1

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flatworld questions (long)

« on: June 20, 2006, 02:37:00 PM »

150fts worth of ice isnt going to hold in clouds and atmosphere at 10s of thousands of feet.

Perhaps the atmosphere isn't 10s of thousands of feet high. By the way, I personally believe that the atmosphere sort of heaps a bit in the middle, and also that 150 feet is a conservative estimate regarding the height of the ice walls.

To 7 The greenhouse effect and depletion of the Ozone layer are COMPLETELY different things. This is a common mistake made by people. The north pole melting is not what yhgou want to worry about its the south pole. Ice takes up a larger surface area so when it melts the sea levels will actually go down. Its the rise in temperature that makes the water expand and then makes the sea levels going up.

Yeah, what you missed was the fact that I referred to the melting of the South Pole as the major problem in my post. In FE lingo, "Ice Wall" is synonymous with "South Pole" because that's what we believe it really is. The North Pole's reduction was just a minor problem in comparison to this. And yeah, sea levels would go way down, because water would bleed off into space without the ice walls of the Antarctic.

Well how come people can go up thouseands of feet in baloons etc? Or climb a mountain higher than 150 ft?

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flatworld questions (long)

« on: June 20, 2006, 02:07:41 PM »

(3) Proven laws of physics on a RE support the idea of an atmosphere with cloud coverage.  On a FE, wouldn't the clouds eventually wind up disappearing off the edges, taking with it much of the world's precipitation?  (especially considering the constant movement of the world)

Flat Earth Theory posits that 150ft ice walls encircle the Earth, holding the atmosphere (and clouds) in.

(7) The F.A.Q. indicates that global warming both does and does not exist.  Please explain the contradiction.

I believe that carbon dioxide is emitted and does degrade the layer of O3 (Ozone layer) which is held in by the ice walls. If the atmosphere above the planet gets too hot, two problems will occur - firstly the North Pole will begin to melt, raising sea-level and possibly pushing water over the edge. Secondarily, and far more importantly, the ice wall may melt, running all the water in the world off into space.

Ok ive picked my "favorites" here because they made me laugh.to 3

150fts worth of ice isnt going to hold in clouds and atmosphere at 10s of thousands of feet.

To 7 The greenhouse effect and depletion of the Ozone layer are COMPLETELY different things. This is a common mistake made by people. The north pole melting is not what yhgou want to worry about its the south pole. Ice takes up a larger surface area so when it melts the sea levels will actually go down. Its the rise in temperature that makes the water expand and then makes the sea levels going up.

3

Flat Earth Q&A / Proof the earth is round...

« on: June 20, 2006, 08:39:53 AM »

I don't know whether to cry for you, or laugh at you.

X2 lol (at him)

4

Flat Earth Q&A / This is a bit stupid

« on: June 20, 2006, 08:30:44 AM »

instead of dodging my questions why not awnser the questions. Give the evidence to back up your side of the story and i will give the facts.

5

Flat Earth Q&A / This is a bit stupid

« on: June 20, 2006, 08:17:07 AM »

Yes, i can see they are explained. But they make absolutely no sense scientificly and have no evidence to back them up.

6

Flat Earth Q&A / This is a bit stupid

« on: June 20, 2006, 07:39:44 AM »

Read the FAQ before posting please.

Yeah but if you read the FAQ those awnsers dont awsner any of the questions been asked. They are all wrong.

7

Flat Earth Q&A / Just to clarify something

« on: June 20, 2006, 07:23:49 AM »

OK anyone else id liek to get a few opinions.

8

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Terroism Link With Flat earth theory

« on: June 19, 2006, 05:57:02 PM »

ALSO SPHERICAL GEOMETRY  PROVES EARTH BEING A SPHERE, MATH IS SOMETHING THE GOVERMENT CAN NOT CHANGE SINCE MATH ALWAYS PROVES ITSELF UNINFLUENCED BY OUTSIDE FORCES.

Explain.

Heres an example 2+2=4 what your saying is the government can change what people think through propaganda to show that 2+2=3

9

Flat Earth Q&A / Just to clarify something

« on: June 19, 2006, 05:48:27 PM »

any takers?

10

Flat Earth Q&A / Explain why you can't see more than x miles.

« on: June 19, 2006, 05:35:28 PM »

I was saying that the FE theory is wrong because if you watched a boat sail away from you it would gradually dissapear (hull first) and appear to be sinking until it is out of sight. THis been due to the curvature of the earth.

11

Flat Earth Q&A / Explain why you can't see more than x miles.

« on: June 19, 2006, 05:29:45 PM »

huh? whos theory?

12

Flat Earth Q&A / Just to clarify something

« on: June 19, 2006, 05:26:29 PM »

Ok so do you FErs believe that the flat earth (lol) is rotating at all. If so could you please post a diagram to illistrate how this works. (doesnt have to be awsome just a crude paint drawingwill do.) Cheers

13

Flat Earth Q&A / Explain why you can't see more than x miles.

« on: June 19, 2006, 05:17:41 PM »

Ok then why if a ship is sailing away does it appear to gradually sink into the water as it gets closer to the horizen?