem is.

24
Topic is an image of a celestial object with a diameter of say 10 km which is 5.2 x 1020 km away (55 million light years) at the center of a galaxy in our Universe. 200 astronomers of multiple telescopes on Earth have taken plenty photos of this far away object but none have been published. It is suggested that the telescopes at different locations on Earth can jointly take photos of this object so that a composite image can be created using bits and pieces of available footage. Missing bits have also been added during several years. The final image is black (the background color of the Universe) with a hole with a black dot in the middle of the hole. The hole is illuminated. The rim of the hole is a shadow of some sort and the light is coming from somewhere. What the dot in the middle is, is not clear. It is suggested that celestial object in the image is a Black Hole. If you try to find out more of the history of this image, you are told that it just popped up on a computer screen of a poor girl part of the team. I just suggest the image is simple fakery and that the girl is a fraud. Reason I do it, is that I don’t believe Black Holes exist in the Universe. I explain more at http://heiwaco.tripod.com/moontravelb.htm

Again, you suggest the image is simple fakery and that the girl is a fraud, yet you have no knowledge of even the basics. You just make it up.

Case in point, you write, "Topic is an image of a celestial object with a diameter of say 10 km..." Right out of the gate you don't have any sense of the facts - Just fabricate whatever feels right to you and mosey on your way. The definition of ignorance.

"It measures 40 billion km across - three million times the size of the Earth"

That seems like a smidge larger than 10 km in diameter.

If you're going to make some claims, at a minimum, get right what you're making a claim against. You can't even get past the first sentence without lying.

25
Before youtube cut me off - just kidding -  my browser is no longer supported, i spent an hour looking for instructions on how to use youtube - found nothing. NO INSTRUCTIoNS

If anyone could confirm this for me i would appreciate it. My understanding is that noweher are there instructions for basic operation of youtube.

It occurred to Me a while back that thee were "top comments", and then it occurred to me that there was no instructions on how it works, or written rules about the top comment designation.

Instructions for what?

Google search: 'youtube top comments description'

Response:

What are top comments on YouTube?
A top comment on YouTube is a comment that has received the most thumbs ups. This is another way to get you popular on YouTube, aside from your videos.


Elapsed time to find answer: 5 seconds

No man. theirs something wrong with that. i just found out google and youtube were related.

You just now discovered this? Google bought YT in 2006 - 14 years ago. Where have you been?

they don't say on the website type your questions in the google search engine. They're giving  you the reigns to lower the bar.

I have no idea what your issue is. What's the problem?

26
Before youtube cut me off - just kidding -  my browser is no longer supported, i spent an hour looking for instructions on how to use youtube - found nothing. NO INSTRUCTIoNS

If anyone could confirm this for me i would appreciate it. My understanding is that noweher are there instructions for basic operation of youtube.

It occurred to Me a while back that thee were "top comments", and then it occurred to me that there was no instructions on how it works, or written rules about the top comment designation.

Instructions for what?

Google search: 'youtube top comments description'

Response:

What are top comments on YouTube?
A top comment on YouTube is a comment that has received the most thumbs ups. This is another way to get you popular on YouTube, aside from your videos.


Elapsed time to find answer: 5 seconds

27
Hm, don't you agree that this American HERO Buzz Aldrin, second (LOL) on the Moon 1969, sounded like a drunken sailor, when he explained about pissing there. (There was no loo in his spacecraft!) So I consider all other people suggesting they have been in space to be Buzz clones. And now they are joined by astronomers suggesting they are taking pictures of celestial bodies (black holes) 50 million light years away. I simply suggest Katie made the photo herself pissing on Earth to become famous. I think she is not credible.

You do realize Ms. Bouman was part of a large effort, specifically experts from MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the MIT Haystack Observatory? It was not just her musing in a dark basement playing with photoshop. There was a large team and actual science involved.

So your suggestion is unfounded and moot. It's not like you possess even the slightest bit of knowledge or expertise the folks involved have. You certainly don't have any credentials or credibility to even assess the effort, let alone claim it is fake. The best you have is fake based upon how you were unhappy with Buzz's demeanor when he talked about urination. You have a warped sense of reality and are completely bereft of logic.

No, I only know young Ms. Bouman. Her 100+ astronomer colleagues collecting data for her magic picture of a black hole in space are unknown to me. Media would not name them. It was only Ms. B that suddenly found the image in her computer. But there were other scientific comments.

I'm not following. You're saying Ms.Bouman is the only one who worked on the effort and then you go on to list people talking about working on the effort?

Re Buzz and his fondness of alcohol, I just quote media.

