Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ihateyouall

Pages: [1]
1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Proof the Earth is Not Round: Exhaustion
« on: December 01, 2015, 03:41:29 PM »
Yet EVEN A MODERATOR couldn't answer a single question without complaining about the number of them. Weak arguments at their best.
Because it's just tiring to answer the same bullshit over and over. I've seen you've ignored the rest of my posts...
What is the point in wasting time on someone too lazy to research what they're talking about? There's a search function.

You mean that one other post? That one single one that you couldn't provide an answer for? Yeah, great example

2
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: ***Flat Earth Q&A Change***
« on: December 01, 2015, 01:18:40 PM »
"Snarky responses.  We will remove them."
Heh, try telling that to Jroa

3
Flat Earth Debate / Re: DET - discussions
« on: December 01, 2015, 11:52:27 AM »
Oh my gosh. Are people now making up their own theories? I mean wow. With that logic, then I can prove that the Earth is a cube and the nightsky is just a projection from NASA and the moon is made of cheese and that penguins don't exist since we've never been to Antarctica.

4
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Proof the Earth is Not Round: Exhaustion
« on: December 01, 2015, 11:41:52 AM »
I love how when us, the RE's are presented with a list of question, we get right to answering.

While the FE's say things like " "People have a lot of questions, and think that other people have a lot of time to answer their questions.  That does not make it right.  If you want a question answered, then ask that question.  Don't make a list like it is an exam or something.  Do you people not have common courtesy?"-Jroa or "Nope, it's still true. That's too many questions, plain and simple. There's a search function, you can find answers all over the forum: instead a rant is put forward containing way more than anyone's willing to read." -JRoweSkeptic   100 questions and RE's have no issue answering. Yet EVEN A MODERATOR couldn't answer a single question without complaining about the number of them. Weak arguments at their best.

5
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Proof the Earth is Not Round: Exhaustion
« on: December 01, 2015, 11:34:45 AM »
Here's a simple tidbit of information as to why the Earth seems level. Now, some common knowledge is that the horizon is out 4.7 km. Our eyesight is up to 48 km. Our field of vision is around 170°. Now from pole to pole, the earth is around 40,000 km. Using Pythagorean's triangle theorem, we can calculate our complete field of vision in kilometers. From left to right the horizon line is about 16km. 16 KM. That is 0.04% of the entire earth. Now, we can take this a bit further. a sphere is 360° when viewed from any angle. 0.04% of 360°, subtracted from 180° would give us the angle of deformation of the horizion we would expect to see.  0.04% of 360 is......0.1  180-0.1= 179.9°    THAT is the angle of the horizon without using anything but the common knowledge of today. If you expect to see the curvature of the earth from the horizon, then you are sadly mistaken.

For your reference, here is an image of a 179° angle.
http://etc.usf.edu/clipart/32600/32657/angle_179_32657_lg.gif

6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Help me answer this, please.
« on: December 01, 2015, 10:23:13 AM »
And there was have the infamous jroa beginning with the insults. Someone needs to moderate you Mr. Moderator

7
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Answers please
« on: December 01, 2015, 09:49:50 AM »
You FE's seem to love perspective yet have very little understanding of what it is. Alright, let's see. What are the calculations for the Sun's size and it's distance from Earth.

8
Please explain further. What fits perfectly in place of gravity but isn't gravity?

9
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: alternate theory to the earth accelerating upwards
« on: December 01, 2015, 09:37:54 AM »
FE would claim at 9.81 m/s upwards. I am an RE btw.

10
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Answers please
« on: December 01, 2015, 09:30:16 AM »
In what dimension would moving something away on an x,y axis cause it to be hidden by the edges of the disc? If the sun is above us then it never dips below the horizon. Regardless of what type of light it is, it would always be visible.Assuming it stayed within the confines of the Earth's edges.

11
I'll avoid an easy insult and just ask a question instead. Are you implying that all mathematical data about gravity and all simulations on how it work are false and should be discredited?

12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Help me answer this, please.
« on: December 01, 2015, 09:21:55 AM »
How about we try something different. You love to dodge evidence, (I've been reading around the forum). How about you provide evidence that explains otherwise.

