Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Should probably read around a little more, or contact the people you were told to contact. Either way, have fun.
Anyways, climate change is totally not happening because that would mean a disruption of Hadley cells, mictic systems, and oscillations, especially the southern oscillation. This is ridiculous because we all know that non-anthropogenic fishkills are on a downward trend, cyclonic phenomena have been reduced, and weather patterns are less extreme.
Wha...? Ha, I understood less than half of that! Well done good sir. But could I trouble you for a somewhat watered-down version?
Good to see more geologists here, I'm still at uni so no specialist subject just yet
See! That PROVES it! GW is LIES! and NASA are LYING to us ALL!
I'm not a geologist, just the progeny of a geologist. I'm more of a general environmental scientist and entomologist.
Alright, Hadley cells are air and water currents that run based on the Coriolis effect every thirty degrees of latitude dependent on temperature. In other words, the summer heats up water at the equator for the Northern Hemisphere, the warm water flows in a clockwise direction up to about 30 degrees, and then cycles back. This water then warms up the water at 30-60 degrees, rinse and repeat. Obviously, the heat transfer reduces further up. This explains the trade winds and is the driving force behind the jet stream. It also creates cells of water in which the middle point is actually higher than sea level. You'd think there would be a meniscus effect going on in the ocean, but it's much less pronounced and even the opposite in some areas.
Mictic systems are water systems that exhibit thermal turnover with seasonal change. Water heats up during the spring, picking up nutrients bringing them to a photic zone, and life begins. Opposite for fall. Only true for dimictic systems, although monomictic are common in non-temperate areas.
Oscillations are similar to mictic systems, but true for the ocean. While the ocean is actually a mictic system, the oscillations have greater global impact. El Ni?o and La Ni?a are examples.
Fishkills are often associated with hypo- or anoxic environments, usually associated with eutrophication and heat-stagnation. Fishkills are exactly what the sound like.
Cyclonic phenomena are just your basic wind-weather stuff: tornadoes, typhoons, and hurricanes. It is predicted that cyclones will become more common, although not necessarily more severe, during global warming.
Anyways, climate change is totally not happening because that would mean a disruption of Hadley cells, mictic systems, and oscillations, especially the southern oscillation. This is ridiculous because we all know that non-anthropogenic fishkills are on a downward trend, cyclonic phenomena have been reduced, and weather patterns are less extreme.
Wha...? Ha, I understood less than half of that! Well done good sir. But could I trouble you for a somewhat watered-down version?
Good to see more geologists here, I'm still at uni so no specialist subject just yet
See! That PROVES it! GW is LIES! and NASA are LYING to us ALL!
I'm not a geologist, just the progeny of a geologist. I'm more of a general environmental scientist and entomologist.
Alright, Hadley cells are air and water currents that run based on the Coriolis effect every thirty degrees of latitude dependent on temperature. In other words, the summer heats up water at the equator for the Northern Hemisphere, the warm water flows in a clockwise direction up to about 30 degrees, and then cycles back. This water then warms up the water at 30-60 degrees, rinse and repeat. Obviously, the heat transfer reduces further up. This explains the trade winds and is the driving force behind the jet stream. It also creates cells of water in which the middle point is actually higher than sea level. You'd think there would be a meniscus effect going on in the ocean, but it's much less pronounced and even the opposite in some areas.
Mictic systems are water systems that exhibit thermal turnover with seasonal change. Water heats up during the spring, picking up nutrients bringing them to a photic zone, and life begins. Opposite for fall. Only true for dimictic systems, although monomictic are common in non-temperate areas.
Oscillations are similar to mictic systems, but true for the ocean. While the ocean is actually a mictic system, the oscillations have greater global impact. El Ni?o and La Ni?a are examples.
Fishkills are often associated with hypo- or anoxic environments, usually associated with eutrophication and heat-stagnation. Fishkills are exactly what the sound like.
Cyclonic phenomena are just your basic wind-weather stuff: tornadoes, typhoons, and hurricanes. It is predicted that cyclones will become more common, although not necessarily more severe, during global warming.
NASA have been lying to us for years re global warming, they are just as likely to be lying about the RE too.
Because all evidence related to global warming is strictly from imaging systems rather than meteorology, botany, changes in migration, changes in ice patterns, or anything of that nature.
None of that evidence says what NASA says it says. This is proven FACT. Anthony Watts is a meteorologist, ask him what he thinks about NASA lies. He has shown how NASA lies (NASA uses more than imaging) with their UAE, the surface temperature stations are all lies.
http://www.heartland.org/publications/environment%20climate/article/25654/Nearly_90_of_Temperature_Stations_Show_Extreme_Heat_Bias_Study_Says.html
Meterologists don't agree with NASA lies. they see through the lies.
The Truth will set you free!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/
What are these lies? All you have shown me are bureaucratic costs that are inevitable but fixable and the only evidence of this is sparse anecdotal evidence. If they are poorly calibrated yet all are consistently so (as somewhat suggested) then it doesn't matter if they show that the temperature in Alaska is 163.8 degrees if the variation is the same or proportional in other areas.
Can you show me where meteorologists disagree with NASA and say that climate change isn't happening? That should be a fun read.
NASA have been lying to us for years re global warming, they are just as likely to be lying about the RE too.
Because all evidence related to global warming is strictly from imaging systems rather than meteorology, botany, changes in migration, changes in ice patterns, or anything of that nature.
Environmental scientists working for many other organisations work more on it.
Yes. Yes we do. Glad you realized that.
After I finish my degree I'll probably be doing something to do with it! Geologist here
That said, it may be to do more with past climate change.
NASA doesn't actually have that much to do with climate change. I have no doubt they venture into it, but it's not one of their main ideas. That is dealt with environmental scientists - geographers, oceanographers, climate specialists and geologists - from all over the world. The data used there actually goes back thousands of years.
So there was an armed jewel heist in England. They had guns and no one did anything to stop them. England's gun laws are super effective lol.
Then why is the atmosphere not clear? Sure you don't work for NASA?
Erm... It is clear... Otherwise you wouldn't be able to see what's in front of you...
But NASA have lied about so much. maybe they are lying about the milankovitch cycle too? Personally I don't beleive in greenhouse gasses, i mean have you ever seen one?
There you are. Carbon dioxide.
