1
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:53:24 PM »
And it's "ones" not "one's". Leave the oppresion to the Grammar Nazis
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:50:05 PM »
Aaah, sorry. I didn't realize you were a tyrant kind of mod. "These are the rules I don't have to follow," and all that. Go ahead. But remember your SS badge next time, to save confusion.
3
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:45:47 PM »
Erm...in the name of science, could I ask you two to...take it outside? You threatened us with bans for doing the same thing.
4
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:42:15 PM »
...I was told you were good at physics, too. Good argument, I'll remember that one for my dissertation...
5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:35:41 PM »
But the laws of thermodynamics say "obviously so," do they not?
6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:33:29 PM »
So...*nervous laugh*
Wouldn't the exchange from "Dark" into kinetic energy cause some sort of detectable trail? e.g heat, sound, light, EM...
Wouldn't the exchange from "Dark" into kinetic energy cause some sort of detectable trail? e.g heat, sound, light, EM...
7
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:26:33 PM »
What is wrong with my username? I am Osama bin Laden, and I have the right to be known as such.
Don't make me prove the contrary...
8
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:23:03 PM »
Well, I can only only thank Wardogg for his patience with me, and show my dissappointment in our elusive friend Mr. Bin Laden for his unfounded aggression, and distasteful choice of username.
9
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:13:38 PM »
I never said a flat earth was stupid. I just disagree with some of their implementations.
10
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:11:09 PM »
Flipping over... But that either wouldn't happen, or would result in destruction, because if FE is infinite, eventually part of it would have to have a linear speed of over c. If anything, it would fall back the way it is, and we'd all fly off. But that's a different matter.
11
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 08:03:15 PM »
The energy expelled from the Big Bang. But the universe moves at a constant rate, or may even be slowing down, showing a finite quantity. A constant acceleration requires a constant supply of energy. From where?
12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 07:56:22 PM »
You've been Wiki-ing me!? tch tch tch... I'm ashamed 
14
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 07:45:34 PM »
We're not talking about an expanding universe. We're talking about a linear acceleration. A so far unfueled linear acceleration.
15
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 07:40:42 PM »
Right, OK...
Barrell scratching, but OK...
I'm sure FE spins, by the way.
Wouldn't a massive explosion, such as Nagasaki etc. cause a downwards force, causing FE to spin?
Barrell scratching, but OK...
I'm sure FE spins, by the way.
Wouldn't a massive explosion, such as Nagasaki etc. cause a downwards force, causing FE to spin?
16
Flat Earth Q&A / Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 07:32:49 PM »
Seperate misunderstanding. Where does FE find the energy for its constant acceleration?
17
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 07:29:47 PM »
I'm really sorry, but I can't quite follow your logic. Would that not still induce a rotation of some description?
18
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 07:15:55 PM »
Apologies, But I'm unfamiliar with the right had rule in conjunction with rotational dynamics. Could you elaborate? Thumb=? Index=? Middle=?
19
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 07:03:32 PM »
And doesn't the effect need some medium to act through? It would hold if the stars were attached to the FE by some manner, but as postulated earlier, that would cause an angular acceleration
20
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 06:47:51 PM »
But that would reverse the direction of the efect just by turning round. Yet, one would only experience a change here when one crosses a certain point, that is the "equator". What delay the effect of the equation until the crossing of the critical point?
21
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 06:22:50 PM »
How do the solar Flares achieves this? And how do they a acheive it in an identical manner when they originate from opposite vectors, depending on the time of day?
22
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 06:14:15 PM »
So why doesn't that attachment cause FE to spin WITH the stars?
Additionally...
What feature, other than a rotating spherical surface, causes the Coriolis effect? Where is it's presence in FE?
Additionally...
What feature, other than a rotating spherical surface, causes the Coriolis effect? Where is it's presence in FE?
23
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 06:08:06 PM »
Why doesn't Dark Energy stop the stars? Does that suggest that the stars are "attached" to something?
24
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 06:04:47 PM »
Beut wouldn't that cause the stars' minimal gravitational field to eventually drag the FE into a spin with the universe?
25
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 05:57:45 PM »
"A: The sun and moon, each 32 miles in diameter, circle Earth at a height of 3000 miles at its equator, located midway between the North Pole and the ice wall. Each functions similar to a "spotlight," with the sun radiating "hot light," the moon "cold light." As they are spotlights, they only give light out over a certain are which explains why some parts of the Earth are dark when others are light. Their apparent rising and setting are caused by optical illusions."
26
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 05:52:52 PM »
Soo...The stars movement are caused by an optical illusion? Caused by what? How does the cause keep the illusions so... relative i.e the stars move at the same rates (in degrees per seconds) and in relative arcs?
27
Flat Earth Q&A / Spin.
« on: August 30, 2008, 05:42:55 PM »
Simply an enlightenment of my limited understanding of this topic...
Does FE rotate? I assume it does, since we can visibly see the sun, moon, stars etc. move across the sky at a constant rate.
If so, around which points, planes, direction etc.
Does FE rotate? I assume it does, since we can visibly see the sun, moon, stars etc. move across the sky at a constant rate.
If so, around which points, planes, direction etc.
Pages: [1]