1

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Light?

« on: February 03, 2011, 03:58:33 PM »

I know all this already and that sight is not completely accurate and im not sure how this disproves me the equation i used doesn't need Mass. But were not talking about rockets here were talking about this flat earth that magically accelerates defying all physics

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Light?

« on: February 03, 2011, 03:38:23 PM »

Peach i should have stated its simple not fundamental. and a word to the slowing of time. It is all relative to the view point but the amount of energy used over this time fast of slow will remain constant.

this is a Kinematic equation V2^2=V1^2+Acceleration*time

V2 is final velocity
V1 is initial velocity
^ is exponential
* is multiplication

[2.9*10^8]^2(aprox. speed of light)=0^2+9.8*X(we are looking for this)
this becomes
8.5*10^15=9.8X
we then divide

8.4*10^16=X
 9.8
this gives us
8.5*10^15 seconds
1.4^14 minutes
2.3^12 hours
9.9^10 days
272,121,786 years

As we all know (with the exception of new earth creationists) the World flat or round is much older than this. we should have reached this speed along time ago.

3

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Light?

« on: February 03, 2011, 03:08:18 PM »

Yes peach you are right but this does not dis prove what I am saying. It is true that time slows relative to the speed of light however the fact that as you approach the speed of light you need more exponentially more energy is true and is not Newtonian physics. as an object travels faster it becomes heaver explaining why it needs more energy. Also Physics never "breaks down" we just need to look at it in different ways it different situations. I know my physics trust me (like you blindly trust others)

4

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Light?

« on: February 03, 2011, 02:58:46 PM »

Yes we will i don't know where you learned physics but ask for your money back. Please explain why we wont, acceleration is the chance in velocity per time for ex. 9.8 meters per second per second. Every one second we will be going 9.8 meters per second faster. This is how gravity and Acceleration works their is no denying this.

edit: sorry misspelled Where

5

Flat Earth Q&A / Light?

« on: February 03, 2011, 02:33:33 PM »

If we are constantly accelerating their will come a point when we will reach the speed of light. When this happens (truly before it does) we will atomize do to the fact the the faster you go the more energy you need to accelerate the mass assuming it remains constant (the mass of the earth increase over time due to space debris but this is just more evidence that we will atomize sooner). Its simple fundamental Physics

6

Flat Earth General / Re: I have been to Space and seen the earth is round

« on: February 03, 2011, 02:17:07 PM »

Oh please James don't try to make me look like some one who hates people based on something like that. Are you not an old man? than what should i call you the man on the internet? and like i said you are in fact right in what you said however you yourself should be questioned under that logic. Meaning i have no more reason to believe you than i do them. You however tried to word it in a way that could be slightly confusing to lesser minds (we cant over look the fact that not ever one has the same level of intelligences). Often when one does this they are actively trying to confuse and through that confusing try to remove themselves from being included in their own logic.

7

Flat Earth General / Re: I have been to Space and seen the earth is round

« on: February 03, 2011, 01:39:26 PM »

Ok James i agree with you 100% but you yourself fall in to that. Your making a claim that its all a lie well i choose to side with the people who have reason to be believed not and old man with no facts to back it up and only word games to try to confuse the less intelligent.

Yet you all still avoid the arguments that we have both made you all choose to jump on the joke you dont see and try to act intelligent and noble by attacking him and skirting the facts that disprove you.

8

Flat Earth General / Re: I have been to Space and seen the earth is round

« on: February 03, 2011, 01:28:12 PM »

I find it funny beyond all belief that not one of you has tried to disprove us. You all seem to concerned with the fact you all have no sense of humor. James Please prove that to me, pretend this is the court system (your apparently good at playing pretend), beyond reasonable doubt that its a lie.

9

Flat Earth General / Re: I have been to Space and seen the earth is round

« on: February 03, 2011, 01:19:07 PM »

..... thank you for trying to act smart by picking apart my straight line explanation by redefining it the same way again with the word shortest included. We can all go to wikipedia and find definitions, but do you have anything intelligent to say about the little problem with your highly inaccurate model?

IOA I'm pretty sure its a joke and he raises a good point why dont we see a disk shaped shadow on the moon?

10

Flat Earth General / Re: I have been to Space and seen the earth is round

« on: February 03, 2011, 01:00:17 PM »

Well Peach First say Hi to Mario for me love his work. second straight is a line connecting two points like this @-----------@. I believe his point is that under your flawed model of of a flat earth one can not fly or "walk" to some places. lets take Australia for an example. If i want to fly there from lax with the "RET" as you call it i can simply fly over the Pacific Ocean. However to do this with your model i would need to fly over land masses. I never crossed over any then i flew there. If that FET were true i would need to fly in an arc around landmasses which would drastically increase the time to fly there. However the ratio of times and distances flown support a round earth. and please dont try to say jet streams have anything to do with this they are already taken to account.

11

Flat Earth General / Re: I have been to Space and seen the earth is round

« on: February 03, 2011, 12:44:21 PM »

Finally some sense on here