Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Etpeman

Pages: [1]
1
My best evidence ever rite here is debunked by this jerk



I need better so help

2
So this is near my house and I have been using this video on The NASA Channel to prove flat earth. Then this other guy comes in and proved it wrong or debunks it or whatever you call it. and now I look like a fool. Can someoen see if he is right or not. I tried and not good with numbers.



Just let me know if I can go bak with any mistak he makes. The guy ia a jerk

3
Defender of NASA? Waht? is that?

 I stand by what I said if all the information I have gathered is in fact true. However that information comes from more "reliable" sources who doesn't get paid with our tax dollars. There is no "agenda" from those sources, other than good honest science.

4
What? 
Idiot!!!, "HOAX NUTS"? You are a "FAIRYTALE NUTS"  You believe the moon is a place we went to?  NASA deletes their own tapes and you fall for it!  hahahaha 
Nasa has been requested numerously by investigators for access to the original tapes, Yu are spreading your crap cause you want to hold on to you claims of non reality. I personally have seen footage AT NASA head quarters where they were confronted to provide access to original footage, I was there, I have also heard this statement by a Television news station once, not sure who said it but i heard it. And they stated "the original footage is not available due to accidental erasing of the tapes." You know WHY, because we will see those coke bottles and other mistakes they filmed which they edited out in the subsequent footage. And the guy from the set picking up something. you can not argue fact sirs. flat or not

Surprisingly claims of a camera housing miracle material that existed in the 60's to protect the film from radiation? Funny how NASA claims now how hard they are working on finding suitable material for their new spacecraft that can withstand radiation to be able to pass through the VA belts. Why not just use your miracle material they had back in the 60's?. Simple, because it never existed, and still does not exist, Technology moves FORWARD morons, not BACKWARDS. If they indeed were able to send man to the damn moon in the 60's I GUARUNTEE they would not today STILL work on finding "suitable materials"  for spacecraft to go through the the VA belts. Wake up, where is your damn common senses and brains??

Every APPOLLO "mission" were faked to impress the Russians and get tax dollars for other things. You are a fool for not exercising common sense You know NASA by now is WELL aware of the fake claims of the moon landing, yet they have not once attempted to PROOF or show their claims of a moon landing as VALID. On the contrary, when confronted they cite "no comment" or just run off like scared rabbits.

With evidence proving against  in a court of law they will fail. You will NEVER stop because you can't. You may soon be forced to as it may be revealed finally and put your crap to rest.. Light don't bounce so whoever said that should not be here. I am a smart man and should be respected.

The lunar module is NOT ONE EIGHT the shuttle was, and not even the damn shuttle could pass through the VA belts, but your Armstrong dude did it in a "capsule that was less than 0.1 inches thick to protect them from radiation.now right? Go hide in a corner. 

5
Moon rays or sun rays don't have light from the sun or moon really? then why do we see it coming towards us AND see it's rays up in the sky? But according to you and who else  we can not see it going towards the moon? Yet we see the moon rays shining away from it into space? No I am not talking about a "hue" surrounding it. I am talking about it's beam shining away from it far into space and NO that is NOT the "optics" of my scope.

I am talking about seeing the moon sideways, when only a portion is lit up or so it seems to the eyes and that portion projects light into space. Yet NO light coming towards it that we can so "conveniently" for you, not see) . Come on man who's the joker here. So selectively you see the light you want to see? The sun projects rays (bursts) that we can see in space, yet never going towards the moon?
The moon is producing it's own light very feasibly. Stars do, Planets do apparently as well seeing we see no light going towards them, yet they "reflect". Or are you suggesting a star's light does not travel through space before it gets to us. If so then according to you the stars light must be killed in space as we can not see light in space. You have not been to the moon neither has NASA, or anyone, therefore we do not know what it's surface is made off.

So the moon makes its own light and i just proved it!

6
I have been arguing for WEEKS on youtube with people about the MOON HOAX and how I KNOW we did not go.
This one idiot calls himself the astrobrant2 or something thinks he knows it all. He is a juvenile who wont shut up. He thinks the moon reflects light from the sun. How can it do that?

The "phases" of the moon proves nothing, it could still be artificially controlled or have been put in it's orbit artificially. However that is not my argument one way or another, my argument is the moon may well generate it's OWN light, and NOT from the sun. The fact is if it does, then the moon phases has NOTHING to do with that one way or another.  The moon rather it seems has a cool light, much like fluorescent lights, which well could be a chemical reaction of some sort covering the moon's entire surface.  WHAT you have been taught in school has shown to be many times as INCORRECT theoretical guessing that explains things in a "comfortable" way. Much like the fictional story of Adam and Eve. You are supposed to be smart and analyze things. 
I may not beleive eveything you people say here but it makes more sense then the garbage NASA feed us.

Pages: [1]