1

Flat Earth Q&A / Why is this site allowed then?

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:21:32 PM »

Yet they're still correct.

right....
thats like saying that anything you say is correct
which i answer with
PORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHESPORKCHOP SANDWICHES

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Why is this site allowed then?

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:19:29 PM »

The governments wouldn't bother shutting down such a small site. After all, very few people who come to the site go away believing in a FE. Why would the governments bother?

rofl.... :roll:
the explanations these people give are so pussyfoot

3

Flat Earth Q&A / Curvitre Picture

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:18:32 PM »

 So you are going to tell me that the camera manufacturers gave me the wrong information about their camera?

yes of course they are in on the conspiracy. Government ruling requires them to publish false information. Duh!

roflroflrolf
but wait, if i go take a pinhole camera that i made myself and take a photo of a curved horizon its fake? no way

4

Flat Earth Q&A / Why is this site allowed then?

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:16:52 PM »

its a hoax website anyways

5

Flat Earth Q&A / I feel FE is true, but I need help arguing my case.

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:11:37 PM »

Here's your proof:

Earth is ROUND, our solar system is heliocentric, gravity exists, and Tom Bishop sucks cocks.

CORRECTOMUNDO

6

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: I guess I'll come back later

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:11:02 PM »

It's a shame that so many people, both FE and RE alike have decided to post such hostility here today.

I found this site and was intrigued.  I feel like there are answers and good conversations to be had, but clearly today is not the day.  I will come back when things aren't quite so temultuous, and I hope we can have a civilized conversation.

I look forward to it.

GO GO INSPECTOR GADGET

7

Flat Earth Q&A / Proof?

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:08:26 PM »

I'm specifically interested in #5. As a licensed ham radio operator I've often used the fact that the upper atmosphere is able to deflect certain radio frequencies in order to talk to distant parts of the world, such as Europe and Russia. If the atmospheric conditions are really good, though, the signal bounces multiple times between the Earth and upper atmosphere.

On two lucky occasions I've been able to hear my own "echo" several seconds later. How does the flat earth theory account for this occurrence?

it doesnt
unless of course you upgrade your tinfoil hats to titanium encrusted billboards

8

Flat Earth Q&A / Relativity disproves accellerating Earth

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:06:18 PM »

Because nothing with mass can reach the speed of light.

and you've tested this?
oh wait its just a THEORY
K T H X
fuckin a

9

Flat Earth Q&A / Gravity At different Altitudes

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:05:14 PM »

lawl this must be so much fun for them seriously, i mean how much fun are they having? im gonna go make a website called we dont see color, oh wait we do lololol.

10

Flat Earth Q&A / My Disproof

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:04:24 PM »

the earth is not round or flat, IT'S TRIANGULAR

no no
its BLACK ok guys, ITS BLACK

11

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: What about that?

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:03:50 PM »

There is more serious facts given by the Nasa, but as some FE'rs fanatics may say, it's fake. By saying that the Nasa lies to us, you are assuming that other countries are also lying like Russia and France who have launched many sattelites in orbit.

I am questioning myself about the point of this website, and the goal too. Wouldn't it be more easier that you were wrong at the begining? I believe that you are wrong and I will prove my theory in this thread.

What about this news :
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/18/world/asia/18cnd-china.html?ex=1326776400&en=3f5fb4a065572bbb&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

In your FAQ, you talked about conspiracy and money. Let's overview this point from a basic example ; I am the writer of this story, I am paid by the news agency to write this article. Many writers are paid to write "conspirational" stories. The government is spending a huge budget on rocket ships and is paying alot of scientist to study space, stars, planets and moon. Where do they gain profits? Do they really make THAT amount of money by telling false things? Why spending that much money to lie? I wan't proof.

I don't live near a shore, I live in Montreal (Quebec). I don't have the money to rent a beautiful apt. near the shore because I'm still young. I believe that the Earth is round, like 99% of everybody who comes here. For me this website is a trick to gather people. Still, it's more for me a web site builded by someone who live in London named Daniel Shenton (I guess it's the webmaster), hosted on a US host named InsiderHosting. I'll stop copy and pasting the WHOIS informations and I'll continue my reflexion...

Do you have valid pictures of the Icewall or the army surrounding the icewall or even a proof that there is army there or anything else? I guess not. It's maybe the reason why they aren't a proof, because they are almost all saying that the Earth is round.

"The ice wall is roughly 150ft high."
Can you explain me why even with a telescope, if you live near the coast you cannot see this wall? Can you please draw me the shape of this wall and where do this theory of "wall of ice" come from?

"A: Since NASA did not send rockets into space, they instead spent the money on developing advanced computers and imaging software instead."
What? Are you kidding me?
My computer is enough powerful to generate something real enought to let you believe that the Earth is rectangular. It looks like you have no or not many 3D knowledge. 3D imagery is generated by computers and not by specific computers. They could easily render something very fast if they had something similar like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_gene Blue Gene. Talking about software, 3ds max or Maya could easily do the job and they did not cost billions of $ to develop.

A: Since NASA did not send rockets into space
What about real people - that have friends - who SAW a shuttle launch?

Anyway, I look forward to a reply. I have more facts to bring.

