Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Repeatable experiments and contemporary physics are more proof than RE will ever have.
NASA doesn't explore space. Flat Earth 101.
Because they have the same argument all the time. You can throw you're proven scientific facts at them, but they will always have some sought of reply, going along these lines.
If you question them about anything to do with the government, NASA, etc., It's a conspiracy. This is their main argument of course, as most modern things space/sphere earth related (Satellites, space launches, images of earth, etc) revolve around these things. Therefore they can just tell you 'it's all a lie' (Of course providing zero evidence backing up these 'lies'). Oh and anything in history to do with a round earth didn't happen either. After all it's in the FAQ so it must be true.
If NASA is so legit, how did they lose 565 Billion dollars in 48 years?
This means that whatever you throw at them will result at them telling you it didn't happen, is a government conspiracy, or it doesn't exist. In other words, our evidence isn't actually evidence at all to them. Despite being proven facts (Don't quote that telling me it's made up by the government either).
Did I mention my aunte and both my cousins moved to Australia recently? Oh wait, Australia doesn't exist, meaning she's either a government agent or she's been imprisoned in a 'fake' Austrailia which is actually a different place.
The other posters have told you about this already.
The word is misled, thank you for visiting. Bye!
Do explain. I doubt the government would be able to pull off such a thing, and besides, what is their motivation? "Okay, we've got them all brainwashed into thinking that the earth is round! Now what?"
NASA's budget is bigger than the GDP of several countries. If that isn't motivation, I don't know what is.
Having been raised from birth in an RE household, it's often difficult to correct certain phrases that have become ingrained in us. I understand completely.
The continued existence of this thread begs to differ.
another question. if the earth is accelerating how come it can't catch up to a shuttle those first few seconds of lift off?
http://www.forumspile.com/Blank-Facepalm.gif
You aren't serious with that question are you.
Then get off the interwebs silly.
lol.
I'm just too addicted to this forum, the debate (when there isn't any trolls) is fun! If I can't participate, due ot lack of knowledge or unable to know how to respond, I enjoy reading the post.
And trust me this website is much more fun than a English research paper. lolthe government needs to keep it a secret so we dont...o wait there is no good reason for the government to do that so lets just make shit up!!!!And if I'm correct, the FE'ers believe that the government made up this lie to gian more money. Of course I believe that's absurd, and that there's plenty of other ways to make more money than a silly lie about the shape of the Earth.
In the FAQ one of the questions was how do satellites revolve around the earth and the answer was satellites don't exist and signals are just broadcasted through towers. My question is why when I look threw my telescope at certain times I can see satellites floating in outer space?
Just exactly what do you see when you spot one of these so called satellites in your telescope?
I would bet all you see is a white dot.
Happy now? This isn't a cartoon.
*Sigh* Look, I completely agree with you. But don't take it so seriously, I don't. I post here because there are in interesting people and FET is an interesting concept. There aren't too many people here who actually believe it and the ones that do are too stubborn to listen to reason anyways.There is actually some basis, mainly Robotham's writings. He did some "experiments" that "prove" the Earth is flat. The theory is plausible. Completely ridiculous, but plausible.its not a theory. a theory has mounds of evidence backing it while this has a few ideas and some random books. following the ways of the higher ups of this idea of a flat earth im going to pick apart your words instead of answering.That was a joke, albeit a bad one. I actually don't believe in FET. I just happen think people should understand the theory before they bash it.Well its definitely not flat. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be round. There you go.And have you actually seen a plat earth from space? How do you know for sure the exact shape of it?Well its definitely not round. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be flat. There you go.
i can sail from america to asia and back around to america
the earth being round, gravity, black hols are all good theories while the earth being flat is a second graders first hypothesis in his science work book.
since when are 1 or a few results ever used in science? the supporters of these ideas put others down for not knowing basic science concepts when they are believing their ideas based off of a few random experiments. who is to say that he is part of a conspiracy to hide the world being round and shit went wrong and only he survived? 1 person, 1 experiment >contemporary science, physics and the laws of the universe? i think not
In the FAQ one of the questions was how do satellites revolve around the earth and the answer was satellites don't exist and signals are just broadcasted through towers. My question is why when I look threw my telescope at certain times I can see satellites floating in outer space?
I dont even know why i bother because Tom is just going to come up with some cock and bull "no data" way out anyway but...
