1

Flat Earth General / Re: Where does it go from here, say when globe is debunked by mainstream

« on: October 05, 2023, 07:02:40 AM »

To give a quick answer, imagine if we don't have to pay NASA shills anything. If we aren't pouring extra money into companies like Verizon to build "satellites" when what we instead see is antennas and wires cluttering the skyline. These same companies turn around and shove 5G down everyone's throats. They buy out politicians to make certain technologies mandatory. Suppose Phillip Morris used an offshoot company to make nicotine a mandatory supplement. The 5G revolution means randoms come to your house and rip out your meters. Whio pays for this switch? Well I imagine PG&E or Dominion are in turn owned by Sprint, Verizon, and AT&T. Extra money equals authoritarian control.

If we stop supporting all the companies that mooch on our belief that the Earth is round, suddenly that all caves in.

Wireless Enabled Meters have been around long before 5G.  Stop smoking crack.

2

Flat Earth General / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Windwaker --Flat earth video game?

« on: October 05, 2023, 07:00:39 AM »

Terrain most definitely gives or determines shape.  How significant that terrain defines a particular shape depends entirely on the frame of reference.

3

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: October 05, 2023, 04:23:17 AM »

I'm still waiting on Jack to answer why we exclude other mammals from competing in sports against humans.   It's discrimination.

4

The Lounge / Re: werepenguin time? WEREPENGUIN TIME!

« on: October 03, 2023, 05:04:17 PM »

Since werepenguins always change forms, are they Gender Fluid or just Trannies.

5

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why does flat earth equate no space travel by man?

« on: October 03, 2023, 04:10:31 PM »

He's saying that an actual force targets the the limit to its weight and everything less than it.

Why is there weight in the first place.  Why can I easily hold a 20 pound baby all day. But strain to hold a 80 pound child for a few minutes.  Why does my body have to work harder to hold 80 pounds up.

Why does an ounce flying insect need to generate a few ounces of lift.  Why does a 100,000 pound jet need to generate over 100,000 pounds of lift to gain altitude.

Question. Where is this 100,000 pounds of lift?

I've been to airports. I haven't seen or felt wind force enough to shatter the airport.

You be stupid....

6

Flat Earth General / Re: Most recent advancement in The flat earth model

« on: October 03, 2023, 04:04:35 PM »

If the flat earth spins very fast, people on earth would be thrown.

Not necessarily.

No gravity + centrifugal

Not necessarily.

7

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: October 03, 2023, 09:26:19 AM »

JB needs to stop being a mammalist.  We shouldn't be excluding other mammals from competing in sporting competitions.

8

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?

« on: September 28, 2023, 05:55:40 PM »

It certainly has. It's your issue if you refuse to try and understand it.

Repeating the same lie wont help you.

Repeating the same thing won't help you either.

Notice how scepti DOESN'T refer to JB's repetition as a lie.

9

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: September 27, 2023, 11:45:58 AM »

But could they give you a boner?

Does that make you gay?

Only for you.

10

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: September 26, 2023, 06:20:56 PM »

They are genetic males with Swyer syndrome. They appear female, and some even have ovaries. Their ovaries are usually non-functioning, and they are given hormones so that they can have all the benefits of puberty (bone development, brain development, etc).

JB has convinced himself that being male brings no sports advantage, and trots out rare disorders all the time, for some reason.

Genetic males are not female, not matter how feminine they appear.

11

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: September 25, 2023, 04:16:33 PM »

What's an XY female?

12

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Three different FE’s, three different butchered versions of gravity.

« on: September 21, 2023, 03:21:25 PM »

Why would you ever create a planet we could live on, as a BALL? No, you'd create a planet which has a FLAT surface, for us to move on. We build houses and buildings with flat surfaces, so why wouldn't your planet have a flat surface, to build our houses upon, right?

Simple, and perfect in design, just as the Earth is.

While I don't fully understand what Turbonium's theory of "gravity" is, I think we agree on this point.



Here's a pizza. I created it myself yesterday. Well, the store created the dough, but then I rolled it in olive oil and added spices to the dough. The pizza had tomato sauce, shredded feta cheese, figs, olives, and kippers (what? I'm a fan of fish on pizza).  Okie, so here's a ball of dough.



Now, I want everyone here to load cheese, pizza sauce, and toppings along the sides and bottom of the pizza.

If you are lucky, the pizza expands outward as it cooks, and covers your sins. If not, all toppings, cheese and sauce simply slide off the pizza. The closest thing to what you suggest involves multiple fused balls, not one single ball with naught but empty space around it.


You need to understand that this is really stupid easy logic, and you guys are being obtuse. Probably deliberately.

