Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - SpaceCadet

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
1
Flat Earth General / Re: Confirmed Pseudolite Landing
« on: October 30, 2019, 09:48:11 PM »
It was never called a satellite John. It was always called a "space-selfie balloon".

These exaggeration don't do your arguements any favours.

2
Flat Earth General / Re: The Shipping Crate Experiment
« on: October 30, 2019, 09:44:14 PM »
Mr. Davis, why do you think it is dark at night? Could it be because that side of the earth is in the earths shadow? I think it is.
It is dark anywhere due to the obstruction of light. In this case, due to the fact that air is not transparent.

Air isn't transparent? Well that explains why I don't see anything anywhere.

Wait a minute....

This here statement proobes my belief that John Davis (and Tom Bishop by the way) do not really believe a flat earth. They are just trying to argue in favour of it.

3
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 29, 2019, 11:02:06 AM »
Hypnotist? Hahahaha. I like that I really do. This is some serious trolling now. I like how you said you went to space and saw the earth. Who is your drug dealer? I want some of that. At least you are not boring like Jack.

So his visions are crap but your visions are truth because......

4
Flat Earth General / Re: Diamond business proves there is more land
« on: October 29, 2019, 10:55:31 AM »
Of course nothing will stop them. They will nuke each other and destroy the world because they are easily offended and very non diplomatic. The sense of entitlement is never a good thing.

Well, it's a good thing that the world is infinite then, isn't it.

Or is just a matrix that the nukes would just burst wide open into the flat earth.

Or some other one you've raised at one time or the other

5
Flat Earth General / Re: Diamond business proves there is more land
« on: October 28, 2019, 10:32:00 AM »
When Rowbotham's name is mentioned Roundies run like rats. LOL For real its funny funny shit. Will you guys accept anything other than left wing college brainwashing and NASA? You rejected Buddah, Moses, Jesus, Mohammed, just reject Satan instead you will feel better.

You do realise that Rowbotham was debunked by someone in his time. Or was Alfred Wallace a NASA shill too?

6
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 28, 2019, 10:29:00 AM »
I didn't read this anywhere.
Yeah, thought as much.

The rest of your lies I do not need to address. I highly doubt you have ever ventured far from home.

Considering he believes there is a Walmarts right next to everyone in the world except the North Koreans.

7
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 26, 2019, 10:19:38 PM »
So.science, you reject.
Vedas, you don't agree with

Your only "evidence" of your flat infinite earth is "look out a window" which is as effective as watching David Copperfield make the statue of Liberty disappear, and your "visions"

No empirical data.

And you call people here liars and brainwashed.

See the irony? Or is that as invisible as your infinite flat earth with yogurt seas?

8
Flat Earth General / Re: Diamond business proves there is more land
« on: October 26, 2019, 05:35:06 AM »
Your thinking, New Earth, is..for lack of a better word, cultish.

You discount ALL the accumulated knowledge of the scientific community when they don't suit your purposes in favour of "a jeweler told me".

If he was screwing with you, if he was exaggerating, if he was as dumb as a bag of sparkly rocks, you don't care. But you are fine with it.

Meanwhile people who spend 4 to 6 years studing in Universities all over the world, spend more years in post graduate research, and most of their lives pursuing knowledge, you call them indoctrinated.

Damn

9
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 25, 2019, 10:20:31 PM »
This guy does not even agree with the Vedas model that he claims is the complete model.

He says they claim 4 billion miles of Earth
He says infinite Earth
He says they claim uninhabited
He claims paradise

And he wonders why everyone here is calling him phantasmagoric

10
Flat Earth General / Re: Australia.
« on: October 24, 2019, 08:37:18 PM »
1- That flight isn't exist. The people who say they have made this trip are NASA employees or volunteers of globalism. others, ie ordinary people fly indirectly and it takes more than 25 hours.
What is your evidence for that claim?
The direct Santiago -> Sydney flight is publicly available to book via sites like SkyScanner.
Don't believe everything you read. It needs to be verified, but it could not. You can query why isn't there Sydney to Santiago flight by examining here.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=82172.0

This is the best advice given by Inky on this forumn. Don't believe everything you read especially wild claims that are not backed up by any evidence.

Or.dpes Inky have any evidence that those fligjts are full.of NASA actors beyond his belief that they must be fake?

