Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Oboto Sobatmas

Pages: [1]
1
Flat Earth General / Re: Calculating the diameter of the stars
« on: July 22, 2020, 01:24:32 PM »
No take it from me that image is most definitely the far side (not Earth facing) side of the Moon. 
There is only one side of the moon and it is the front side.
I have taken plenty of images of the Moon myself and so I am very familiar with what the nearside of the Earth looks like.
There is already only one side. You think they are different things because of contrast, better quality shooting, et cetera.
The dark patch on the very edge of the Moon about the 11 o'clock position is Mare Crisium which, on a photo taken from Earth is on the opposite point about 1'oclock position.  So about 90% of the part of the surface shown in your photo (or the photo you posted) is completely invisible from Earth.
We can also use a different photo if it is important according to you whether it is front or back. I don't think the result will be very different from that.
The first photos of the far side of the Moon were taken by Apollo astronauts. More recently we have spacecraft in orbit around the Moon (LRO for example) which have taken very detailed images of the whole of the Moons surface.
These fairy tales have nothing to do with our topic. This photo shows the average craters on the lunar surface. You don't need to make Apollo propaganda. If NASA wants copyright for photos, I can change the photo if you can prove it. Otherwise, the source of the photo is not important. It is any of thousands of moon photos.
And why don't you believe in the presence of meteorites?  They hit the Earth as well you know.  The Barringer crater in Arizona is the perfect example of an Earth/meteorite impact.

There term 'shooting star' is just a metaphorical one.  It is not intended to be taken literally.  Shooting 'stars' are actually nothing whatsoever to do with actual stars.  I'm surprised you didn't realise that.
Ahahaha! How funny! They hit Arizona. How they know they are not falling stars but falling meteorids?

Surely there are not meteorids. No space, no meteor. We see the stars and some of them are falling. If you watch carefully, you can see that this way. No, it's not meteor. Star. It stands there, we see it, so look, this is a star. And then it slips. What does it have to do with meteor? In order for it to be meteor, when you take it to the video, it should suddenly appear and then slide at a point that has never existed. I've never seen that. I saw it carefully one time, and it was a star that I specifically identified a star that was clearly there, and that star that I determined slipped from there. No no, it cannot be a meteor. I have observational evidence from my point of view.

Congratulations, Wise, this is the most preposterous unexpurgated refutable nonsense on the internet today.

2

For those who are asking for evidence of my claims, I won't do so, you first have to prove all your Heleocentric claims to me. I will never take photo shop as evidence or the testimony of the Masonic elite.

The fact that you have gone to great lengths to make up a fairy tale of completely unsubstantiated drivel, masquerading as 'visions', means to me that you have no intention of seeing facts of a globe Earth for what they are. The perfect sunrise I saw this morning on the way to work, with underlit clouds slowly being lit from the sides and then above, was so much more proof than your nonsense could muster in a million years. No wonder you resort to a puerile 'you first' stance.   
I'm left with two potential conclusions, (1) you are deliberately acting as a fool in order to discredit the poor unfortunates that might subscribe to such buffoonery as yours, or (2) you actually believe it.
What you propose is so fanciful and ridiculous, I think it is most likely you are trolling in order to discredit Flat Earthers. Prove me wrong.

3
You know a lot of fancy words for someone who is not even from America LOL In any case you guys within globe matrix think that if a person has a vision he is a lunatic or crazy, yet all your religions are based on testimonies of people that had visions. Explain that to me LOL

Oh boy, you're my new favourite. Fancy words, all in the English dictionary, who would have thought an Englishman might actually use them?
On the other point, I do not have a religion that I would call 'mine', and so this point is moot. Look it up, it is also in the aforementioned dictionary!
Keep it up buddy, but fear not, I will not be listening, it is time for my cocoa, and so to bed. Good night, you silly deranged little sausage.

4
Here I want to describe few known continents of the infinite earth, etc etc.....


Of course there are many other super landmasses but those are the once that I personally know off

You hang in there, buddy, stick to your medication, you're definitely 'special'




Yes I'm special but not in a way you meant! You wanna call me a retard and insult me? It didn't work buddy. I'm special because I can describe these lands and I know what is outside globe matrix. You can never be like me, but you can also be special by humbling yourself and worship me as your God. Speaking of medications, I don't take any. Medications like many other things in this Matrix world is pure poison designed not to treat you but to destroy you.

