1

Flat Earth General / Re: this is pretty round

« on: May 28, 2011, 02:41:37 PM »

Not really, lol. You can easily tell thats not real. Look at around 5:30 and watch until 7:00 in this video.

2

Flat Earth General / this is pretty round

« on: May 28, 2011, 02:25:13 PM »

Theres even a full clip of the module descending into the ocean. Explanations?

3

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Justify this statement.

« on: March 01, 2011, 06:09:04 PM »

Whoops wrong board. Could someone move this?

4

Flat Earth General / Re: Video.

« on: March 01, 2011, 03:46:06 PM »

Im not picking sides, cause I know how drawn out debates can get on here; but what are you're thoughts on this video? In the theory here you say NASA's space shuttle launches are fake, but in this video it appears very real. There is also clearly  curvature on the earths horizon in this video as well. Again, I'm not picking sides I'm just interested in these theories here and want to learn as much as i can about them before I make a decision.

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

  The shuttle launches are not fake, I have seen one from Cape Canaveral in Florida. I think FES is saying that shuttles orbiting the earth are fake.

Which they have absolutely no proof of (that they're fake)
Their only argument to rebut against space travel is that the pictures are photoshopped/ the video is edited.  Its all fake...
Whereas we have video from the space shuttle from earth, through the entire sequence to orbit.

Thats what im talking about in my new thread, "justify this statement" they have no back up for anything in their theories. The moon and the sun have gravity JUST so the earth can be flat. There are giant gears in the sky JUST so the earth can be flat. Everything is a conspiracy theory JUST so the earth can be flat. There is no scientific reason to why they got there, but just so their theory can make sense. If you use that logic with anything and have enough time on your hands, you can make any theory true in your eyes.

5

Flat Earth Q&A / Justify this statement.

« on: March 01, 2011, 03:31:01 PM »

Okay so in my *Joke* bunny theory, you all asked me to justify the theory. *and WHY the snuggies were there* As so it was just an example, it got me the idea to what justifies everything in the faq? Is it all there just to support the the idea that the earth is flat? But yet has no scientific background to why it got there?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“There is a vast "ice wall" that keeps the water where it is. This explains why you can find a vast plane of ice as you travel southward. The wall is roughly 150ft high. In the McIntyre model, however, the height of the wall increases further as one moves toward the edge of the world.”

Justify Why this ice wall is here. How did it form? Did it magically appear just to make the earth flat? *Why would water fall of the earth/even need a ice wall to keep it from falling off if there isnt any gravity to begin with?*

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“A celestial body, known as the antimoon, passes between the sun and moon.”

Justify why heck this even got here? Again did it just magically appear just to support your theory? Is there any purpose for this to be there besides for the earth just being a disc? ONE reason?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Q: "How is it that the Earth does not have a gravitational pull, but stars and the moon do?"

A: This argument is a non-sequitur. You might as well ask, "How is it that snakes do not have legs, but dogs and cats do?" Snakes are not dogs or cats. The Earth is not a star or the moon. It does not follow that each must have exactly the properties of the others, and no more.

Justify why the earth disobeys your physics? Its still matter, right?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“This is unknown. Most FE proponents believe that it is generally composed of rocks. Please note that in Hinduism, the Earth rests on the back of four elephants and a turtle.”

What is the logical reason of ROCKS being underneath the earth? Just to support your theory?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And my final question: Which is easier to form. A DISC or a sphere? It seems that since you need all of these things, [massive rocks beneath the earth, giant celestial gears, the moon and the sun having gravity but not the earth for.... some.. odd reason... and every piece of video footage showing the earths roundness to be part of some massive conspiracy theory] to create your disk, and all you need is gravity to create a sphere, the answer is pretty clear.

6

Flat Earth General / Re: Proof for RE

« on: February 28, 2011, 09:08:24 PM »

That wasn't even the point I was trying to get at. It was just an example. The point is that any theory can be created and argued upon such as the Flat Earth *theory. Anyone can go upon in the manner such as this website does and with enough time on their hands to build up a theory soley to support a single idea and serve no other purposes. And especially defend it in the manner that you do. Facts? There are no facts in your theory. All it is is a completely outrageous theory souley to commemorate a primitive beliefs that uses the *conspiratist card whenever there is a huge gap in it.

All I'm saying is that there's no practical reason for your theory and it is simply constructed to support one primitive idea for no reason, which is completely unstable. And you call the round earth theory weak? Wow. If anyone you should be the one that thinks before he types.

7

Flat Earth General / Re: Proof for RE

« on: February 28, 2011, 07:11:58 PM »

there are massive floating Easter bunnies in the sky.

Do you have any evidence for your outlandish claims?

 The bunny earth theory (BE) explains many problems with RE and FE. The problem with RE and FE is that they both rely on the sky being blue when the sky is really medium grey. This is solved by massive celestial snuggies being surrounded by the earth. The bunnies are attracted by this and therefore rotate around our earth. This rotation creates gravity. Although we BE belivers do believe in many of the FE theory's Conspiracy theories because its obvious no space ship could go through a giant snuggy.

This is obviously photoshoped but is a conceptual scale of how big the bunnies would be in the earth sky.

I will be posting more of my theory me and my colleagues have been developing for the past several years in a separate forum. this is just the very basics.

8

Flat Earth General / Re: Video.

« on: February 28, 2011, 05:57:39 PM »

Just like every single other clip of anyone that high up, and every video of anything in orbit, and every country's goverment that has any sort of space organization, and also the giant floating gears in the sky, correct?

9

Flat Earth General / Re: Proof for RE

« on: February 28, 2011, 05:51:48 PM »

Lurk Moar

was that to me? because i have and its clear that on here you cant prove anything about the shape of the earth where all will agree

Singularly because you discount all videos and pictures, and bypass any written arguments such as the moons wobbling with things like, "massive celestial gears in the sky that control the moon and the sun". So pretty much using that way of arguing, you can really prove anything in this forum. Now go on, try and prove me wrong that there are massive floating Easter bunnies in the sky.  Its clear that on here you cant prove anything about their badass existence in the sky where all will agree.

10

Flat Earth General / Video.

« on: February 28, 2011, 05:06:14 PM »

Im not picking sides, cause I know how drawn out debates can get on here; but what are you're thoughts on this video? In the theory here you say NASA's space shuttle launches are fake, but in this video it appears very real. There is also clearly  curvature on the earths horizon in this video as well. Again, I'm not picking sides I'm just interested in these theories here and want to learn as much as i can about them before I make a decision.

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">