11
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 24, 2019, 08:35:05 PM »
New Earth, the vedas refer to Earth being round, not circular. Round translates to sphere. The Hindus know Earth to be a sphere.

If you were to engage your brain, you would realise an infinite earth can have no shape whatsoever to it's edge, because there is no edge.

The 'water' surrounding earth, aka space, on the other hand, is as far as humans need be concerned, indeed infinite, littered with 'continents' we like to call planets.
[/quot
Liar, watch this video

Earth is a disk according to Vedas 4 billion miles in diameter enclosed inside a giant sphere. And yes I know earth is infinite and have no edge, Are you reading my posts correctly? And no there are no planets in space. All continents are located on infinite universal ocean, some of these continents are bigger then any planet you can imagine.

New Earth, the veda refers to earth as bhoogola, meaning, "the sphere that is earth." 

Why have you suggested I watch a hare Krishna recruitment video?   ??? ??? I don't even own an orange robe and the lands of goat milk seas and cheese don't appeal to my sensitive tummy.

For someone who lies around all day on the couch watching YouTube, lies to himself everyday about reality, and then lies about studying the vedas, you're the last person to be calling anyone a liar.


Nope The earth is called "Bhumandala" which means the circle of the earth. Our known world is called Bharata Varsha, located in the ocean of salt. No where in Vedas it says that earth is a globe. The video might be from Hare Krishna but Vedic wisdom is not exclusive to Krishna movement. Vedas are studied by many different people all over the world, its not just Hare Krishna.

Low content you need to get banned troll
Then let me ask another way:  Why do you think this is true?  I know better than to ask for a shred of evidence, so just tell me what reason you have to believe what you've told us.  Obviously from the posts in this thread, other people here have found no reason to believe you.  You've asserted some wild claims, I have to say.  So why do you believe it?

To.add to Yes' question, why do you believe your version of the bedas and not thenHare Krishna version?

12
Flat Earth General / Edward Snowden on the Conspiracy
« on: October 23, 2019, 06:56:56 PM »
For most flat earthers and space deniers, the Earth seems to operate as if round because a conspiracy exists to make everyone believe it is round. Dutchy for example, is a firm believer in NASA hiding the fact that space doesn't exist and NASA never went to the moon.

Edward Snowden on a recent podcast admitted that even though he had a rediculous amount of access to files from the CIA and other intelligence agencies, he found no evidence of such a conspiracy.

"In case you were wondering: Yes, man really did land on the moon. Climate change is real. Chemtrails are not a thing," he adds

He also said "But the idea that we're hiding them -- if we are hiding them -- I had ridiculous access to the networks of the NSA, the CIA, the military, all these groups. I couldn't find anything," he continued. "So if it's hidden, and it could be hidden, it's hidden really damn well, even from people who are on the inside." Which I can only take to mean that if there was a conspiracy, NASA themselves and the US government believe they went to the moon and the truth is hidden even from them. How that could work, I would love to know.

So what do you think?

https://edition-m.cnn.com/2019/10/23/us/edward-snowden-joe-rogan-conspiracies-trnd/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.google.com%2F&rm=1

13
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 21, 2019, 06:30:05 PM »
Unfortunately Jack Black, none of Soundly's (and any other person's I might add) observations are recorded in the "Sacred Texts" of the High Prophet Rowbotham and so Tom Bishop will simply dismiss them.

14
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 21, 2019, 12:31:55 AM »


Now some of you asked to describe the movements of moon and sun. I do not know and if I were you I would not ask this question because the official round earth explanation of this is totally bogus and we flat earthers do not have the answer either. However in Vedas it says that both Sun and Moon are present over the entire span of Earth disk (Bhumandala) The sun goes around the Earth disk, covering area which is millions of miles wide. The rest I don't know and trust me neither does NASA nor  your high school teacher.


But but but I thought you said your model was complete? Why don't you know?

I'm quite sure I'll trust my teachers much more than I'll trust you. After all, the alphabet they taught me is what I use to communicate and it obviously works cause surprise surprise, you use it too!

15
I am sure it pays well. They are set for life after such a gig.

Damn it. They didn't tell me about that during the NASA shill indoctrination course. It seems it pays more than my current gig defending the globe religion on this website.

16
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 19, 2019, 10:46:33 PM »
And speaking about "complete models",  please explain with your complete model how the moon sinks bellow the horizon without shrinking in size.

