Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I made no such claim.
I am saying that the official distance 2,550 miles has to be wrong: by what margin, by how much, is something that has yet to be determined.
I don't know how much higher or faster. That's down to the evacuation of pressure. Try it out and let me know.A similar question arises, which I will ask via another hypothetical scenario. I have a ball bearing on a spring, ready to launch directly up. It's got a remote controlled release mechanism. On launching it, it pops into the air, let's say about half the height of an evacuatable cylinder. I remove half the air from that chamber, then launch the ball bearing again. Under Denpressure, does the ball launch higher into the cylinder, or lower? Roughly how much of a change in height would be expected?The ball will go much higher then fall faster than it would under atmospheric conditions.
Similarly, how is the Ball's descent affected? Does it fall faster or slower?
Could you be more specific? How much higher and how much faster do you predict? Also, I added a second question to my previous post.
A similar question arises, which I will ask via another hypothetical scenario. I have a ball bearing on a spring, ready to launch directly up. It's got a remote controlled release mechanism. On launching it, it pops into the air, let's say about half the height of an evacuatable cylinder. I remove half the air from that chamber, then launch the ball bearing again. Under Denpressure, does the ball launch higher into the cylinder, or lower? Roughly how much of a change in height would be expected?The ball will go much higher then fall faster than it would under atmospheric conditions.
Similarly, how is the Ball's descent affected? Does it fall faster or slower?
if all elements attempt to find their place, if I dig a hole, and I find a tuber while digging, and I put it at the bottom of the hole after digging, deeper than where I found it, why does the tuber not rise to the level I found it at? Why does the natural state of all things seem to be at the bottom, regardless of its weight/ density/ whatever?The natural state of all things isn't at the bottom, that's the thing. The Earth consists of trapped matter in all things and pressure releases them in stages, from super pressure right under the Earth to lesser pressure above. Your tuber has been placed in an environment that it's not strong enough to recover from.
If I buried you up to your waist in sand, you could pull yourself out with a bit of energy and time. I buried you up to your neck you are going to have a serious problem, because your body is not designed for that environment.
However, if I was to lay a lump of lead on the sand and leave it, it would eventually sink and sink. Everything has it's place as long as you are alive, your place is on top of the ground. When you die, your body is taken apart and put into its respective elemental make up of the Earth.
Anything ejected up to the surface will always be under pressure. The more dense ejection, the more pressure is applied, giving a small dense object a lot of measured weight for it size because it displaces more atmosphere than other less dense object of bigger sizes because those objects actually absorb quite a lot of atmsophere in terms of a lot is equalised into them, which is why a sping can be big but light to us and weigh next to nothing.
I also have a small experiment for you to weigh in on (pun unavoidable). I have two spring scales. One hangs vertically, the other horizontally. Attached to both are identical cables whose weight is known. The cable hangs over a simple pulley with no notable resistance, so that the end of the cable hangs down. In both cases, two object of identical shape and weight are hung from each scale, and show the same weight.There bound to show the same weight. Why wouldn't they? They are identical. As long as the same resistance is acting on each pulley there will be no change against the other.
Both weights and scales are inside an evacuation chamber, which is then evacuated. How does this evacuation affect both spring scales, one hanging vertically, one horizontally?
Take part or don't. I don't care which decision you make. Either put the questions to me in a civil manner or stop going on about them and just sit back and watch. Your choice.
I did the first time. You immediately responded by attempting to beg out of answering them due to a perceived attitude problem on my part. My questions are straightforward, don't involve the numbers you are afraid of, and are relevant to your Denpressure hypothesis.I asked you to put your questions to me in a civil manner. How you answer is different...but I expect you to put them to me without trying to be clever to impress all your weak internet friends.
If you want to put the questions to me without all the childish silliness, then I'll be happy to answer them. If not, then there's nothing else to say on the matter.
You need to look at all the facts and evidence that shows the earth is round, and get out more to see the world around you.Anywhere I can travel to on my feet, my visual surroundings indicate a flat Earth.
The Earth is in suspended animation
ina true vacuum.
I will when you ask me the questions in a calm, cool, civil manner.Playing along with the troll, for a moment, Scepti, if all elements attempt to find their place, if I dig a hole, and I find a tuber while digging, and I put it at the bottom of the hole after digging, deeper than where I found it, why does the tuber not rise to the level I found it at? Why does the natural state of all things seem to be at the bottom, regardless of its weight/ density/ whatever?When you come back without trying to be a skitty git, I'll address your points. Clean up your act or ship out.
