1
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flat Earth just doesn't work...
« on: November 07, 2013, 10:07:55 PM »- So if the Coriolis effect is a "myth", how do you explain temperature and air distribution? It's a crucial part of the world's biosphere that is driven by wind systems that don't just appear magically around the Earth. Without it, many parts of the planet would likely be uninhabitable due to the extreme heat, intense cold or an area becoming a highly arid environment.Winds appear from cold air flowing to lower regions. Sunlight mostly causes the lower pressure where it shines over the Flat Earth, and higher air pressure where it does not, in the nighttime. Winds travel from west to east because sun rotates over the FE from east to west. And the low pressure caused by sun rays constantly draws the high pressure winds from the west directly next to it, to fill up the void left by evaporating water from the air. The flat layers of the Sky have ascending and descending flows just like the undersea currents do.
You can't use the Coriolis myth to explain the Pacific current can you? Thought so.
- And if the Earth went on for miles more, why has no country tried to exploit it.They do. In secret. Read: Nazi Germany's New Schwabenland. This is why Germany was invaded. It's high technology advancements and brilliant minds were dangerous to The Conspiracy.
- Why would entire governments waste time on a petty cause to fool and convince 7 billion people that the Earth is round.For much more than 7 billion dollars. All wasted on 'space programs' and 'interplanetary flights' 'space explorations' and 'satellites' which simply.do.not.exist. Unless you've flown aboard one of those babies yourself? No?
Didn't think so.
- They'd hardly be earning any money from wasting time on this retarded conspiracy facade, and they'd certainly be losing more money to the people they have to keep quiet about a flat earth. HELLO. There's dozens of space agencies and countries with thousands of scientists conducting experiments, expeditions with satellites, photographing the world from above. How can you possibly keep that many people quiet with money that's coming from thin air. A bad global Economy shits on this kind of conspiracy.The economy is bad because the conspiracy keeps everyone poor enough to keep technology supressed, and the Flat Earth a secret.
They might as well be temples with thousands of priests conducting rituals, sacrifices for the gods, performing miracles unseen by anyone directly except in photoshopped pictures. How can you possily keep that many people believing gods aren't real?
Those people are payed by the Conspiracy from what they steal from world economy, to keep their mouths shut. Their funds, contracts, secrets, are not transparent to any public or individual. They are 'classified' and you pretend you've seen them all, all you wish. I still need your evidence for myself, if I am to believe your guru Garbage.
A marine program makes sense, since you go to any port and see ships. Sail with them over the seas using a Flat Earth map easily. A space program makes no sense, as you can't go to a "space port" or agency and book a flight to the moon and back, if you'll be. If you'll be my baby.
By Savage Garden.
You can't even just say that it's been going on like this for centuries. Most people didn't even give a damn about it back then.People of great intellect did, because they were employed by rich merchants who wanted to profit on trade. Columbus knew the Earth was flat, but didn't know Amerika would be between Europe and India. They thought it was just a giant ocean of Atlantic and Pacific that was hard to sail on, because they had to keep a circular trajectory. Using their Flat Earth maps, in order to reach India. Or at least Asia.
- What forces keep the ENTIRE UNIVERSE orbiting our supposedly tiny "plain" of land and sea. Why are we suddenly the center of the universe again? I'm saying this because somehow, the sun revovlves around the Earth, and that just don't make sense considering other systems in the Milky Way.Why wouldn't the sun revolve around the Flat Earth? Maybe it's drawn to it's mass, lol!
The true fact that gravity, which is a result of Earth's high mass, keeps the Earth together. Like what many have said about it, an object with enough mass would generate a gravity well which would pull in lesser mass objects such as with the Earth and the moon or the Sun is with the Earth (Earth revolves around the Sun, not the other way around, otherwise our system of recording time such as the gregorian calendar, based on the Earth's revolution around our parent star is fucked as well) because the Sun has a high mass and is therefore able to generate a large gravitational well which keeps the 7 planets in our system in check. The same kind of phenomena is found as well in other star systems that have profoundly been discovered to have PLANETS too.
Stars aren't physical, they can just be ice meteors that reflect light from the earth's surface, or the aurora borealis. Or other sources of light we don't know of yet.
Ice meteors (stars) can float like they do because there's smaller descending air pressure in the upper Flat Sky layers.
The Earth doesn't revulva around anything. Gregorian calendar is made up after observing Flat Earth data. A flat piece of paper can't prove RET. Like ever ever everest est. Estest.
And NO. You did not just explain Earth's formation. When I mean formation, I mean such as how the solar system formed in a cloud of dust and gas. The development of higher mass objects then sweeped up left over planetoids, gases and matter that eventually formed the planets we know today.There is no solar system. Higher mass objects are made of mostly gas, if you knew any science at all. So they have less gravity than you think, because if they had more gravity they'd implode and be smaller than they are now. Thus disproving gravity.
And again with the lighting. I just told you that in NZ, the sun was NOT VISIBLE at ALL. It was not partially over the horizon, nothing. PITCH DARK at 4 AM IN THE MORNING. IN CANADA it was BROAD DAYLIGHT. The time in Canada at that exact moment was in the morning/midday the day before! They've had sunlight for hours more than NZ has. What you said does not explain that. What your saying doesn't make any real relevance to the FET. If it's flat, there should be light across the world. Even a trickle. BUT it was DARK OUT. And these were at two radically different times. One a day behind, another a day forward. It doesn't make any sense.Why should there be light across the world? The sun is smaller than the flat earth. The earth is very big, and flat and wide as a pancake. Lighting up all of it is impossible. The light waves are pressed down through atmosphere across large distances since sunlight is much like rain. It "falls" down pressed by air pressure from the higher Flat Sky layers.
AND the Earth can be considered a CELESTIAL Object. It exists in the universe and space, and if you were on another body, the Earth would appear in the sky. If you were on the moon, it'd make just as much sense to say Earth is a celestial object. It's above in the sky. So either way, Earth could be a celestial object either way. This just makes it seem like were in the freakin' 17th century.The earth is called EARTH for a raison. The reason being that it is NOT a celestial object. Celestial is anything not on the Earth. The Earth is on the Earth, is it itself, therefore not "celestial" by the clear definition. Which you should learn before spouting your nonsense here. Polluting everything with your pointless opinions that make no points.
But you're not on the Moon. The Moon is flat. Look at it, you see no curvature on it's surface.
If you were on the Moon you'd see the Flat Earth below you constantly. But only sides of it like conical semicircular areas because you'd only be close to some parts while further away from the others.
How do you know we're not in the 17th century? 3 centuries of phantom time are not difficult to add for any medieval tyrant.
Your not explaining anything. Your just listing a bunch of things that don't make any real sense. No evidence, no true explanation based on science.You have a narrow mind that refuses to understand the real sense of these things.
Science isn't based on experiments.



? We have great big wide rivers like the Amazon (widest in the world), St Lawrence, missippi. And the reason for this is because they aren't rivers, there part of the Atlantic/Pacific ocean. In a way, the Americas don't exist (as a continent). There a bunch of islands!! The idea of a huge continent not being found until 1492 is ludacris, and they werent found because they were so remote!!!!! You can reach Asia from Europe by sail easily, that is if you cross the right places. People kept on hitting land in the unknown islands and blatantly assumed it was a huge mega-continent. I live in the Americas myself but I know I live one of many islands between Europe and Asia. Try looking at the Erdapfel globe, it will give you a good idea of what the world really looks like (except it shows it as round and not having the noticeable American islands




