I think you're the one with the particular fondness for the drink considering you're making no sense in your ramblings about the black hole image.
You have to concentrate and not drink too much alcohol and study my findings.
This black hole image involved 100's of astronomers incl. some at the South Pole with their telescopes of all kind taking pictures of the Universe and the center of a galaxy 55 million light years away. Then plenty people tried to put these pictures together and ... MAGIC ... Ms. Bouman got the bits right. It was checked four times but it was Ms. Bouman that got it right. All alone.
She just added some missing pieces and ... a black hole appeared.

If you don't understand something do you always assume it's fake? Seems to be a pattern for you. The epitome of Dunning-Kruger at full strength. And once again, you have your facts wrong and suggestions unfounded. Not to mention you're being ridiculous.

Case in point, your idiotic statement: "It was checked four times but it was Ms. Bouman that got it right. All alone. She just added some missing pieces and ... a black hole appeared."

You have literally no idea what you're even commenting on:

"Bouman led the development of a computer program called CHIRP, or Continuous High-resolution Image Reconstruction using Patch priors. CHIRP helps account for differences between when data arrived at telescopes in difference places on Earth, fill in gaps between the telescopes' coverage, and single out the black hole data from everything else in that patch of sky. The program made it possible to create the images which another program (designed by Mareki Honma and his team) stitched together into the final picture that awed everyone on April 10. Her CHIRP team was actually one of three teams working to turn the data into images -- a total of about 40 people, led by Bouman, Andrew Chael, Kazunori Akiyama, Michael D. Johnson, Jose L. Gomez, and Sara Issaoun.

Those 40 people spent several years working on just one aspect of a project which involved around 200 people from 60 research institutions in 18 countries. It turns out that combining 8 radio observatories around the world to make the next best thing to a 10,000 km-wide antenna, then processing all of that data into an image of the event horizon of a black hole 54 million light years away, is a big, complex, collaborative project."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kionasmith/2019/04/14/we-should-listen-to-katie-bouman-science-takes-teamwork/#4f7b6dee2034

28
Flat Earth General / Re: Pretending Subquarks actually exist!
« on: June 30, 2020, 12:34:57 PM »
Quote

No experiment has disproved Relativity.   This is important!

The first researcher to do this will certainly get the Nobel prize and go down in history.  It's the Holy Grail of physics, to poke a hole in Einsteins theory.  And one day it will certainly happen, and when it does it will be front page news and we will get a whole new theory out of it.

But so far, this has not happened. Every experiment confirms it, again and again

That is in my mind, stupid argument.

What if paper was published in some "opposing" country. Mainstream science is west science. What if paper was published in China, or Russia? Or in some 3. World country? One TV (that thing where host invites persion to talk about recent events) "show", on National TV (not some poor channel) invited Medical expert to talk abiut COVID-19. Soon, talk about corona became ideological talk, and Medical expert said that (he was detelied, but it was like 2 months ago, and I didn't remember) some Chinese paper was punlished in mid 1900. Few decades later, US scientist published paper talkkng about same thing and he was accepted, he made his fame (in medical srcles). Now, old Chinese paper was discovered few years ago. He didn't made it to the mainstream science.

It is Serbian program so you won't get anything, even if I got link. That medical expert was on same show multiple times, so I will have to watch some 10+ hours or context to find that ;D

What in the world are you rambling on about? Mainstream science is a west science? Plenty of chinese, russian, and croatian scientists publish mainstream articles in mainstream publications.

I'm sure there are million instances where someone has claimed some scientific finding and the person(s) who claimed the same thing afterward got the credit. But if you have a criticism, be specific with facts and evidence. Not just your musings.

29
Flat Earth General / Re: Is there a Missing Orbital Sagnac Effect?
« on: June 30, 2020, 12:28:08 PM »
I guess he isn't talking about Normal saganac

The question is, what are you talking about then?

30
Arts & Entertainment / Re: R.I.P. Carl Reiner
« on: June 30, 2020, 11:16:26 AM »
Another comedy legend that couldn't get renewed for one more season:
Carl Reiner, the comedian, writer, director and actor whose contributions to the development of television comedy are rivaled by few others, died Monday night of natural causes at his home in Beverly Hills. He was 98.

Just three days before his passing, Reiner — the father of actor and director Rob Reiner — tweeted what now seems his public goodbye: “Nothing pleases me more than knowing that I have lived the best life possible by having met & marrying the gifted Estelle (Stella) Lebost – who partnered with me in bringing Rob, Annie & Lucas Reiner into this needy & evolving world.”

A national treasure for sure.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 121