That's not a pizza.

Calling it such is like calling a diesel truck an EV because it has an alternator and uses electricity.

13

Flat Earth General / Re: Elon Reeves Musk: Agent of Satan; Foundation of Evil

« on: September 15, 2023, 08:38:20 AM »

Elon Musk taunting hard working soul bearing Americans with his Devil's champion armor after renaming Twitter to align to satanic symbology.

You're just mad you couldn't buy it.

Actually, him buying it does nothing but benefit me and TFES.

I am mad that Elon Musk is trying to bring about the second coming and destroy all of America.

Destroying America.  I didn't know owning a social media platform could cause the destruction of America.

Please review this thread which is filled with evidence that Elon Musk is trying to bring about the end of the world. Any rational mind will be forced to admit that his aims are nothing but nefarious.

I did.  Seems like emotional ranting.  Emotion driven responses are irrational.

Emotions are driven from a evolutionary prerogative that has evolved over millions of years as adaptive responses to situations. Emotions are quite rational in a sense, and in a completely other sense are not innately irrational as you claim with no basis.

Rationality is not solely about objective analysis - it also about efficient decisions which emotions can be used to help simplify complex decisions.

That said, it is pure fact with no emotional connection what so ever.

Emotions are personal and are not uniform between individuals.  While some may experience similar emotions, their emotional responses will differ from another persons in varying degrees, even for the same thing.

Emotions in and of themselves are complex and don't simplify shit.

I've never heard of or come across any decision where emotions have simplified the decision.

14

Flat Earth General / Re: Most recent advancement in The flat earth model

« on: September 15, 2023, 08:21:52 AM »

If the flat earth spins very fast, people on earth would be thrown.

Not necessarily.

15

Flat Earth General / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Windwaker --Flat earth video game?

« on: September 15, 2023, 08:18:23 AM »

Why are we arguing about a fictional world in a video game?

16

The Lounge / Re: Hello

« on: September 15, 2023, 08:13:45 AM »

Not yet.

So your saying you haven't been attention whoring yet, but will be soon.   I can't wait to see this.  Wise will likely have a full melt down.

17

The Lounge / Re: Hello

« on: September 12, 2023, 02:13:42 PM »

So he hasn't killed himself.

Told you he was attention whoring.

18

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: September 08, 2023, 03:35:13 PM »

Exclusivity must be proven as being discriminatory, you don't prove it isn't.

Again, by definition it must be.
How are you going to exclude someone without discriminating?

You may as well be saying that just because someone is wrong that doesn't mean they are incorrect.

No it doesn't.

If exclusivity is by default discriminatory, then there can't be a naturally occurring exclusion that isn't discriminatory.  Exceptions would have to have extenuating circumstances, which are not naturally occurring.  That's not the case.

19

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: September 07, 2023, 09:05:16 AM »

You don't prove the negative.

Exclusivity must be proven as being discriminatory, you don't prove it isn't.

20

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: September 06, 2023, 02:50:17 PM »

Exclusivity doesn't mean discrimination.

By definition, it does.
As you are discriminating between the people/groups to determine who is eligible.
The question is if you can justify it.
For example, it is discriminatory to say paedophiles cannot be babysitters, but that is justified.

Exclusivity being discriminatory is the exception not the rule.

Are you assumed guilty and must to prove your innocence?

21

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: September 05, 2023, 05:34:22 AM »

Exclusivity doesn't mean discrimination.

22

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?

« on: August 31, 2023, 07:50:43 AM »

There's something called TNT equivalent. In other words, a bomb that is particularly explosive is equal to a certain number of tons of dynamite. This is beca dynamite has a set amount of energy, and so does a ton of it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TNT_equivalent

I didn't know this myself before researching.

TNT equivalent is a convention for expressing energy, typically used to describe the energy released in an explosion. The ton of TNT is a unit of energy defined by convention to be 4.184 gigajoules (1 gigacalorie),[1] which is the approximate energy released in the detonation of a metric ton (1,000 kilograms) of TNT. In other words, for each gram of TNT exploded, 4.184 kilojoules (or 4,184 joules) of energy are released.

They are not carting around literal tons of dynamite. They have an explosive better than dynamite. Why is it not nuclear, you ask? Why must it be nuclear, I respond.

The point being, in all the above tests of power of this new weapon, years passed, and trees are still growing. No radiation turned all life into withered husks. It is simply either high explosive or the result of a chain explosion. They made dure to take a pretty picture for the camera though.

Yes, years have passed.  While large doses of radiation will kill vegetation, unless the high radiation dose remains constant, vegetation will regrow.

You clearly don't understand how radiation emissions from nuclear weapons work and how areas that still have radioactive emissions can still have vegetation grow.