Thanks,
Michael

yea dont even waste your time here, these people are so full of shit, they will just say read the faq you are fuckin wrong

12

Flat Earth Q&A / Explain to me

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:02:33 PM »

So it works just as the conspirators say? The sun emits charged particles that , when come into contact with the earth's atmosphere, cause light to be emitted?

no thats just jesus and santa lighting coal fires in their demon room thats located beneath the earth which has a giant glass ceiling that reflects light upwards khtx

13

Flat Earth Q&A / GOOD WORK WAS ABOUT TIME FOR A CLEANUP IN HERE

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:01:46 PM »

yes clean up after the diggers who BITCHSLAPPED THE F U C K OUT OF YOUR BOARDS!  

no shit
these faggots got pwnd

14

Flat Earth Q&A / GOOD WORK WAS ABOUT TIME FOR A CLEANUP IN HERE

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:01:12 PM »

Have you looked out your window recently?

Clear precedent for a flat earth.

Yea you dont know what you are talking about
You do realize you cannot see the curvature of the earth before like a couple hundred miles
geegee

15

Flat Earth Q&A / Relativity disproves accellerating Earth

« on: February 16, 2007, 05:00:03 PM »

No. It is accelerating at a rate of 9.8m/s^2

If Earth is accelerating, and the key word here is ACCELERATING, we would eventually reach close to the speed of light. We cannot attain light speed because general relativity forbids it. The Earth's mass would become narly infinite. If what some people claim is true, and I am referring to the belief here that the earth is slowing down, we would be flung into space. If the deceleration was slow enough to NOT throw everthing into space, once it stopped, there would be no "gravity" without this, the next step you took would be your last because the force exerted on the ground would propel you up, and up, and up.

these people are full of shit because they didnt realize that, but of course the govt has a nifty time machine that will transport us all back to the year -00000000000000000000000000000000000000000.01bc where all things were good when sophicles was molesting little kids and bunnies were free to roam the pastures of the sky. right... :roll:

16

Flat Earth Q&A / Thanks to who ever created this site

« on: February 16, 2007, 04:58:31 PM »

yea not really
its like the special olympics, you may win but you're still a retard

17

Flat Earth Q&A / Tom- Please Read. Serious Post

« on: February 16, 2007, 04:57:47 PM »

OK, I looked through the FAQ a bit and saw the spotlight explanation (uhh... OK).  How does that explain a crescent moon?

well obviously thats just a big piece of paper stuck in the sky that gets arranged every night so that people think the world is flat.......round i mean...lawlz

18

Flat Earth Q&A / My Disproof

« on: February 16, 2007, 04:56:19 PM »

yea its called perspective, and it still doesnt MEAN the earth is flat

19

Flat Earth Q&A / Why?

« on: February 16, 2007, 04:54:18 PM »

It's not necessary to purport the roundness of the earth if the poor and uneducated have already created the idea of a Round Earth for themselves.

NASA Administrators simply take advantage of the situation, charging the public 16.8 billion dollars a year in exchange for some computer generated pictures and a few astronaut interviews.

And they stand to benefit how? So what, they get 16.8 billion dollars, wowzers thats a shitload of money, man thats so much its gonna bankrupt the US an keep the poor people down. OH WAIT ITS NOT... gfg.

What do you do for a living Tom? Seriously, you probably own a computer shop in a small town and sit in your basement all day crying about how you are poor.

20

Flat Earth Q&A / Relativity disproves accellerating Earth

« on: February 16, 2007, 04:52:13 PM »

No, Earth is accelerating.

so how do we not fly off if we dont have gravity? OOOOOOOOP GOT YOU NOW

21

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: A couple of questions...

« on: February 16, 2007, 04:51:13 PM »

1) What is the "ice wall?" The FAQ mentioned it but did not explain.

2) How do you discount the horizon? If you are facing the ocean, and a ship is out of sight over the horizon, it comes back up mast first. It reappears little by little, top to bottom.

3) Why would there be such a conspiracy when there is no need for one? I can't think of any ways life would be different no matter what the shape was, barring any interference physics would cause.

#3 because these people are full of shit an they cannot find a better thing to bitch about than how the earth is not round. seriously make up some other fuckin story, this is just retarded, its been proven false like 5000000000000000000000000000000 billion fuckin times

oh but wait people might gain monies from this... like how? OMFG ITS OIL, WAR IN IRAQ, BUSH IS EVIL, BLAME THE LIBERALS! :roll:

22

Flat Earth Q&A / Tom- Please Read. Serious Post

« on: February 16, 2007, 04:49:32 PM »

i smell mexicans

23

Flat Earth Q&A / so...

« on: February 16, 2007, 04:46:31 PM »

lawl i did but it doesnt answer anything
so if everything is on the same plane how come people have flown around the world? geegee on that one? and whats on the underside of your said flat earth? water? rofl maybe theres a secret society of evil 3 headed negros?

24

Flat Earth Q&A / so...

« on: February 16, 2007, 04:40:53 PM »

So if the earth is flat, where did you get this info? Have you seen the edge of the earth? How do people on the bottom of the earth keep from falling into space if theres no gravity? How do I get to the other side of the earth if its not round? Do I teleport there? or do I dig through the crust? because obviously I cannot go over the ice wall. this makes no sense.