Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Snaaaaake

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 21
1
I memba you.

I memba you too. It's been over 5 years since I've last posted, crazy.

2
The Lounge / Re: Why Do the Brits Wear Such Ridiculous Hats?
« on: June 10, 2018, 10:35:40 AM »
They like to be different

3
I used to be ROUND000, I don't know why I changed it to this stupid snake name.

4
The Lounge / Re: Favorite Video Game? (if you have one)
« on: June 10, 2018, 10:34:30 AM »
In no particular order:

Fornite
GTA V
Smash Bros Melee
Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild
Mario Kart Double Dash
Madden
NBA 2K


5
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: April 02, 2013, 06:48:07 PM »
1. Yes they do. Homosexuals are human beings. Dogs are not.

2. You'd rather have a baby be born deformed than it be adopted by a gay couple?

3. Explain.

1. Homosexuals do not have the legal standing to marry. It is illegal for them to do so.

2. The federal government has declared both incestuous and homosexual marriage as undesirable and illegal. I would rather that a child not grow up in an undesirable or illegal household.

3. Gay marriage hurts me because my money is being put to waste on things which do not benefit society. Why should I be burdened with paying for someone's unproductive sexual lifestyle?

When my taxes go towards rewarding heterosexual behavior I could at least say that the money is going towards the benefit of america, and that those couples are creating our future soldiers, engineers and scientists, as well as making the US into a richer nation.

When my money goes towards rewarding homosexual behavior I can't say any of that. It's a total waste.

1. Thanks Captain Obvious, that's what this whole debate is about. You said earlier gays don't have any legal standings at all, but now you say they do but not to marry.

2. Too bad it's already (unfortunately) legal to marry your first cousin in several states as I stated earlier, in fact more states (unfortunately) allow relative marriage than gay marriage. Why should it matter what the federal government says, if gay marriage is voted on a state basis?

3.  You say this hurts you, but don't care at all about the government spending money on robosquirrels or tax breaks for sports leagues? http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/politics/coburn-government-waste
 
Yet you continue to think that gay marriage is somehow the worst of your problems. Also, you know that a gay couple can just as easily adopt a baby who will grow up to be a scientist, engineer, etc?

6
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: April 02, 2013, 02:07:03 PM »
Quote from: Snaaaaake link=topic=58093.msg1474456#msg1474456
Did you really just use Yahoo Answers to make a point? Really?

Dogs don't have legal standings and therefore can't get married.

Nor do homosexuals. Homosexuals do not have legal standing and therefore can't get married. I'm glad you agree that the law should stay as it is.

Quote
Getting married to a family member is illegal because if they were to have a child it could end up being genetically deformed which is harming an innocent life.

I thought the argument in this thread was that marriage doesn't necessarily lead to children? Now it does?

The government doesn't recognize incestuous unions because it is an undesirable behavior. It is not a behavior which contributes to the prosperity of the nation.

Quote
Who is being harmed by gay marriage?

I am.

1. Yes they do. Homosexuals are human beings. Dogs are not.

2. You'd rather have a baby be born deformed than it be adopted by a gay couple?

3. Explain.

7
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: April 02, 2013, 12:10:16 PM »
"Why should we encourage homosexual unions?"

I'll answer this one (again) but I'm not getting into the financial discussion with you because you are hellbent on the idea that it is what's important for our government (and not its people).

Homosexuals, though they are so different than you and I (sarcasm) fall in love, too.

Why should the government give out life long tax breaks to two people because they fell in love?  "You're in love, congratulations, here's some lifelong cash for you." Is that why you think the government gives out tax breaks to married couples?  ???

This woman fell in love with her father.

This woman fell in love with her dog.

Are you arguing that because they fell in love we should let them get married and give them life long monetary benefits in the name of love?

Did you really just use Yahoo Answers to make a point? Really?

Dogs don't have legal standings and therefore can't get married.

Getting married to a family member is illegal because if they were to have a child it could end up being genetically deformed which is harming an innocent life. Sad thing is, a lot of states allow family members to get married: http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/human-services/state-laws-regarding-marriages-between-first-cousi.aspx

Who is being harmed by gay marriage?

8
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: April 01, 2013, 07:21:18 PM »
This isn't about people having kids, its about people thinking that Homosexuality is immoral. Even if you look back at arguments congress has made in the last ten years, they are pretty much all about it being wrong/ a danger to the family unit.  This whole gay people don't produce tax payers thing is stupid.  Our goal is to make raising children in poverty less difficult, and to make sure they have a brighter future.  We should not be subsidizing every married couple so they will have children, we have enough people already.

So why should we give homosexuals money for being homo?

I've listed off reasons to encourage heterosexual unions, which directly results in millions of dollars and prosperity of the nation. Why should we encourage homosexual unions?

