1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: About that pendulum thread
« on: June 25, 2008, 09:15:16 PM »
Hm. Guess so.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I've been wondering...I doubt it. It would cause the stars to appear to rotate laterally in the sky, unless they were rotating with the Earth. Then, of course, there's the fact that (to my knowledge) the rotation has never been measured. If it were rotating, then the further one travelled from the centre, the more one would feel pulled out towards the Ice Wall.
Does the Flat Earth rotate laterally?
Thanks.
The Moon orbits not because of gravity.
It doesn't mean that they are there either.However, we can prove they are there electrons, etc.
No one has seen an individual electron. No one has seen a proton within its electron shell.And nobody has seen a flat earth, or at least not all at once, like looking at the map. And don't say you looked out your window. I did too, and saw a hill. Thus, the Earth must be round.
Obviously, you are too low to see a curved horizon. The eye is fallible - for example, when I look at my desk, I don't see all the atoms composing it, but that does not mean they are not there.Did you even read my last post? The theory of gravity also predicts that an object will fall to earth at 9.8ms^-2. How about something that contradicts RE theory?When I look out the window from my multi-storey office, the horizen is flat. How about that?
The questions still begs: has FE theory predicted anything that contradicts RE theory? Can it do so?No it can't. Is it the dark object that causes eclipses in FE? I can't remember the name.
For example, can it predict solar eclipses? I know RE theory can and has.
Really?
"The radius of the sun's orbit around the Earth's axis symmetry varies throughout the year, being smallest when summer is in the northern annulus and largest when it is summer in the southern annulus.
Here are some very good diagrams of seasons on the flat Earth."
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=13876.0
It even has diagrams for those of you who suffer from reading comprehension.
While it's supposed to be in space, it becomes invisible.It was not yet in space when it exploded. I fail to understand this entire point.
And the astronauts do it because, if they don't do it, the government will kill them and their family.That's reasonable, but highly unlikely and lacks any form of supporting evidence.
Ok so in FET it's impossible to go to space blah blah blah. But while I was looking throught the "Shuttle crashes" post I noticed something. What about the people who have died in shuttle crashes? What happened to them? What about their grieving families? Are they acting? And what about the fact that the dead people haven't been seen since? No one would want to live hidden the rest of their lives just to help out a conspiracy. Now what does FES say for this?
As I said in the Shuttle Crashes thread, the shuttle goes upward out of people's view, stays their for a few days, then crashes. The people onboard knew they were going to die, but they couldn't tell their families.
If ghosts are physical, then they are made of matter (or composed of materials resemble to a physical being). Are you saying that this is true?
it's a shame that ICBM's don't exist as well
?if gravity didnt exist wouldnt we be floating? or have an extremely bad sense of balance to which we cant even walk?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_gravity#Acceleration
Now apply this to a flat earth. There you go.
Space craft. Enough said.
Now apply this to a flat earth. There you go.
I guess I think they're probably real, but we (people) have yet to "see" any.
The shows that they have out there for ghost hunting though, are just gay.
Light is nonphysical
Then how can we stop it to a standstill, or how would we see since out optic nerves in our eyes have to react with contact from something to cause stimulation?
I think that you should rethink your statement before continuing your argument.
if gravity didnt exist wouldnt we be floating? or have an extremely bad sense of balance to which we cant even walk?
the evidence is hard to deny.
No it's not.
Our eyes could only see physical entities or objects.Light is nonphysical, and we can see it. Wouldn't it then be possible that such sightings of ghosts are emissions of light? Also, ghosts show up on video frequently when they are invisible to the naked eye. Actually, a lot of the whole thing doesn't make sense, but the evidence is hard to deny.
The guy actually walked in circles even though he knows he's waling in a straight line
I'm not aware of any current projects involving private touring that are orbital -- are you?
They went to the marker that denotes the "south pole" and then went back to the coast via a different route? I'm not sure why that's impossible.
...in March they reached the opposite side of the continent.
Also, the Google-NASA connection has been established.
Yeah, it seems to have been put back. What did it say?
How is telling you where to get information dodging a question? Sounds like I'm wiping your butt for you and you're telling me I missed a spot.I posed a direct question to you and you didn't answer it. Will you? I'm just trying to understand your views on this topic.
Use the search, it's so easy a noob can do it.
FE doesn't require... "subducting plates"Well?
Many threads on earthquakes exist, this thread is about volcanoes.You're doding the question.