1

Flat Earth Debate / I would ask for proof.

« on: July 31, 2018, 12:15:07 PM »

          Let's begin with a question. Is the Earth flat? A question that people are oddly, still discussing. Whether you believe the earth is flat simply for religion, for the simplification for yourself, or you may just like to come up with conspiracy theory's, or you have scientific backing, even If I mentioned why you believe this or not, the question still stands. From You Tubers I have watched, to the forums on this site. One thing always seems to be lacking. Proof.

     So, I will ask a few questions and In return, If you so choose, You would respond with concrete evidence of the earth being flat. There are however, rules that I  have that I will bullet following this paragraph:

1. You must use Globe Earth physics. Every other scientist put down in history, used physics available at the time, and dared to use those physics to create explanations of seemingly complex things.

2. If you choose to send video or photographic evidence, It must be a fair resolution.

3. Within this sub forum, N.A.S.A. and the Government/Army have nothing to do with anything. There is simply no scientific backing to what you think they have done. This is only directed at those people out there that use these people as backing or evidence of a flat earth.

4. If the technology does not exist, Do not try to use it in your explanation. With out the actual technology there is no telling how it would actually operate.

That sums up my rules. Now, if you are still intrigued it's time for the questions I would enjoy having civilized answers for.
I will, again, bullet them:

1.)The Ice wall

2.)Science of the waves blocking the Ice wall

3.)Why are other celestial bodies round, not flat?

4.)Do many of you recognize the common Universal model, or do you recognize a different model?

5.)How could millions keep a secret about Australia?

6.)Horizon
6a.)boat disappearance
6b.) bridges following earth curvature

7.)If you believe in an Ice wall, how does gravity work?
7a.)If you believe gravity is actually a matter of density, how would air hold us down?

Those are all of my questions. If you did read this far, thank you, I appreciate it. If you want me to elaborate further, please let me know, I try to stay active at least once a week. If you wish to speak to me further, please let me know the best way to contact you and I will as soon as possible. I also ask for no rude or snarky comments as well as no swearing.
None of what I have posted is meant to be rude, just want to make sure that it's there.
    Thank you,
                    flat_earth_debunker.

2

Flat Earth Debate / Re: A respectful questioning of the flat earth

« on: July 05, 2018, 12:26:10 PM »

Chines Hobo. Why would Nasa with hold technology?? secondly. Your working by FE physics and not real physics. That Proof of a theory Is the most important. If I said you have 10m long hair, does that make it true? No. I need evidence. A picture of your hair of a in person meet. The same goes for physics and the earth. Where is your proof that FE physics work. Where is the proof that There is a 50m Ice wall? The way we use physics works perfectly to explain the earth. Also, Australia does exist, Ive been there. I know people from there. I have family there. So where is your proof that Australia does not exist. Actually where is your proof on anything you said? You need proof. I'm Not gonna "REPENT for my INDOCTRINATED sins(first of all im agnostic, secondly, Its not a sin to say the earth is round.)" nor am I going to "just belive you". Sorry to tell you but lifes rough, get a Cup.

3

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Quick Question

« on: June 16, 2018, 07:57:19 PM »

well my friend, Its because the earth simply can't be flat and must be round for this to occur, They think we see the same stars in different patterns but they believe the stars are projected onto a large dome in the sky. Which means that we wouid still see the same constellations. Trust me, It's dumb.

4

Flat Earth Debate / Re: A respectful questioning of the flat earth

« on: June 16, 2018, 07:54:19 PM »

I apoligise. In that Article I had no Idea I came off as rude to you. That is on me. As for the demands. I didn't mean to make them demanding. I wanted it more like a " If you want to show me evidence, please provide this." sort of thing. Secondly, I believe that You also came off as slightly pissy. Mind my language.

Thirdly, You do have a point, you can't prove the earth is round, but you also can't prove the earth is flat, however, with the knowledge that scientists have gained, we know that we must be round. We have witnessed rotations of a spherical earth. We have sufficient evidence and analysis of why seasons must occur the way they do relative to the sun.

we also have sufficient evidence as to why gravity must exist because we have observed celestial bodies attracting each other
and we know there must be gravity, the invisible force that attracts anything in the universe (because its so sexy ) must be the cause. the physics we have now perfectly explain all phenomenon in the universe except for a single star that is so incredibly hot that you would melt from 500 miles away. Science works.