The model is complete, isn't it?

17
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 19, 2019, 10:44:52 PM »
I really don't want to offend people but you guys are fucking morons. We are not on the globe we are on infinite flat earth. None of you even looked into Vedas. I was just on the flight from New York to Chicago at 35,000 feet I could easily see the lights of Chicago from central Michigan. You guys have no fucking clue. The plane started its descent somewhere in Michigan state not even near Lake Michigan but a lot further East, heading into Chicago. And yes I saw Chicago from there. A straight fucking line with no curve. If the earth was a globe I would never be able to see this far. Rowbotham proved its not a globe long time ago, using trigonometry. Just admit it.

Ignoring your height during the flight and the fact that you can't see the bases of the buildings and all that, why couldn't you see the Loco Loco mountains from there? Hmmm?

18
Flat Earth General / Re: Diamond business proves there is more land
« on: October 19, 2019, 10:42:58 PM »
You guys can post and think whatever the fuck you want. I know the jewelry business because I come from a family of Jewelers. Cartier was actually my ancestor. What do you broke ass wanna be's know? Now listen there is more land. A lot of these diamonds you see in stores come from way beyond Antarctica.

And you know this because.......
Your great great grand papi told you? Yiu have pictures of his trip beyond the walls?

19
Lackey has realised he just hit a wall, contradicting himself. If he comes back, he'll come back with insults, incredulity or gish gallop.

Let's watch.

20
Actors. You forgot actors. All those passengers that claim to take those flights are actors.


Actors who, by the way, can't seem to get any other acting jobs than their 1 or 2 flights in the southern hemisphere.

21
Flat Earth General / Re: New complete model of infinite flat earth
« on: October 19, 2019, 08:46:26 PM »
I guess the sun drops below the Loco Loco mountains every night. That's why it seems to go below the horizon. That will mean the horizon os the Loco Loco mountain range. It is mobile so it stretches away whenever anyone gets close.

Yes I know I typed Loco Loco mountains.

22
Once again, the fact the medicine ball has mass sufficient to provide enough resistance for your arms to generate the sufficient energy to propel you backwards as a result of the effort to toss it away from you is purposefully ignored and otherwise obfuscated by the disingenuous RE adherents in this thread.

Claiming rockets can fly in a vacuum is pure bupkus...

Aside from intakes, there is no differentiating between how a rocket moves through the atmosphere and a jet engine moves through the atmosphere.

What of a propeller driven aircraft? Does that move the same way as a jet engine?

23


Of course it doesn't heat boil. Boiling is the rising of vapour bubbles through the liquid. It gives the same appearance as if the water were on the stove. Boil. Not gets hot.
You'll be surprised at how many people do think it gets hot.
But at least we have that out of the way.

No one in this conversation implied that in anyway. Except you.

24
This has to be willful ignorance. Nothing else can explain it.

You throw a ball foward. The ball moves through the atmosphere. You move backwards. Yet you claim it is the action of the ball hitting the atmosphere that makes you moving against the atmosphere that moves you.

Exhaust gasses move out of a rocket. They move through (THROUGH) the atmosphere. The rocket moves in the opposite direction. Yet you claim the exhaust gases hitting the atmosphere and by implication rebounding off it is what makes the rocket move in the opposite direction. How do the gas molecules moving through and displacing the air molecules push against those air molecules to then push against the rocket to move the rocket in the opposite direction? Can you draw a diagram to explain this?

Or will Scepti drive us off on a tangent by copy-pasting reams from other people's research thay have absolutely nothing to do with the question but because he can cherry pick one line that he can twist to imply what he wants to believe?

Or with Dutchy and Lackey waive it all away and claim NASA lies, pissing on the achievements of thousands of people who dedicated their lives to making these things work as they actually do?


25
Flat Earth General / Re: Difficult to Grasp.
« on: October 06, 2019, 08:54:15 AM »
Welcome Dak.

Most people who don't follow mainstream are looked at differently.

Now that truth of Plane Earth has been brought into view, Round Earthers are now laughed at.

Do you trust NASA? (You canít be a Flat Earther and trust NASA.)

I used to like NASA and was fascinated with all of these supposed planets like Mars, Venus, Jupiter, etc. Now, I don't like NASA anymore. I also stopped liking science altogether.