13
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Answers please
« on: December 01, 2015, 09:20:43 AM »
Ball or disc the experiment's results wouldn't change

14
After reading every single page of this Topic. I have to say, the FE's are in a pinch. Almost always did they resort to either insults, going off topic, or ignoring. I expect MUCH more from a moderator. FE-0 RE-1

15
Sphericalearth, you'll find that most FE Theorists hold debates in the same manner as JRoweSkeptic. The only hope to preserve their argument is to get off-topic and start attacking the person instead of their argument.

16
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Help me answer this, please.
« on: December 01, 2015, 02:14:46 AM »
With the FET, sunset and sunrise would simply be impossible. No amount of light refraction or perspective would change that.

17
Flat Earth Q&A / Answers please
« on: December 01, 2015, 01:56:57 AM »
How is a horizon possible if the sun is above us? If you did the experiment yourself by using a disc shaped object and a small ball, you'd see that the ball would be visible at all times, yet with flat earth theory, the sun hides behind the horizon. How can a horizon exist on a disc if the sun is overhead?

18
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: I need scientific proof
« on: November 13, 2015, 04:33:38 PM »
Or. MAYBE. You have no answers? People do this ALOT on other forums and get answers. It usually isn't one person answering all of them, but a group will answer a few and so on. This is the Q&A after all. Why the fluff wouldn't you post questions? Just an excuse to not have any answers.

19
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: General Questions
« on: November 13, 2015, 12:46:19 PM »
I've got a feeling the conspiracy nuts aren't taking any actual questions today

20
Flat Earth Q&A / I need scientific proof
« on: November 13, 2015, 12:31:42 PM »
How is the Earth accelerating upwards to keep us on the ground?

How is it that one in a plane cannot see the entire earth as they should on a plane?

How is that ships disappear over the horizon? (I've heard the perspective thing and that's just stupid. Perspective doesn't change with a lens. The ship does disappear when looked through a telescope, I've done it myself)

How is a horizon possible if the sun is above us?

How is a sunset and sunrise possible if we are on a disc? On a disc, the suns light must travel through an constantly even amount of atmosphere to reach us, so it would look the same from our view morning to day. On a globe, the sun's light must travel through a much thicker layer of atmosphere at sunrise and set, which is why its so much dimmer. This would not be possible on a disc.

How are penguins documented to exist in Antarctica if no one is allowed there? How are people routinely allowed to travel to Antarctica for personal reasons if it is supposedly protected? Why isn't Antartica visible from the southern tip of Chile? They are roughly 600 miles apart, though on a disc this would not be an issue.

Why can mountaintops be seen at a horizon level?

Students have sent a camera into space and the curvature of the earth is very clearly seen. This was done privately as a class experiment. The camera they used was not a go-pro, so the fish eye lens is not possible especially since in the image, you can very clearly see no distortion of the bobblehead or it's arms. There are several other images from several people around the world that are not associated with NASA in any way. Weather balloons are relatively cheap and one can do the experiment themselves. Some canadian teens even sent a lego man into space and this picture clearly disproves and kinda of fisheye lens trickery because of the canadian flag not being distorted even though it clearly would be.
http://i.space.com/images/i/000/014/889/i02/lego-man-space-youtube-video.jpg?1327753307

http://i.livescience.com/images/i/000/033/241/iFF/obama-bobblehead-mono-lake.jpg?1352481925

Now, some common knowledge is that the horizon is out 4.7 km. Our eyesight is up to 48 km. Our field of vision is around 170°. Now from pole to pole, the earth is around 40,000 km. Using Pythagorean's triangle theorem, we can calculate our complete field of vision in kilometers. From left to right the horizon line is about 16km. 16 KM. That is 0.04% of the entire earth. Now, we can take this a bit further. a sphere is 360° when viewed from any angle. 0.04% of 360°, subtracted from 180° would give us the angle of deformation of the horizion we would expect to see.  0.04% of 360 is......0.1  180-0.1= 179.9°    THAT is the angle of the horizon without using anything but the common knowledge of today. If you expect to see the curvature of the earth from the horizon, then you are sadly mistaken.

For your reference, here is an image of a 179° angle.
http://etc.usf.edu/clipart/32600/32657/angle_179_32657_lg.gif

Now. Any responses?

Pages: [1]