1

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Clear Undeniable Proof

« on: April 17, 2009, 11:04:02 PM »

It's called sarcasm. Maybe if you had contact with actual human beings once in a while you would understand.

11000 posts is hilarioussss.

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Clear Undeniable Proof

« on: April 17, 2009, 10:52:52 PM »

I would believe FE the day pigs could fly.

That's probably about all that could convince me.

3

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Flat Earth's world.

« on: March 09, 2009, 03:56:13 PM »

An excellent point, given the reliance on GPS technology, but what about before it? The earliest form of GPS could provide a navigational fix about once per hour, and that was only in 1960. Unless you also want to include the ground-based radio nav equipment, which would be early 1940s, although those needed the ground-based transmitters that were only located on, well, the ground. Unless of course a system of fake LORAN buoys. Or there was the Decca Navigator, but that was only rated for coastal waters, not sure how it would handle international.

But before the 1940s, before positioning systems that were Point and Click, where navigation required actual navigating... what? Told them maybe they were heading off to supply one of many installations that protected the South Pole's independance? Approachable only by boat, so none could see the wonders on the other side?

Wouldn't there be a record of such installations in the South Pole, to cover it up? This is assuming, as you said, that the boat patrols weren't in on the conspiracy.

There might be anything in the records... but all it takes is a single person to classify it TS "Need to Know Only." and not even the president can look at it without proving a need to know.

If you don't know what it is, how do you prove a need to know about it?

They told people they were going to Antarctica back then, as it is on or near the ice wall, I'm never sure which one it is.  As long as they saw ice, how would they know anything was wrong?  I'm way down south, there's some ice, this must be Antarctica.

Right, because you clearly would know how the insider of the government works. Do you not realize how ignorant and dumb you look by saying things like this? You sound like a 20 yr old idiot who still lives in his moms basement thinking your in some fantasy land where you know how the world works and you know how the deep insides of the government works.

lol.

4

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Flat Earth's world.

« on: March 09, 2009, 03:51:59 PM »

This site is a waste of time to even read; I have no clue why I invest so much time in reading this useless stuff.

No matter what argument is brought forth, FE's will never agree with you. So, in other words, this is a website where smart people (people who believe earth is round) post, and then get put down by FE's. The problem with their theory is there is never any thing that is valid. Once again, no matter what argument you give, they will have some excuse as to why it's not valid.

Secondly, It's a good point brought forward about all of the people involved with this. There are thousands of people that would have to be involved in this to make it "work" or for it to be viable. Those thousands of people have tons of a family and friends, and you're going to sit here and tell me not one of them leaked any info? It's like if someone is sickened with a virus, they get on a plane, the virus spreads to all those people, and then travels with them to wherever they end up. It's not as simple as "keeping your mouth shut", I mean, we're talking about these people "knowing" the earth is flat. It would seem kinda serious, right?

But, again, there's no point in any argument because they're all just shot down with one reason or another. The truth is, FE's are just stubborn people who wake up every morning fighting for a theory that has no bearing whatsoever. Because so many people believe in a spherical earth, they know it just pushes our buttons when they say one of their witty little comments that you really can't respond to because they seem so freakin stupid to say what they just said.

So yea, I don't have any posts, I just come here and read around when I'm bored, or even when I'm kind of down because the stuff I read around this website actually makes me crack up a lot of times.

One of the last things I'd like to mention is the FE's here that are really hardcore FE's. They use this site as a tactic to feed their addiction to this retarded theory. I will GUARANTEE that not one of these ignorant people go around in their day to day life talking about how they believe the earth is flat. Why? Because if you said that to pretty much anyone besides the few around here who think the earth is flat, any normal person would look at you and think you're out of your freakin mind.

End of story. Enjoy arguing for years and years and fighting for a wasted cause that won't ever get anywhere.

5

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Space travel for regular citizens

« on: August 15, 2008, 09:09:29 PM »

They haven't.  Just because this guy says he wants to doesn't necassarily mean he is going to.

Well, already over 20 people have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to reserve a spot.

It will happen.

Plus, even tho I'm sure this point has been brought up a million times, there's no way a "secret" like this could be kept among so many people, which is clearly something you FET's don't understand. Hell, when there's one or two people who know where Paris Hilton is, word gets out and a hundred paparazzi will be there. How the hell would something that millions of people supposedly know of get kept secret?

lol, everything about this is comical. I sure hope you don't go around telling your friends that you think the earth is flat, then again, you prolly wouldn't have any friends to tell if you did that....

6

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Doppler Radar Problem

« on: August 15, 2008, 09:03:56 PM »

FET accounts for this sort of thing.

Your made up shit does not account for anything. 

I know completely what you're saying. I'm currently going for my bachelors degree in Meteorology.

Ever weather pattern and even model for that matter, is based on the shape of the earth. The NAM, GFS, etc., etc.. would not be the same with a flat earth.

Secondly, people like myself and you know best about this. Our daily career involves so many things that prove the earth is round.

Basically, these people are insane and honestly, pretty ignorant to think the earth is flat.

7

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Space travel for regular citizens

« on: August 14, 2008, 08:52:28 PM »

k, I must have misread something.

But anyway, that's even besides the point. If the government was so set on keeping this a secret, they wouldn't let anyone come ever the slightest bit close to private space travel.

8

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Space travel for regular citizens

« on: August 14, 2008, 08:44:05 PM »

How would it not prove anything? They're going past the 32 miles according to the FAQ that states the sun, stars, whatever, are only 32 miles above the surface.

It proves plenty.

I just joined, someone linked me to this, and it's so entertaining to read all of this. Mind you, there's always going to be people out there doubting something, but there's so many factual, well documented, REAL stuff that proves the earth isn't flat.

I just enjoy the useless responses that I see all over the place here that give no real explanation or answer to most questions, just "no" or "you're wrong" or "it's part of the conspiracy"

9

Flat Earth Debate / Space travel for regular citizens

« on: August 14, 2008, 08:23:53 PM »

I'd like to here some input on this.

Branson recently announced that himself and his company would create space travel for ordinary people, aka, I pay a fee, I get in his space ship, and I fly into "space" and see the earth isn't flat, etc., etc..

Why isn't the government shutting him down? Give me some logic on this, because telling me that they're all part of the conspiracy isn't logic, it's an excuse.

Now even tho they won't be actually going into space, they will be going 100km up, which is far past the theory that stars are only 32 miles away or whatever I read.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/jun/10/spaceexploration.uknews