1

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sub-solar point.

« on: August 23, 2016, 04:16:22 AM »

After reading the last posts I realized that my confusion came from watching the visual aid in FAQ that explains the seasons and thinking that during summer period the sun should be directly above at least some of the southern states.

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sub-solar point.

« on: August 22, 2016, 12:32:02 PM »

Why would there be subsolar points "everywhere"? They're documented locations. Why don't you plot them all and explain to me what your issue is.

The problem is that there are no subsolar points in the US except Hawaii and only occurs twice per year. If we follow the FE model described in FAQ there should be more. How the heck didn't I made my self clear enough?!?!

Edit: Here is a site that tracks the sub-solar point and the sub-lunar point. http://rl.se/sub-solar-point

3

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sub-solar point.

« on: August 22, 2016, 03:12:16 AM »

It's seems that i didn't researched the Flat Earth community well enough. I didn't realize that there are other vastly different FE models from the one described in the FAQ.
And btw the video I posted talks about many things and the only one I am interested is the subsolar point. The things you listed above about the movement of the the Solar System through Space is off topic. The last two sentences were enough.
Would you be kind enough to point 1 (or more) FE models that most of this community agrees on?

4

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sub-solar point.

« on: August 22, 2016, 01:01:30 AM »

I don't get it. How is your last comment addressing anything zork said? Just explain why in the US this phenomenon occurs only in Hawaii twice a year? Should't this happen more often on more places?

5

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sub-solar point.

« on: August 21, 2016, 06:03:43 AM »

Almost 2 months and no response.
I thought this was a serious forum. I thought you wanted to spread your word about the flat earth and expose the lies from the round earthers.
I am starting to think this is just a troll forum that is made to make fun of people who actually believe in this.I will be happy if someone at least post some BS explanation (its not like if FEr post something will be any different from BS) just for the lolz.

6

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sub-solar point.

« on: July 06, 2016, 05:53:27 AM »

It has been 5 days since I posted my thread and almost a month since JusticeCat's thread and there is no response on the subject about subsolar points from the Flat Earth community. I am highly disappointed from this forum.

7

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sub-solar point.

« on: July 02, 2016, 12:47:24 AM »

The thing that bothers me is that, shouldn't there be more (I mean a lot more) places in the US where this phenomenon occurs (if we follow the FA model illustrated here)?

8

Flat Earth Q&A / Sub-solar point.

« on: July 01, 2016, 08:47:15 AM »

Hello, I new to the site and I'm really curious how dose the sub-solar points fit in the Flat Earth model. Here is a video by Michael Stevens(Vsauce) explaining it.
  It starts roughly at 3:15