This is the ONLY way I was able to make sense of flat earth and only reason I joined this forum, what JackBlack said - is to redefine the spherical model to a flat model, without destroying orbiting satellites. A very, perhaps super benign explanation of why there are orbiting satellites is because I have yet to see GPS work indoors or under a bridge or in a tunnel where many types of RF can penetrate, however, GPS signals do not. Every underpass I drive by or spend time under will block out my GPS lock, so this does suggest orbiting satellites. The math would make sense I believe for an RE transformed into FE model, my only question is, how is it that satellites stay in orbit on a flat earth? What keeps them suspended unless it is lack of gravitational pull toward a large mass (i.e. earth, flat or not)? Maybe my real question is - what -exactly- is gravity?

Quote from: Timeisup on March 24, 2020, 03:16:04 PM

You appear to have self invented a class of vehicles or objects that work in a way unknown to science.

You should really try reading more.
The satellites his model has orbit Earth, just like the ones in the RE model.

The only difference between the RE model and his model is he redefines flat to match the surface of Earth.

That is why you didn't stand a chance at debating him, because you weren't paying attention to what he had said and instead were just treating it as a FE model based upon the known definitions.