Now I also want to get back on track as I have moved farther away from the main topic of this comment. this next part is in full disrespect, and this is the only part of the comment that is meant in this manner. You must have some nerve to think that the entirety of that post was me posting sh*t on flat earthers demanding things from them. I'm simply not.  All I want flat earthers to do Is really question what they're saying before they say it. Now there's only one statement I'm going to leave you with d*ck head. you must be a cactus because you certainly are a prick.



Now, I apologise yet again for that last section, However. I must get back to the second matter at hand. I am deeply astounded mostly at the flat earth "dome" and "Ice wall" Neither of these would work in modern science. I want you (notice that I'm not demanding) to think on the normal principles of electro-magnetics, relativity, Light, Chronolithics, and thermontology. (the study of absolute zero and things relaiting to temperature) and if you are willing, tell me how these two things can exist.

5

Flat Earth Debate / Re: A respectful questioning of the flat earth

« on: June 15, 2018, 05:32:32 PM »

P.S. When I say Use globe physics, I mean Use those physics to find something that says the earth is flat. Because Your physics that have are still technically widely unaccepted, will immediately prove the earth is flat because of the way you change them. I want you to use whats widely accepted because all though yours may be right, Nobody knows that yet. If that means waiting another hundred years for somebody to prove you right do it so you can say I told you so.

6

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Flat Earth is an anarchy organisation.

« on: June 15, 2018, 05:14:14 PM »

on the vaccines thing, shut the F up it you have no Idea what you are talking about. ITs made of a Dead virus to allow your immune system to say, this is bad don't let it in. Its not made of pig fetus's. It has a very VERY small amount of mercury in it that's actually considered good for your body. IT also contains a suspending fluid called disopyrtrymald that your body naturally produces but also tells your body to attack that specific area because there is something bad there. We produce it in labs. ITs a simple procedure that you have no clue what your saying because you physically have AIDS and were born as an acostic child.

7

Flat Earth Debate / A respectful questioning of the flat earth

« on: June 15, 2018, 05:02:52 PM »

First, I want to start with the most simple question you may be able to answer. How do you know the earth is flat? I want image proof and I don't want a model of the flat earth or this cant happen if the earth is round. I want image proof that the earth is flat. I also don't want the "horizon looks flat" that can be explained by the obloid effect which states that the larger something is, the less drastic its feature will be. Its simple logic in that standpoint. Second, I want concrete evidence of an Ice wall and the dome. Now you guys explain that there is an Ice wall holding in all the water and a dome projecting stars, however, If the stars in the sky are so bright they can even light up the night, Why do people in Australia see different stars than in the U.S.A? Second of all, Why would other planets form round, when you believe ours is flat? Do you have image proof that they are round? what if it is an optical illusion making it seem round? You choose not to back that up with evidence or empirical proof of the existence of why we would have formed flat. Now I don't believe the earth is flat but this is a backing of the scientific method of study. Now I have to ask this question to a man named flat earther asshole which is an actual you tuber. You can search if you'd like. he said that boats don't disappear over the horizon, Its all perspective. He said that you would be unable to see it disappear over the horizon because it would become to small. However, Instead of showing us, He zoomed in with a camera and zoomed out saying you could no longer see it. In fact that's not the case. It's a matter of Pixels Per Inch. My Dad owns a boat and when we go out boating we see land disappear over the horizon the farther we get out to sea. It disappears bottom first. When we sail back We see it top first. Now second of all, He also did a poor job of explaining something V-sauce mentioned in one of his videos. the verrazanos narrow bridge has been adapted to the curvature of the earth. How ever He said that the bridge was curved but the horizon was still flat. This does not answer the question however. It was a statement. If you want watch the video. He also mentioned that no flat earther believes in the Idea that the earth accelerates up a 9.8 meters per second despite the fact that there is literally an entire sub topic on it, Lowering his credibility. I want to tell you guys, You treat it as more of a religion than a science. I hear "I believe this" all the time instead of "I have PROOF of this". Secondly, You also say that space does not exist and you acknowledge the other planets, yet you show none of them In your model. I don't understand why this is so difficult for you to look at and think about. You want to revise Physics that have worked for centuries, And we have proof of these physics we use. thirdly, an Ice wall? come on. Why would the U.S. want to hide that from us, What would they have to gain? There's literally no reason for them to keep it from us. Finally. You say we've never been to outer space and that it proves the earth is flat. Even If NASA staged the moon landing, How does that prove the earth is flat? The only thing I want to hear back from you guys is proof of how things must work using globe physics, and find something out there that defies those physics in a whole new way to prove why the earth must be flat. I want you to think and find proof to say you know, rather than I believe.  Stay frosty, and remember, If every pork chop were perfect, we wouldn't have hot dogs.