I also have a small experiment for you to weigh in on (pun unavoidable). I have two spring scales. One hangs vertically, the other horizontally. Attached to both are identical cables whose weight is known. The cable hangs over a simple pulley with no notable resistance, so that the end of the cable hangs down. In both cases, two object of identical shape and weight are hung from each scale, and show the same weight.
Both weights and scales are inside an evacuation chamber, which is then evacuated. How does this evacuation affect both spring scales, one hanging vertically, one horizontally?
Oh please, Scepti, you can't go around calling everyone ignorant, naive, and stupid and then get all in a huff when someone is flippant in return. It really does nothing but make you look the spoiled child.
Very appropriate. Now, answer the question or admit you have no answer. I mean, we all know you have no answer, but it's nice to be formal about these things.
Playing along with the troll, for a moment, Scepti, if all elements attempt to find their place, if I dig a hole, and I find a tuber while digging, and I put it at the bottom of the hole after digging, deeper than where I found it, why does the tuber not rise to the level I found it at? Why does the natural state of all things seem to be at the bottom, regardless of its weight/ density/ whatever?When you come back without trying to be a skitty git, I'll address your points. Clean up your act or ship out.
I also have a small experiment for you to weigh in on (pun unavoidable). I have two spring scales. One hangs vertically, the other horizontally. Attached to both are identical cables whose weight is known. The cable hangs over a simple pulley with no notable resistance, so that the end of the cable hangs down. In both cases, two object of identical shape and weight are hung from each scale, and show the same weight.
Both weights and scales are inside an evacuation chamber, which is then evacuated. How does this evacuation affect both spring scales, one hanging vertically, one horizontally?
So, ignoring the long running troll fest, a question-
Why is air pushed up by the UA and no other form of matter, such as anything touching the air?
If you stand on some train tracks and there is a train coming at you, I'm pretty sure you the air won't make you move while the train is on its way.
I started this thread to point out yet ANOTHER similarity with the moon and sun. I wasn't referring to it on a daily basis. If anything, we can compare the similarities over a month instead of a year. I'm telling you, they are the same thing. I think the moon creates the light energy we see as the sun.
My mistake, I didn't get the calculator out, I just saw 2,600 and 2000 and made an assumption, wrongly. They would be the same. I'll make a point next time in watching out for your attempts at duping, as I rarely take much notice of you in reality, you just sort of slip in like a pick pocket, then runaway waiting for me to realise my wallet has been nicked.Both objects are 8000 cu mm.scepti - If I weigh an object 20 width x 20 length x 20 height cm on some scales there will be pressure on 5 sides, a total of 2000 sqmm.If it's exactly the same material then of course it will be different.
Another object of same material, 40 width x 40 length x 5 height cm, pressure on 5 sides, a total of 2600 sqmm.
The scale pan is flat and 50 x 50 cm.
So the weight will be different?
Do you see what I'm trying to say to you?
Human eyeball is actually a sphere this is why an illusion of curve appears. But I have been on many flights no curvature observed.
The solution to this problem depends on whether or not we consider the coefficient of friction between the floor of the bus and the kid to be zero (as he's on a skateboard). There's be no horizontally applied external forces.There is no such thing in reality as gravity or inertia and I swear on that. It's bogus.
If that was theoretically the case, then the only force acting on the kid would be a vertical force due to gravity. The kid's body would resist moving because of inertia, and therefore crash into the back of the bus at around 20 mph.
The larger sphere has a greater surface area. More surface area means more air to push down on. This means that air is exerting more overall pressure to the larger sphere, even if the two objects are at the same altitude.
Atmospheric air pressure exerts a force equal at, and perpendicular to, every point on the sphere's surface. The air pressure exerted on both sphere's is identical, that is 1 atm =101,325 Pa (in the metric system).
Who said it had greater air pressure pushing on it?Sceptipoo, a question- I have two Steel balls. One is solid and half a meter in diameter. One is hollow and one meter in diameter. The hollow one is completely airtight, and has a 1 centimeter thick outer shell.The solid half a metre ball would take a lot more energy to get it into motion than the larger airtight ball due to it having more density against the ground.
Which of these two steel balls takes more effort to get moving?
Why would it have more 'density against the ground' since under your model, it is air pressure from above that pushes objects towards the ground. Why would the object with the smaller surface area have the greater Air Pressure pushing on it?
Sceptipoo, a question- I have two Steel balls. One is solid and half a meter in diameter. One is hollow and one meter in diameter. The hollow one is completely airtight, and has a 1 centimeter thick outer shell.The solid half a metre ball would take a lot more energy to get it into motion than the larger airtight ball due to it having more density against the ground.
Which of these two steel balls takes more effort to get moving?