A necessary thing for Flat Earthers is to reject science. That's why they can't prove a single thing with logic. Instead they use the tactic of shouting. The harder you shout the more right you are. Right?
It's pointless talking about the so called lack of logic of flat/alternate Earth theorists while you're adhered to a rotating global model that requires a mountain of magical mysteries in order for it to work.

Projecting much? Tell me, how do the sun and moon move between the tropics of cancer and capricorn during the year? Heck, what is the sun, what is the moon?

26
Flat Earth General / Re: Difficult to Grasp.
« on: October 06, 2019, 08:51:51 AM »
Welcome Dak.

Most people who don't follow mainstream are looked at differently.

Now that truth of Plane Earth has been brought into view, Round Earthers are now laughed at.

Do you trust NASA? (You canít be a Flat Earther and trust NASA.)

I used to like NASA and was fascinated with all of these supposed planets like Mars, Venus, Jupiter, etc. Now, I don't like NASA anymore. I also stopped liking science altogether.

If you don't like science, then you shouldn't be here. By here, I mean the internet. Because all of the internet, all the computers and servers and mobile phones, all of that is science.

Your cars and fancy bikes, aircraft and boats. That's all science. The concrete of yiur homes, the asphalt of your streets. Glass, synthetic clothing materials, even the food you eat. All science and the applicarion of science.

Strange that isn't it? And nothing to do with NASA at that.

Mostly nothing anyway.

27
I look out the window and see a flat horizon.
Ergo, the earth is flat.

I also look out the window and see the moon descend below the horizon. But this is a trick of perspective. The moon is actually moving away from me, it just SEEMS to be descending below the horizon.

Why should the moon droping below the horizon be taken as a trick of perspective but the flat horizon should be taken as actual representative of the entirety of the earth?

28
Houston, the ISS has successfully docked with the CGI SODA CAN.

I was hoping for root beer, but got a l e m o n a d e.

Have a close look at 2:30



Seriously.  What's wrong with you?

That's what happens when one spends all day in mum's basement watchong only flaer videos with no ability to understand. In the words of Phuket, being stuck on M T Stupid

29
Flat Earth General / Re: How can Earth hold Atmosphere?
« on: October 04, 2019, 01:42:33 AM »
If you have a cup or glass and you pour water in it, the container can hold only some water and when the water level increases over edge of cup or glass, water will pour away.

Now imagine air instead of water and Earth instead of cup. All the armosphere should pour away from Earth, leaving Earth whisout atmosphere. So how can we breathe? Are there any invisible boarders around Earth preventing atmosphere from escaping?
You bring up a good point. It seems unlikely that the atmosphere touches the boundary and vacuum of "space" , yet remains on Earth. There is probably a come over the Earth containing the atmosphere.

Vacuums don't suck. The vacuum of space does not suck the atmosphere away from Earth. So, there is no reason for the atmosphere to leave Earth as there is nothing pulling it away from Earth.
You have atmosphere + you have Earth accelerating 9.81 m/(s*s). Either atmosphere accelerates with Earth (why then? for example water falls down - doesn't accelerate - as long as it is not in a cup-like object), there are some invisible bounds or atmosphere just leaves Earth.

It sticks to the Earth. Just like water. It's all attracted to the center of the Earth. There are no invisible bounds involved. Because Earth is so big, gravity is enough to keep atmosphere in place.

I advise you to read this: https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/05/16/why-doesnt-the-vacuum-of-space-suck-up-earths-atmosphere/#11abd10d5fff
If there is gravity, how do you explain that force pulling objects near the edge of Earth has same power and direction as near center of Earth?

Well that's a problem for the flat earth. It's why most flat earthers deny gravity

30
Yeah, but if there is a lack of described curvature on a segment of river, and the earth were indeed curved, then wouldn't that indicate that the water at one end of the segment is flowing uphill... is this part of the back story of that argument?

No, you need to try and get your head around curvature and elevation, two different things and how they interact with Gravity.

For example in the FE model its an infinite plane, or a finite plane under the dome, both flat so how do rivers flow, they flow from high to low in terms of elevation.
What do you mean?

I think he neans that in any of these 2 flat earth models, infinite plane or a physical dome, the earth to all intents and purposes is flat and rivers flow only due to local elevations. A river will flow from a higher point on that flat plane to a lower point. Top of a hill, higher area of land etc to a lower point like a river delta, bottom of said hill, lower area of land etc.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16