This isn't about encouragement, this is about equal rights. If gay marriage was passed nation wide, no one is forcing anybody to become gay. If you're straight, go ahead and marry the opposite gender. No one is stopping you.

9
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: April 01, 2013, 04:22:06 PM »
So then shouldn't gays be allowed to marry since there's a possibility of adopting? It's not like the child's original parents are taking the kid back.

Gays already receive benefits for adopting children. They can list them as dependents on their tax returns and receive credits. If you choose, you and your sister could jointly adopt a child, despite not being in a sexual relationship together, and receive similar credits.

Marriage benefits are given specifically to heterosexual couples because the government has deemed heterosexual unions a desirable behavior. Homosexual behavior is not a desirable behavior, bestiality is not a desirable behavior, and neither is incest. Public money should not be put towards those disgusting things.

I am still lost to why gays should be given equal rights. Please continue to explain to us how homosexuals contribute as much to humanity as heterosexuals to be deserving of the same benefits.


10
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: April 01, 2013, 04:04:05 PM »
Tom is just going to say the same thing over and over no matter what you say. Might as well talk to a brick wall, at least it might listen.

11
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: April 01, 2013, 03:50:42 PM »
Gay couples adopt, Tom. Do you know what a huge service that is to the public??

If a gay couple does happen to adopt, it's still heterosexual behavior which produced that tax payer, not homosexual behavior.

So then shouldn't gays be allowed to marry since there's a possibility of adopting? It's not like the child's original parents are taking the kid back.

12
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: April 01, 2013, 02:36:39 PM »
I guess if you're infertile or don't ever want to have children, just forget about getting married. CLEARLY marriage is only about money, and not love.

13
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: March 30, 2013, 10:44:38 AM »
The purpose of marriage isn't to have children. Just because someone has a better chance of having children doesn't mean they still will.

14
The Lounge / Re: Flat Earthers for marriage equality
« on: March 29, 2013, 10:13:13 AM »
I vote no.

Why should we give gays marriage benefits? That money is intended to provide incentive to start a family and produce future tax payers.

Gays cannot reproduce and do not create future tax payers. The majority do not adopt. Therefore they should not receive the benefits marriage brings.

By that logic infertile/elderly couples should not get married either.

15
The Lounge / Re: Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 28, 2013, 01:44:29 PM »
no

16
The Lounge / Re: Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 28, 2013, 01:07:19 PM »
Your name sounds familiar....

17
The Lounge / Re: Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 28, 2013, 08:16:43 AM »
Instead of haphazardly stopping by every year or two, you should adopt the same schedule as Halley's Commit.  That way, we know when to expect you.

Maybe. I'll check my schedule for 2061 and see if I can make it.

18
The Lounge / Re: Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 27, 2013, 08:19:37 PM »
Wow...time flies huh?

19
The Lounge / Re: Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 27, 2013, 07:03:11 PM »
I'm still here!  Not that you or anyone else cares.  :(

I remember you!

20
The Lounge / Re: Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 27, 2013, 05:29:24 PM »
What's going on with you, Round000?

Not a whole lot, just finishing classes and waiting for summer for now.

22
The Lounge / Re: Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 27, 2013, 12:12:22 PM »
hey bro what up

Did you change your name? I don't remember you.

23
The Lounge / Re: Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 27, 2013, 12:01:00 PM »
Not much, yesterday I randomly remembered this place and thought I should stop by. I think I was going to visit last summer but ended up forgetting/too busy. I might hang here for a few days but I'll try to visit again this summer.

24
The Lounge / Re: Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 27, 2013, 10:41:05 AM »
ROUND000!!

Space Cowgirl!!!!


Saddam hasn't posted a single thing since I blocked him...

 :(

25
The Lounge / Making my once a yearly visit
« on: March 27, 2013, 09:51:19 AM »
Hey, first time here since 2011. Most people probably don't remember me. Are Saddam, Gayer, Draincover, Oscar (I know he left but maybe he's come back), Space Cowgirl, Tom Bishop, etc. still here?

-ROUND000 (Roundoo)

26
The Lounge / Re: I'm still alive
« on: July 17, 2011, 09:32:18 PM »
Yes! You're still here! Alright well, my reason for coming here is over. See you in another year or so.

-Roundoo

27
The Lounge / Re: I'm still alive
« on: July 16, 2011, 09:22:25 AM »
Nooooo.  :(

It says he was last on yesterday, though. I guess he hasn't gone back online yet.

28
The Lounge / Re: I'm still alive
« on: July 16, 2011, 09:16:25 AM »
Where's Saddam? He's the only cool person...

29
The Lounge / Re: I'm still alive
« on: July 15, 2011, 09:01:22 PM »
Is it hung or hanged? Hanged sounds better.

30
The Lounge / Re: I'm still alive
« on: July 15, 2011, 08:44:41 PM »
Oh, I thought he was hanged.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 21