It is very obvious that a standard disk shaped flat earth map does not work. We also know that round earth global map does work accurately.
That is precisely because earth is 5D. So although it appears like a globe and can be mapped like a globe, it is still not a globe.
Human experience upon the earth clearly shows that earth is infect not a globe.
Rowbotham proved it its not spherical, however spherical modes does work for navigation and other things.
So this brings me to a conclusive point. To imagine infinite earth we actually must imagine infinite number of globes with different continents of course. This was also suggested in the book called Worlds Beyond the Poles by Amadeo Giannini. The earth however is still flat but its 5D aspect makes it illusionary global.
And which ballistic object do you know that's escaped the atmosphere?I CAN'T STOP LAUGHING!!!!!!!! HILARIOUS!
Do you people actually have this stuff IMPLANTED into your minds from birth from a chip or something?
Surely you can't read up on it and just accept it all, there must be drugs involved in some fashion, or like I said, some kind of micro chip implanted into your skull that interferes with your brains ability to use rational thought.
All this rocket crap makes sense to these guys because they are naïve believers. Astrophysicists can make it all up because the rockets don't REALLY leave our atmosphere.
Does that mean you have to give the tip to Jesus? Or Jesus is giving you a tip? Or only Jesus will be tipped?
They are not hiding a flat earth. Per the earth's shape, they are simply mistaken.
Tom is a false flag. His account has been hacked by NSA. There is a flat earth conspiracy and they will kill you if you try to find out. I was followed home last night and I just joined a few days ago.
Your FACTS are based on books, not direct visual sighting or direct measurement of anything done by yourself.
About your gravity and spherical earth.
The simple and easy answer, is, the water would run off, just as it would if you poured it on a football.
Your gravity is laughable. It does not exist.
I mean, your supposed moons gravity pulls at the oceans and yet your so called earth gravity pulls everything into the centre....I mean...what?
It's so senseless, it's beyond all reason and the most basic logic and common sense.
But this is just the point. If we can find out about these people, we can maybe put them in order on the map so that it all fits around a concave earth.
The fact that some people in some countries are smaller than other in other parts, tells me that, some live lower down the concave earth and some live higher up.
Here's a few for instances and have a think about it.
The highest above sea level towns.
La Rinconada, Peru, over 16,000 feet above sea level.
Wenquan, China, over 16,000 feet above sea level.
El Aguila, Argentina, over 16,000 feet above sea level.
Colquechaca, Bolivia, over 15,000 feet above sea level.
Ukdungle, India, over 15,000 feet above sea level.
Now, of course you can say, "yes but they are up mountains, etc or whatever.
The point is, the people of these places are at one hell of a high elevation.
If the map was made to cater for where these places are against lower places in whatever parts of the countries, then a concave map could be made to see if it works out for where these places could be on it, as opposed to the nonsensical globe.
It's one trillion percent not a globe, so this stuff should be looked at, which I am trying to.
Ok, just to give you a quick and easy thought. Look at Thailand, Japanese, Chinese, etc...Years ago they were all basically tiny framed, but now, with more modern foods, shelter and drugs...you know what I mean, so let's not start pretending you don't.It could only flow downhill to the sea on certain areas and I'm being kind in saying that, because in reality, the sea would not exist on a globe, because not only would it flow down hill, it would flow off into your space.
But you do not say why, not giving mechanisms. Under my understanding of my gravity and my space, water always flows downhill. Away from space.QuoteIf your gravity stops water flowing off into space, it would also stop it flowing altogether, you can't have it both ways.
Yes I can. Water flows 'down,' down is away from space, water flows downhill, towards the lowest point, away from space. Various pressures and procedures keep the water rising to land liquid and gaseous forms and keep the water cycle going.QuoteBecause lots of things have changed since the early times.
The food was the fat of that land and the genetics were of that land.
It's all mixed, today, where people have acclimatised from other parts and bred into the various areas.
Food today is a mixture of imports from every part of the circle of land masses.
Please, be specific. What do you mean by 'early times?' 300 years ago? 1000 years ago?
This is what I'm talking about, so how about switching your head on instead of making out you can't grasp what I'm talking about.
It could only flow downhill to the sea on certain areas and I'm being kind in saying that, because in reality, the sea would not exist on a globe, because not only would it flow down hill, it would flow off into your space.
If your gravity stops water flowing off into space, it would also stop it flowing altogether, you can't have it both ways.
Because lots of things have changed since the early times.
The food was the fat of that land and the genetics were of that land.
It's all mixed, today, where people have acclimatised from other parts and bred into the various areas.
Food today is a mixture of imports from every part of the circle of land masses.