1

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: how far

« on: January 21, 2008, 11:49:48 AM »

that there are trips proves nothing. these are scheduled voyages charted well in advance along the coast or venturing inland with guides. sure, you can hire a guide and go climb vinson; you can sail with a cruise line.

but I've yet to meet anyone who just sailed with their own boat, unloaded their own dogs and set out for the ice wall without an officially sanctioned guide. love to meet someone who tried.

sailing part of the coast no more means you've seen all of antarctica than sailing the mediteranean means you've seen europe.

2

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Another flat earth theory

« on: January 13, 2008, 07:55:27 PM »

I can't accept the acceleration theory. we would have to be accelerating through an endless void.

gravity is simply very similar to magnetism. in fact, the scientists biefeld-brown defied gravity using simple electromagnetic tricks.

3

Flat Earth Q&A / simply getting to antarctica isn't easy

« on: January 13, 2008, 07:52:02 PM »

if you went without permission, with an official guide and with no limits on which zones you could go to... well, few would survive to tell the tale. but give it a shot.

4

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: remember the integratron

« on: January 13, 2008, 07:49:06 PM »

they don't exist? and the proof is?

besides, what if they're on the other side of the flat earth?

5

Flat Earth Debate / Re: I have one complaint about this forum. And how it's run.

« on: January 12, 2008, 12:32:48 AM »

you mean, ya'll aren't serious? I thought I'd stumbled into a real pack of the flat earth society, the only group standing up to the galileans against the RE conspiracy,

did the real FES dies with charles johnson?

6

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Moon Landings

« on: January 12, 2008, 12:25:43 AM »

who says we stopped going to the moon? it's just as likely they found something valuable, and stopped telling us they were going.

7

Flat Earth Q&A / in reality, antarctica....

« on: January 12, 2008, 12:23:48 AM »

is a world government preserve. only a select few even get to visit. this would be the area bordering the ice wall. the ice wall is fairly protected.

if you read up, you'll find that hitler sent people there. the US government sent an army to dislodge them; they came back in rafts, defeated (and not by the nazis.) seriously, you can look this up.

for many years after, only government workers got to visit the continent. Today, it;s a handful of adventurers and elite RE scientistsl

so anyone who sees the ice wall won't tell you. 

8

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Digging down?, And other question.

« on: January 12, 2008, 12:16:12 AM »

You of course get to the other sides. The antipodes visit our side all the time. They know. we don't. it's their advantage,

RAM files
The plane truth is they've lied about everything.

9

Technology, Science & Alt Science / remember the integratron

« on: January 12, 2008, 12:04:09 AM »

http://integratron.com/Welcome.html

this was ostensibly a dome built on plans for power sources from ufos. it doesn't work here, except psychically. But the builder was a former government engineer.

In fact, in the 1950s and 1960s, hundreds of people would gather at the location in the California desert to watch UFOs dance in the moonlight. Hundreds saw this stuff.

And the location was known as a place of power to Indians long before the dome was built.

If you've spent any time in the California desert, you know odd stuff happens out there. look hard enough, you will find... the government... or the other-siders.

10

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: A grand unified conspiracy theory

« on: January 11, 2008, 07:25:16 PM »

I can respect that. Perhaps I'll come back. I am disappointed to find no mention when I search for Integratron, thought.

11

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: A grand unified conspiracy theory

« on: January 11, 2008, 07:16:47 PM »

Come now, folks, you must admit that to make all of mainstream science preach that the earth is round instead of flat would take more than NASA.

I am not being sarcastic. I'm seriously interested in conspiracy theories of all stripes, and for some reason have been fascinated with the flat earth since my comic book days. And I am seriously interested in formulating a 'grand unified conspiracy theory' to fuel a book I'm writing.

I'm also interested in having fun and kicking around some theories. Thus far, I have to say, posters here seem a little dogmatic and joyless for a group trying to convince people of a theory most would consider pretty far out.

Is this a group trying to find the truth and convince people, or like Charles Johnson, just interested in preaching.

The heroes of my novel, by the way, are flat earthers. One thing I hope to learn is whether there really is a 'flat earth society' that has followed Johnson, or y'all are just yanking chains. There are other sites that do just that.

12

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Gravity on a FE...same as a round earth

« on: January 11, 2008, 07:06:22 PM »

magnetism, nothing more, nothing less. well, something akin to magnetism.

Biefeld, Brown and Tesla all demonstrated that you can create flying devices that defy gravity with simple manipulation of electromagnetism. At the end of WWII, numerous soldiers saw such machines built by the Nazis. Not long after, a general said we'd 'flying cars' with a decade.

The same people keeping the round earth theory alive are hiding these things.

The 'plane truth' is that they lie about everything.

13

Flat Earth Q&A / Protest the Galileans! I'm in

« on: January 11, 2008, 06:44:50 PM »

When's the march of the antipodes?

14

Flat Earth Q&A / A grand unified conspiracy theory

« on: January 11, 2008, 06:40:34 PM »

Allow me to introduce myself. I'm a writer by trade yet a novelist only by desire, but I stumbled onto this place because of a long fascination with the flat earth.

No comment on the idea itself, but even the site FAQs state that a massive conspiracy is required. I have plenty of ideas on how that could explain everything from JFK to angels to UFOs to why Antartica has been a government preserve since Germany's misadventures down there.

So I'll be posting along these line and welcome any thoughts along these lines. Such as, what's really on the other side of what I see as a coinlike flat earth.

let''s work together. The 'plane truth' is that they've lied about everything.

15

Flat Earth Q&A / There's another side and other siders

« on: January 11, 2008, 06:33:53 PM »

Think of all the things that could explain, from UFOs to angels to Christ to who really killed JKF.

If we're going to theorize a flat earth conspiracy, we might as well make a grand unified conspiracy theory.

16

Flat Earth Debate / Ah, you've not heard of gravitational lensing...

« on: January 11, 2008, 06:17:54 PM »

or the hypothesis of the deflection of light, the last part of relativity to be 'proven.'

And you'll not consider the possibility of another theory of gravity apart from the notion the earth is moving toward the sky at a speed that produces 1G. A theory of the flat earth I'd not previously seen.

simply put, if gravity were a stronger force than generally expected, a relatively small disk of an earth would create the same gravitational force as a sphere with much greater mass.

and the deflection of light would explain why a flat earth looks round from elevation, why ships disappear beneath the horizon and much more.

But ah well. Thought I'd found a place to bounce ideas around with fellow explorers. Initial impression is that one can't post a theory here without accepting the site's official story, which is interesting given the site is devote to defying another official story.

Peace, brothers. We should stick together because the 'plane' truth is, the've lied about everything.

17

Flat Earth Debate / Another flat earth theory

« on: January 10, 2008, 09:39:57 PM »

Just wondering if this has been considered. Einstein's last theorem, of course, tells us that over the vast distances of space, the weak force of gravity can bend light, making straight lines appear curved.

But if gravity is really a strong force, like magnetism, this would happen over small distances -- which explains why a flat earth, seen from on high, appears curved.

And many other things.

Best, a newbie working a book about the FE
http://ramfiles.blogspot.com/