I dont understand why you (Tom) dont have sufficient data to do simple geographical equations based on flight times to prove an arch in the earths surface. The RE'rs have posted sites, explained reasoning, have done equations, basically done all the work they can do and them some. They have even posted IN DETAIL there reasoning and mathematical basis for their theories, yet you still need data? I feel that if they were to take you into space and orbit the earth, all you would do is blindfold yourself and say "i see nothing that disproves my point". I deem that Tom should be removed from all intellectual criteria from this point on, he has no scientific reasoning of why the data is insufficient nor does he specify what more he wants, simply "more"... "more" what? Flight times? Equations? Explanations? Perhaps if you explained what KIND of data you want we would be able to provide this "data" for you because you simply choose not to look for it yourself. As it has been stated in this thread before, Tom continually asks for proof that the earth is round and we oblige, yet when we ask for data that the earth is flat (and simple geographical equations or a valid time/travel ratio would suffice) you simply say "no funding". I dont see where funding is needed to do mathematical equations (such as the RE'rs have done) to at least give us a valid scientifically reasoning for why it may perhaps be flat. In short all i see when i read this thread (in its entirety) is as follows;
FE'rs: The earth is flat
RE'rs: Here are mathematical equations that prove the earth is round, i would like to discuss this and see what mathematical equations you have to prove your point.
FE'rs: That equation isnt sufficient enough
RE'rs: I beg to differ, it involves the travel/time ratio due to curvature of the earth, please tell me what you would like more.
FE'rs: More data.
Re'rs: What kind.
FE'rs: More, this is insufficient.
Needless to say, being a new member, it makes me think that the RET is more inclined to be true due to proof that they have provided and the lack of data the FET has provided.
There is actually some basis, mainly Robotham's writings. He did some "experiments" that "prove" the Earth is flat. The theory is plausible. Completely ridiculous, but plausible.its not a theory. a theory has mounds of evidence backing it while this has a few ideas and some random books. following the ways of the higher ups of this idea of a flat earth im going to pick apart your words instead of answering.That was a joke, albeit a bad one. I actually don't believe in FET. I just happen think people should understand the theory before they bash it.Well its definitely not flat. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be round. There you go.And have you actually seen a plat earth from space? How do you know for sure the exact shape of it?Well its definitely not round. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be flat. There you go.
i can sail from america to asia and back around to america
the earth being round, gravity, black hols are all good theories while the earth being flat is a second graders first hypothesis in his science work book.
its not a theory. a theory has mounds of evidence backing it while this has a few ideas and some random books. following the ways of the higher ups of this idea of a flat earth im going to pick apart your words instead of answering.That was a joke, albeit a bad one. I actually don't believe in FET. I just happen think people should understand the theory before they bash it.Well its definitely not flat. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be round. There you go.And have you actually seen a plat earth from space? How do you know for sure the exact shape of it?Well its definitely not round. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be flat. There you go.
i can sail from america to asia and back around to america
Well its definitely not flat. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be round. There you go.And have you actually seen a plat earth from space? How do you know for sure the exact shape of it?Well its definitely not round. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be flat. There you go.
So humanity is a miracle now. I suppose from some invisible being in space? Why couldn't this same miracle happen to create the one and only flat earth?i said miracle for lack of a better word. as in not religion, but please pick my words apart because thats all you can do to convince yourself you arn't thinking like a neanderthal. we DONT know that there isn't life because are arn't technologically advanced enough to see it.
Now earth is a supermass in space? Since when. And have you actually seen earth from space? How do you know for sure the exact shape of it?
*sigh*humans are an evolutionary "miracle" for lack of a better word. a lot of shit went right for you to be on this forum following some random guys book on why modern day science is a conspiracy. in freshman bio we learned how the first bacteria formed but im too lazy to find my papers.
The point is, as far as we know earth is the only planet with humans. Just as in the case that as far as we know earth is the only one that is a plane. Try and keep up. The principles aren't that hard.
Why would only the earth have humans on it and no other planets. When I look out my telescope to other planets I don't see any other humans looking back at me. How can this be?!?
what does that have to do with this? good job at making yourself look horribly stupid
c dwhy would only the earth be flat and no other planet? when looking out in a telescope you dont see other planets as planes.
You started the stupidity. Great job.
In FET, there is no gravity. The illusion of gravity is created by the Earth's acceleration. Like Proleg said, read the FAQ. It will answer many of your questions.The earth is not a planet. Read the FAQ.
planet or not it still has a gravitational force that would cause it to be spherical. this "mass" does not defy the laws that most of the universe abides by.
what happens when you roll a penny off of a table? it falls off.
what happens when you reach the "end" of the flat earth? nothing you keep going because it's round.
The earth is not a planet. Read the FAQ.
Why would only the earth have humans on it and no other planets. When I look out my telescope to other planets I don't see any other humans looking back at me. How can this be?!?
