1

Flat Earth General / Re: Fact

« on: December 17, 2010, 12:03:04 AM »

I'm a round earther but i really don't see the point in stating which theory i believe in is relevant because i was just curious to see what ideas and theory's are most prevelant within the board.

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Mathmatical evidence with repeatable outcomes and predictable outcomes

« on: December 11, 2010, 11:48:01 AM »

So far no takers on tpeing out a theoretical model or theory that has worked to predict future natural phenomena such as solar or lunar eclipses

3

Flat Earth General / Re: Fact

« on: December 11, 2010, 10:46:50 AM »

i was actually gonna wait for a true beleiver to give me their versions of things and what they beleive is fact to the otherside so im gonna give it a few days lol

4

Flat Earth General / Re: Fact

« on: December 11, 2010, 10:07:01 AM »

Ok i will rephrase the question

IN regard to flat earth theories what is considered fact within this board or community?

5

Flat Earth General / Fact

« on: December 11, 2010, 09:55:28 AM »

What is fact?

simple enough question

6

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Mathmatical evidence with repeatable outcomes and predictable outcomes

« on: December 11, 2010, 09:28:30 AM »

and sorry as i took it that way

but through the numerous links ive been through not one has been able to give me a theory or theoretical model of a flat earth or the systems there contained or to deal with celestial bodys that would fairly accurately predict coming events such as solar or lunar eclipses to compare and test against the current standing theories so in effect those who beleive in a round earth have no way to compare results and data with a flat earth model allowing them to make informed decisions because science is not fact it is just as current as the latest tests and theories about how the natural world works

7

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: The Most Important Question?

« on: December 11, 2010, 09:23:18 AM »

this is all well and dandy but it seems we still dont have an answer for the original question who stands to gain from this giant international global/ uhh im not sure how to say whole disc conspiracy seeing at its a very old conspiracy something must have been leaked at sometime or another

8

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Mathmatical evidence with repeatable outcomes and predictable outcomes

« on: December 11, 2010, 09:14:36 AM »

ah but there in lies the run around i asked for a theory it doesnt have to be mathmatical it jast has to be a functional model or theory that can be used to make predictions about the observable phenomena of the natural world and nice try with the belittling but this is fun for me.

9

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Mathmatical evidence with repeatable outcomes and predictable outcomes

« on: December 11, 2010, 08:53:59 AM »

I guess what i am looking for are working models and theorys such as RE'ers have to do things such as be able to predict phenomena such as solar and lunar eclipses meteorology and other such phenomena which does require mathmatics and equations along with observations of the natural world to determine when things will happen to a certain degree as non of these are perfect sciences but we are able to predict them relatively closely to when they will happen and yes the equations numbers and data resources are most likely going to be called out on the conspiracy theory but they have alot of data and it seems to be fitting with all known and observable phenomena.

10

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Mathmatical evidence with repeatable outcomes and predictable outcomes

« on: December 11, 2010, 08:23:49 AM »

Ah yes the whole math has to many unsolved portions to it but so far as i can tell they cant even produce a test with a large enough scale and controlled variables and data to support many of their claims such as how are they achieving the size of the sun or how far from the surface of the earth the celestial bodies are so far it seems mainly singlular observational with no controls or variables or the such that can be repeated by other to come out with the same result and can also be used to make predictions about wat may happen when different conditions are met. and the run around i've seen so much of is quite frankly amusing

11

Flat Earth Q&A / Mathmatical evidence with repeatable outcomes and predictable outcomes

« on: December 11, 2010, 07:05:10 AM »

I've been browsing this forum for a day or two now just reading the posts and such but so far as i have read no FE'er has typed out and listed mathmatical equations their results and the repeated tests to be tried by other such interested readers. If you are so convinced of these things and have was to prove them do it and please keep the sarcastic and assanine remarks to a minimum becuase that really does seem to be rampant on this board. and sorry if this has been covered i just havent found it yet.


Sorry wrong area thought i was in the debate forum trying to move it but cant delete it so opening it again in the right area.