1
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Gravitational pull.
« on: February 05, 2009, 01:16:37 PM »
I can almost feel my IQ lowering from being on this site. This is the last you'll see of me as I doubt my questions will ever be logically answered.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
3
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Gravitational pull.
« on: February 03, 2009, 09:44:36 PM »I'm not convinced that such local deviations exist. If they were actually measured, such variations could well be due to the gravitational influence of the heavens.It has been proven that the gravitational pull differs across the earth. I thought FE didn't believe in gravity at all.
Not to drag the thread off-topic, but I'm of the minority opinion that the earth does produce gravitation (though I believe it to be imperceptible or nearly so). It must, in my opinion, because it contributes to the stress-energy tensor.
4
Flat Earth Q&A / Gravitational pull.
« on: February 03, 2009, 11:00:05 AM »
Oh god, How did mix up South America with Africa. Man regardless of how hard it is to read that map in the faq it was stupid that even I laughed at my mistake. Next time I'll look at a real map before I start making statements. Anyways the last topic went way to far off topic. So here's a new thread.
Please note that I do not want to be told to search the forums. Either you answer the question or link me to said thread.
In your FAQ you state the earth is accelerating up at 9.8m/s. Then how is that the gravitational pull differs around the world? Why would something fall faster in
Copenhagen, where the gravitational pull is 9.815 m/s? compared to Singapore which has a gravitational pull of 9.781 m/s?? If your theory were correct then everything would
fall the same rate, yet that's not how it is.
Please note that I do not want to be told to search the forums. Either you answer the question or link me to said thread.
In your FAQ you state the earth is accelerating up at 9.8m/s. Then how is that the gravitational pull differs around the world? Why would something fall faster in
Copenhagen, where the gravitational pull is 9.815 m/s? compared to Singapore which has a gravitational pull of 9.781 m/s?? If your theory were correct then everything would
fall the same rate, yet that's not how it is.
5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Regarding satellites
« on: February 02, 2009, 09:42:10 AM »
Statler: This is what we call a "medium thread".
Waldorf: A "medium thread"?
Statler: Yeah, it isn't rare and it certainly isn't well done!
Both: OHOHOHOHO!!!
I guess I shouldn't have expected more from this forum. I come here and ask a serious question and all I get in reply are some half arsed answers and am mocked to cover the fact that your theories are flawed. The idea that the earth is flat is just absurd and the fact that you cling on to it like some 5 year old clings on to his imaginary friend is just sick.
6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Regarding satellites
« on: February 01, 2009, 02:17:12 AM »
We don't have the technology to produce a high quality 3d image that is somehow viewable from any angle and any distance in the sky, also if anything were to move in the way the of the beam the image would be distorted.
7
Flat Earth Q&A / Regarding satellites
« on: January 31, 2009, 09:54:49 PM »
In your faq you state that satellites don't exist. Then how is it that we are able to see them in the night sky? Are telescopes actually producing a "fake image"?
Pages: [1]