Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Knightcote

Pages: [1]
1
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sun IS a spotlight.
« on: March 01, 2009, 12:38:16 PM »
They're called "crepuscular rays" and their formation is explained here:

http://www.atoptics.co.uk/atoptics/rayform.htm

2
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sun IS a spotlight.
« on: March 01, 2009, 08:55:13 AM »
The fact that the sun is so much further away in RE will make up for this. The angle observed could be caused by a small object close by, or a larger object further away. The effect is caused by scattering of the light by air/water particles.

3
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Star distance and parallax
« on: February 27, 2009, 07:31:28 AM »
I asked this exact same question a few days ago and haven't got a reply yet...

4
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: 2 Questions
« on: February 24, 2009, 12:26:19 PM »
I've been searching this site on and off for a while now, and I still can't seem to find any satisfactory answers for my original two questions, in particular the one regarding the different constellations visible from different points on the Earth's surface. I also can't believe that no one's really explored the phenomenon of magnetic pole reversal on the Earth, and how it would occur with a liquid core that presumably experiences no turbulence due to a FE's lack of an angular velocity. Unless of course, the flat Earth does spin. As a consequence of a rotating flat Earth, if I throw a ball in the air, it will not land where I would expect it to land but would appear to vear off to one side. (Because I am not longer applying a centipedal force to the ball, it travels straight, I still have some angular velocity from the Earth's rotation)

5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: 2 Questions
« on: February 23, 2009, 04:37:04 PM »
Ha ha, okay, sorry. I did a search for "proper movement" which returned nothing relevent, but I did find a few threads on the constellations point. Unfortunatley, as of the time of writting, I don't think a conclusive answer has been given to the posed question. (The best I can find is "They're too far away") I don't think there's much regarding the red shift observed from distant galaxies either, although there's a lot of other stuff to do with the doppler effect applied to slightly different problems. There is one thread about this actually, but I don't think the question is really addressed in its entireity before it just becomes a shouting match. Bit of a shame really.

6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: 2 Questions
« on: February 23, 2009, 03:28:27 AM »
I'm not quite sure how the theory of "Celestial Gears" would solve the problem of the same constellations being observed from different locations within the "Southern hemisphere", but not being observed in the North. Using the map given in the FAQ as a reference, surely there must either be duplicate star patterns around the Earth to allow people in South America and Austrailia to observe the same constellations, or there must be something preventing the "North" from observing the "Southern" constellations and vice versa. (from a plain line-of-sight argument if there were no replicated constellations, the same stars should be visible everywhere) Furthermore, I am unsure as to how a "Celestial Gear" model would explain observed proper motion of stars, and the differences between proper motions of different stars. from my limited understanding of the theory, this surely would imply an infinite sequence of gears for each individual star. At the very least, I cannot see any alternative to cogs within cogs in explaining binary stars; their movement relative to each other coupled with their movement relative to other stars and the Earth.

Also, what do you guys think about obseved doppler red shift from galaxies and stars. What causes it?

7
Flat Earth Q&A / 2 Questions
« on: February 21, 2009, 01:09:26 PM »
Having just read through the newbie FAQ, I am still curious about 2 issues in particular that I don't believe have been answered in the FAQ. (Apologies if they have, I' have only just stumbled across this website tonight and am interested to hear your views)

1. How to FE believers explain the predictions made about movements of heavenly bodies without a heliocentric model of the solar system, (ie. how would parallax measurements work when presumably the earth does not move on a seasonal basis relative to the sun)

2. How can different constallations be viewed in what would be the Southern hemisphere in the RE model

Thanks

Pages: [1]