23

The Lounge / Re: Hurricane Idalia

« on: August 30, 2023, 01:16:24 PM »

Rain.  It's a thing.

24

Flat Earth General / Re: Elon Reeves Musk: Agent of Satan; Foundation of Evil

« on: August 29, 2023, 05:14:40 AM »

Elon Musk taunting hard working soul bearing Americans with his Devil's champion armor after renaming Twitter to align to satanic symbology.

You're just mad you couldn't buy it.

Actually, him buying it does nothing but benefit me and TFES.

I am mad that Elon Musk is trying to bring about the second coming and destroy all of America.

Destroying America.  I didn't know owning a social media platform could cause the destruction of America.

Please review this thread which is filled with evidence that Elon Musk is trying to bring about the end of the world. Any rational mind will be forced to admit that his aims are nothing but nefarious.

I did.  Seems like emotional ranting.  Emotion driven responses are irrational.

25

The Lounge / Re: Hurricane Idalia

« on: August 29, 2023, 05:13:04 AM »

I thought we would make it through the whole year without a hurricane.

I HAVE SNACKS.

You live in Florida.  Quit dreaming.

26

Flat Earth General / Re: Elon Reeves Musk: Agent of Satan; Foundation of Evil

« on: August 28, 2023, 03:38:04 PM »

Elon Musk taunting hard working soul bearing Americans with his Devil's champion armor after renaming Twitter to align to satanic symbology.

You're just mad you couldn't buy it.

Actually, him buying it does nothing but benefit me and TFES.

I am mad that Elon Musk is trying to bring about the second coming and destroy all of America.

Destroying America.  I didn't know owning a social media platform could cause the destruction of America.

27

Flat Earth General / Re: Elon Reeves Musk: Agent of Satan; Foundation of Evil

« on: August 28, 2023, 03:22:48 PM »

Elon Musk taunting hard working soul bearing Americans with his Devil's champion armor after renaming Twitter to align to satanic symbology.

You're just mad you couldn't buy it.

28

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is a woman?

« on: August 28, 2023, 12:51:06 PM »

Who are your peoples? And who do they think is a liar? Emma Vigeland is reading an email from a viewer. Which has about as much weight as a post on the FES.

I will assume your peoples are "The Majority Report" and "this lady" is Jamie Reed.

The person they are referring to with OCD didn't have gender dysphoria. He threatened to "self-harm" his genitals after he masturbated. He was sent to the gender clinic and prescribed hormones to reduce his libido and sexual arousal. You'd think Emma would have read the affidavit before calling Jesse Singal a transphobe for having the opinion that maybe this person shouldn't be treated at a gender clinic. ALSO, the person who sent the email hasn't got a clue how OCD is treated. The patient should never be encouraged to focus on their obsession. (yes, I saw clips of the video a few days ago on Twitter).

Perhaps the NYT are also your peoples?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/23/health/transgender-youth-st-louis-jamie-reed.html

https://archive.li/2023.08.23-101453/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/23/health/transgender-youth-st-louis-jamie-reed.html

The reality was more complex than what was portrayed by either side of the political battle, according to interviews with dozens of patients, parents, former employees and local health providers, as well as more than 300 pages of documents shared by Ms. Reed.

Some of Ms. Reed’s claims could not be confirmed, and at least one included factual inaccuracies. But others were corroborated, offering a rare glimpse into one of the 100 or so clinics in the United States that have been at the center of an intensifying fight over transgender rights.

They investigated her claims.

I find the effort to smear Jamie Reed as a transphobe terribly funny. She identifies as "queer" and is married to a transman. I will never understand why people who pretend to be trans allies aren't upset that trans people (especially teenagers) are not receiving proper care. Anyone who doubts affirmation only treatment is immediately called a far right fascist. It's the weirdest thing since the Satanic Panic.

Unless it promotes the gender agenda, it is anti-lgbqtlmnop...

29

Announcements / Re: Circumventing Our Security

« on: August 27, 2023, 01:12:12 PM »

Why would anyone want to circumvent security?  It's a FE Forum.

30

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: What is the Temperature outside the Dome?

« on: August 27, 2023, 07:47:47 AM »

Unmeasureable.

Why would it be unmeasurable?

Because we have to get outside the dome.

But in order to get outside the dome, you need propulsion to continue when buoyancy is zero. That's assuming there even is anything outside the dome.

There's also the idea that there are extremes in high or low temperatures, but air is so non-dense that high temperature appears cold. But if air is that non-dense, how the hell can you measure it?

Why would you need to get outside the dome to measure the temperature?  Do you not understand thermodynamics?