Stop, Stop! You're killing me! Your utterly unverifiable, hysterical delusions are a work of immense comedic value, and you should be more widely advertised. I feel honoured to be one of the few who get to witness your demented ramblings. Keep it up buddy!!

5
Here I want to describe few known continents of the infinite earth, etc etc.....


Of course there are many other super landmasses but those are the once that I personally know off

You hang in there, buddy, stick to your medication, you're definitely 'special'

6
Flat Earth General / Re: Solve this proof
« on: September 07, 2018, 08:21:27 AM »
I'm not so sure that being able to dig or not would truly stand scrutiny as 'proof' of globe or flat earth.

7
Flat Earth General / Re: 150ft Ice Wall Edge
« on: September 02, 2018, 02:26:02 PM »
With the bi-polar map, what would cause the ice-caps to form, but for the areas around them to not freeze?

8
Excellent question.
No response or attempt at derailment by JROA et al.

As a question, it looks like it qualifies as 'too hard to answer'.

Nice one, well done.

9
Flat Earth Debate / Re: When is a Scientist taught to lie?
« on: April 08, 2017, 02:49:40 AM »


"So if we run with the all scientists are part of the conspiracy idea,"

Scientists are puppets on strings, they are not the masters.
[/quote]

Jack is not saying they are the masters in his query, far from it. The inference is that they ARE puppets in some way. Therefore his query remains the same, and your comment neither answers it or helps, it merely misdirects.
Try harder to understand the orginal post, and then try to come up with a response of some value or merit.

10
Flat Earth General / Re: how to create flat earth map from google earth
« on: February 08, 2017, 03:02:33 PM »
U.K. And Eire seem to have gone on holiday.

I'm in the UK, and I can assure you, I'm not on holiday, the stars look the same, the moon is in the right place, we're still here.
Of course, I could be part of the cover-up...

11
Flat Earth General / Re: how to create flat earth map from google earth
« on: February 08, 2017, 11:59:22 AM »
Australia to S Africa roughly 5000 miles, Santiago to Cape Town roughly 5000 miles, both measurements can be confirmed by the flight times.
Prasnet, your picture is fanciful. What a surpirse.

12
Flat Earth General / Re: Expedition to cruise the Antarctica coast line.
« on: February 03, 2017, 01:46:46 PM »
I would strongly advise against trying to approach the AW without prior authorization.  Trust me on this one, you don't want to do that.  I was an Antarctic Wall Patrol Officer for ten years, from 2001 to 2011. The length of The Wall is regularly patrolled by aerial and nautical patrol teams, which cover the entire length every 2 1/2 hours, and can spot large vessels by radar up to 90 miles out, and small craft (like a buggy or a canoe) visually up to 15 miles out. Anyone approaching within 30 miles of The Wall is contacted by radio and warned off. Approach within 10 miles and you will be intercepted by an Antarctic Wall Quick Reaction Team, usually disguised as regular military or UN forces. Any attempt to evade the AWQRT (pronounced “awkwart” by other personnel) will result in immediate use of lethal force. Over the last decade I’ve seen dozens of scientists, explorers, and lost adventurers terminated and disposed of.  And that's just in my sectors.

I'm calling bullshit on this. Prove ANY of this nonsense

No it's not.
It's the truth.

Oh, okay then, I can't argue with that, case closed, point proved, sorry to cast doubt, I'll be off then.

13
Flat Earth General / Re: Expedition to cruise the Antarctica coast line.
« on: February 03, 2017, 01:19:55 PM »
I would strongly advise against trying to approach the AW without prior authorization.  Trust me on this one, you don't want to do that.  I was an Antarctic Wall Patrol Officer for ten years, from 2001 to 2011. The length of The Wall is regularly patrolled by aerial and nautical patrol teams, which cover the entire length every 2 1/2 hours, and can spot large vessels by radar up to 90 miles out, and small craft (like a buggy or a canoe) visually up to 15 miles out. Anyone approaching within 30 miles of The Wall is contacted by radio and warned off. Approach within 10 miles and you will be intercepted by an Antarctic Wall Quick Reaction Team, usually disguised as regular military or UN forces. Any attempt to evade the AWQRT (pronounced “awkwart” by other personnel) will result in immediate use of lethal force. Over the last decade I’ve seen dozens of scientists, explorers, and lost adventurers terminated and disposed of.  And that's just in my sectors.

I'm calling bullshit on this. Prove ANY of this nonsense

Pages: [1]