1
The Lounge / Re: I have very good news to everybody!
« on: August 22, 2020, 09:40:17 AM »
Fly Quantas.
Have fun!
Have fun!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I notified these friends to the apartment management that there should be nothing other than common satellite antennas on our terrace, which is a common area. If I do not get a result, I will complain to the municipal police.
Rockets don't work in the vacuum of so-called "space".You appeared to have confused rockets and aircraft.
Aircraft don't work in the vacuum of space, which is why it was irrelavent for Danang to bring them up.
Rockets do.
If you wish to disagree, there was a nice big thread on it with FEers and other reality deniers failing to provide any evidence or rational justification for why rockets magically don't work in space, nor were they able to provide a refutation for the evidence and rational arguments provided which clearly show beyond any sane doubt that rockets do work in space.
I think he may be playing DA.
You said that a "Comet is a Space Craft" and a spacecraft is not aircraft - it's right there in the NAME!Another point: Navigation is not in line with vacuum space.
How so?
Of course the navogation needs matters AKA air to work. Without such medium, the aircraft will go straight.
A spacecraft is powered by rockets - one or more large ones for major speed changes and one or more manoeuvring thrusters and some attitude control thrusters.
Hence spacecraft do not air to navigate is the vacuum of space.
But, when it comes to comets, they do not navigate but their orbit simply controlled by gravitation and the laws of motion.
I never understood that oneThis is breaking news, but it seems Mike Hughes has died in an attempt to launch his homemade rocket.what do you mean calling him a MFer
Rest in piece, you crazy MF'er!
In this context, it is a colorful term of endearment
A reply for all questions here:
Since in this thread, Rabinoz and JackBlack ain't show up till now, that means my proposition is too obvious unbeatable. The argument is so powerful. Both of them are probably crying now
Let us know if his condition changes.
Wise's english is really improving...
It has a little bit to do with it. How can we trust such a selfish organization for their word at all? Anyone who has traveled knows not to trust airlines.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the average “profit per passenger” of the seven largest U.S. airlines was $17.75 — for just a one-way flight — and the average profit margin across those seven airlines was 9% in 2017. This per-passenger profit is roughly double what airlines around the world make per passenger, according to the International Air Transport Association.
They are the bones of a great many things and peoples. Every time in history - find one that contradicts me - the mundane example is but a tale we tell ourselves to sleep at night. The rest is fear.
The Unknown haunts us, secretly. The Other begs the question.
I agree, the positivist position is that the whale flew through the air - light as he was a young born - and yet is that description satisfying to you!? Of course not. The explanation requires a paradigm shift.
A whale landed far enough off land; enough to notice the news syndicate. Call the trumpets.
We should be careful about our beliefs in uncertain times....
Less than a year ago a dead humpback whale was found in the amazon jungle with no possible explanation.
I suggest you read the thread. Of course large beings existed. To think they are dragons is ludicrous though.
It does mention nothing about that. But I am making up my "guess" as much so as she made up her "guess." Mine obviously fits within the argument I am making, and hers her argument. Funny enough, the fact that plankton is influenced by moonlight also supports my general hypothesis. As things are stated, we seem to be on even ground.It makes no such thing clear. It simply says that lack of the light does not affect them; this would make sense if it was a learned behavior or if it developed due to a queue that the danger would be likely to present itself. Perhaps tides.I assume then you think these oysters close their shells for fun?
The article makes it clear that the oysters are not trying to avoid moon light. Whatever causes them to open and close their shells, is clearly not a fear of any danger in the light. It could easily be something as simple as more abundant food during the full moon, and less abundant during new moon, and they need to open wider when there's less food. There's zero evidence that they're afraid of moon light. And there's abundant evidence that people expose themselves to moon light with no ill effects.
Anomaly-hunting is not science.
The article states:
"So why would the oysters care about the phases of the moon? Laura Payton, a co-author of the study from the University of Bordeaux, tells Davis at The Guardian she has a guess. “We know that oysters open their valves when there is food,” she says, and previous research has shown that the movement of plankton, which oysters filter out of seawater and consume, is influenced by moonlight."
It mentions nothing about 'danger', 'harmful', whatever. You literally are making up the notion that "oysters are afraid of moonlight..." or the like based upon nothing.
Just look at the pyramids and the lack of solid explanation.
Many great things were accomplished before OSHA came along.
People using my map has not to accept everything I defend.I highly doubt anyone is using your map, wise.